Kedah MIC-UMNO rift widens over PN cooperation motion
In a widening of the row, S.K. Suresh said MIC does not need anyone's permission to make decisions regarding its political future.
'The future of the nation and the Indian community is our priority, and we always welcome cooperation with all parties for the benefit of the party and the community,' he said.
Suresh accused Kedah UMNO of hypocrisy for partnering with DAP despite past hostility and criticism, noting that some Umno leaders had defected and that DAP had previously insulted UMNO before now openly cooperating with it.
Earlier, Kedah UMNO information chief Datuk Shaiful Hazizy Zainol Abidin said Kedah MIC's move was a clear indication that it no longer wished to be part of BN's efforts to rebuild its political strength.
Shaiful Hazizy also said that if that was the wish of Kedah MIC's grassroots, then Kedah BN wished them all the best.
'Kedah BN has never been intimidated by any change in the political landscape, especially if it involves parting ways with any component party.
'History has proven that Kedah BN can stand firm, move forward, and continue to gain the people's mandate even without the help of those who choose to turn away,' he said in a statement on Saturday.
Shaiful Hazizy also warned that parties leaving BN should not expect to return seeking seats or privileges.
'Let it be clear to everyone — when this door is opened for you to leave, do not one day come back demanding space, seats, or privileges in BN after having raised your hand in support of the opposing side.
'Loyalty is not a toy that can be pawned during election season and reclaimed when the situation becomes desperate,' he said.
In a statement on Friday, Kedah UMNO Youth chief Raqib Abu Hassan said Suresh was being a hypocrite, while the latter's response to Shaiful was 'shallow'.
'Taking a swipe at Kedah UMNO for 'cosying up' with DAP is trite.
'The reality is that it is MIC that has lost its allies and influence in Kedah, not UMNO.'
Raqib also said that Kedah MIC should stop playing 'hero', adding that Kedah BN would not be cowed by such threats.
However, warning Kedah UMNO not to provoke MIC, Suresh hinted at exposing 'past incidents' if tensions continued.
The motion, passed at Kedah MIC's annual meeting attended by party president S.A. Vigneswaran, will be referred to the central leadership for a final decision. It paves the way for Kedah MIC to work with PN in the next general election.
On August 2, MIC president S.A. Vigneswaran had said the party was open to talks with any political group to ensure its survival and better serve the Indian community.
MIC's future has been questioned after deputy president M. Saravanan said its direction would be decided at the October AGM, noting the party felt like an 'unwanted guest' in the unity government, holding no posts despite having senior leaders. —Aug 10, 2025
Main image: Free Malaysia Today
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New Straits Times
5 hours ago
- New Straits Times
Crude oil market bets Trump's India threats are hollow
THE crude oil market's rather sanguine reaction to the United State s' threats to India over its continued purchases of Russian oil is effectively a bet that very little will actually happen. President Donald Trump cited India's imports of Russian crude when imposing an additional 25 per cent tariff on imports from India on Aug 6, which is due to take effect on Aug 28. If the new tariff rate does come into place, it will take the rate for some Indian goods to as much as 50 per cent, a level high enough to effectively end US imports from India, which totalled nearly US$87 billion in 2024. As with everything related to Trump, it pays to be cautious given his track record of backflips and pivots. It's also not exactly clear what Trump is ultimately seeking, although it does seem that in the short term he wants to increase his leverage with Russian President Vladimir Putin ahead of their planned meeting in Alaska this week, and he's using India to achieve this. Whether Trump follows through on his additional tariffs on India remains uncertain, although the chances of a peace deal in Ukraine seem remote, which means the best path for India to avoid the tariffs would be to acquiesce and stop buying Russian oil. But this is an outcome that simply isn't being reflected in current crude oil prices. Global benchmark Brent futures have weakened since Trump's announcement of higher tariffs on India, dropping as low as US$65.81 a barrel in early Asian trade on Monday, the lowest level in two months. This is a price that entirely discounts any threat to global supplies, and assumes that India will either continue buying Russian crude at current volumes, or be able to easily source suitable replacements without tightening the global market. Are these reasonable assumptions? The track record of the crude oil market is somewhat remarkable in that it quickly adapts to new geopolitical realities and any price spikes tend to be shortlived. The Russian invasion of Ukraine in February 2022 sent crude prices hurtling towards US$150 a barrel as European and other Western countries pulled back from buying Russian crude. But within four months, the price was back below where it was before Moscow's attack on its neighbour as the market simply rerouted the now discounted Russian oil to China and India. In other words, the flow of oil around the globe was shifted, but the volumes available for importers remained much the same. But what Trump is proposing now is somewhat different. It appears he wants to cut Russian barrels out of the market in order to put financial pressure on Moscow to cut a deal over Ukraine. There are effectively only two major buyers for Russian crude, India and China. China, the world's biggest crude importer, has more leverage with Trump given US and Western reliance on its refined critical and other minerals, and therefore is less able to be coerced into ending its imports of Russian oil. India is in a less strong position, especially private refiners like Reliance Industries, which will want to keep business relationships and access to Western economies. India imported about 1.8 million barrels per day of Russian crude in the first half of the year, according to data compiled by commodity analysts Kpler. About 90 per cent of its Russian imports came from Russia's European ports, mainly Urals grade. There are some Middle Eastern grades of similar quality, such as Saudi Arabia's Arab Light and Iraq's Basrah Light, but it would likely boost prices if India were to seek more of these crudes. If Chinese refiners were able to take the bulk of Russian crude given up by India, it may allow for a reshuffling of flows, but that would not appear to be what Trump wants. Trump and his advisers may believe there is enough spare crude production capacity in the US and elsewhere to handle the loss of up to two million bpd of Russian supplies. But testing that theory may well lead to higher prices, especially for certain types of medium crudes which would be in short supply. For now, the crude oil market is assuming that the Trump/India/Russia situation will end as another TACO, the acronym for Trump Always Chickens Out. The writer is from Reuters
New Straits Times
10 hours ago
- New Straits Times
13MP debate descends into shouting match once again over "kafir harbi" remark
KUALA LUMPUR: The Dewan Rakyat debate on the 13th Malaysia Plan was once again thrown into a shouting match this afternoon when an opposition member of parliament called RSN Rayer (PH-Jelutong) "kafir harbi" (non-believers who are against Islam). It all started when Datuk Awang Solahuddin Hashim (PN-Pendang) accused the Malaysian Indian Transformation Unit (Mitra) of failing to deliver aid. He claimed that despite RM100 million being allocated for Mitra, "not a single cent" had been released and accused some board members of doing nothing for the Indian community. Following Awang's allegations, Rayer rose and interjected, citing the standing order and accusing him of making a malicious assumption regarding Mitra's allocations. "How does he, or Batu and Segamat, together with Indian MPs and other non-Indian MPs, know that this matter has not been brought to the prime minister's attention? "How does he know the prime minister does not care about this matter? Don't make accusations or malicious assumptions. I don't want to waste time with Pendang... I am fed up with him," he said. The heated exchange between the two continued before being stopped by Syahredzan Johan, who was presiding over the session. Awang later resumed his debate and took a jab at Rayer, saying that Pas had remained calm even when the party was previously labelled "Parti Ajaran Sesat." "They even called Pas 'Parti Ajaran Sesat,' but we stayed calm. One of them is a kafir harbi who called us that. He said it just now in Parliament. But we stayed calm," he said. Tensions escalated further after Chong Zemin (PH-Kampar) interjected in defence of Rayer before being muted by Syahredzan. Syahredzan later instructed Awang to withdraw the "kafir harbi" term, which he did, and the session subsequently resumed.
The Sun
13 hours ago
- The Sun
Real winners, losers of Trump's tariffs
PRESIDENT Donald Trump has single-handedly pushed countries closer towards a new world order that will be different from the present American and Western-dominated one. As Trump brags to the American public about the latest 'gains' from his transactional foreign policy using tariffs as his bazooka, impacted countries have begun to look closely at the concessions they have been compelled to make. Meanwhile, their media and public are debating whether their country's negotiating team has done well or badly in protecting the national interest. They are also quietly preparing for how they can fight back against this unprecedented threat to the world economy. For now, the latest iteration of Trump's still escalatory unilateral tariffs appears to be hurting long-established US allies, including in Asia, the hardest. Key concessions/exemptions/ special conditions Canada – USMCA (United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement)-compliant goods are exempt. Lumber and dairy face potential tariffs of up to 250%. Transshipment violations risk a 40% penalty plus fines. Previous 25% auto tariffs have been partially suspended. EU – Goods with an existing MFN (most favoured nation) tariff of 15% or higher will face no additional duties. Aerospace exclusions are under negotiation and investment commitments are anticipated. India – No measures announced; no agreement reached. Japan – Committed to purchasing US goods; auto tariffs suspended. Deal framework announced, with details still being finalised. South Korea – Committed to investments in the US. UK – Aerospace products exempted; formal deal signed. Baseline rate applies pending sector-specific agreements. Indonesia – Tariff reduced from the initial 32%; agreement includes undisclosed investment terms. Malaysia – Reduced from initial 24%; deal announced but details incomplete. Philippines – Tariff increased from the initial 17%; agricultural purchases pledged. Deal announced but details remain incomplete. Vietnam – Tariff reduced from the initial 46%; investment commitments made. Formal deal framework established. The biggest loser Based on current information, India stands to be the biggest loser from the new US tariffs as it faces the most severe increase among all countries. A new 25% tariff on Indian goods, on top of an existing 25% duty, brings the total tariff to 50%. This move is a response to India's continued purchases of Russian oil. Analysts have warned that the latest tariff rate could reduce India's outbound shipments to the US by up to 60% and potentially shave off about 1% from its GDP. Canada is also facing a high tariff rate. Products that do not comply with USMCA are subject to a 40% tariff. This is a significant increase and could disrupt supply chains. While it is higher than the rates for the EU, Japan and South Korea, it is lower than the total tariff India is facing. The EU, Japan and South Korea are key US trading partners and geopolitical allies. These three have been hit with a new tariff rate of 15%. While it is a substantial increase over earlier rates, it is still lower compared to Canada and India. All three have secured trade deals that cap tariffs at this rate, marking a significant improvement over the higher rates previously threatened. However, the additional purchase and investment conditions imposed – deemed 'extortions' by some of their political leaders – make these agreements considerably more costly than they initially appear. From a broader geopolitical perspective, the US could end up the biggest loser in what Trump and his Republican team claim is a historic opportunity to reset the global trading and economic system in America's favour. Their claims, made in relation to 'Making America Great Again', include raising new federal revenue to address chronic deficits, pressuring domestic and international businesses to relocate their factories to the US and compelling countries to increase their imports of American goods and services. However, the majority of US economists – mainstream and progressive – disagree with the claim that tariffs are a net benefit to the American economy or consumer. While Trump's administration argues that tariffs protect domestic industries, economic consensus holds that tariffs will ultimately harm the US economy. Economists warn that the costs of tariffs are largely borne by American businesses and consumers through higher prices and reduced purchasing power. Furthermore, they contend that tariffs can lead to slower economic growth, decreased efficiency and innovation by shielding domestic companies from competition, as well as result in job losses in industries that rely on imported goods or are targeted by retaliatory tariffs from other countries. Winner on the geopolitical front Even if successful in the short run on the trade and revenue front, the tariff war has alienated allies and resulted in significant geopolitical losses for the US. Rather than strengthening the US position, these tariffs have strained relationships with Europe and Asia, which have been treated as economic adversaries or, at best, economic pawns. This transactional approach to foreign policy has eroded respect, trust and cooperation, particularly within alliances designed to counter the rise of China, Russia and other BRIC countries, whom Trump identifies as hostile adversaries. By alienating partners such as Canada, the EU, Mexico and countries in the Asia-Pacific region and forcing them to pay exorbitant sums or to seek alternative trade relationships, the US has weakened the very coalitions that are crucial for its prosperity, dominance and strategic interests. Overall, the tariff wars have not only isolated the US economically and geopolitically but have also strengthened China's position as a rival trade and geopolitical leader while eroding American soft power and multilateral credibility.
