The crude oil market bets Trump's India threats are hollow
Tired of too many ads?
Remove Ads
Tired of too many ads?
Remove Ads
Tired of too many ads?
Remove Ads
DIFFERENT THIS TIME?
The crude oil market 's rather sanguine reaction to the U.S. threats to India over its continued purchases of Russian oil is effectively a bet that very little will actually happen.President Donald Trump cited India's imports of Russian crude when imposing an additional 25% tariff on imports from India on August 6, which is due to take effect on August 28.If the new tariff rate does come into place, it will take the rate for some Indian goods to as much as 50%, a level high enough to effectively end U.S. imports from India, which totalled nearly $87 billion in 2024.As with everything related to Trump, it pays to be cautious given his track record of backflips and pivots.It's also not exactly clear what Trump is ultimately seeking, although it does seem that in the short term he wants to increase his leverage with Russian President Vladimir Putin ahead of their planned meeting in Alaska this week, and he's using India to achieve this.Whether Trump follows through on his additional tariffs on India remains uncertain, although the chances of a peace deal in Ukraine seem remote, which means the best path for India to avoid the tariffs would be to acquiesce and stop buying Russian oil.But this is an outcome that simply isn't being reflected in current crude oil prices.Global benchmark Brent futures have weakened since Trump's announcement of higher tariffs on India, dropping as low as $65.81 a barrel in early Asian trade on Monday, the lowest level in two months.This is a price that entirely discounts any threat to global supplies, and assumes that India will either continue buying Russian crude at current volumes, or be able to easily source suitable replacements without tightening the global market.Are these reasonable assumptions?The track record of the crude oil market is somewhat remarkable in that it quickly adapts to new geopolitical realities and any price spikes tend to be shortlived.The Russian invasion of Ukraine in February 2022 sent crude prices hurtling toward $150 a barrel as European and other Western countries pulled back from buying Russian crude.But within four months the price was back below where it was before Moscow's attack on its neighbour as the market simply re-routed the now discounted Russian oil to China and India.In other words, the flow of oil around the globe was shifted, but the volumes available for importers remained much the same.But what Trump is proposing now is somewhat different. It appears he wants to cut Russian barrels out of the market in order to put financial pressure on Moscow to cut a deal over Ukraine.There are effectively only two major buyers for Russian crude, India and China.China, the world's biggest crude importer, has more leverage with Trump given U.S. and Western reliance on its refined critical and other minerals, and therefore is less able to be coerced into ending its imports of Russian oil.India is in a less strong position, especially private refiners like Reliance Industries , which will want to keep business relationships and access to Western economies.India imported about 1.8 million barrels per day of Russian crude in the first half of the year, or about 37% of its total, according to data compiled by commodity analysts Kpler About 90% of its Russian imports came from Russia's European ports and was mainly Urals grade.This is a medium sour crude and it would raise challenges for Indian refiners if they sought to replace all their Urals imports with similar grades from other suppliers.There are some Middle Eastern grades of similar quality, such as Saudi Arabia's Arab Light and Iraq's Basrah Light, but it would likely boost prices if India were to seek more of these crudes.If Chinese refiners were able to take the bulk of Russian crude given up by India, it may allow for a re-shuffling of flows, but that would not appear to be what Trump wants.Trump and his advisers may believe there is enough spare crude production capacity in the United States and elsewhere to handle the loss of up to 2 million bpd of Russian supplies.But testing that theory may well lead to higher prices, especially for certain types of medium crudes which would be in short supply.It's simplistic to say that higher U.S. output can supply India's refiners, as this would mean those refiners would have to be willing to accept a different mix of refined products, including producing less diesel, as U.S. light crudes tend to make more products such as gasoline.For now the crude oil market is assuming that the Trump/India/Russia situation will end as another TACO, the acronym for Trump Always Chickens Out.But the reality is likely to be slightly more messy, as some Indian refiners pull back from importing from Russia, some Chinese refiners may buy more and once again the oil market goes on a geopolitical merry-go-round.Enjoying this column? Check out Reuters Open Interest (ROI), your essential new source for global financial commentary. ROI delivers thought-provoking, data-driven analysis of everything from swap rates to soybeans. Markets are moving faster than ever. ROI can help you keep up. Follow ROI on LinkedIn and X.(The views expressed here are those of the author, a columnist for Reuters.)
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indian Express
6 minutes ago
- Indian Express
US State Department's 2024 Human Rights Report soft on Trump allies, criticizes Europe, South Africa, Brazil
The U.S. State Department has released its widely anticipated 2024 Human Rights Report, which has dramatically softened criticism of some countries that have been allied with President Donald Trump, while some traditional allies of Washington have been criticised for 'erosion of freedom of speech'. The 2024 Human Rights Report, which was largely completed before Trump began his second term, reportedly underwent significant revisions in the subsequent months before it was released on Tuesday. The report, however, has been critical of restrictions on political speech by U.S. allies in Europe that American officials believe target right-wing politicians. South Africa was also singled out for its human rights situation 'significantly worsening.' The report pointed to unfair treatment of white Afrikaners, a minority that ran the country's apartheid government. Another country where the State Department found the human rights situation declined is Brazil. The Trump administration has clashed with the Lula da Silva government in Brazil over several issues, including the trial of former President Jair Bolsonaro, which Trump has referred to as a 'witch hunt'. The 2024 Human Rights Report took aim at the courts in Brazil, stating they took action undermining freedom of speech and disproportionately suppressing the speech of supporters of Bolsonaro. Another significant change in this year's report is how it largely omitted criticism of governments over their treatment of LGBTQI rights, which had appeared in Biden administration editions of the report.
India.com
6 minutes ago
- India.com
Oil, Tariffs And A Tightrope: Is India Risking US Ties To Keep Russia Close?
New Delhi: The United States has hit India with steep new tariffs, turning a once-warm trade partnership into a tense standoff. At the centre of the dispute is New Delhi's decision to keep buying discounted Russian oil, a move that Washington says undermines its sanctions policy. The shift has led to a wider global realignment: allies facing friction and rivals finding common ground. President Donald Trump's tariff-heavy strategy is blurring the line between friend and competitor. Signs of a broader geopolitical realignment are also visible. For the first time since the 2020 Galwan Valley clash, Prime Minister Narendra Modi is considering attending the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation (SCO) summit, which China is hosting this year. Russia remains a long-standing ally, but closer ties with Beijing carry strategic and economic risks. Diplomatic sources suggest that Modi's potential presence at the SCO would be read in Washington as a signal that India is willing to engage more with blocs where the United States has little sway. India's trust deficit with China remains deep. Border disputes, military skirmishes and Beijing's open support for Pakistan during Operation Sindoor have left a legacy of mistrust. Russia's growing dependence on China could further reduce India's influence in the region. Analysts emphasise that Moscow's military cooperation with Beijing, including joint patrols in the Sea of Japan and advanced technology transfers, has added to New Delhi's unease. The trade imbalance adds another layer of concern. India's deficit with China has crossed $100 billion in FY 2024-25, up from $85.09 billion the previous year. By contrast, the U.S. relationship brings a surplus of over $35 billion, with bilateral trade valued at $119.71 billion in 2023-24. Washington has repeatedly highlighted this surplus as proof that it remains a more beneficial trade partner for India, even as it warns that continued Russian oil imports could jeopardise preferential market access. Analysts warn that closer alignment with Russia and China could strain India's relations with the West. The United States and its allies view both nations as strategic rivals. India's engagement with them may invite further economic restrictions and weaken platforms like the Quad, which includes the United States, Japan and Australia. Conversations in Washington policy circles have questioned India's reliability as a Quad partner, especially if it moves towards energy and defence agreements that align with Chinese and Russian interests. While Russia has been a dependable partner for decades, the Ukraine conflict has bound it tightly to China, which is now its largest trading partner. This dynamic could leave India as a secondary priority for Moscow. India is benefiting in the short run in energy sector by purchasing Russian crude at a discount of up to $8-10 per barrel, but strategists warn that these savings could be erased if Western tariffs expand to cover more sectors. India's next moves require careful calculation. Each decision carries significant long-term consequences, not only for its trade but also for its place in the shifting global power structure. A senior Indian diplomat put it privately, 'This is no longer just about oil. It is also about choosing which world order we want to belong to, and that choice will define the next two decades.'
Economic Times
6 minutes ago
- Economic Times
$3.4 billion payday? Report says Trump family cashed in big from White House years
During Donald Trump's time in the White House, his family amassed an estimated $3.4 billion through various ventures, including cryptocurrency projects, real estate, and merchandise sales. Critics argue that Trump blurred the lines between public office and private gain, particularly through his children's management of business transactions, which circumvented traditional disclosure requirements. Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Where did the $3.4 billion come from? Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads How has Donald Trump combined business and politics? Why is this legally tricky but politically effective? Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads What does this mean for Trump's brand? FAQs It's no secret that US President Donald Trump has blurred the distinction between politics and business. However, a new analysis estimates that the Trump family has made a staggering $3.4 billion during their time in the White cryptocurrency ventures to golf resorts, licensing deals to merchandise, the Trumps have used their political platform in ways that critics say are unprecedented in modern American history. While much of it takes place in the public eye, the true money trail remains largely hidden, as per a report by the Rolling to The New Yorker, the majority of the Trump windfall, around $2.37 billion, came from cryptocurrency projects linked to the family. Financial investments led by Donald Trump Jr. and Eric Trump reportedly increased by $339.6 of the profit is attributed to his children's management of business transactions, which avoids traditional political disclosure requirements, as per a report by the Rolling Trump's iconic Mar-a-Lago resort generated an extra $125 million in profit, thanks in part to the publicity and exclusivity associated with Trump's political brand. Add $127.7 million in merchandise sales and legal fees, as well as a budding media network worth approximately $116 million, and you can see how the Trump empire grew during and after his critics claim he has been willing to blur, or erase, the line between public office and private gain. Last month, during an official state visit to Scotland paid for by taxpayers, Trump took the time to open a new golf course near Aberdeen. He also hosted British Prime Minister Keir Starmer at his private Turnberry resort, which is likely to boost the club's reputation and revenue, as per a report by the Rolling to reports, he has even discussed hosting major global summits such as the G20 at his Doral golf club, echoing similar proposals from his first term that were heavily criticized for potential conflicts of sitting presidents are subject to strict rules regarding personal investments, Trump has largely avoided direct violations by having his children handle the transactions. This "family-run" model has created a legal loophole, allowing profits to flow while protecting certain transactions from public scrutiny, as per a report by the Rolling contrasts sharply with Trump's frequent claims that political opponents used public office for personal gain. Critics argue that no other first family has so aggressively monetized the presidency, while supporters see it as a sound business from fading, the Trump brand has grown into a global network of investments, luxury properties, and digital ventures, all driven by the presidency's visibility and influence. Whether you see it as entrepreneurial genius or an ethical red flag, one thing is certain: the Trump era has been extremely beneficial to Trump's financial estimated $3.4 billion in various business his adult children, which helps him avoid certain political disclosure laws.
