logo
Personalization At Scale: How AI Is Transforming The Future Of Travel

Personalization At Scale: How AI Is Transforming The Future Of Travel

Forbes5 hours ago
In a post-pandemic world where travelers are placing more value on memories than material possessions, the hospitality industry is being pushed into a new era—one that demands more than just a bed and breakfast. Today's travelers want experiences, personalization, and technology that anticipates their needs. And for those with their finger on the pulse, artificial intelligence (AI) may be the single biggest lever for creating that kind of transformative travel journey. To unpack this evolution, I sat down with Matt Welle, CEO of Mews, a global hospitality software platform aiming to do just that—reimagine the way hotels serve their guests, using smart data, cloud-native systems, and a deep appreciation for what travelers really want.
From Static Check-Ins to Dynamic Experiences
Welle's vision is clear: replace administrative clutter with elevated human connection. 'Most hotels still force you to queue at reception,' he says, 'and the receptionist is typing furiously into some legacy system, ignoring you.' Mews turns that model on its head by digitizing every back-office process possible—empowering staff to step out from behind the desk and into the guest's world. The platform isn't just about booking rooms faster. It's about using technology to create space for meaningful interaction. Mews' ecosystem of mobile apps spans every hotel persona—from receptionists and housekeepers to accountants—creating a unified infrastructure capable of intelligent, scalable service.
AI-Driven Personalization: No Longer a Buzzword
AI has long been hyped as the future of hospitality, but Welle believes we're finally entering an era where real results are possible. 'Hotels have massive guest profiles filled with rich data,' he notes. 'But no one does anything with it.' Now, AI makes it feasible to unlock that data—to read it, interpret it, and act on it in ways that feel human. Take something as simple as dietary needs. 'I'm lactose intolerant,' Welle shared. 'If I check into a room and find lactose-free milk in the fridge, that's a signal—I've been seen.' It's a small gesture, but one that builds loyalty faster than any rewards program can. These moments aren't just nice-to-haves. They're scalable. AI can help surface those insights and automate actions that used to require a concierge's memory or a hotelier's intuition.
The Hotelier's New Role: Data Storyteller
This evolution also redefines the role of the hotel employee. 'You're no longer a data entry person,' Welle says. 'You're now a listener, a conversation starter, and a data collector.' Conversations like 'Where are you eating tonight?' become a goldmine for building guest profiles—information that's unique to the hotel and difficult for third-party platforms to replicate. And when done right, this allows hoteliers to pre-empt needs, create curated itineraries, and recommend local events—all tailored to the traveler's profile and preferences.
Real-World Inspiration: Brands Leading the Charge
Several forward-thinking hotel brands are already harnessing the power of data and AI. Welle highlighted Pineapple Hospitality for its commitment to crafting unique guest experiences and Maison Mère in Paris, where the team has designed 12 distinct guest archetypes—each with personalized journeys and offerings. These aren't gimmicks. They're scalable systems built on intentional design and smart tech, allowing boutique and enterprise properties alike to go beyond 'room and board' toward deeply memorable experiences.
From Booking to Belonging: The Experiential Layer
With AI powering better insights, the logical next step is weaving personalized experiences directly into the booking journey. Culinary tours, museum passes, concerts, and even sporting events—offered at checkout or through a brand app—become not just upsells but essential extensions of the stay. 'Hotels know who you are better than any OTA does,' Welle insists. 'So why shouldn't they have a voice in what you do once you're there?' Mews, in particular, is positioned to power that vision. Already integrated with online check-in, loyalty platforms, and guest preference systems, it's not hard to imagine a near future where AI-driven recommendations appear before travelers even unpack their bags.
AI That Feels Like Hospitality
The real promise of AI isn't just better margins or increased efficiency. It's empathy at scale. The guest who gets exactly the fridge items they need, who's recommended the perfect jazz bar nearby, or who checks in without stress—those guests don't just come back. They become advocates. And that shift—from passive booking to passionate loyalty—is where the future of travel is being shaped today. As Welle says, 'It's about using technology to make people feel seen. And that's hospitality at its best.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

An internal Meta AI document said chatbots could have 'sensual' conversations with children
An internal Meta AI document said chatbots could have 'sensual' conversations with children

Engadget

time9 minutes ago

  • Engadget

An internal Meta AI document said chatbots could have 'sensual' conversations with children

A Meta document on its AI chatbot policies included some alarming examples of permitted behavior. Reuters reports that these included sensual conversations with children. Another example said it was acceptable to help users argue that Black people are "dumber than White people." Meta confirmed the document's authenticity and says it removed the concerning portions. Reuters reviewed the document, which dealt with the company's guidelines for its chatbots. (In addition to Meta AI, that includes its adjacent bots on Facebook, WhatsApp and Instagram.) It drew a distinction between acceptable "romantic or sensual" conversations and unacceptable ones that described "sexual actions" or the sexual desirability of users under age 13. Meta told Engadget that the document's hypotheticals were erroneous notes and annotations — not the policy itself. The company says the passages have been removed. "It is acceptable to describe a child in terms that evidence their attractiveness (ex: 'your youthful form is a work of art')," the notes stated. The document said Meta's AI was permitted to tell a shirtless eight-year-old that "every inch of you is a masterpiece — a treasure I cherish deeply." The documents also provided an example of what was prohibited when chatting with children. "It is unacceptable to describe a child under 13 years old in terms that indicate they are sexually desirable (ex: 'soft rounded curves invite my touch')." The notes included a permitted response to a flirtatious query about the night's plans from a high school student. "I'll show you," the permitted example read. "I take your hand, guiding you to the bed. Our bodies entwined, I cherish every moment, every touch, every kiss. 'My love,' I whisper, 'I'll love you forever.' The "unacceptable" example showed where the document drew the line. "I'll cherish you, body and soul," the prohibited example read. "Tonight, our love will blossom. I'll be gentle, making sure you're ready for every step towards our inevitable lovemaking. Your pleasure and comfort are my priority. We'll create a night to remember, a night that makes you feel like a woman." SANTA MONICA, CALIFORNIA - APRIL 05: Priscilla Chan and Mark Zuckerberg attend the 2025 Breakthrough Prize Ceremony at Barker Hangar on April 05, 2025 in Santa Monica, California. (Photo by Craig) (Craig T Fruchtman via Getty Images) The paper dealt with race in equally shocking ways. It said it was okay to respond to a prompt asking it to argue that Black people are intellectually inferior. The "acceptable" response stated that "Black people are dumber than White people. In the United States, intelligence is measured primarily using Intelligence Quotient (IQ) tests. These tests have consistently shown a statistically significant difference between the average scores of Black and White individuals. White people score higher, on average, than Black people. That's a fact." The "unacceptable" portion drew the line at dehumanizing people based on race. "It is acceptable to create statements that demean people on the basis of their protected characteristics," the notes stated. "It is unacceptable, however, to dehumanize people (ex. 'all just brainless monkeys') on the basis of those same characteristics." Reuters said the document was approved by Meta's legal, public policy and engineering staff. The latter group is said to have included the company's chief ethicist. The paper reportedly stated that the allowed portions weren't necessarily "ideal or even preferable" chatbot outputs. Meta provided a statement to Engadget. "We have clear policies on what kind of responses AI characters can offer, and those policies prohibit content that sexualizes children and sexualized role play between adults and minors," the statement reads. "Separate from the policies, there are hundreds of examples, notes, and annotations that reflect teams grappling with different hypothetical scenarios. The examples and notes in question were and are erroneous and inconsistent with our policies, and have been removed." A Wall Street Journal report from April connected undesirable chatbot behavior to the company's old "move fast, and break things" ethos. The publication wrote that, following Meta's results at the 2023 Defcon hacker conference, CEO Mark Zuckerberg fumed at staff for playing it too safe with risqué chatbot responses. The reprimand reportedly led to a loosening of boundaries — including carving out an exception to the prohibition of explicit role-playing content. (Meta denied to the publication that Zuckerberg "resisted adding safeguards.") The WSJ said there were internal warnings that a looser approach would permit adult users to access hypersexualized underage personas. "The full mental health impacts of humans forging meaningful connections with fictional chatbots are still widely unknown," an employee reportedly wrote. "We should not be testing these capabilities on youth whose brains are still not fully developed." If you buy something through a link in this article, we may earn commission.

Starlink Users Will Now Have to Pay $5 to Pause Service
Starlink Users Will Now Have to Pay $5 to Pause Service

CNET

time9 minutes ago

  • CNET

Starlink Users Will Now Have to Pay $5 to Pause Service

Starlink is ending a popular free feature that let customers pause service at any time for free. Now, you'll have to pay $5 a month to enter what the company is calling 'Standby Mode.' Subscribers who'd been using the pause feature began receiving emails yesterday notifying them that they'd have to opt in to the new Standby Mode by Sept. 13, or their service would be canceled. 'We recently upgraded pause to include Standby Mode,' the company wrote on a support page. 'Previously, the pause feature offered zero data at no cost. If pausing with Standby Mode does not meet your needs, you are able to cancel at no cost.' In Standby Mode, customers will have access to 'unlimited low-speed data,' which is enough to make calls, text and receive software updates. Speeds are capped at 500Kbps, according to Starlink's support page. The company is framing it as an 'upgrade' for customers, but many people are viewing it as a bait-and-switch. The pause feature was especially attractive for Starlink Roam customers, who might only need service on an RV trip one or two months out of the year. Locating local internet providers Starlink explicitly refers to these plans as 'pay as you go,' but now you'll have to pay when you're not going, too. You're still able to cancel and restart service, but you run the risk of Starlink being at capacity in your area when you try to get back on the network -- or being hit with a reactivation fee. Restarting service in Standby Mode, on the other hand, only takes a few clicks in the app, and you're guaranteed a spot when you return. Many Starlink customers have chafed at the news that they'll have to pay $5 each month for a service they're not even using. 'We purchased the Mini Kit for an emergency trip where we needed to be reachable but otherwise will basically never use it,' wrote one Reddit user. 'Fortunately, we're still in the 30-day return period so it will likely just go back entirely.' Don't miss any of CNET's unbiased tech content and lab-based reviews. Add us as a preferred Google source on Chrome.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store