Will bring Pahalgam attackers to justice: External affairs minister S Jaishankar at SCO
The Pahalgam terrorist attack was deliberately conducted to undermine Jammu & Kashmir's tourism economy and sow a religious divide, external affairs minister S Jaishankar said at the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation (SCO) foreign ministers' meeting in China's Tianjin, even as his Pakistani counterpart Ishaq Dar looked on.
Recalling the strong condemnation of the April 22 attack by UNSC, where China is a permanent and Pakistan non-permanent member, Jaishankar called upon the Eurasian bloc to take an uncompromising position on terror and stressed that India would continue to work to bring the perpetrators of the J&K attack to justice.
India presses for strong rebuke on terror, Pahalgam in SCO declaration | page 22
While raising the issue of the Pahalgam terror attack at the SCO foreign ministers' meeting in China on Tuesday, S Jaishankar did not name Pakistan as the bloc's charter prohibits member-states from raising hostilities in bilateral relations.
However, like in his address at the same meeting in Islamabad last year, he reminded his counterparts that the bloc was founded to combat the three evils of terrorism, separatism and extremism.
"Not surprisingly, they often occur together. Recently, we in India witnessed a graphic example in the terrorist attack in Pahalgam on April 22. It was deliberately conducted to undermine tourism economy of Jammu & Kashmir, while sowing a religious divide," Jaishankar said.
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
Tennessee Launches New Coverage for Senior Drivers
The Quote General
Learn More
Undo
He also said while India would continue to approach new ideas and proposals by SCO positively for "collective good", such cooperation must be based on mutual respect, sovereign equality and in accordance with territorial integrity and sovereignty of member states.
The foreign ministers' meeting looked to finalise the agenda, including the final declaration, for the SCO summit that will be hosted by President Xi Jinping in Sept and in which PM Modi is expected to participate.
India is pressing for a strong condemnation of terrorism in the declaration, including the Pahalgam attack.
"UNSC, of which some of us are currently members, issued a statement that condemned it in strongest terms and 'underlined the need to hold perpetrators, organisers, financiers and sponsors of this reprehensible act of terrorism accountable and bring them to justice'. We have since done exactly that and will continue doing so.
It is imperative that SCO, to remain true to its founding objectives, take an uncompromising position on this challenge," the minister added.
In a bilateral meet with his Chinese counterpart Wang Yi on Monday, EAM had described terrorism as a shared concern, expressing hope that SCO will strongly uphold zero tolerance against terrorism. Combating terrorism and ensuring a terror-free Afghanistan tops India's priority list in the security-oriented group that is looking to expand cooperation in areas like trade, investment & people-to-people exchanges.
On Afghanistan, Jaishankar said it had been long on the SCO agenda and the compulsions of regional stability were buttressed by India's long-standing concern for the well-being of the Afghan people. "The international community, particularly SCO members, must therefore step up with development assistance. India, for its part, will certainly do so," he said.
The minister lamented lack of assured transit within the SCO space, saying its absence undermines the seriousness of advocating cooperation in economic areas.
This again was a dig at Pakistan which continues to block land access to Afghanistan and Central Asia for India.
While talking about a world besieged by conflicts, competition and coercion, Jaishankar said the challenge before SCO is to stabilise the global order, de-risk various dimensions and "through it all, address long-standing challenges that threaten our collective interests".
"World is moving towards multi-polarity. This is not just in terms of redistribution of national capacities, but also emergence of effective groupings like SCO. Our ability to contribute to shaping of world affairs will depend on how well we come together on a shared agenda. That means taking everybody on board," he added.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Mint
28 minutes ago
- Mint
New Zealand is right to atone for its colonial crimes in the Pacific
In London recently, Penny Wong, Australia's foreign minister, called on Britain to face up, in the Indo-Pacific, to the uncomfortable realities of its colonial past. Ms Wong's forebears were from ethnic-Chinese communities that laboured in British Borneo's perilous mines. Colonial stories, she said, 'can sometimes feel uncomfortable—for those whose stories they are, and for those who hear them.' Some in Britain's ruling Conservative Party objected furiously to Ms Wong lecturing Britain on how to grapple with its past. Yet she raised an issue that will not go away. Britain has declared its intention to seek much deeper trade and security ties in the Indo-Pacific region. It is unlikely to succeed, Ms Wong intimated, in what she called 'the most consequential region of our time', unless Britain faces up to how an often-abusive history colours its relations there. Understanding the past, she said, 'enables us to better share the present and the future. It gives us the opportunity to find more common ground.' Patricia O'Brien, a historian of colonialism at Georgetown University and the Australian National University, emphasises the point in an excellent piece in the Diplomat, a foreign-affairs magazine: 'Reckoning with colonial pasts, in current times, makes for good diplomacy.' Britain and other former colonisers might consider this especially worthwhile if they wish to criticise the region's new imperial power, China, on firm moral ground. Britain, alas, is a past master at failing to reckon with its history. Among numerous illustrations, it has serially bungled its approach to atoning for its imperial slavery in the Caribbean, where its king remains the head of state of eight countries. Yet Britain is by no means the only power in the Indo-Pacific with a sordid past. During the Pacific war of 1937-45, imperial Japan massacred civilians, forced Chinese and Koreans into slave labour and conscripted tens of thousands of Korean and other 'comfort women' into military brothels. Japan's relations with its neighbours are still bedevilled by that history. In the South Pacific, where white-British colonies, including Australia, became colonisers themselves, colonial wrongs remain a political minefield. But recent experiences there show how it is possible for countries to pick a way through it. New Zealand, in particular, is an exemplary apologiser. An apology from a state is quite different from one offered by an individual. Meaningful political apologies are extended by the many to the individual—to victims of slavery, for instance, or to their descendants. There is, notes Hiro Saito of Singapore Management University, a performative dimension to the act. But the performance counts for nothing if the actors are not sincere. Few could fault New Zealand for apologetic sincerity. In 2002 Helen Clark, then the prime minister, issued a moving apology for her country's past mistreatment of Samoa. It included banishing its leaders and causing the death of over a fifth of the population, after New Zealand allowed a ship carrying Spanish flu to dock at the island-territory. Her apology was met with Samoan rituals of forgiveness. 'Unfinished business', as Ms Clark called it, can only be settled with the victims' agreement. Last August another New Zealand prime minister, Jacinda Ardern, volunteered an ifoga, a public display of humiliation and apology, for her country's racist 'dawn raids' in search of Pacific Islanders who had overstayed their work visas in the 1970s. Chris Finlayson, a former New Zealand attorney-general who negotiated dozens of apologies and financial settlements with iwi, Maori tribes, says: 'If the Crown simply breezes in and says we're sorry, they don't accept it.' Apologies have to be specific and attuned to the victim's sensitivities. 'It is acknowledgment that certain things happened in history…and a promise that there will be a different way [in future].' It helps perhaps that modern diplomatic apologies chime with a South Pacific tradition of atonement, of which tabua, polished sperm whales' teeth used as gifts, are emblematic. Only in January the new prime minister of Fiji offered one to Kiribati. Yet even when such props are unavailable, doing the right thing is surely advisable. Not least because when states say sorry they are thinking more about opening up the future than closing down the past. At a time of bleak geopolitical contestation, there is a virtuous logic to that which even hard-headed strategists should keep in mind.
Time of India
38 minutes ago
- Time of India
Custody row: SC directs Centre to issue lookout notice against 'missing' Russian wife, child; 'seize her passport'
NEW DEKHI: The Supreme Court on Thursday directed the central government to issue lookout notice for a Russian woman absconding with her child. The bench also directed the authorities to "seize her passport" and to inform the airports and immigration officials across the nation to ensures that she doesn't leave the country. The father, embroiled in a custody battle with his estranged Russian wife, has alleged that she violated court orders by withholding access to their minor child. He claimed he has had no knowledge of their whereabouts since July 7, despite repeatedly filing complaints, none of which, he said, prompted any action, according to PTI. "Father of the child apprehends that the petitioner has been facilitated to flee out of the jurisdiction of this court. She was statedly seen entering the Russian Embassy through a back door on July 4, 2025 along with a Russian diplomat, with whom she is alleged to have some relationship. It is further alleged that the police have failed to provide protection to the minor child, thereby defying the directions issued by this court," PTI reported the bench as saying. "Keeping in mind the comity, diplomatic relationship, and autonomy enjoyed on a reciprocal basis by different embassies, we are not issuing any directions in respect of the officers of the Russian Embassy in India. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Switch to UnionBank Rewards Card UnionBank Credit Card Apply Now Undo However, we do not hesitate to observe that if, on the basis of the police report, we find any diplomatic personnel attached or connected to the said embassy has prima facie committed an offence within the framework of the penal laws of this country, the law must take its own course," it added. The court urged the Russian embassy's top official to assist Indian authorities, including Delhi Police, in enforcing its orders. It criticized the woman's counsel for giving vague responses about her whereabouts, raising doubts about their credibility. The order was also directed to be shared with senior legal and police officials for compliance. "The officials at the Ministry of Home Affairs and the Ministry of External Affairs, Union of India are also directed to communicate this order to all international airports and other ports within India, and the immigration authorities be intimated to ensure that neither the petitioner (woman) nor the minor child is permitted to leave the country," the order said. The hearing has been posted for July 18. The child's mother, a Russian citizen living in India since 2019 on an X-1 visa, had her visa extended periodically by the Supreme Court during ongoing proceedings. On May 22, the court also instructed Delhi Police to maintain discreet but effective surveillance on both parents' residences.
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Good Trouble Protest: Full schedule of city-wise timings and key locations for the massive anti-Trump protest
In a show of coordinated dissent, thousands of Americans are expected to gather across more than 50 cities on Thursday to participate in the ' Good Trouble Lives On ' protests, a national day of action challenging the policies of the Trump administration. Timed to coincide with the fifth death anniversary of Congressman John Lewis , a towering figure of the U.S. civil rights movement, the protests are being led by a consortium of rights groups to resist what they call the administration's growing 'authoritarianism.' With a focus on restoring democratic protections, the demonstrations are not only a tribute to Lewis's lifelong advocacy for justice but also a pointed rebuttal to President Donald Trump's recent executive actions that have unsettled advocates for civil liberties. Also Read | Is the Alaska Tsunami warning cancelled after the powerful earthquake? Here's what we know so far by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Play War Thunder now for free War Thunder Play Now Undo Legacy of 'Good Trouble' The movement draws its name from one of John Lewis's most iconic phrases: 'Never, ever be afraid to make some noise and get in good trouble, necessary trouble.' Organizers say Lewis's legacy continues to inspire nonviolent civic engagement and civil disobedience — tools that are increasingly vital amid what they characterize as a rollback of hard-won civil rights. Live Events Lewis, who served more than three decades in the U.S. Congress, died of pancreatic cancer on July 17, 2020. His record of challenging injustice, from the Edmund Pettus Bridge in Selma to the chambers of Capitol Hill, remains a touchstone for modern resistance movements. Nationwide Demonstrations Planned According to the official list provided by organizers, protests under the 'Good Trouble Lives On' banner are scheduled in every U.S. state. Cities including New York, Atlanta, Los Angeles, and Dallas will witness large-scale gatherings, while smaller demonstrations will occur in towns such as Twin Falls, Idaho and Mount Vernon, Iowa. Among the earliest events is a 7:30 a.m. gathering at Kelly Ingram Park in Birmingham, Alabama, while West Coast cities such as Seattle and Portland will host evening rallies. Locations range from courthouse steps and state capitols to university campuses and public squares. The central aim, according to organizers, is to spotlight federal actions perceived to erode democracy — including restrictions on Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) programs, voting rights limitations, and budget cuts to key social safety nets such as Medicaid and Social Security. Organizers and Support The protest initiative is being steered by a coalition that includes the Transformative Justice Coalition, Black Voters Matter, The Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights, League of Women Voters, Declaration for American Democracy Coalition, and Mi Familia en Acción. In a joint press release, the groups cited 'escalating authoritarian actions' as the impetus for the demonstrations. 'We're mobilizing to defend the soul of our democracy,' the statement read. Protesters are also amplifying economic grievances, contending that the administration's budget priorities disproportionately harm working-class and marginalized communities. At a recent press briefing, leaders pointed to three core demands: halting discriminatory policies, restoring full civil rights protections, and safeguarding federal support programs for vulnerable families. Virtual Participation and Teach-ins While most protests are in-person, some organizations have arranged virtual events to accommodate broader participation. In New Jersey, for instance, Indivisible Princeton is set to host an online 'teach-in' at 7 p.m., while the League of Women Voters of Monmouth County will hold a virtual panel focused on democratic engagement and civil rights history. These online events aim to extend the reach of the movement beyond physical gatherings, especially for those unable to attend due to health or travel concerns. Tensions with the Trump Administration The protests mark the latest in a series of grassroots mobilizations opposing the Trump administration's approach to civil liberties. Critics argue that President Trump's recent actions — from eliminating DEI funding to weakening independent agencies — reflect an authoritarian drift. The administration, however, maintains that its policies are focused on government efficiency and constitutional integrity. Lewis, during his lifetime, was a frequent critic of Trump, famously refusing to attend the 2017 inauguration and often voicing concern over what he considered the erosion of democratic norms. Cities and Times Here is a snapshot of some key protest locations and their scheduled times: Atlanta, Georgia: 7 p.m. to 8:30 p.m. at 609 Thurmond St. NW Chicago, Illinois: 5:30 p.m. to 8 p.m. at Daley Plaza, 50 W Washington St. New York City: 5:30 p.m. to 7:30 p.m. at Foley Square Philadelphia, Pennsylvania: 5:30 p.m. to 9 p.m. at City Hall Seattle, Washington: 4 p.m. to 8 p.m. at Seattle Central College A full list of protest times and locations spans all 50 states and includes both urban and rural communities, signifying the depth of concern over the administration's direction. FAQs What are the 'Good Trouble Lives On' protests? These are coordinated, nationwide protests held on July 17, 2025, to honor the legacy of civil rights icon John Lewis and to challenge the policies of U.S. President Donald Trump's administration. The protests focus on resisting what organizers describe as growing authoritarianism. Why were these protests held on July 17? The date marks the fifth death anniversary of Congressman John Lewis, who passed away on July 17, 2020. Lewis was renowned for his nonviolent activism and lifelong commitment to civil rights.
