Tim Walz's claims son knows why young men are ditching Dems and turning to ‘incredibly dangerous' Trump
Former vice presidential candidate Gov. Tim Walz shared an anecdote on Friday in which his son, Gus Walz, explained President Donald Trump's unique appeal with young men.
Since the 2024 election, the Democratic Party has been reckoning with its lack of support from young men.
The New York Times recently published a report claiming that Democrats are spending $20 million on a study called, 'Speaking with American Men: A Strategic Plan.'
The project aims to analyze 'the syntax, language and content that gains attention and virality in these spaces' of male voters.
Walz shared some insight from his son, however, that came without such a price tag.
'[Gus] is pretty in tune to this, but what he said was, he said, 'Dad, a lot of these young guys – they're not voting on the policy issues,'' Tim Walz said during an interview on the 'Grounded' podcast.
'And he wasn't dissing them, he said they may know the policy issues, but most of them don't. They're doing it because there's a sense of excitement, a sense of thrill in this, it's entertainment or whatever.'
Walz highlighted how different this approach is from many experienced adults in the political world, noting, 'We all dismiss that,' arguing many Trump critics say ''Donald Trump's a clown,' you know, 'Donald Trump's rallies are a clown.''
On the 'Grounded' podcast, ex-vice presidential candidate Gov. Tim Walz said his son Gus revealed to him that young men are 'not voting on the policy issues.'
Grounded Podcast/Substack
Nonetheless, Walz argued the core of Trump's appeal is telling young men, 'You've got a place to belong.'
'I think — this is me just pontificating for what it's worth,' he said.
'Social media and other things have disconnected people more than they were. We were more connected to my generation. It was easier to be a kid when I was growing up.'
Walz explained that the core of Trump's appeal is telling young men, 'You've got a place to belong.'
AFP via Getty Images
He then warned that Trump taps into a deep need in American society.
'And I've always said this as a teacher: If you don't give a kid a place to belong, they'll go find one. So you want them to be involved in sports and music and things in school, because they will go find a group of folks,' he said.
'And I think Donald Trump understands belonging, understands groups, I mean, look at it. He gives them a uniform, the red hat. He gives them some chants, some talking points, whatever. It's not all that different than when we build sports teams in high school. 'You belong, you are part of this,'' Walz added.
'It's not so much the policies,' he said, echoing his son's comment.
'I think it's incredibly dangerous, but I don't think we went out to get them. We didn't go out to make them feel a part of this.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
21 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Hungary's Orban lauds MAGA advance after Nawrocki's win in Poland
BUDAPEST (Reuters) -Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orban said on Friday that nationalist Karol Nawrocki's victory in Poland's presidential election was "fantastically good", hailing the success of an ally of U.S. President Donald Trump. Eurosceptic Karol Nawrocki narrowly won the Polish presidential election on Sunday, delivering a big blow to the efforts of Donald Tusk's centrist government to cement Warsaw's pro-European orientation. "From a Hungarian perspective, I think the outcome is fantastically good, as there is a pro-Ukrainian, pro-war, pro-Brussels liberal government operating in Poland," Orban said in an interview on state Kossuth radio. Orban, also an ally of Trump, said he interpreted Nawrocki's victory as the "continuation of the patriot's advance." "One could also say that the 'Washington Express' has arrived in Warsaw," Orban said, alluding to Nawrocki's election as a victory for European conservatives inspired by Trump and his Make America Great Again (MAGA) movement. Both Tusk's government and its conservative nationalist predecessor have been staunch supporters of Ukraine in the war triggered by Russia's 2022 invasion and have been critical of Orban's tilt towards Moscow. Nawrocki has said Poland must continue to support Kyiv's war effort, but in a break with the policy of previous governments in Warsaw, he opposes NATO membership for Ukraine. For his part, Orban has refused to send weapons to Ukraine since the start of the war and kept close relations with Moscow. Orban publicly endorsed Nawrocki ahead of the second round of Poland's election.
Yahoo
36 minutes ago
- Yahoo
White House Finally Responds to Elon Musk's Bombshell Epstein Claims
The White House has responded to Elon Musk's shocking claims about President Donald Trump and Jeffrey Epstein's purported relationship. In an X post Thursday, Musk brazenly accused the Trump administration of withholding files related to Epstein's sex trafficking investigation because the president himself was mentioned in them. 'Time to drop the really big bomb: @realDonaldTrump is in the Epstein files. That is the real reason they have not been made public. Have a nice day, DJT!' Musk alleged. 'Mark this post for the future. The truth will come out.' White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt responded to Musk's accusations hours later, telling CNN's Samantha Waldenberg in a statement Thursday night: 'This is an unfortunate episode from Elon, who is unhappy with the 'One Big Beautiful Bill' because it does not include the policies he wanted.' 'The president is focused on passing this historic piece of legislation and making our country great again,' she continued. The White House did not respond to the Daily Beast's request for comment on Musk's accusations. Epstein was accused of sex trafficking minors in 2019. He pleaded not guilty. A month after his arrest, he died by suicide in a prison cell, according to authorities. The disgraced financier and the president had a documented friendship in the 1990s and early aughts, but ultimately had a falling out in 2004 over a piece of real estate, per The Washington Post. When probed on Epstein's arrest in 2019, Trump responded to a reporter: 'Well I knew him like everybody in Palm Beach knew him. I mean, people in Palm Beach knew him. He was a fixture in Palm Beach. I had a falling out with him a long time ago. I don't think I've spoken to him for 15 years. I wasn't a fan. I was not—yeah, a long time ago, I'd say maybe 15 years. I was not a fan of his. That I can tell you. I was not a fan of his.' The president has not been accused of any wrongdoing in connection with Epstein nor was he ever implicated in Epstein's alleged abuse of minors. Musk and Trump have had their own falling out in recent days, largely due to an innate disagreement over a budget proposal the president is advocating for. The bill, which Trump has described as 'big' and 'beautiful,' lists out a number of the president's favored domestic policies on tax, government spending, and immigration. Musk has criticized the bill, arguing that it would drive up the federal budget deficit and undo the Department of Government Efficiency's cost-cutting efforts. 'Elon was 'wearing thin,' I asked him to leave, I took away his EV Mandate that forced everyone to buy Electric Cars that nobody else wanted (that he knew for months I was going to do!), and he just went CRAZY!' Trump wrote on Truth Social Thursday. 'I don't mind Elon turning against me, but he should have done so months ago,' he added in another post.
40 minutes ago
What Trump ordering an investigation into Biden's actions might mean legally and politically
WASHINGTON -- President Donald Trump has ordered an investigation into pardons and other executive actions issued by his predecessor, Joe Biden — launching an extraordinary effort to show that the Democrat hid his cognitive decline and was otherwise too mentally impaired to do the job. Trump, who turns 79 this month, has long questioned the mental acuity and physical stamina of Biden, and is now directing his administration to use governmental investigative powers to try and back up those assertions. Biden, 82, and now undergoing treatment for prostate cancer, dismissed Trump's actions as 'ridiculous.' Here's a look at what Trump is alleging, what impact it could have, and why the country may never have seen anything like this before. Trump directed his White House counsel and attorney general to begin an investigation into his own allegations that Biden aides hid from the public declining mental acuity in their boss. Trump is also casting doubts on the legitimacy of the Biden White House's use of the autopen to sign pardons and other documents. It marks a significant escalation in Trump's targeting of political adversaries, and could lay the groundwork for arguments by leading Republicans in Congress and around the country that a range of Biden's actions as president were invalid. 'Essentially, whoever used the autopen was the president,' Trump said Thursday. He then went further, suggesting that rogue elements within the Biden administration might have effectively faked the president's signature and governed without his knowledge — especially when it came to pushing policies that appeased the Democratic Party's far-left wing. 'He didn't have much of an idea what was going on,' Trump said, though he also acknowledged that he had no evidence to back up those assertions. A Trump fundraising email released a short time later carried the heading, 'A robot ran the country?' Legal experts are skeptical about that the investigation will do much more than fire up Trump's core supporters. 'I think it's more of a political act than one that will have any legal effect,' said Richard Pildes, a constitutional law scholar at New York University School of Law. He added: 'I think it's designed to continue to fuel a narrative that the administration wants to elevate, but courts are not going to second-guess these sorts of executive actions' undertaken by Biden. Trump has long questioned the legitimacy of pardons his predecessor issued for his family members and other administration officials just before leaving office on Jan. 20, people whom Biden was worried could be targeted by a Trump-led Justice Department. But Trump has more recently suggested Biden was unaware of immigration policies during his own administration, and said Thursday that aides to his predecessor pushed social issues like transgender rights in ways Biden might not have agreed with. It is well-established that a president's executive orders can easily be repealed by a successor issuing new executive actions — something Trump has done repeatedly since retaking the White House. That lets Trump wipe out Biden administration policies without having to prove any were undertaken without Biden's knowledge — though his predecessor's pardons and judicial appointments can't be so easily erased. 'When it comes to completed legal acts like pardons or appointing judges,' Pildes said, a later president 'has no power to overturn those actions.' Autopens are writing tools that allow a person's signature to be affixed automatically to documents. The Justice Department, under Democratic and Republican administrations, has recognized the use of an autopen by presidents to sign legislation and issue pardons for decades — and even Trump himself acknowledges using it. 'Autopens to me are used when thousands of letters come in from young people all over the country and you want to get them back,' Trump said Thursday. Michigan State University law professor Brian Kalt said the 'consensus view is that, as long as the president has directed the use of the autopen in that particular instance, it is valid.' 'The only issue would be if someone else directed the use of the autopen without the President's approval,' Kalt, an expert on pardons, wrote in an email. Yes. Article II, Section 2 of the Constitution bestows the president with the power 'to grant Reprieves and Pardons.' 'A president's pardons cannot be revoked. If they could, no pardon would ever be final,' American University politics professor Jeffrey Crouch, author of a book on presidential pardons, said in an email. 'There is no legal obstacle I am aware of to a president using an autopen on a pardon.' Kent Greenfield, a Boston College law professor, said, 'Once you pardon somebody, you can't go back and un-pardon them.' 'If it's done with a president's authority, I don't think it matters whether it's done with an autopen or not,' Greenfield added. 'The president's authority is the president's authority.' Trump's suggestions that Biden's administration effectively functioned without his knowledge on key policy matters go beyond questions about pardons and the president using the autopen. Even there, though, the Supreme Court ruled in 2024 that former presidents have broad immunity from prosecution. At the time, Trump celebrated the ruling as a 'BIG WIN' because it extended the delay in the Washington criminal case against him on charges he plotted to overturn his 2020 election loss. Such immunity would likely cover Biden as a former president. It might not extend to Biden administration officials allegedly acting without his knowledge — though Trump himself acknowledged he's not seen evidence of that occurring. Biden has dismissed Trump's investigation as 'nothing more than a mere distraction.' 'Let me be clear: I made the decisions during my presidency. I made the decisions about the pardons, executive orders, legislation, and proclamations. Any suggestion that I didn't is ridiculous and false,' he said in a statement. In a word, no. There have been allegations of presidents being impaired and having their administrations controlled by intermediaries more than the public knew — including Edith Wilson, who effectively managed access to her husband, Democratic President Woodrow Wilson, after his serious stroke in 1919. Wilson's critics grumbled about a shadow presidency controlled by his wife, but the matter was never formally investigated by Congress, nor was it a major source of criticism for Wilson's Republican successor, Warren G. Harding. More recently, some questioned whether President John F. Kennedy struggled more than was publicly known at the time with Addison's Disease and debilitating back pains while in office. And there were questions about whether dementia might have affected Ronald Reagan during his second term, before he was diagnosed with Alzheimer's in 1994, five years after he left office.
