Lalu Prasad's 'jhumla' jibe after PM Narendra Modi's rally: 'Weather warning for Bihar'
Shortly after Prime Minister Narendra Modi launched a scathing attack on RJD president Lalu Prasad Yadav in Bihar, the former chief minister hit back and issued a 'weather alert' for 'heavy rain of lies, false promises and illusions' for the poll-bound state.
In a post X, Lalu Prasad shared an AI-generated video with clips of PM Modi, Bihar CM Nitish Kumar, and wrote, "Weather warning in the interest of Bihar- Today there is heavy rain of lies, false promises and illusions in Bihar, hailstones of false and tempting promises are also falling along with thunder, be careful."
Earlier in the day, Modi attacked the Rashtriya Janata Dal (RJD) chief over allegations that he "insulted" BR Ambedkar during his birthday celebrations.
The remarks came in reference to a viral video that surfaced earlier this week, showing Yadav's feet near Ambedkar's portrait.
'The whole country saw what the RJD did to Babasaheb's photo recently.... I know that these people will never apologise because they have no respect for the Dalits and the backwards. RJD and Congress place Babasaheb's photo at their feet while Modi keeps him in his heart,' Modi said.
He further slammed RJD and the Congress for looting Bihar, saying that poverty became the state's "misfortune".
"Those who brought 'jungle raj' to Bihar are looking for an opportunity to repeat their old deeds somehow. You have to be very cautious for the bright future of your children," the prime minister said during a public gathering in Siwan.
PM Modi described RJD and Congress' actions as "anti-Bihar and anti-investment". He said that they just nurtured "poor infrastructure, mafia raj, gunda raj, and corruption".
Further taking a swipe at the opposition, Modi said that the gist of their politics is "parivar ka sath, parivar ka vikas".
"They do not shy away from harming crores of families in Bihar for the benefit of their families. Babasaheb Ambedkar was against such politics," he added.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
3 minutes ago
- Time of India
Israel-Iran War: Can Trump bomb Iran without asking? Capitol Hill says no, invokes War Powers Act
President Donald Trump is keeping his cards close. When asked whether the United States would join Israel's escalating military confrontation with Iran, he simply said, 'I may do it. I may not.' That was on June 18, just days after Israel launched strikes on Iranian territory. Since then, speculation has grown over whether Trump might authorise a U.S. military operation—without getting the green light from Congress . According to Department of State spokeswoman Tammy Bruce, 'He is the singular guiding hand about what will be occurring from this point forward.' But many lawmakers disagree. And they're rushing to reassert control. Congress says, "Not without us" The U.S. Constitution is clear: only Congress has the power to declare war. Live Events 'This is not our war,' said Republican Representative Thomas Massie of Kentucky. 'Even if it were, Congress must decide such matters according to our Constitution.' Massie has introduced a resolution under the 1973 War Powers Act to stop any unauthorised U.S. strikes on Iran. He's joined by Democrat Ro Khanna of California, who posted on X, 'Are you with the neocons who led us into Iraq or do you stand with the American people?' Over in the Senate, Democrat Tim Kaine has introduced a similar resolution. 'This resolution will ensure that if we decide to place our nation's men and women in uniform into harm's way, we will have a debate and vote on it in Congress,' he said. The War Powers Act: What it actually does Passed in 1973 after the Vietnam War and President Nixon's secret bombing of Cambodia, the War Powers Act was designed to limit the president's ability to launch military action unilaterally. It says, The president must notify Congress within 48 hours of launching military action. Military deployment without congressional approval is limited to 60–90 days. Congress must be consulted 'in every possible instance' before troops are committed abroad. The law was passed over Nixon's veto—but almost every president since has found ways to work around it. Why it's back in the spotlight As Israeli airstrikes continue and Trump hints at joining in, lawmakers worry that the U.S. could be dragged into another prolonged Middle East war. That's exactly what the War Powers Act was supposed to prevent. Bernie Sanders, the independent senator from Vermont, has proposed the No War Against Iran Act , which would prohibit the use of federal funds for any attack on Iran without a formal declaration of war or congressional authorisation. 'The recent escalation of hostilities between Israel and Iran could quickly pull the United States into another endless conflict,' Senator Kaine warned. Can the President Act without Congress? Technically, the president is commander-in-chief of the military. Under Article II of the Constitution, Trump can respond to 'sudden attacks' or threats. But the power to start a war—that belongs to Congress. Still, history tells a different story. Since World War II, U.S. presidents have authorised military operations in Korea, Vietnam, the Gulf, Libya, Somalia, and more—without formal declarations of war. They've relied instead on broad laws like the 2001 and 2002 Authorisations for Use of Military Force (AUMFs), passed after the 9/11 attacks and before the 2003 Iraq invasion. Trump used the 2002 AUMF to justify the assassination of Iranian General Qassem Soleimani in 2020. So does the War Powers Act have any real power? It's complicated. Congress can vote to end military action, but the president can veto that decision. Overriding a veto requires a two-thirds majority in both the House and Senate—a rare feat in a divided Washington. In 2019, Congress tried to end U.S. support for the Saudi-led war in Yemen. Trump vetoed it. Then again in 2020, after the Soleimani strike, Congress passed a bill to limit Trump's powers to launch war on Iran. Trump vetoed that too. The War Powers Act has been criticised for being more symbolic than effective. Even President Joe Biden once led a Senate subcommittee that concluded the law was falling short of its original purpose. Opinions split, even within parties Not all Democrats back Kaine's resolution. Senator John Fetterman of Pennsylvania has said he would vote against it. He believes Trump should retain the option to preemptively strike Iran's nuclear infrastructure. On the Republican side, some are more cautious. Senator Rand Paul of Kentucky said: 'No president can bomb another country without the permission of Congress.' He added, 'It's always been my belief that you don't go to war without the approval of Congress and bombing other countries is obviously war.' But others support Trump's freedom to act. Senator Ted Cruz of Texas said, 'A single bombing run, historically, has not been understood to require congressional authorisation.' Sustained warfare, he agreed, would require Congress to act. Senator Lindsey Graham took it a step further. 'If diplomacy is not successful,' he said, 'I would urge President Trump to go all in… If that means flying with Israel, fly with Israel.' The House and Senate are currently on recess, but both will be forced to vote on the new resolutions once they return. The outcome will test the strength of Congress's war-making authority. Meanwhile, Trump has made it clear he's watching the conflict closely. After cutting short a G7 trip in Canada, he returned to Washington and declared, 'We now have complete and total control of the skies over Iran.' He added, 'We know exactly where the so-called 'Supreme Leader' is hiding... We are not going to take him out (kill!), at least not for now.' At its heart, this isn't just a legal or political issue. It's about whether the people, through their elected representatives, get to decide when America goes to war. For decades, war decisions have been drifting away from Congress and towards the Oval Office . This moment could shift that balance—or cement it. With Iran's nuclear programme in the crosshairs, and Israel already striking, the next move could redraw the map of the Middle East—and reshape America's role in it. And if history is any guide, the decision could be made by one man, not 535 lawmakers.
The Hindu
15 minutes ago
- The Hindu
Telangana sets benchmark with ₹1.04 lakh crore for Agriculture since Cong. came to power
Hyderabad The Telangana government has spent a staggering ₹1.04 lakh crore, ever since the Congress came to power, to revitalise agriculture and garnered the attention of other States. The series of pro-farmer policies include a ₹2 lakh loan waiver that has freed 25 lakh farmers from debt in a single year, as against the previous governments that took years to release crop loan waiver in installments, a senior Minister argued. The Revanth Reddy government waived crop loans worth ₹20,616 crore in its first year alone, bringing immediate relief and restoring the economic dignity of farmers across Telangana, said Bhongir MP Chamala Kiran Kumar Reddy. The Rythu Bharosa scheme has disbursed ₹7,310.59 crore within five days, beginning June 16, helping 65.12 lakh farmers. In total, the government has spent ₹12,682 crore on Rythu Bharosa payouts in 18 months. The government intends to disburse ₹9,000 crore in nine days. The same was informed to senior Congress leaders in New Delhi during the Chief Minister's recent visits drawing appreciation from the Congress leadership. Besides, the government continued 24x7 free electricity for agriculture and providing a subsidy of ₹16,691 crore for 29 lakh pump sets. The grain procurement practice has reached a new scale with ₹500 per quintal bonus incentive for paddy helping the Sreach a new milestone in rice production. Officials said in 2023-24, the government procured 95.31 lakh metric tonnes of paddy from 15 lakh farmers at a cost of ₹20,964 crore. So far, paddy worth ₹29,562 crore has been purchased and payments made to over 21.59 lakh farmers. Telangana produced 2.80 crore metric tonnes of paddy this year, highest in the country. Telangana is also leading in oil palm cultivation, with 18,985 farmers planting the crop across 60,432 acres since the Congress government took charge, officials argued. Officials also revealed that farmers hit by unseasonal rains and floods received ₹10,000 per acre in compensation, totalling ₹260 crore. Revival of Central schemes In addition, the State government has revived 16 Centrally-sponsored schemes that were previously stalled due to non-release of matching grants. A sum of ₹245 crore has been allocated for their reactivation. Telangana is also providing drip and sprinkler irrigation systems, including 100% for SC/ST farmers, 90% for small and marginal farmers, and 80% for others with 75% subsidy on sprinklers. Since December 2023, equipment worth ₹282 crore has been distributed to 40,265 farmers.
The Hindu
29 minutes ago
- The Hindu
Economic growth anchored in social justice under all Cong. govts: Bhatti
Economic growth anchored in social justice remains at the core of Congress governments and the work being undertaken in Telangana under Chief Minister A. Revanth Reddy is a reflection of this conviction, Deputy Chief Minister Mallu Bhatti Vikramarka said here on Friday. Addressing the 6th edition of CSR and Sustainability Conference and Awards for 2024, organised by Assocham Southern Region, the Deputy CM said, 'In Telangana, we are shaping a new development narrative, one that does not separate economics from ethics. We are committed to building a State that is fiscally responsible, socially inclusive and environmentally conscious.' Look beyond balance sheets Asserting that true development is one that empowers people to stand on their feet, especially in today's 'world of unprecedented resources and extraordinary inequality,' Mr. Vikramarka urged business leaders to look beyond balance sheets to a future we are shaping together. Let us not act not out of charity but out of shared responsibility… work for transformation and build societies that flourish.' Telangana is an ideal destination for corporate social responsibility (CSR) initiatives. The State provides a platform not just to fulfill CSR mandates, but to do so with 100% impact and transparency. He called upon companies across India to consider Telangana as a prime hub for their CSR investments. The State offers an industry-friendly ecosystem where there are no language barriers; law and order is maintained; and offering abundant, affordable skilled human resources, which the government had set out to enhance with initiatives such as the Young India integrated residential schools and the Young India Skills University. Above all, the State has a proactive, friendly government, the Deputy Chief Minister said. Telangana's competition is not as much with other Indian states as with developed nations. In sectors like healthcare, pharma, IT, and agriculture produce, the State has set an unmatched trajectory, he added. Real purpose of CSR is not ticking the box but recognising that growth without inclusion is fragile and that profits without purpose are hollow. Sustainability is not only about the environment, it is about human dignity too, he said. Assocham in a release said that special addresses, and panel discussions on various topics formed part of the conference. Over 20 organisations were presented awards across various categories for their contributions in CSR and sustainability.
