PM wants NZ to get behind development, progress
National leader Christopher Luxon has told the party's annual conference that the country needs to "say yes" more.
Addressing about 550 delegates, MPs and supporters at the Air Force Museum of New Zealand in Christchurch, Luxon bemoaned "activists" who opposed housing developments, agriculture, cruise ships and mines.
"If we're serious about keeping Kiwis at home, creating jobs and increasing wages for all New Zealanders, we can't afford to keep saying no to every opportunity that comes our way."
Opposition parties have heavily criticised the government for its economic policies and laid the blame at its feet for the 30,000 New Zealanders who moved to Australia last year, but Luxon said the opposition would make it worse.
"Take a look at Australia," he said. "If they shut down their mining industry or their energy industry tomorrow, as Labour and the Greens want to do here, I guarantee you would see fewer Kiwis moving across the ditch."
Luxon's speech came hot on the heels of an announcement from the United States that it would increase tariffs to 15 percent.
Still digesting the announcement and what it would mean for New Zealand exporters, Luxon acknowledged "challenging" global conditions.
"We can't just batten down the hatches and hope for the best," he said.
Luxon's speech made no mention of National's coalition partners, New Zealand First or ACT, or even the word 'coalition' itself, although deputy Nicola Willis acknowledged the "energy" it took to keep Winston Peters and David Seymour under control.
Instead, Luxon's speech was heavy on shoutouts to his National ministers and their policies, and also on blaming the previous government for the cost-of-living struggles New Zealanders currently faced.
"In the years to come, immediate action on the cost of living isn't enough," he said. "The last government spent billions of dollars in failed handouts, only to watch inflation roar and the economy falter.
"We have to keep our eyes on the prize."
Echoing his speech at Monday's post-cabinet press conference, Luxon leaned on the economic policies the government had introduced, such as tax changes, FamilyBoost and the removal of the Auckland Fuel Tax.
"We're doing what we can," he said.
The speech contained an announcement the government would make it easier to get a concession on Department of Conservation land.
"That means more certainty for businesses, less bureaucracy and much faster decisions, so the businesses that should be operating can get up and running."
There would still be restrictions on some parts of the DOC estate.
"Where it does make sense, we need to get to the 'yes' much faster - instead of being bogged down in process and uncertainty," Luxon said.
Charges of $20-40 for foreign visitors to high-volume sites like Cathedral Cove, Tongariro Crossing, Milford Sound, and Aoraki Mount Cook were being introduced, but New Zealanders would be exempt from the fees.
Party president Sylvia Wood, who was re-elected at the conference, said the party would select candidates for the 2026 election shortly.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Scoop
3 hours ago
- Scoop
Regulation Ministry To Tackle 30 Different Product Labelling Regulations
Minister for Regulation Hon Scott Simpson Minister of Commerce and Consumer Affairs Unnecessary costs and frustrations throughout the economy are caused by complex and outdated labelling regulations. Minister for Regulation David Seymour and Commerce and Consumer AffairsMinisterScottSimpson have today announced the Ministry for Regulation will conduct a sector review into product labelling to address this. 'The Ministry for Regulation is in a unique position to take on regulatory costs that make it harder for Kiwis to get affordable goods. Because these regulations are imposed by so many departments, it takes one ministry with a mandate for cutting red tape,' says Mr Seymour. 'New Zealand product labelling requirements are made up of over 30 different codes, standards, and regulations. This leads to high costs for businesses to label their products to comply with New Zealand standards. 'New Zealand's labelling regime drives up prices and limits wage growth. Exporters face extra compliance costs preparing products for overseas markets, while consumers miss out on global goods because importers face differences in labelling requirements. Many countries are also shifting to QR codes that link to online labels, easily tailored for different markets and changing needs. 'Complex labelling rules hit businesses at every level. From small exporters navigating conflicting overseas standards, to pharmacies putting medicines on their shelves. Businesses are forced to print multiple versions of essentially the same label. It's also building products and agricultural sprays; the list goes on. Those costs ultimately get passed on to consumers at the checkout. 'The price of groceries is a major concern for Kiwis. Current settings mean products packaged for Australia might not be able to be sold in New Zealand. This forces businesses to waste time and money repackaging,' says Mr Seymour. 'If we want new international retailers to come here, we need to show them we welcome business investment. The best way to do that is to get out of their way when it comes to annoying compliance that isn't benefiting anyone. 'Businesses like Chemist Warehouse have been a game-changer for Kiwis purchasing cheaper pharmaceutical products. However, they're also tied up by excessive labelling requirements adding costs to their operations.' 'This is a step towards lower compliance costs for businesses and increased global competitiveness for Kiwi goods on the world stage,' says Mr Simpson. 'This Government is working with businesses, industry groups, and consumer advocates to identify pain points and gather input to shape the review's terms of reference. 'In a time when households are feeling the pinch, every unnecessary cost we can remove from the system is a win for families and businesses.' The review is expected to be complete by December 2025.
Otago Daily Times
3 hours ago
- Otago Daily Times
Previous govt spent too much during Covid: Treasury
By Giles Dexter of RNZ The previous government spent too much during the Covid-19 pandemic, despite warnings from officials, according to a briefing released by the Treasury. The Treasury's 2025 Long Term Insights Briefing said debt had risen in recent decades, partly because responses to adverse shocks were not met by savings between those shocks. The higher debt meant less capacity to respond to future shocks, like natural hazards, weather-related risks and biosecurity risks. Treasury estimated the total cost of the pandemic was $66 billion over the 2020-26 financial years and about 20.4% of GDP. The IMF and OECD estimated it was among the largest Covid-19 responses globally. The agency releases a briefing every three years, with this one looking at the role of fiscal policy through shocks and business cycles. The briefing said the Covid-19 response showed the challenges of using fiscal policy to respond to shocks and cycles. Initially, Treasury recommended "strong fiscal stimulus" at the start of the pandemic, which was cited as "perhaps" causing the economy to be much stronger than expected by the end of 2020. The wage-subsidy scheme in particular was seen as making an important contribution to the strong initial recovery, limiting the increase in the unemployment rate and enabling economic activity to resume when restrictions relaxed. Treasury then moved away from recommending broad-based stimulus, preferring more targeted and moderate support. Its post-election advice to the then-Finance Minister in late 2020 highlighted "the importance of controlling ongoing spending and ensuring it was high value to meet the medium-term fiscal challenge." By August 2021, with the Delta lockdowns coming in, Treasury recommended any decisions to provide support to businesses "should take account of macroeconomic trade-offs". It recommended against any further stimulus from Budget 2022 onwards. Wage subsidies and similar schemes during lockdowns made up about 35% of the costs of the response. A further 18% came from health-system costs, like vaccination, contact tracing, and managed isolation and quarantine. The remaining "nearly half" was made up of a wide range of initiatives that Treasury said had "varied objectives". Some were aimed at directly responding to the impacts of Covid-19, others were aimed at providing fiscal stimulus or "achieving social or environmental objectives". They included "tax changes, training schemes, housing construction, shovel-ready infrastructure projects, increases to welfare benefits, the Small Business Cashflow Scheme, Jobs for Nature, additional public housing places and school lunches". Programmes within the fiscal response that were not tied to the shock were seen as having "a lagged impact on the economy and proved difficult to unwind in later years". The report suggested cyclical management was best left to monetary policy, run by an independent central bank. It also suggested governments set out clearly when fiscal policy will be used ahead of time, including pre-defining responses. Ideally, this would have cross-party agreement. An independent fiscal institution, which could scrutinise and report on the sustainability of fiscal policy, was also suggested. The previous government had considered setting up a watchdog to cost election policies, but it could not get cross-party support. National then changed its tune, with current Finance Minister Nicola Willis supporting such a measure, but New Zealand First and ACT were opposed to the idea. 'Dangers of excessive spending' - Willis Willis jumped on the report's release, saying Treasury's language was "spare and polite", but its conclusions were "damning". She said the briefing showed the challenges of using "big spending measures" to respond to one-off shocks. Willis singled out the briefing's focus on the money spent on initiatives not directly tied to the Covid-19 response. "That is a very diplomatic way of saying New Zealanders are still paying the price of the previous government extending a big-spending approach, initially intended for a pandemic response," she said. Labour has been approached for comment.
RNZ News
4 hours ago
- RNZ News
Labour MPs gather in Christchurch to formulate election strategy
Labour leader Chris Hipkins addressed the Queenstown Business Chamber on Thursday. Photo: Screengrab Analysis: Labour MPs are gathering in Christchurch for a team 'away day', as the party inches closer to announcing its tax policy. Last year's mid-winter retreat was held in Auckland to re-engage with 'supercity' residents , after the party's bruising defeat in Election 2023 The caucus is now pushing to connect with the South Island - leader Chris Hipkins addressed the Queenstown Business Chamber on Thursday, while other MPs visited flood-affected properties in Moteuka. They will all come together in Christchurch on Friday to look to the year ahead and talk strategy for the run-up to next year's election. The meeting comes as the government works against a tide of negative headlines about the economy, with unemployment jumping to 5.2 percent on Wednesday. National campaigned on rebuilding the economy and Prime Minister Christopher Luxon heralded 2025 as the year of "going for growth" in his State of the Nation speech in January . The party is now battling the headwinds of an economic downturn, with some business voices, like former National leader-turned Auckland Chamber boss Simon Bridges, criticising the coalition for not doing more to stimulate the economy. Labour has been near silent on the policy front, choosing instead to criticise the coalition's ideas and hone its messaging on the cost of living to better resonate with voters feeling the pinch. Responding to an update on the government's transition to a universal road-user charges system , Hipkins said the timing could "clobber" those already struggling to pay the bills, but as for Labour's alternative timeline, who knows? The strategy thus far shows some promise, with the left bloc parties - Labour, the Greens and Te Pāti Māori - holding a narrow lead over the coalition in several political polls this year. Labour has also emerged as the party New Zealanders think has the best handle on the cost of living, according to the latest Ipsos Issues Monitor , but the race remains tight and the coalition parties are poised to pounce, when Labour unveils its tax plan this year. On Sunday, The Post reported Labour was one step closer to endorsing a capital gains tax (CGT) - insiders say the party's policy council has narrowly voted for a CGT over a wealth tax . While MPs will most likely discuss tax policy at today's mid-winter retreat, the public shouldn't hold its breath for an announcement. Party process requires both the council and caucus to sign off on policy. In the meantime, the party is clearly preparing to pitch - and defend - its approach to tax. Hipkins told TVNZ's Q+A in March he would need time to "counter the misinformation that often goes with tax changes" before the 2026 Election. Hipkins will give an opening speech to his caucus in Christchurch on Friday, before MPs have policy and strategy discussions behind closed doors. Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
