logo
Many types of dinosaur had weaker bites than thought, say researchers

Many types of dinosaur had weaker bites than thought, say researchers

Researchers found that, while dinosaurs like the mighty Tyrannosaurus rex were optimised for quick, strong bites – much like a crocodile – many others that walked on two legs, such as the Spinosaurus and Allosaurs, had much weaker bite forces.
They instead specialised in slashing and ripping flesh.
The research, published in the journal Current Biology, revealed that meat-eating dinosaurs followed many different evolutionary paths in terms of skull design and feeding style, despite their similarly gigantic sizes.
'Tyrannosaurs evolved skulls built for strength and crushing bites, while other lineages had comparatively weaker but more specialised skulls, suggesting a diversity of feeding strategies even at massive sizes,' said Andre Rowe, a palaeobiology research associate at the Univeristy of Bristol and one of the study's authors.
'In other words, there wasn't one 'best' skull design for being a predatory giant; several designs functioned perfectly well,' he added.
In the study, scientists probed how walking on two legs influenced skull mechanics and feeding techniques in dinosaurs.
'Carnivorous dinosaurs took very different paths as they evolved into giants in terms of feeding biomechanics and possible behaviours,' Dr Rowe said.
Evolution can produce multiple 'solutions' to life as a large, carnivorous biped
To understand the relationship between body size and skull biomechanics, researchers used 3D X-ray scanning technology to analyse skull mechanics, and quantify the feeding performance and bite strength of 18 species of two-legged carnivorous dinosaurs ranging in size from small to giant.
Researchers were surprised to find clear divergence among the species. For instance, skull stress didn't show a pattern of increase with size.
Some smaller dinosaurs even experienced greater stress than the larger species due to increased muscle volume and bite force.
ADVERTISEMENT
'Tyrannosaurids like T-rex had skulls that were optimised for high bite forces at the cost of higher skull stress,' Dr Rowe said.
'But in some other giants, like Giganotosaurus, we calculated stress patterns suggesting a relatively lighter bite.
'It drove home how evolution can produce multiple 'solutions' to life as a large, carnivorous biped.'
'Large tyrannosaur skulls were instead optimised like modern crocodiles, with high bite forces that crushed prey. I tend to compare Allosaurus to a modern Komodo dragon in terms of feeding style.
'This biomechanical diversity suggests that dinosaur ecosystems supported a wider range of giant carnivore ecologies than we often assume.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Many types of dinosaur had weaker bites than thought, say researchers
Many types of dinosaur had weaker bites than thought, say researchers

Irish Independent

time06-08-2025

  • Irish Independent

Many types of dinosaur had weaker bites than thought, say researchers

Researchers found that, while dinosaurs like the mighty Tyrannosaurus rex were optimised for quick, strong bites – much like a crocodile – many others that walked on two legs, such as the Spinosaurus and Allosaurs, had much weaker bite forces. They instead specialised in slashing and ripping flesh. The research, published in the journal Current Biology, revealed that meat-eating dinosaurs followed many different evolutionary paths in terms of skull design and feeding style, despite their similarly gigantic sizes. 'Tyrannosaurs evolved skulls built for strength and crushing bites, while other lineages had comparatively weaker but more specialised skulls, suggesting a diversity of feeding strategies even at massive sizes,' said Andre Rowe, a palaeobiology research associate at the Univeristy of Bristol and one of the study's authors. 'In other words, there wasn't one 'best' skull design for being a predatory giant; several designs functioned perfectly well,' he added. In the study, scientists probed how walking on two legs influenced skull mechanics and feeding techniques in dinosaurs. 'Carnivorous dinosaurs took very different paths as they evolved into giants in terms of feeding biomechanics and possible behaviours,' Dr Rowe said. Evolution can produce multiple 'solutions' to life as a large, carnivorous biped To understand the relationship between body size and skull biomechanics, researchers used 3D X-ray scanning technology to analyse skull mechanics, and quantify the feeding performance and bite strength of 18 species of two-legged carnivorous dinosaurs ranging in size from small to giant. Researchers were surprised to find clear divergence among the species. For instance, skull stress didn't show a pattern of increase with size. Some smaller dinosaurs even experienced greater stress than the larger species due to increased muscle volume and bite force. ADVERTISEMENT 'Tyrannosaurids like T-rex had skulls that were optimised for high bite forces at the cost of higher skull stress,' Dr Rowe said. 'But in some other giants, like Giganotosaurus, we calculated stress patterns suggesting a relatively lighter bite. 'It drove home how evolution can produce multiple 'solutions' to life as a large, carnivorous biped.' 'Large tyrannosaur skulls were instead optimised like modern crocodiles, with high bite forces that crushed prey. I tend to compare Allosaurus to a modern Komodo dragon in terms of feeding style. 'This biomechanical diversity suggests that dinosaur ecosystems supported a wider range of giant carnivore ecologies than we often assume.'

Does your cat prefer to sleep on their left side? Scientists have investigated why...
Does your cat prefer to sleep on their left side? Scientists have investigated why...

Irish Examiner

time17-07-2025

  • Irish Examiner

Does your cat prefer to sleep on their left side? Scientists have investigated why...

Why do I snore? What possible purpose does it serve? Our ancient hominid ancestors can't have snored; the noise would have drawn predators, such as leopards, to the sleeper. Natural selection would soon have eliminated such a tendency. Cats don't snore but they have other sleeping foibles. Alanna, our pussy, slumbers through much of the day. But she won't curl up just anywhere; she commandeers the highest available location before nodding off. That would have made good survival sense to her wild forebears. An approaching predator is easier to spot from above and is less likely to notice the sleeper. Enemies, apart from eagles, having to attack uphill from below, would be at a tactical disadvantage. But Alanna has another quirk; she always sleeps lying on her left side. I used to think that such traits were peculiar to her but, according to a paper just published in Current Biology, they aren't. Every domestic cat, it seems, has a preferred sleeping position and each one always chooses to lie on a particular side of the body. Could this 'lateral bias' be down to 'handedness'? About one in ten people is left-handed. It used be thought that ciotógs were more talented and creative than the rest of the common herd. The most famous lefties were Leonardo da Vinci and Vincent van Gogh. Barack Obama and Bill Gates both write with the left hand. However, researchers at Cornell University found no evidence that 'kicking with the left foot' meant that you were more gifted. 'Pawedness', the animal equivalent of handedness, is found in many, perhaps all, vertebrates: Parrots prefer to hold food items in one claw rather than the other. Pregnant cows sleep more often lying on their left side than on the right, whereas non-pregnant ones show no side preference. Amphibians and reptiles have similar biases. Whether fish exhibit pawedness, is uncertain. Nor is the choice of side written in stone; most dogs, for example, are right-pawed, although bitches and pups, according to one study, are more likely to be lefties. Lateral bias in sleeping positions of domestic cats: About two-thirds of cats prefer to sleep on their left side. Pictures of cats from unsplash: left cat courtesy of Noah Dustin von Weissenfluh (@noah_dustin), right cat courtesy of Gleb Kuzmenko (@badfantasy) Researchers, led by Sevim Isparta of Italy's Bari Aldo Moro University, have studied handedness in domestic cats. Examining 408 Youtube videos of sleeping pussies, they found that 65% of them sleep on their left side, while 35% chose the right. There is a division of labour between the two sides of the brain. Each side specialises in particular tasks. The right hemisphere, say the researchers, 'is dominant for threat processing and, in most species, animals react faster when a predator is approaching from the left side'. It analyses spatial information while the right amygdala responds to dangers and threats. If a cat, sleeping on its left side, is awakened by the approach of a predator, the threat would be detected in the cat's left visual field. The left side of the brain controls the right side of the body, so left visual information is processed in the right hemisphere. Sleeping on the left side, therefore, may have evolved as a 'fight or flight' mechanism to help the cat respond more quickly to danger and hunt for prey more efficiently. Left-oriented sleeper Alanna agrees! Read More Demand for ejiao has soared — which is bad news for donkeys

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store