logo
Posthaste: Canadian snowbirds now have more reasons than Trump to dump that Florida condo

Posthaste: Canadian snowbirds now have more reasons than Trump to dump that Florida condo

Yahoo13-06-2025
More Canadian snowbirds are putting their properties in Florida on the market, according to media reports, but unloading them might not be that easy — especially condos.
Real estate in the Sunshine State boomed during the pandemic, but now the tables have turned and the condo market is in a serious slump, said Admir Kolaj, a Toronto Dominion economist, in a recent report.
Condos play a big role in Florida real estate. There are about 1.5 million of them, accounting for 15 per cent of the state's housing stock, double the national share.
Over the past three months, sales have dropped 13 per cent and are down more than 25 per cent from pre-pandemic levels. Prices have fallen about 8 per cent from their peak, said Kolaj.
Inventories are climbing, with close to 80,000 condos and townhomes for sale, about 20,000 or 35 per cent more than a year ago.
Headwinds buffeting the market include higher interest rates (mortgage rates in the U.S. are still close to 7 per cent), a steep drop-off in domestic migration and economic uncertainty brought on by Donald Trump's tariff war.
But Florida condos face their own special set of problems. For one, the Sunshine State is the most expensive in America for homeowners insurance, with condo-specific premiums estimated at double the national average, said Kolaj.
Homeowner association fees are also climbing under new stricter regulation on condo inspections and repairs. Buildings older than 30 years — more than half the condos in Florida — must undergo milestone inspections and condo associations have to foot the bill for repairs. Kolaj said in some reported cases where there was the need for major repairs special assessment fees ran into the thousands.
'Given all the headwinds that the condo sector faces, it is no wonder that many owners are choosing to list their units for sale, growing the glut in an already-flooded market,' he said.
Canadians are among them.
Florida has the largest share of foreign home buyers in America, accounting for 20 per cent of the national total. Twenty-seven per cent of those buyers are Canadian, the highest percentage save for Latin Americans.
According to media reports, more of those Canadians are putting their properties on the market, spurred by a weaker dollar, stricter travel requirements and Trump's repeated comments about Canada as the 51st state.
Realtors in Florida told CNN earlier this year they have seen a 'sharp uptick' in Canadians looking to sell their homes.
'Some of the clients I have been dealing with want to sell at any cost, even at a loss,' said Share Ross, a realtor based in southeast Florida.
Gulf Coast News reported in April that Canadians were making a 'mass exodus' from Southwest Florida, after the U.S. required background checks and fingerprints if they planned to stay more than 30 days in the state.
Reduced foreign interest is just one more thing on a long list of challenges facing Florida's condo market, said Kolaj. And owners may have to wait a while for a rebound.
There are indications that the state will soften its law on older condos and if other conditions fall into place the condo market could find firmer footing by late 2026, he said.
to get Posthaste delivered straight to your inbox.Canadian labour productivity is finally making gains. As today's chart from BMO Capital Markets shows productivity growth is on the rise and catching up to the growth rate of the United States, though that has been declining.
Statistics Canada said last week that productivity grew 0.2 per cent in the first quarter of 2025. That's down from 1.2 per cent growth in fourth quarter of 2024, but it is the first time there have been consecutive quarterly increases since the start of the COVID-19 pandemic.
'The bad news is that productivity could take a hit in the coming quarters as economic growth is expected to slow meaningfully due to trade uncertainty,' said BMO senior economist Shelly Kaushik.
Former prime ministers Jean Chretien, Joe Clark and other politicians and experts attend a summit in Calgary to discuss issues including peace and security, trade, energy security and critical minerals, artificial intelligence and quantum computing.
Today's Data: United States Producer price index
Earnings: Transat AT Inc., Adobe Inc.
National Bank's $5 billion megadeal was decades in the making for Dominic Paradis
Can Canada repair ties with China? How the two countries could end the tariffs war and expand trade
Don't assume further rate cuts from the Bank of Canada, Poloz warns
With the cost of homes on the rise, the typical first-time homebuyer in Canada looks different than in the past. The Financial Post takes a look at who is buying and what it takes for them to own their first home.
Are you worried about having enough for retirement? Do you need to adjust your portfolio? Are you starting out or making a change and wondering how to build wealth? Are you trying to make ends meet? Drop us a line at wealth@postmedia.com with your contact info and the gist of your problem and we'll find some experts to help you out while writing a Family Finance story about it (we'll keep your name out of it, of course).
Want to learn more about mortgages? Mortgage strategist Robert McLister's Financial Post column can help navigate the complex sector, from the latest trends to financing opportunities you won't want to miss. Plus check his mortgage rate page for Canada's lowest national mortgage rates, updated daily.
Visit the Financial Post's YouTube channel for interviews with Canada's leading experts in business, economics, housing, the energy sector and more.
Today's Posthaste was written by Pamela Heaven with additional reporting from Financial Post staff, The Canadian Press and Bloomberg.
Have a story idea, pitch, embargoed report, or a suggestion for this newsletter? Email us at posthaste@postmedia.com.
Canada home prices are heading into correction territory
Just when you thought Toronto's condo market couldn't get any worse …
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

What's Really Inside Your Supplements? This Founder Is Uncovering the Truth Behind the $180 Billion Industry
What's Really Inside Your Supplements? This Founder Is Uncovering the Truth Behind the $180 Billion Industry

Entrepreneur

timea minute ago

  • Entrepreneur

What's Really Inside Your Supplements? This Founder Is Uncovering the Truth Behind the $180 Billion Industry

From creatine to NAD+, this company is uncovering the truth behind mislabeled, underdosed and overhyped products. Opinions expressed by Entrepreneur contributors are their own. I recently wrote about creatine and profiled Jeff Byers, co-founder of Momentous, for a reason: integrity matters. When it comes to what we put in our bodies, especially for entrepreneurs aiming to optimize energy, recovery and longevity, founders and consumers deserve transparency and truth. And yet, the supplement industry is booming with very little of either. We're in the middle of a health optimization gold rush. Creatine gummies, NAD+ capsules, sleep pills and brain-boosting stacks are everywhere. Scroll Instagram, walk into Erewhon or search Amazon, and you'll find thousands of options. The global supplement industry is growing fast and is expected to top $240 billion by 2028, yet many of these products do not contain what they claim to. You may be spending $30, $50 or $90 on a supplement and getting barely a trace of the active ingredient, or in some cases, nothing at all. Unlike pharmaceuticals, supplements don't require FDA approval before hitting the market. That creates a loophole where products can launch quickly, and claims, unless dangerously false, go largely unchecked. And it's not just obscure or small brands. Some of the top-selling supplements on Amazon are underdelivering, misleading or worse. That's where Steve Martocci and SuppCo come in. Martocci, best known for founding the music-tech platform Splice, is now on a mission to fix one of the most frustrating problems in wellness: a lack of transparency. SuppCo is a health tech startup that independently tests supplements and publishes public reports that give consumers one thing the industry often avoids: truth. CEO and Co-Founder, Martocci, struggled with his health for most of his life, reaching nearly 300 pounds despite playing three sports and training consistently. Martocci said to me, "Traditional medicine failed me. I remember being told my labs were on the 'low end of normal' and that nothing could be done. It was completely disheartening." After selling GroupMe to Skype, Martocci discovered functional medicine and began working with a doctor on a tailored supplement stack. He lost nearly 100 pounds over the next year and realized that even though supplements had become mainstream, there was no software actually to help people navigate this space. The supplement industry is a $180 billion market, yet it's filled with confusion, noise and a multitude of products that don't deliver what they promise. With SuppCo, Martocci is on a mission to transform how people discover, manage and optimize their supplement routines. Join top CEOs, founders and operators at the Level Up conference to unlock strategies for scaling your business, boosting revenue and building sustainable success. I was introduced to SuppCo's work through their recent Creatine Gummies Report. Creatine, which I personally take and have written about, is one of the most well-researched supplements for both brain and physical performance. But not all products are created equal. SuppCo tested five popular creatine gummy brands sold on Amazon. Only two passed. One contained less than 25% of the labeled amount. SuppCo recently published a report on NAD+ supplements, a trending ingredient in the longevity and cellular energy space, which tested nine products and was even more revealing. 4 passed (Double Wood, Rho Nutrition Liposomal, NatureBell and Thinbi), with Thinbi exceeding its claim at 103%. 5 failed, including Maripolio, which showed 0% of its claimed NAD+. Others tested at less than 3% of the listed amount on the label. NAD+ was the perfect follow-up to the creatine testing series because it represents everything confusing about the supplement space right now. Martocci explained that NAD+ is one of the fastest-rising compounds in longevity and biohacking, endorsed by scientists and influencers, but it's also one of the most confusing for consumers. Martocci said, "You can supplement with NAD+ itself or its precursors like NR and NMN, and most consumers don't understand the bioavailability differences between the three and that one of them is distinctly worse." When we see brands cutting corners on things we can measure, like certifications and testing transparency, they're usually cutting corners on things we can't see too, like what's actually in the bottle. As NAD+ continues to trend for its role in cellular repair and longevity, the gap between marketing and reality becomes even more concerning. Related: Why Top Entrepreneurs Are Swapping Beach Vacations for Longevity Retreats If you're a wellness founder, product integrity is not just a checkbox. It is the heartbeat of your brand. Jeff Byers' company, Momentous, invests in clinical research and testing not because it is required, but because it is what builds lasting trust. Byers told me, "That means showing the science, backing it up with testing, and being radically transparent with our consumers." The next generation of wellness brands will not win on hype. They'll win on data. Consumers are becoming smarter and more demanding, and they want to see the data. SuppCo has already rated over 700 brands and 22,000+ products, and their TrustScore has become remarkably predictive of testing. Now, quality brands are reaching out not just to request a TrustScore, but to get feedback on how to improve their quality practices. When choosing supplements, most people go wrong by treating supplements as if they were all the same. For example, they'll buy the cheapest magnesium without realizing that magnesium oxide has terrible bioavailability compared to magnesium glycinate. Or they'll choose a multivitamin based on how many vitamins are crammed into it, not whether those forms and doses actually work together. Jenna Stangland, co-founder of A4 health and Dietitian for the Minnesota Timberwolves and Minnesota Wild, explains how important it is to ensure that a supplement is tested and validated, as most likely, the dose on the label may not match what is in the bottle and even worse, it could be contaminated. Stangland personally takes NAD+ regularly to support her own energy and help her body adapt to stress and inflammation as she's on airplanes and traveling with teams multiple times per week. Having only tested the creatine and NAD+ categories, SuppCo is just getting started. The company plans to test every major supplement category where there's confusion or questionable quality. This includes protein, magnesium, pre-workouts and nootropics — anywhere consumers are making decisions based on incomplete information, their aim is to bring transparency. Related: Are Your Employees Stressed? You Need to Embrace Transparency. A big milestone they hit recently is the launch of SuppCo Pro, a premium subscription that unlocks deep personalization features. They have received strong user response to their Personal Nutrient Plan, which creates tailored supplement recommendations based on a user's specific goals, as well as their Product Optimizer, which suggests higher-quality, better-value alternatives to what a user is currently taking. This is where the real magic happens, as they can offer truly personalized guidance. I personally appreciate how easy it is to understand their public reports. On the app, you can quickly see whether a product passed or failed, and why. They even launched a browser extension that flags whether the supplement you're browsing has been independently tested. For those of us who care deeply about healthspan, recovery and long-term performance, this kind of transparency is a game-changer.

Spirit's survival hinges on finding more cash
Spirit's survival hinges on finding more cash

Fast Company

timea minute ago

  • Fast Company

Spirit's survival hinges on finding more cash

NEWS Without a cash boost, the budget airline's comeback could stall out. [Photos: David Sypher /Unsplash, Yeti Studio/Adobe Stock] BY Spirit Airlines can't seem to reach its cruising altitude. The budget airline issued a warning late Monday that if it doesn't find an infusion of cash, its business is poised to fail. Spirit expressed the dire state of its financials in its quarterly earnings report, filed late Monday. The report comes less than six months after the beleaguered airline emerged from bankruptcy with a plan to right its business and pursue profitability. 'Management has concluded there is substantial doubt as to the Company's ability to continue as a going concern within 12 months from the date these financial statements are issued,' the company wrote in the filing, citing a scenario in which the company fails to hold the liquid assets needed to meet its debt obligations and keep its credit card processor. To steer itself out of the crisis, Spirit is pursuing 'liquidity enhancing measures' that could include selling some of its aircraft or real estate and offloading some of its extra airport gate capacity. 'While it is the Company's goal to execute on these initiatives, there can be no assurance that such initiatives will be successful,' the company wrote. Spirit cut 200 jobs back in January as part of its plan to slash $80 million in costs. Last year, the company sold 23 Airbus planes – more than 10% of its fleet – to drum up emergency cash. 'As you all know, we're facing significant challenges with our business, which is why we've been focused on taking actions to optimize our organization and create more efficiencies,' Spirit CEO Ted Christie told staff in an internal memo early this year. 'The bottom line is, we need to run a smaller airline and get back on better financial footing.' Recent problems, Frontier bailout Spirit filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy late last year in light of mounting losses, a pile of debt and failed merger negotiations. The airline continued to operate during that time frame, which coincided with the busy holiday travel season. 'The most important thing to know is that you can continue to book and fly now and in the future,' the company wrote in an open letter to customers at the time. Spirit was in talks with JetBlue to combine the two airlines back in 2023, but the ill-fated merger faced stiff opposition. The Justice Department sued to block the $3.8 billion deal over antitrust concerns and ultimately a federal judge sided with the government, sounding the merger's death knell. Earlier this year, Spirit rejected a different merger offer from fellow budget carrier Frontier. Frontier revised the offer, but Spirit declined to move forward with the deal, which would have been worth around $2.16 billion. At the time, the company insisted that going it alone and pursuing its post-bankruptcy restructuring plan would benefit shareholders more than doubling up with another airline. The airline industry is in a strange transitional phase in 2025. Normal U.S. carriers are looking to rebrand themselves as 'lifestyle' airlines while credit card companies double down on luxe travel perks designed to make air travel more bearable. The industry's already wafer-thin margins are threatened by Trump's endless parade of tariffs and the economic chaos they sow. Meanwhile, a spate of U.S. aviation disasters has led to tanking trust in air travel and calls for a national overhaul of the air traffic control system that undergirds the whole industry. How – and if – budget airlines fit into the future of travel is an open question, but it's one Spirit needs to answer if it plans to survive. Unfortunately for the troubled airline, time is running out. The early-rate deadline for Fast Company's Most Innovative Companies Awards is Friday, September 5, at 11:59 p.m. PT. Apply today. ABOUT THE AUTHOR Taylor Hatmaker is a writer and photographer based on the West Coast. She was previously a Senior Editor at TechCrunch, where she specialized in social media, gaming and online culture. More

Tariff ‘Mission Accomplished' hype is just that
Tariff ‘Mission Accomplished' hype is just that

Los Angeles Times

timea minute ago

  • Los Angeles Times

Tariff ‘Mission Accomplished' hype is just that

On May 1, 2003, George W. Bush announced, 'Major combat operations in Iraq have ended.' He was standing below a giant banner that read, 'Mission Accomplished.' At the risk of inviting charges of understatement, subsequent events didn't cooperate. But it took a while for that to be widely accepted. We're in a similar place when it comes to President Trump's experiment with a new global trading order. 'Tariffs are making our country Strong and Rich!!!' proclaims Trump, making him not only the first Republican president in living memory to brag about raising taxes on Americans, but also the first to insist that raising taxes on Americans makes us richer. MAGA's mission-accomplished groupthink relies primarily on three arguments. The first is that Trump has successfully concluded a slew of beneficial trade deals. The truth is that some of those deals are simply 'frameworks' that will take a long time to be ironed out. But Trump got the headlines he wanted. The second argument is a kind of populism-infused sleight of hand. The 'experts' — their scare quotes, not mine — are wrong once again. The White House social media account crows, 'In April, 'experts' called tariffs 'the biggest policy mistake in 95 years.' By July, they generated OVER $100 BILLION in revenue. Facts expose the haters: tariffs WORK. Trust in Trump.' But the high-fivers are leaving things out. The most-dire predictions of economic catastrophe were based on the scheme Trump announced on April 2, a.k.a. 'Liberation Day.' Trump quickly backed off that plan ('chickened out' in Wall Street parlance) in response to a bond and stock market implosion. Saying the experts were wrong under those circumstances is like saying experts opposed to defenestration were wrong when they successfully convinced a man not to jump out a window. The third argument, made by the White House and many others — that tariffs are working because they're raising money — is a response to a claim no one made. To my knowledge, no expert claimed tariffs wouldn't raise money. The estimates of these revenues from Trump world are stratospheric. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick expects somewhere between $700 billion and $1 trillion per year. Last month, the government collected $29 billion. It's likely this number will significantly increase as more tariffs come online and businesses run down the inventory they stockpiled earlier this year in anticipation of more tariffs to come. Normally, Republicans don't exult over massive revenues from tax hikes. But Trump's defenders get around this problem by insisting that money is 'pouring' and 'flowing' into America from someplace else. It's true that tariff revenue is pouring into the Treasury, but that money is coming out of American bank accounts, because American importers pay the tariff. Even Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent cannot deny this when pressed. So yes, tariffs are 'working' the way they're supposed to; the problem is Trump thinks tariffs work differently than they do. It's possible some foreign exporters might lower prices to maintain market share, and some American businesses might absorb the costs — for now — to avoid sticker shock for inflation-beleaguered consumers, but what revenue is generated still comes from Americans. Ultimately it means higher prices paid here, reduced profits for businesses here or reduced U.S. trade overall. Sometimes, when pressed, defenders of the administration will concede the true source of the revenues, but then they say the pain is necessary to force manufacturers and other businesses to build and produce in the United States. It's backdoor industrial policy masquerading as trade policy. That, too, might 'work.' But all of this will take time, no matter what. And, if it works, that will have costs, too. Manufacturing in America is more expensive — that's why we manufacture so much stuff abroad in the first place. If this 'reshoring' happens, our goods will be more expensive, and less money will 'pour in' from tariffs. It's difficult to exaggerate how well-understood all of this was on the American right until very recently. But the need to grab any argument available to declare Trump's experiment a success has a lot of people not only abandoning their previous dogma but leaping to the conclusion that the dogma was wrong all along. Maybe it was, though I don't think so. The evidence so far suggests that problems are looming. The dollar is weakening. Prices continue to rise. The job market is reeling. The stock market (an unreliable metric, according to MAGA, when it plummeted after Liberation Day) is holding on, thanks to tech stocks. The truth is we won't have real evidence for a while. It's worth remembering that Americans don't live by headlines and press releases and they don't live in the macro economy either. Declaring 'Mission Accomplished' for the macro economy won't convince people they're better off in their own micro-economies when they're not. @JonahDispatch

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store