
Cars aren't tested properly for women's safety. Congress is trying to fix that.
WASHINGTON — Maria Weston Kuhn was on vacation with her family in Maine when a head-on car crash changed her life. Kuhn and her mother, both in the back seat, were rushed to the hospital with serious injuries.
The seatbelt Kuhn wore pinned her intestines to her spine. After emergency surgery and a hospital stay, Kuhn, then 19, had to take a semester off from school to recover. Yet even though her father and brother were closer to the site of impact, they walked away with only scratches.
After Kuhn, who is now 24, returned home from the hospital, she noticed a clipping from Consumer Reports on her bed: Her grandmother had cut out an article about gender disparities in car safety testing. Kuhn learned that her injuries were exactly the kind of injuries women are most likely to suffer in car crashes.
'It's just like reading your life in a story. It's crazy,' she told NBC News in an interview last month.
As Kuhn then discovered, women are 73% more likely to be seriously injured in a head-on car crash compared with men in the same crash. Female drivers and front-seat passengers are 17% more likely to be killed in a car crash than a male occupant of the same age, according to multiple studies conducted over the last five years.
Chris O'Conner, president and CEO of Humanetics, one of the world's leading producers of crash test dummies, said that's for a relatively simple and chilling reason: Cars are not designed to be safe for women.
'If you look back in history, the crash test dummy was designed around a male, and that male became the baseline,' O'Conner said, adding that vehicles are being designed 'around a male.'
Safety standards today look much like they did in the 1980s, when the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) first mandated the use of dummies in car safety testing, though there were moves to do more testing with female dummies during the Obama administration. But NHTSA regulations still allow car companies in the U.S. to test for safety using 40- to 50-year-old dummies that are not anatomically representative of the average female, in terms of height, weight and body type — despite newer, more high-tech testing dummies being available.
Today, more women have driver's licenses than men, and O'Conner argues NHTSA must bolster testing requirements to force American car companies to prioritize safety.
'The car companies aren't required to test with the new dummy, because the regulation says you only have to use the old standard, which is from 40-50 years ago. So why are the car companies still using this? Because it's available and it's easy,' O'Connor said.
The standard 'female' car-test dummy in use today weighs 108 pounds and is 4 feet, 11 inches tall. The Hybrid III dummy, created in the 1970s, is based on the smallest 5% of American women and, according to O'Conner, is really just a smaller version of a male-representative dummy with 'a chest strapped on to it.'
Humanetics' newer model, called the THOR-5F, has 150 sensors, including in the legs, where female drivers are at a nearly 80% higher risk for injury than male drivers are in the same accident. The model has also been designed to better mimic an actual female body, according to O'Conner.
'This enables us to be able to design cars that are safer for women as well as safer for men,' O'Conner said.
A Department of Transportation spokesperson said Secretary Sean Duffy's 'top priority' is safety.
'He agrees that new crash test dummies that better cover the only two genders — male or female — have taken too long to develop,' the spokesperson said.
Five and a half years after her accident, Kuhn and her organization, Drive US Forward, are driving forces behind the ' She Develops Regulations in Vehicle Equality and Safety (She DRIVES) Act ' — a bipartisan bill requiring that NHTSA uses 'the most advanced testing devices available' and directing the agency to update federal motor vehicle safety standards.
Duffy's spokesperson said he 'appreciates Congress's interest in resolving this issue and is committed to accelerating the process to improve safety for all Americans.'
The Senate Commerce Committee, which has jurisdiction over NHTSA, voted unanimously to advance the bill to the full Senate earlier this year.
'This legislation deals with passenger safety and specifically for women to be safer when they're traveling in vehicles,' Sen. Deb Fischer, who leads the bill, told NBC News in an interview last month.
'This is truly a safety issue for women. It needs to be addressed,' added Fischer, a Nebraska Republican. 'There's a simple fix, and that fix is to be able to have crash test dummies that reflect a woman's lighter frame, lesser weight than an average man, and to gather the data from that in order to make these vehicles safer for women to travel in.'
Asked why Congress needs to act to force NHTSA to update safety regulations, she replied: 'Sometimes manufacturers need to be pushed a little bit, but I think it always needs to be based on science and facts, and that's what we have here. We have facts out there that show that there is a problem. It's a big safety problem, and there's a simple fix. So let's do it.'
Since her accident, Kuhn has shared her story with several lawmakers, many of whom support a legislative solution. The She DRIVES Act is 'unifying' and 'nonpartisan,' Kuhn said.
'With enough determination and commitment, we can come together as Americans to make our country a better place for everyone,' she added.
'It is difficult when you entrust your government to protect you and take care of you, and when they fail to do that, it costs lives,' Kuhn said, adding, 'Everybody deserves to feel safe in a car.'

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Belfast Telegraph
an hour ago
- Belfast Telegraph
Five killed by Israeli fire near aid points, Palestinians say
The Israeli military said it fired warning shots at people who approached its forces early on Sunday. Four bodies were brought to Nasser Hospital in Gaza's southern city of Khan Younis. Palestinian witnesses there said Israeli forces had fired on them at about 6am at a roundabout half-a-mile from a site run by the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF) in the nearby city of Rafah. The Israeli military said it fired warning shots at people it said were suspects who had advanced towards its forces and ignored warnings to turn away. It said the shooting occurred in an area in southern Gaza that is considered an active combat zone at night. Al-Awda Hospital said it received the body of a 42-year-old man and 29 people who were injured near another GHF aid distribution point in central Gaza. The military said it fired warning shots in the area at around 6.40am but did not see any casualties. A GHF spokesperson said there was no violence in or around its distribution sites, all three of which delivered aid on Sunday. The group had closed them temporarily last week to discuss safety measures with the Israeli military and has warned people to stay on designated access routes. The past two weeks have seen frequent shootings near the new hubs where thousands of desperate Palestinians are being directed to collect food. Witnesses say nearby Israeli troops have opened fire, and more than 80 people have been killed, according to Gaza hospital officials. Israel's military has said it fired warning shots or, in some instances, near individuals approaching its forces. Witnesses said Sunday's shooting in southern Gaza occurred at around 6am, when they were told the site would open. Many had headed towards it early to try and get desperately needed food before the crowds. Adham Dahman, 30, who was at Nasser Hospital with a bandage on his chin, said a tank had fired at them. 'We didn't know how to escape,' he said. 'This is trap for us, not aid.' Zahed Ben Hassan, another witness, said someone next to him was shot in the head. He said he and others pulled the body from the scene and managed to flee to the hospital. 'They said it was a safe area from 6am until 6pm,' he said. 'So why did they start shooting at us? There was light out, and they have their cameras and can clearly see us.' The hubs are set up inside Israeli military zones – where independent media have no access – and are run by GHF, a new group of mainly American contractors. Israel wants it to replace a system co-ordinated by the United Nations and international aid groups.


NBC News
2 hours ago
- NBC News
Sen. Cory Booker says he won't accept campaign donations from Elon Musk
Sen. Cory Booker on Sunday said that he would not accept campaign donations from tech mogul Elon Musk but urged the former Trump advisor to "get involved right now in a more substantive way" in Democrats' push against the sweeping GOP-backed spending bill. "This bill is disastrous for our long-term economy," Booker told NBC News' "Meet the Press." "This is an American issue, and I welcome Elon Musk not to my campaign. I welcome him right now, not to sit back and just fire off tweets, get involved right now in a more substantive way, in putting pressure on Congress people and senators to not do this." Asked directly whether he would ever accept campaign funding from Musk, Booker said, "I would not accept money from Elon Musk for my campaign, but I would be supportive of anybody, including Elon Musk, putting resources forward right now to let more Americans know," about the bill. Booker's remarks come as other Democrats, like California Rep. Ro Khanna, have floated welcoming Musk into the Democratic party after a feud between President Donald Trump and the Tesla and SpaceX CEO exploded into public view last week. "We should ultimately be trying to convince him that the Democratic Party has more of the values that he agrees with,' Khanna told Politico last week after Musk and Trump fired off a series of social media posts online criticizing each other. The falling out started after Musk called the budget bill a "disgusting abomniation" in a post on X. In subsequent posts on Truth Social, the president accused Musk of "wearing thin" and said "he just went crazy." Musk later accused Trump of " ingratitude" in another post on X after he spent $250 million boosting Trump's campaign in 2024 and accused Trump of links to deceased sex offender Jeff Epstein in a now-deleted post. On Saturday, in a phone call with NBC News, Trump said he has no desire to repair his relationship with Musk after their public spat. The president also responded to a direct question about what might happen if Musk decided to financially support Democrats in the 2026 midterm elections, days after Musk wrote in a post on X,"In November next year, we fire all politicians who betrayed the American people," appearing to refer to Republicans who voted for the GOP-backed spending bill in the House. 'If he does, he'll have to pay the consequences for that,' Trump told NBC News, adding that there could be "serious consequences." In May, House Republicans passed a sweeping domestic policy bill called the "One Big Beautiful Bill Act" that extends tax cuts passed in the first Trump administration, increases funding for border security and eliminates federal taxes on tips and overtime pay. The bill has also drawn scrutiny from Democrats for slashing funding for Medicaid and some food stamps while implementing work requirements for Medicaid, which provides healthcare for low income Americans. Musk and some Senate Republicans have blasted the bill for estimated effects it could have on the federal debt and deficit, though Trump and House Republicans have downplayed those concerns. "More Americans have to understand that if this bill passes, average Americans are going to see their costs skyrocket as this president again pushes legislation that is indicative of his chaos, corruption and cruelty towards Americans," Booker said on Sunday.


Daily Mail
3 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Harrowing map shows cancer explosion that'll make you put down your favorite drink... have you left it too late?
Drinking alcohol is fueling a silent epidemic of cancer that's now killing 70 Americans every day, a study has claimed. Researchers from the University of Miami say the number of American adults dying from alcohol-linked cancers has doubled over the last three decades. Your browser does not support iframes. Your browser does not support iframes. Your browser does not support iframes.