
Pricing Is A Product: Why It's A Top Priority
Today, it's part of the product experience.
In a world of usage-based models, AI-powered agents, and real-time infrastructure, pricing isn't just a finance decision—it's something your customers feel every time they log in. It shapes trust, affects adoption, and determines whether a user grows with your product… or leaves with a bad taste in their mouth.
Yet for most companies, pricing is still treated like a one-time project. Just a spreadsheet. A little backend configuration. Or worse, a last-minute change handled manually by a billing vendor or yet another engineering ticket.
That model breaks under pressure—especially now.
Three big things:
1. AI shifted the cost structure.
Usage is no longer predictable. With agentic workflows, one user action might fan out into dozens of model calls, tool invocations, or backend operations. That makes the cost of a single request highly variable—and increasingly difficult to track or explain.
Metrics like 'requests' that once worked well now feel disconnected from real costs. At the same time, more accurate metrics like tokens or compute are harder for users to mentally model. This leads to confusion, frustration, and ultimately, churn.
2. Customer expectations shifted, too.
Users now expect real-time feedback on spend. They want to know how much something will cost before they run it. They expect self-serve usage dashboards that are accurate, intuitive, and real time. They expect visibility and proactive usage alerts. 'You've hit your limit' with no prior warning isn't acceptable anymore.
3. Monetization became a growth lever.
Pricing is now core to product, GTM, and revenue strategy. It can't be just about finance anymore. Teams building AI-native tools or hybrid PLG + SLG motions are learning quickly that pricing is one of the most powerful levers they have. If you're not experimenting with pricing the same way you do with your product, you're falling behind.
You wouldn't ship a new feature without user testing, observability, and a feedback loop. Why would you treat pricing any differently?
At Metronome, we believe pricing should be treated like a product system—one that's:
This isn't hypothetical. We've all seen what happens when companies get it wrong: pricing shifts confuse users, cost spikes without warning, dashboards lag behind reality. And we've all see the results: Surging churn, deluges of support tickets, and sometimes irreparably lost trust.
If you're scaling an AI-native product, building a hybrid PLG + SLG motion, or shifting to usage-based pricing, your monetization system needs to evolve too.
It's time to give pricing the same strategic attention as UX, observability, or security.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
13 minutes ago
- Yahoo
UnitedHealth stock pops on Buffett's Berkshire share purchase
UnitedHealth Group's (UNH) stock jumped early Friday after Warren Buffett's Berkshire Hathaway (BRK-A, BRK-B) revealed Thursday it purchased 5 million shares last quarter. The insurance giant has suffered multiple setbacks in the past couple of years — with earnings misses piling on top of all that, the stock has been under constant pressure, and is down more than 45% year-to-date. But on the news of Berkshire's share purchase, the stock popped nearly 10% in early trading Friday. The last time Berkshire held a stake in the company was when Stephen Hemsley was CEO, between 2006 and 2017. Hemlsey has returned to the role after former CEO Andrew Witty stepped down in May — after a year of compounding headwinds. Last year, the company suffered one of the biggest cyberattacks in history on one of it's subsidiaries, Change Healthcare, which manages payments — creating havoc for health providers for months. The US Health and Human Services Department (HHS) had to step in and assist to help get payments flowing again. The company subsequently announced a larger-than-expected impact from the attack in mid-2024, dragging down major indices. At the end of the year, during the annual shareholder's meeting in New York City, insurance CEO Brian Thompson was shot to death. The struggles for the company didn't end there, as public backlash against the industry swelled in the aftermath, and the entire insurance industry was forced to address the issue of denied claims. In April this year, the company's stock crashed after an earnings miss shocked the Street. In May, Hemsley took over, and in the latest earnings call addressed the missteps the company has made, as well as the higher cost environment that it did not adjust in time to. "Beyond the environmental factors that are affecting the entire sector and more specifically to us, we have made pricing and operational mistakes as well as others," he said on the call. UnitedHealth's stock pop also helped boost the Dow (DJI), which was up about a half percent in early trading. Previously, UnitedHealth's losses dragged the Dow. In May, UnitedHealth was attributed with 88% of the Dow's decline year-to-date. Anjalee Khemlani is the senior health reporter at Yahoo Finance, covering all things pharma, insurance, provider services, digital health, PBMs, and health policy and politics. That includes GLP-1s, of course. Follow Anjalee as AnjKhem on social media platforms X, LinkedIn, and Bluesky @AnjKhem. Click here for in-depth analysis of the latest health industry news and events impacting stock prices Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
13 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Former Google Executive Says AI Job Creation Claim Is '100% Crap' And Warns 'CEOs Will Be Replaced' As Machines Outperform Humans At Nearly Everything
AI is rewriting résumés before people even graduate, as students try to steer toward "AI-proof" careers. But according to former Google X Chief Business Officer Mo Gawdat, the sunny idea that AI will replace drudgery with shiny new jobs is, in his words, "100% crap." Gawdat, who spent years at Google's secretive "moonshot factory" developing futuristic projects like self-driving cars and internet-beaming balloons, joined "The Diary of a CEO" podcast to dismantle the rosy talking points tech leaders keep repeating. "The best at any job will remain," he said, pointing to elite software developers who deeply understand architecture and technology. "The best... will stay — for a while." That pause matters. Gawdat believes even top performers will eventually feel the pressure once artificial general intelligence — a level of AI that can perform any intellectual task a human can — hits its stride. Don't Miss: The same firms that backed Uber, Venmo and eBay are investing in this pre-IPO company disrupting a $1.8T market — 'Scrolling To UBI' — Deloitte's #1 fastest-growing software company allows users to earn money on their phones. You can And the threat isn't limited to rank-and-file workers. Gawdat warned that executives patting themselves on the back for cutting staff with AI might want to check their own job security. "AGI is going to be better at everything than humans, including being a CEO," he said. AGI — short for artificial general intelligence — refers to AI capable of performing any intellectual task a human can, not just narrow, specialized skills like today's systems. "You really have to imagine that there will be a time where most incompetent CEOs will be replaced," he said. It's not exactly shocking that bad bosses could be swapped out — plenty of employees might call that an upgrade — but Gawdat's point is sharper: AI's reach is so broad it will challenge anyone who isn't the absolute best at what they do. If algorithms can outperform you, title or corner office won't save you. Trending: Bill Gates Warned About Water Scarcity. He's already seen the shift firsthand. His current AI startup, was built by three people. Without AI, he estimates it would have taken 350 developers. That's 347 jobs gone before the company even launched. The efficiency is staggering — and for most workers, unsettling. Gawdat predicts the real pain could start by 2027, describing a "short-term dystopia" where layoffs hit hard, inequality grows, and stability shakes. The so-called golden age of AI, with abundant wealth and universal health cures, may only arrive if humanity changes the incentives driving corporate decisions. "There's absolutely nothing wrong with AI — there's a lot wrong with the value set of humanity at the age of the rise of the machines," he said, making it clear the technology isn't inherently the villain. The problem is how people choose to use it. For now, his advice is simple: be exceptional or be replaceable. AI isn't coming just for entry-level roles or factory jobs. It's coming for your podcast, your code, your creative briefs — and yes, maybe even your CEO. Read Next: 2,000 High Earners Manage $6B With This AI Platform — Kevin O'Leary Says Real Estate's Been a Smart Bet for 200 Years — Image: Shutterstock UNLOCKED: 5 NEW TRADES EVERY WEEK. Click now to get top trade ideas daily, plus unlimited access to cutting-edge tools and strategies to gain an edge in the markets. Get the latest stock analysis from Benzinga? APPLE (AAPL): Free Stock Analysis Report TESLA (TSLA): Free Stock Analysis Report This article Former Google Executive Says AI Job Creation Claim Is '100% Crap' And Warns 'CEOs Will Be Replaced' As Machines Outperform Humans At Nearly Everything originally appeared on © 2025 Benzinga does not provide investment advice. All rights reserved.


TechCrunch
15 minutes ago
- TechCrunch
Perplexity's bid for Google Chrome could be just the beginning
Perplexity, the AI search startup that hasn't even cracked 100 million monthly users, just made a $34.5 billion cash offer to buy Chrome from Google. The unsolicited bid comes as the DOJ prepares its remedy decision after ruling Google illegally maintained a search monopoly. The timing makes sense, but questions remain. Perplexity won't name its backers for the massive deal, and the offer is worth far more than the company has raised. The move fits Perplexity's broader push for distribution after earning plenty of buzz in tech circles but struggling with mainstream user adoption. The company has also explored acquiring Brave browser and launched its own AI-powered browser, Comet. Whether this Chrome play is serious or just a stunt is still up for debate. On Equity, we're revisiting a conversation with Neil Chilson, a lawyer, computer scientist and head of AI Policy at the Abundance Institute, to unpack what's at stake for Google in its search and ad tech battles, and how generative AI could reshape competition in the space. As always, Equity will be back for you next week, so don't miss it! Equity is TechCrunch's flagship podcast, produced by Theresa Loconsolo, and posts every Wednesday and Friday. Subscribe to us on Apple Podcasts, Overcast, Spotify and all the casts. You also can follow Equity on X and Threads, at @EquityPod.