Talk To Your Obsidian Notes on the Go Using Claude AI
In this tutorial Artem Zhutov explains how to integrate Claude Code with Obsidian to create a smarter, more intuitive note-taking system. From automating daily notes to using AI agents for deeper insights, this guide will show you how to optimize your workflows for maximum efficiency and accessibility. Whether you're looking to streamline idea capture, maintain productivity across devices, or ensure secure remote access, these tools offer a flexible solution tailored to your needs. By the end, you'll see how this integration can make your notes not just a repository of information, but a powerful extension of your mind. After all, your best ideas deserve to flow as freely as your thoughts. Enhance Obsidian with AI Optimize Your Daily Notes Workflow
Daily notes are a cornerstone of effective note-taking, helping you track tasks, goals, and reflections. With Claude Code, this process becomes automated and intuitive. By responding to prompts tailored to your objectives, you can generate structured notes that sync effortlessly across devices. This ensures continuity in your planning, whether you're working on a laptop at home or checking your notes on your phone during a commute. Automating daily notes not only saves time but also keeps your workflow consistent and accessible, allowing you to focus on what matters most. Use Semantic Search for Deeper Insights
Semantic search tools transform how you retrieve and organize information in your Obsidian vault. Unlike traditional keyword-based searches, semantic search focuses on concepts and ideas, allowing you to uncover patterns and connections within your notes. By integrating plugins such as MCP Tools, Semantic Search, and Local REST API, you can create a cohesive knowledge base that is both intuitive and powerful. This approach enhances your ability to identify relationships between ideas, making your notes more actionable and insightful. Integrating Claude Code with Obsidian for Smarter Note-Taking
Watch this video on YouTube.
Expand your understanding of Obsidian note-taking app with additional resources from our extensive library of articles. Maintain Productivity with Persistent Sessions
Switching between devices often disrupts workflows, but persistent sessions eliminate this challenge. Tools like tmux allow you to maintain your workflow without losing context, allowing you to resume tasks seamlessly across devices. Claude Code's planning mode complements this by helping you clarify tasks, brainstorm ideas, and reference specific files or folders for targeted context retrieval. Additionally, the ability to run multiple sessions in parallel supports multitasking, allowing you to manage various projects simultaneously. This setup ensures that your productivity remains uninterrupted, regardless of where you work. Streamline Idea Capture with Voice-to-Text Integration
Voice-to-text technology simplifies the process of capturing ideas and managing notes. Tools like Whisperflow and Super Whisper enable you to dictate notes, transcribe meetings, or issue voice commands with ease. This reduces the need for manual input, allowing you to focus on developing ideas and strategies. Whether you're jotting down thoughts during a walk or documenting a brainstorming session, voice-to-text integration ensures your notes stay up to date and accessible. This feature is particularly useful for professionals and creatives who need to capture ideas quickly and efficiently. Ensure Secure Remote Access for Greater Flexibility
Remote access is a critical component of modern workflows, allowing you to manage your Obsidian notes from any location. Tools like Tailscale VPN provide a secure connection between your devices, while Termius acts as a remote terminal client for accessing and managing your notes. This setup not only protects your data but also ensures you can work efficiently, whether you're at home, in the office, or traveling. By prioritizing security and accessibility, you can maintain productivity without compromising the integrity of your information. Customize Workflows to Maximize Efficiency
Customizable workflows lie at the heart of an optimized Obsidian setup. With Claude Code, you can tailor your note-taking processes to suit your specific needs. AI agents play a pivotal role in this customization by offering suggestions, automating repetitive tasks, and helping you focus on high-priority activities. Whether you're brainstorming new ideas, planning complex projects, or organizing your knowledge base, these tools empower you to work smarter and more efficiently. By aligning your workflows with your goals, you can unlock the full potential of your Obsidian vault. Transform Your Note-Taking with Advanced Tools
Integrating Claude Code with Obsidian improves your note-taking experience to a new level. From automating daily notes and using semantic search to allowing voice-to-text interaction and making sure secure remote access, these features make your notes more accessible, actionable, and valuable. By adopting advanced tools and workflows, you can enhance productivity, maintain seamless connectivity, and fully use the capabilities of your Obsidian vault. Whether you're managing tasks, capturing ideas, or organizing information, this integration ensures that your notes work for you—anytime, anywhere.
Media Credit: Artem Zhutov Filed Under: AI, Guides
Latest Geeky Gadgets Deals
Disclosure: Some of our articles include affiliate links. If you buy something through one of these links, Geeky Gadgets may earn an affiliate commission. Learn about our Disclosure Policy.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Geeky Gadgets
27 minutes ago
- Geeky Gadgets
ChatGPT-5 vs Claude vs Qwen : The Hidden Costs of Picking the Wrong AI Model
What if the future of app development hinged on the AI model you choose? With the rapid evolution of artificial intelligence, developers are faced with a critical question: which model delivers the best balance of speed, reliability, and cost-effectiveness? In the race to build smarter, faster applications, three contenders—ChatGPT-5, Claude, and Qwen—have emerged as frontrunners. Each features unique strengths, yet their differences could mean the success or failure of your next project. Imagine building a tool like 'Newsletter Digest,' a web app designed to summarize newsletters, only to discover that your chosen AI model struggles to deliver functional results. The stakes are high, and understanding these models' capabilities is no longer optional, it's essential. In this comparative overview, Rob Shocks explains how these AI models stack up in real-world scenarios, using the development of 'Newsletter Digest' as a case study. You'll uncover insights into their performance metrics, strengths, and limitations, as well as the hidden costs that could impact your budget. Whether you're a developer seeking reliability, a strategist prioritizing creativity, or someone chasing speed, this breakdown will help you navigate the trade-offs. By the end, you might find yourself rethinking what matters most in an AI partner: precision, adaptability, or efficiency? AI Model Comparison Summary Project Overview: Developing 'Newsletter Digest' 'Newsletter Digest' is a web application that connects to Gmail, aggregates newsletters, and summarizes key stories for users. It also allows users to view individual newsletters in a streamlined interface. The app was developed using a modern tech stack to ensure scalability, responsiveness, and ease of use: A React-based framework for building a dynamic and efficient front end. A React-based framework for building a dynamic and efficient front end. Tailwind CSS: A utility-first CSS framework that enabled clean, responsive design. A utility-first CSS framework that enabled clean, responsive design. Neon: A Postgres database solution for managing user and application data. A Postgres database solution for managing user and application data. Prisma: A database toolkit that simplified schema generation and management. A database toolkit that simplified schema generation and management. Clerk: A user authentication and management tool integrated with Stripe for seamless billing functionality. The core functionality of summarizing newsletters relied on the capabilities of Claude, GPT-5, and Qwen Coder. These models were tested for their ability to deliver a functional app, their speed, usability, and cost-effectiveness. Comparing the AI Models Claude (Opus 4.1 and Sonnet 4) Claude proved to be the most reliable and mature AI model for this project. It excelled in generating a fully functional app with minimal errors, particularly in tasks such as database schema generation and implementing app features. Its workflow required fewer corrective prompts, which significantly reduced development time. However, this high level of performance came at a premium, as Claude was the most expensive model in the comparison. For developers prioritizing reliability and efficiency, Claude offers a robust solution, albeit at a higher cost. GPT-5 GPT-5 demonstrated strong strategic thinking and versatility but fell short in implementation compared to Claude. While it made reasonable progress in building the app, it required more corrective prompts and encountered occasional errors during the setup process. The Cursor CLI, used to interact with GPT-5, is still in beta, which introduced some glitches and limited functionality. Despite these challenges, GPT-5 showcased its ability to handle complex tasks with guidance, making it a viable option for developers who can invest additional time in troubleshooting and refinement. Qwen Coder Qwen Coder stood out for its speed, delivering rapid responses during the development process. However, it struggled to produce a complete and functional app. Its outputs were often incomplete, and it frequently stopped abruptly, requiring significant manual intervention to fill in the gaps. While its speed is promising, Qwen's lack of reliability and functionality placed it behind both Claude and GPT-5 in this comparison. Developers seeking a balance between speed and reliability may find Qwen less suitable for complex projects. ChatGPT-5 vs Claude vs Qwen Watch this video on YouTube. Stay informed about the latest in AI Models Comparison by exploring our other resources and articles. Performance Metrics The three AI models were evaluated based on their overall performance in building 'Newsletter Digest.' The results revealed clear distinctions in their capabilities: Claude: Delivered the most reliable and functional app with minimal errors and a smooth workflow. Delivered the most reliable and functional app with minimal errors and a smooth workflow. GPT-5: Ranked second, offering decent progress but requiring more corrections and encountering occasional errors. Ranked second, offering decent progress but requiring more corrections and encountering occasional errors. Qwen: Ranked third, excelling in speed but failing to deliver a complete and reliable app. Claude's ability to produce a polished and functional app with fewer iterations made it the top performer, while GPT-5's versatility and Qwen's speed highlighted their respective strengths and limitations. Cost Analysis Cost is a significant factor when selecting an AI model, particularly for projects with budget constraints. Here's a breakdown of the pricing for each model: Claude (Opus 4.1): $15 per million input tokens, $75 per million output tokens. $15 per million input tokens, $75 per million output tokens. GPT-5: $0.125 per 1,000 input tokens, $0.10 per 1,000 output tokens. $0.125 per 1,000 input tokens, $0.10 per 1,000 output tokens. Qwen: Pricing varies but is generally more affordable than Claude and GPT-5. While Claude was the most expensive option, its superior performance justified the higher cost for this project. GPT-5 offered a more affordable alternative with slightly reduced effectiveness, while Qwen's lower cost reflected its limited functionality and reliability. Insights on Development Tools The development process also highlighted the importance of the tools used alongside the AI models. These tools played a critical role in streamlining the workflow and making sure a smooth development experience: Clerk: Simplified user authentication and integrated seamlessly with Stripe for billing, reducing the complexity of managing user accounts. Simplified user authentication and integrated seamlessly with Stripe for billing, reducing the complexity of managing user accounts. Cursor CLI: Provided access to multiple AI models but, as a beta tool, had limited features and occasional glitches that impacted usability. Provided access to multiple AI models but, as a beta tool, had limited features and occasional glitches that impacted usability. Neon (Postgres DB): Worked effectively for database management, especially when paired with Prisma for schema generation and maintenance. While most tools performed well, the beta status of Cursor CLI highlighted the need for further refinement to improve its reliability and feature set. Looking Ahead: Future Considerations As of August 2025, the AI landscape continues to evolve, with emerging models like Grok and Gemini showing potential to disrupt the market. Developers should remain vigilant for advancements in AI capabilities and pricing structures. For now, Claude remains the preferred choice for projects requiring maturity, reliability, and comprehensive functionality. GPT-5 offers a strong alternative for tasks that demand strategic thinking and creative input, while Qwen Coder's speed may appeal to developers working on less complex applications. Continued refinement of tools like Cursor CLI and exploration of new technologies will further enhance the app development process, paving the way for more efficient and innovative solutions. Media Credit: Rob Shocks Filed Under: AI, Top News Latest Geeky Gadgets Deals Disclosure: Some of our articles include affiliate links. If you buy something through one of these links, Geeky Gadgets may earn an affiliate commission. Learn about our Disclosure Policy.
Telegraph
an hour ago
- Telegraph
NHS to pilot AI prostate cancer tests
An AI tool to spot prostate cancer earlier is being piloted by the NHS. The two-year scheme involving more than 3,000 men aims to speed up diagnosis of the disease, which is the most common form of cancer in men. Every year around 55,000 men in the UK are diagnosed with prostate cancer and 12,000 die from it. But just half of cases are caught at an early stage, when treatment is most effective. Trials suggest the technology can help radiologists detect around 11 per cent more early-stage cancers by highlighting suspicious regions in MRI scans. The software by Quibim uses advanced AI, trained on real pathology results, to segment the prostate into zones and highlight areas most likely to contain aggressive disease. The two-year pilot, backed by £2.6 million in NHS funding, will be rolled out to seven hospitals in England. Clinical trials suggest it can raise detection rates from 80 per cent to more than 90 per cent. Early detection dramatically improves survival rates. Almost all men who are diagnosed with stage one or two of the disease are alive five years later, compared with rates of less than 50 per cent for those with late-stage disease. As well as looking at detection rates, the pilot will examine the cost-effectiveness of the approach to see if the NHS can save money by catching the disease sooner. It will also examine the impact on inequalities in heath, with black men twice as likely to get prostate cancer. Prof Peter Johnson, national clinical director for cancer at NHS England, said: 'The NHS is funding and testing this exciting AI technology to help us diagnose and treat prostate cancer patients as quickly as possible and offer them the best chance of survival. 'As part of the 10-Year Health Plan, the NHS is taking advantage of our unique position to test state-of-the-art technology like this, and rolling it out as fast as we can to make the NHS fit for the future.' Dr. Ángel Alberich-Bayarri, chief executive of Quibim said: 'This NHS rollout is a major milestone in our mission to improve cancer diagnostics through AI. 'We're proud to support the NHS in advancing early detection and addressing health inequalities in prostate cancer care. By empowering radiologists with AI, we can help ensure more men are diagnosed earlier, when their chances of survival are highest.' Screening could cut deaths by 40 per cent The findings come as The Telegraph launches a campaign calling for the introduction of targeted screening for prostate cancer. Currently, men are not offered tests, even if they have a family history of the disease. Experts believe there is a growing case for targeted screening, meaning that PSA blood tests would be offered to those at heightened risk of the disease. Even though prostate cancer is the most-common male cancer in the UK, it is the only major cancer with no screening programme. The UK National Screening Committee (UKNSC) is currently considering whether to recommend the rollout of testing. In the past, it has rejected the idea because of concern that PSA tests are too unreliable, and would result in too many men undergoing needless procedures. In recent years, however, the back-up technology used to confirm a diagnosis has significantly improved, with hopes that further advances being tested, could mean that in the future, screening could cut deaths by 40 per cent. Prof Shonit Punwani, Professor of magnetic resonance and cancer imaging and consultant radiologist at UCLH, said: 'Initial studies have shown that the tool helps radiologists to enhance their diagnostic accuracy through identifying subtle early stage lesions that are sometimes not obvious on scans. 'Ultimately, QP-Prostate aims to improve patient outcomes by assisting radiologists in creating more accurate and reliable MRI reports.'
Telegraph
an hour ago
- Telegraph
Unemployed to get AI chatbot for filling out ‘boring' job applications
Unemployed people will be given an AI chatbot to help them fill out job applications as part of a government scheme to help Britons cut down on 'boring life admin'. The Government will next week unveil plans to develop an 'AI helper' that will help people apply for work – a move that critics warned could mean employers are flooded with irrelevant job applications. The scheme comes amid a surge in working-age Britons on jobless benefits and a slump in entry-level roles. Official data published this week showed that 3.7 million Britons are now claiming Universal Credit with no work requirements – a rise of more than a million since Labour came to power. On Monday the Department for Science, Innovation and Technology will issue a notice inviting AI companies to help develop an 'agent' that can fill in forms, complete job applications and register patients at doctors' surgeries. While existing chatbots such as ChatGPT are best known for answering questions, AI agents are capable of handling tasks such as booking flights and sending emails as well as answering questions. The Government's AI agent is expected to be in use in 2027. It could also be used to help people update addresses on driving licences and register to vote. Doing so would only require a short prompt, rather than filling in multiple pages of forms. Officials said the initiative was designed to 'save people time and modernise the state'. However, it comes as employers are grappling with a deluge of job applications as AI tools mean candidates can instantly generate CVs and cover letters tailored to job descriptions. A study by recruitment website Totaljobs released on Friday found that recruiters are drowning in CVs, with almost three quarters saying they were being inundated with irrelevant applications. Claire McCartney, of the Chartered Institute of Personnel and Development, said: 'When used appropriately, AI tools can be a useful aid for jobseekers.' However, she added: 'If candidates heavily rely on or misuse AI tools, it could mean that they're unsuitable for the roles they've applied for.' She said a quarter of firms were attempting to reduce or monitor the use of AI by applicants. Neil Carberry, the chief executive of the Recruitment and Employment Confederation, said: 'If you are advertising a job you will get hundreds more CVs than a few years ago and a large number will demonstrate they haven't really thought about the job. 'They have done 50 applications in a couple of days where previously they'd have done 10 good ones.' AI tools such as ChatGPT have been blamed for a decline in graduate opportunities, but Rachel Reeves has also been criticised for hitting the jobs market with record-breaking tax rises.
