'Free speech' vow after abortion clinic safe zone breach
The case has been highlighted by US Vice-President JD Vance and the Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and Labour - a bureau within the US State Department.The bureau said it was "disappointed" by the ruling, in a post on X. "Freedom of expression must be protected for all," it added.Speaking on Radio 4's Today programme, Tossici-Bolt said: "It was nothing to do with protesting, harassing or intimidating. It was inviting a conversation."She said her actions were "certainly not to make any woman unhappy or distressed"."Anyone could have approached me - including woman attending the clinic. It was up to them," said Tossici-Bolt."I was there to listen to them. Not that I was there to convince them or change minds or not."Asked what she would do next, she said: "I was given a conditional discharge. I will continue my fight for free speech."At Poole Magistrates' Court on Friday, District Judge Orla Austin said Tossici-Bolt's presence "could have a detrimental effect" on the women attending the clinic.The judge continued: "It's important to note this case is not about the rights and wrongs about abortion but about whether the defendant was in breach of the PSPO."
'Unprecedented'
The prosecution had been brought by Bournemouth, Christchurch and Poole Council for breach of a PSPO under the Anti-social Behaviour, Crime and Policing Act 2014.The zone at Ophir Road came into force in October 2022, running from 07:00 to 19:00, Monday to Friday.Tossici-Bolt's legal counsel, Jeremiah Igunnubole, from the Alliance Defending Freedom, said they would "explore all legal options".He said the conviction and costs imposed were "unprecedented"."Never before have we seen entirely peaceful conduct being criminalised for nothing other than offering a consensual conversation," he said.Speaking earlier this week, former supreme court justice Lord Sumption said: "Woman having an abortion - it's a very agonising decision and most people feel they are entitled to protection. "Anti-abortion campaigners can shout their views from the rooftops, broadcast or write in the press. "Freedom of speech is in no way inhibited, except they cannot stand outside abortion clinics so has to harass the women trying to get in."
You can follow BBC Dorset on Facebook, X (Twitter), or Instagram.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Sun
18 minutes ago
- The Sun
Epping migrant protesters aren't racists – they're mums worried about their kids & angry at Labour smears
THE small boats crisis is a national security emergency. In the last 100 days we have seen a spate of alleged attacks by illegal migrants. A girl in Epping, sexually assaulted. A ten year old in Stockport, nearly kidnapped. Three stabbed in Southampton. All adding to a general sense of lawlessness in the country. 2 2 It's no wonder protests are starting up across the country. I wouldn't want my children to share a neighbourhood with small boat migrants about which we know next to nothing. I don't want anyone else's family to have this forced on them either. For saying this I, and the millions of people who agree with my statement, were labelled 'racist' on BBC Radio 4's Thought For The Day. The BBC didn't see anything wrong with this statement and allowed it to be broadcast. Well, there is nothing racist about caring about the safety of your family. Patriotic protesters When I was in the Home Office I saw up close that dangerous people were crossing the Channel. I sounded the alarm publicly that terror suspects were crossing in small boats. I am pushing for the Government to publish the migrant crime stats quarterly, but until then the indicative data suggests certain nationalities are far more disposed to commit crime than others. The overwhelming majority of those crossing in small boats are adult males with no paperwork. Protesters arrested near migrant hotel after 'asylum seeker guest' arrested on suspicion of assault How are the authorities supposed to identify them and check their criminal record? The British people are right to be worried. It's why on Sunday I visited peaceful and patriotic protesters in Epping, Essex, who are simply fed up. I spoke to teenagers, parents and grandparents — all rightly concerned about the safety of their community. These weren't racists or far-right thugs — they were mums in pink T-shirts with Union Jack bunting. One mother told me how her daughter's school had written to her suggesting children avoid certain parts of town on their walk home. Her young daughter told me that men from the hotels loiter outside certain spots 'where they look at us.' These weren't racists or far-right thugs — they were mums in pink T-shirts with Union Jack bunting Another mother told me how her daughter had bought a pair of construction worker's boots to put outside the house, to make it look as if there was a man inside. Among everyone I spoke to there was outrage at how they felt the perfectly legitimate anger over mass, uncontrolled migration had been ignored by the Government and smeared by an absurdly out-of-touch liberal elite. The Government isn't listening to the community in Epping, nor those across the country who have asylum hotels forced upon them. These hotels aren't where the cabinet or senior officials live. They are safe in their ivory towers. It doesn't affect their day-to-day lives like it does for those in the rest of the country. Sir Keir Starmer should get out of Westminster and come and speak to the people of Epping to hear their concerns and act on them. Maybe then he will wake up and do something about the spiralling small boat crossings. But until then we will keep seeing fair-minded Brits out protesting that enough is enough. Sick joke We're seven years into this and more than 170,000 have arrived illegally. Based on a Dutch study, each migrant is set to cost us roughly half a million pounds over the course of their lifetime. By the end of the decade, we'll have spent tens of billions on this. It's a disgrace. A sick joke on the British people. It simply has to end. I will be the first to admit the last government didn't do enough to fix this problem. I was the first Minister to close hotels, initiating 100 exits — but we needed to do more. I fought tooth and nail with then Home Secretary Suella Braverman to get Rishi Sunak to disapply Tony Blair's Human Rights Act and ECHR so we could deport all those coming illegally. But despite much arguing, I couldn't persuade him, so I resigned and fought on the backbenches for much stronger measures. If Starmer is to succeed he needs to close all the loopholes immigration offenders use to frustrate their removal. And he needs to reform the judiciary to remove activist judges who compromise the independence of the judiciary. Otherwise the British people will continue to suffer.
The Independent
an hour ago
- The Independent
Jannik Sinner's US Open preparation hit as he retires from Cincinnati Open final
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging. At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story. The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it. Your support makes all the difference.
The Guardian
2 hours ago
- The Guardian
Sally Rooney could be arrested under Terrorism Act after pledging royalties to Palestine Action
Irish novelist Sally Rooney could be arrested under the Terrorism Act after saying she intends to use proceeds from her work to support Palestine Action, which was proscribed as a terrorist organisation in the UK last month, a legal expert has warned. Earlier, No 10 said that supporting the group was an offence under the act, after Rooney had made her pledge. Royalties from Rooney's books, including Normal People and Conversations with Friends, and BBC adaptations of them would be used to support Palestine Action, she wrote in the Irish Times over the weekend. The legal expert also said that the bestselling writer could face prosecution if she were to express her views at, for example, a UK book festival, underscoring the proscription's 'gross disproportionality'. While the prime minister's spokesperson would not respond to the author's comments specifically, they said that there was 'a difference between showing support for a proscribed organisation, which is an offence under the Terrorism Act, and legitimate protest in support of a cause', according to the Press Association. Asked what message No 10 would give to people considering donating money to Palestine Action, the spokesperson said: 'Support for a proscribed organisation is an offence under the Terrorism Act and obviously the police will, as they have set out, implement the law as you'd expect.' More than 700 people have been arrested under the Terrorism Act in relation to the group since it was proscribed in early July, many of whom were detained at a peaceful protest on 9 August in Parliament Square, London. 'My books, at least for now, are still published in Britain, and are widely available in bookshops and even supermarkets,' wrote Rooney on Saturday. 'In recent years the UK's state broadcaster has also televised two fine adaptations of my novels, and therefore regularly pays me residual fees. I want to be clear that I intend to use these proceeds of my work, as well as my public platform generally, to go on supporting Palestine Action and direct action against genocide in whatever way I can.' Palestine Action was proscribed as a terrorist organisation after activists broke into an RAF base in Oxfordshire and spray painted two planes. They 'knew, of course, that their actions were illegal,' Rooney wrote in the Guardian in June. 'From the suffragettes to the gay rights movement to the anti-apartheid struggle, genuine political resistance has always involved intentional law-breaking.' In her Irish Times article last weekend, Rooney said that she 'would happily publish this statement in a UK newspaper – but that would now be illegal'. Rooney's books also include Beautiful World, Where Are You and, most recently, Intermezzo. Lawyer and writer Sadakat Kadri said: 'Receiving money with the intention of using it to support terrorism is an offence under section 15 of the 2000 act.. That means Rooney could be arrested without a warrant as a 'terrorist'.' He added that 'the absurdities don't end there', and said the decision of the home secretary, Yvette Cooper, to bracket Palestine Action with groups such as Islamic State meant the BBC would also be criminally liable if it continued to pay royalties to Rooney. in view of her stated intentions. 'Authoritarian governments routinely threaten writers and intimidate broadcasters, but I find it quite extraordinary that Labour under Keir Starmer has now chosen to go down the same path.' Asked whether Rooney could face legal repercussions if she, for example, spoke at a book festival in the UK, Kadri said that 'there's certainly a risk she'd fall foul' of the law. If Rooney expressed 'her views in terms of condemning the war crimes being committed in Gaza, an arguable case for prosecution could be made out'. 'Saying that isn't for one moment an attempt to justify the statute,' said Kadri, which he described as 'a shameful attack' on free speech. 'It's just a particularly stark illustration of the measure's gross disproportionality.' Mike Schwarz, head of the public inquiry team at the legal firm Hodge Jones & Allen, said that 'anyone providing money which might, in the state's eyes, fund 'terrorism' and, separately, anyone supporting an organisation proscribed under terrorism legislation runs a very real risk of serious police interest and prosecution for grave offences in the UK. This seems particularly the case in the current febrile political climate surrounding Palestine Action.'
