The Irish economy has performed well and entered 2025 in a strong position
The Irish economy has performed well, with the domestic economy, as measured by the Modified Gross National Income, estimated to have grown by about 4% in 2024, according to the International Monetary Fund's annual review of the Irish economy.
The IMF Staff Report for the 2025 Article IV Consultation said the domestic economy is projected to continue growing, albeit at a slower pace in a highly uncertain global environment.
It also noted there are significant external downside risks to growth and public finances, which are vulnerable to external trade and tax policy shifts.
Ireland's 2025 Article IV Consultation was set against the backdrop of Budget 2025 which was framed in the context of a continued need to improve public services and accelerate infrastructure to support a growing population and the competitiveness of the Irish economy.
The Report sets out the views of the IMF on the current position of the Irish economy and identifies key structural factors that will have a bearing on domestic living standards in the years ahead.
The Minister for Finance Paschal Donohoe said he welcomed the IMF's assessment of the results achieved and noted the risks highlighted in the report.
"I note and share the IMF's assessment of external risks, notably the reversal of globalisation, the ongoing disruption caused by regional conflicts, domestic capacity constraints, and the uncertainty in relation to corporation tax receipts," said Minister Donohoe.
"While I acknowledge Ireland's vulnerability to the rise in global uncertainty, our economy has demonstrated resilience in the face of consecutive large shocks.
"I acknowledge the IMF's recommendation of a broadly neutral fiscal stance for the upcoming budget and five-year fiscal plan."
Minister Donohoe said the Programme for Government has committed to delivering a clear and credible macroeconomic and fiscal framework and one that would prioritise continued economic resilience through investment in capital spending and funds for future needs.
"I welcome the IMF's strong support for the two savings funds which the Government has established. By the end of this year, I expect a total of €16 billion to be saved in the funds."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Examiner
an hour ago
- Irish Examiner
Cianan Brennan: Why didn't government admit its error with biometric public services cards?
Six years ago, the Data Protection Commission (DPC) went mano-a-mano with the government of the day over the infamous public services card, and ended up in a long legal war of attrition. That battle involved a simple question: Could the card be used as a catch-all portal for citizens accessing the State's services, regardless of their wishes? That particular spat was more than a little unedifying, ending up in a wholesale climbdown on the part of the Department of Social Protection in December 2021. However, yesterday's decision by the commission to fine the department €550,000 and order it to suspend the biometric processing of the public's data via the card should be even more seismic. €550,000 is five times the amount of the next-largest fine for breach of GDPR by a public body, and more than half of the maximum allowable. Puzzling defence of the indefensible Six years is a long time, however, and the world is a different place now. This time round, the State may be more willing to take its punishment from its own regulator. That in itself would be borderline farcical. The government — former social protection minister Regina Doherty being probably the most noteworthy culprit — argued for years that the card did not carry biometric data, despite it being plainly obvious to anyone with common sense that it did — in this case, a photo used for facial matching. Why did the State spend hundreds of thousands of euro in taxpayers' money defending the indefensible? The answer may be because it couldn't afford not to. Why did it do so? Because it couldn't afford not to. Having stated until it was blue in the face that black was indeed white, to change tack in any way would have been legally disastrous. Why the government of the day couldn't just hold its hands up and admit fault in the first place, rather than spending hundreds of thousands of euro in taxpayers' money defending the indefensible, we may never definitively know. However, we can speculate. The card is deeply ingrained in Irish society now, but that wasn't the case to quite the same extent in 2019. Furthermore, back then GDPR was brand new. It was so new that the initial investigation into the public service card was carried out under Ireland's previous Data Protection Act. Under that act, the commission had far fewer teeth to impose fines. GDPR is now a firmly embedded, if not universally beloved, EU policy. Maybe in 2019 it was felt the time wasn't right for the government to eat crow on its ambitious biometric card venture. Range of views in data protection community Those we polled yesterday across Ireland's niche data protection community had different views as to whether or not the Government, in the guise of the Department of Social Protection, will go the legal route once more. One said: The circumstances have changed. The data protection and GDPR landscape is much clearer now than it was under the old act. 'It seems more likely than not that this is one that won't be challenged, at least not in court.' However, there was little consensus. 'For years, they [the department] have been shouting that there is no biometric data on the card. Now this decision from the regulator is unequivocal that there is. Can they really back down from that? Would that be in character?' a second expert asked. DPC will defend its decision 'very robustly' Should the Government press the nuclear button once more and appeal the decision to the courts, deciding commissioner Dale Sutherland has made it clear that 'we will very robustly defend our decision'. He said: We are well used to this. It is a feature of our system. There are other puzzling aspects to yesterday's decision, not least the sheer length of time it took. The biometrics investigation had been set in train even before the 2019 decision, which dealt specifically with whether or not the government had the right to make the card mandatory for public services such as passport applications, yet it was only officially commenced in July of 2021. It then took four more years to complete, during which time the card has become ever more embedded in Irish society. That is surely an inordinate amount of time to take over a key investigation concerning personal data. 'This was a complex inquiry with complex issues,' Mr Sutherland said. 'The resources these inquiries take are just extraordinary. This one took a bit of time,' he added, while allowing 'it's probably a bit longer than we would have liked'. Digital Rights Ireland, whose initial complaint spurred the investigations back in 2017, professed itself 'concerned' at the length of time it had taken to finalise the probe. A spokesperson added that the decision 'leaves the Government in a very serious situation', given it has spent 'hundreds of millions of euro on an illegal public service card project'. Mr Sutherland stressed, however, that 'the important thing is that it [the investigation] is done now'. Asked whether the world had moved on in the last six years, he said: 'The principles haven't.'
Irish Examiner
2 hours ago
- Irish Examiner
Rosita Sweetman: I was poor when the country was — being poor in a rich Ireland must be torture
Being 'poor' is miserable. Being poor in an affluent society is torture. Ireland is now, statistically, one of the richest countries in the world - but child poverty, or children in consistent poverty, has increased by an astonishing 78% in the past year, according to a new report. And renting a house, never mind buying a house, for you and your children, has never been more difficult. This week the Government serendipitously announced its plans for the housing market where rents on Daft show new build apartments in Dublin (seemingly made mostly of MDF) are €2,300 for a single bed, €3,500 for a double. So what does our delightful new government do? Sadly, far from beating their breasts, saying, our nation's children should not be in 'consistent poverty', our lovely young people should not be beggaring themselves to rent or buy a home, our old people should definitely not be forced to sell their homes and go into so-called 'homes' where they could be neglected or even unsafe, the Government plan to bring in legislation that will enable landlords to raise rents even higher. They say it's the only way to increase supply. In a way, it's not surprising. We've been bastards to each other over property ever since the Famine, when Gombeenism, (ie taking over your dying or emigrating neighbour's gaff) signalled the birth of native capitalism. It's a tradition so ingrained that many of our politicians run side hustles as landlords. Remember the Celtic Tiger, when Bertie and Co whipped the country into a frenzy of acquisition that everyone knew was going to end in a massive crash? And when the crash hit the property boys circled the wagons, bailed out the banks, created Nama. Welfare was slashed. Supports for the vulnerable were slashed. Social and affordable builds came to a stop. Hospitals and schools had their budgets shaved to the bone. New entrants to teaching, nursing, the police, the civil service got salaries a fraction of their predecessors'. Housing regeneration projects in the most deprived areas were abandoned. To top it all the 'poor' were openly derided. Remember a plush, well fed Leo Varadkar and his 'Welfare cheats cheat us all?' schtick? A slogan that whitewashed the reality: since the crash the wealthy have been increasing their take, worldwide. A 2024 Oxfam report showed that billionaire wealth increased by €13 billion in 2024, or €35.6 million per day. It's the dodgy ground on which our current crisis is built. Poverty in the 90s Going through papers and photograph albums recently for my memoir, ' Girl with a fork in a world of soup', I was struck over and again how poor my children and I were in the 90s when my marriage crashed. We were lucky in one way, I'd managed to keep our home (despite vigorous attempts to ensure the opposite by my ex), we had a roof over our heads. But with the charmingly named 'Deserted Wives Allowance' then IR£69 a week, heating the house was not possible. Mould marched the walls. Eating right was not possible either. We went from proper hot dinners to yellow pack pizzas. All our clothes came from charity shops. I had unpaid bills in every small supermarket for miles. "Everything in this house is broken," said the son of one of the school mums who came to visit. She was mortified but he was right. You think you live in a decent society, that there will be a safety net when you fall, but no. The children and I fell and fell through a whistling void. As we went down I sold paintings, rugs, desks, cabinets, more paintings. Anything I could lay my hands on to keep us afloat. I went to the family lawyer to find he was now working for 'the other side', ie my ex. I went to Social Welfare who said they couldn't help since I was still 'technically' married. I went to a GP who said I should take a holiday, away from the children; I seemed "very stressed". Through gritted teeth I explained I didn't have enough money to get to the end of the week, never mind go on holiday, never mind getting someone to mind the children who anyway were also deeply traumatised and would have suffered more if I'd left. I went to the local priest. He almost tore his soutane in half, slamming the drawer of his desk, stuffed with cheque books and see-through envelopes bulging with rolls of notes. Once a film company used the house as a location. When their cheque for IR£1,300 was read by our local bank as IR£3,300 I whooped. Money! When the bank took me to court their representative said: "She went to DID Electrical the next day and bought a new washing machine, and a fridge!" As if I'd blown their precious loot on heroin. Thankfully that judge was just. The case was dismissed. For once, it wasn't Josephine Soap's fault. It was the bank's. For not reading the cheque properly. Hurray! The Dublin housing market When, after 17 years, the children and I were forced to leave our home for other reasons, we encountered the Wild West that is the Dublin rental market. Oh boy. The first home we got was a beauty but at €2,300 a month roared through the money my mum had left us. The next house - about one tenth the size of the first - was a former groom's habitat off South Circular Road. Then it was an old Georgian off Leinster Road with cartoonishly avaricious landlords. When we asked permission to strip out an old and stinking carpet and paint the three flights of stairs white they agreed. Then they served notice. The place looked so lovely it was going back on the market the following week at twice the price. The next landlord was an ex-garda. When he couldn't legally hike his rent he booted us on the grounds his daughter was moving in and charged us for 'cleaning' new curtains, bringing the pine table and the sofa we'd left behind to the dump. When I looked through the window a month later there were strangers, enjoying our stuff with nary a daughter to be seen. When I tried to take up the case with the PRTB - the Private Rental Tenancies Board, it went nowhere, and of course the PRTB replaces all recourse to the courts, so that was that. Happy Gombeening. Rosita Sweetman: 'When, after 17 years, the children and I were forced to leave our home for other reasons, we encountered the Wild West that is the Dublin rental market. Oh boy.' Throughout our shenanigans I had the advantage of being educated. Of having a voice, however small. Imagine the despair trying to navigate this entanglement without those advantages? Being poor is miserable. Being poor and at the mercy of landlords who've basically been given free rein is going to be terrifying for so many. Being the child of poor parents at the mercy of this system has got to be the worst of all. Come on Irish government. We're rich. We have billionaires amongst us. We can do better than this, for everyone. Can't we?
Irish Times
2 hours ago
- Irish Times
Tariff ‘uncertainties' could ‘weigh heavily' on Irish economic growth
Ireland is the country most exposed to the threat of US tariffs after Mexico and Canada, the OECD said on Tuesday, with exports to the US accounting for close to 20 per cent of GDP. The group's economic outlook says Donald Trump's trade policies will damage consumer and business sentiment in Ireland and could 'weigh heavily' on economic growth if the US administration adds pharmaceuticals to the list of imports subjected to tariffs. The Paris-based organisation also warned that public spending in the Republic is 'surging' as the new Government rolls out measures announced in Budget 2025. While the State's tax revenues remain strong, the impact of Mr Trump's trade agenda could lead to 'weaker' returns, putting pressure on the public coffers. The OECD said these 'looming risks warrant greater fiscal prudence' on the Coalition's part. READ MORE The organisation also warned that mounting uncertainties around tariffs are expected to weigh on consumer and business sentiment and 'restrain business investment and household consumption' in 2025 and 2026. Due to the 'key role of a few foreign-owned multinationals in export-oriented sectors, like pharmaceuticals or advanced computer and business services', it said, new industry-specific tariffs could lower economic growth and 'adversely impact fiscal balances'. In Ireland, GDP group is now projected to come in at 3.7 per cent this year, falling to 2.3 per cent in 2026. Modified domestic demand, which controls for the big distortions arising from the activity of multinationals, is projected to expand by 2.2 per cent in 2025 and 2.1 per cent best year, in 2026, below its long-term average of 2.7. Gloablly. the OECD forecasts global economic growth to slow to 2.9 per cent this year from 3.3 per cent in 2024. It expects the rate of expansion in the US will tumble further, to 1.6 per cent from 2.8 per cent last year – an outlook that is significantly lower than its projection 2.2 per cent in March. Washington's policies have tipped the world economy into a downturn clouded in heightened uncertainty, with the US among the hardest hit, it said in its twice-yearly economic outlook report on Tuesday. 'Weakened economic prospects will be felt around the world, with almost no exception,' chief economist Alvaro Pereira said. 'Lower growth and less trade will hit incomes and slow job growth.' The assessment indicates how Trump's policies have become the most pressing problem for the global economy, with no easy solution in sight. The situation could yet be exacerbated by retaliation from US trading partners, a further erosion of confidence, or another bout of repricing on financial markets, the OECD said. The club of 38 rich countries published its forecasts just as its members' ministers convene in Paris for an annual meeting. Top commerce officials are expected there include US trade representative Jamieson Greer and EU trade commissioner Maroš Šefčovič. Lin Feng, a representative from China's ministry of commerce, is also scheduled to attend. 'Agreements to ease trade tensions and lower tariffs and other trade barriers will be instrumental to revive growth and investment and avoid rising prices,' the OECD said. 'This is by far the most important policy priority.' Yet the organisation also said that even if Trump reversed course on tariffs, the bonus in terms of growth and reduced inflation would not materialise immediately, due to a persistent drag from heightened uncertainty over policy. For the US, the OECD said curbs on immigration and a sizeable reduction in the federal workforce add to the trade-related drag on the economy. It also cautioned that the budget deficit will expand further as the effect of weaker economic activity will more than offset spending cuts and revenues from tariffs. Inflation in the US will also move higher this year, making it likely that the Federal Reserve will not resume easing policy until 2026, according to the OECD. That process may even be derailed if consumer-price expectations get de-anchored, it added. Besides the fallout from global trade, the organisation also warned that fiscal risks are intensifying around the world, with 'tremendous' pressures for more spending on defence, climate and ageing populations. It called for governments to reduce non-essential spending and raise revenues by broadening tax bases. – Additional reporting by Bloomberg
