Denbighshire, Conwy, Gwynedd & Anglesey MPs back assisted dying bill
This does not mean the bill has become law, but it allows it to now progress to the House of Lords for further scrutiny.
The majority almost halved since the last vote in November, during the bill's second reading.
If successful, the bill would make assisted suicide legal for terminally ill adults expected to die within six months, and with the mental capacity to make a choice about how to end their life.
Below are comments from MPs Llinos Medi, Liz Saville Roberts, Claire Hughes, Gill German and Becky Gittins on why they all backed the bill.
Llinos Medi (Image: Submitted) "I am assured that the bill has been strengthened during the scrutiny process. For example, I voted in favour of an amendment to prevent health professionals such as doctors from initiating conversations with under-18s about assisted dying, which passed.
"Regardless of today's vote, scrutiny does not end here. As MPs, we have a duty and I remain committed to listening to all voices, including those who oppose the bill.
"Whatever your opinion on today's outcome, I believe that we should show respect to both sides of the debate. Days like today are not easy and we must show compassion to all."
Liz Saville Roberts (Image: Submitted) "I believe that adults who are terminally ill, with a prognosis of six months or less to live, and who have full mental capacity, should have the legal right to make this profoundly personal decision for themselves, free from coercion and with strong safeguards in place.
"I fully understand the concerns many people, including disability rights groups and medical organisations, have raised about protecting individuals.
"That is why I support the inclusion of strict safeguards, involving medical professionals, social workers and judicial oversight, to ensure that each decision is carefully assessed, voluntary, and free from pressure.
"I am also conscious of concerns about the so-called 'slippery slope'. However, the bill is tightly framed, applying only to terminally ill adults and excluding those whose suffering is solely related to mental illness. Any further changes would require full parliamentary scrutiny."
Claire Hughes (Image: Submitted) "Fundamentally, I believe we should all have the right to decide what happens to our bodies and when enough is enough.
"I believe that the status quo - where only terminally ill people with the wealth to enable them to travel to Dignitas are able to exercise control over their final moments - is not good enough.
"This bill has gone through a robust process, making it rigorous, practical and safe, and is rooted in the principles of compassion, justice and human dignity.
"I want, again, to make it abundantly clear that good palliative care and giving terminally ill people the choice to choose an assisted death, are not mutually exclusive."
Gill German (Image: Rick Matthews) "During report stage, I supported New Clause 10, which expands the bill's protection for medical practitioners to ensure they have 'no obligation' to administer an assisted death and provide legal protections for medical professionals to ensure they are not subject to punishment for refusing to carry out an assisted death.
"Further, I voted against New Clause 1 and 2. While I respect the deeply held views on all sides, I believe both amendments introduced unnecessary risks by restricting open, compassionate conversations between clinicians and patients that are often essential to end-of-life care.
"New Clause 1, which was not adopted, would have banned doctors from raising assisted dying with adult patients at all, even when clinically appropriate. This clause would disproportionately harm those with lower health literacy who may not know how to start the conversation.
"New Clause 2, which was passed, prevents doctors from discussing assisted dying with under-18s in any context. I believe this risks isolating terminally ill teenagers or young relatives of dying patients, by preventing doctors from discussing assisted dying with under-18s in any context.
"This may drive vulnerable young people towards unregulated and potentially harmful sources of information."
Becky Gittins (Image: Submitted) "I believe there are as many safeguards as practically possible contained within this bill to ensure free and fair choice for patients to make this decision in an informed way, free from coercion.
"I hope that the high level of parliamentary scrutiny that this bill has received will encourage a more forensic consideration of the role of patient decision-making across the UK and broader society.
"Throughout the legislative process, the attention given to the needs of the most vulnerable people and the importance of ensuring a free choice has brought an essential focus on the role of coercion, domestic abuse, disability, ableism and poverty on people's ability to genuinely make a free decision about their lives – whether on this issue or many others."
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
STV News
26 minutes ago
- STV News
Congestion charge could force businesses to leave city, council warned
The introduction of a congestion charge in Glasgow could lead to businesses moving out of the city, the Chamber of Commerce has warned. Glasgow City Council has been considering a number of charging options for road users and, while plans for a workplace parking tax have now been shelved, an 'at-city-boundary' congestion charge and tolling of the Clyde Tunnel remain on the table. The city's SNP group has said it would seek to exempt Glasgow residents from any new charge, which would be paid by those entering the city from other council areas. The options are being investigated as part of efforts to reduce car use and increase revenue. But Stuart Patrick, chief executive of Glasgow Chamber of Commerce, said: 'We cannot support a city-wide congestion charge until public transport improvements have been made in line with the conclusions of the Connectivity Commission. 'We are very concerned about the possible displacement of business out of Glasgow. We believe the city council needs support from the Scottish Government to deliver priority transport projects such as the Clyde Metro and the Glasgow City Region Bus Partnership improvement plan.' The Connectivity Commission, chaired by Professor David Begg, proposed a range of measures to upgrade the city's transport capacity, including a Metro system. The city's Labour group also opposes the proposed congestion charge and Clyde Tunnel toll. It has said residents from Ayrshire, Lanarkshire, East Renfrewshire, East Dunbartonshire and beyond would be forced to pay to visit Glasgow for work, family or social reasons. Cllr Angus Millar, SNP, the council's convener for climate, transport and city centre recovery, said: 'I think it is important that we as a council fully explore any and all opportunities we have to utilise powers and to raise revenues to support the sustainable transport transition that we are undertaking.' He was 'a little bit confused around some of the statements from Labour colleagues' as the group had previously supported proposals for congestion charging and it had been included in the council's strategic plan, which passed unanimously. Cllr Millar said it was 'a chicken and egg discussion', adding: 'If we want to see significant improvements on public transport then we need to be able to identify where the investment is coming from to make those investments.' He was speaking at the city's economy, housing, transport and regeneration city policy committee,which received an update on potential charging options today. They were asked to note progress, including the decision to halt work on a workplace parking levy, rather than approve any plans. Bailie Anthony Carroll, Greens, proposed an amendment which would have seen a possible workplace parking charge revisited once controlled parking zones are in place across the city. A parking scheme would have required businesses and workplaces to hold a licence for spaces they provide to staff and visitors, with licence charges based on the number of places available. It was estimated it could have raised over £8m per year. But officials reported there is 'limited commercial and public appetite' for the scheme and they will direct resources towards other options. Bailie Carroll said funds raised through a levy could help to 'actually improve our public transport systems' as the council has not received the same UK Government support as regions in England. Cllr John Carson, Glasgow Labour's deputy leader, said: 'We are against a workplace parking levy. 'People can dress it up in various narratives, but ultimately we see it very clearly as the Scottish Government passing the buck onto local authorities rather than giving us the money that we need to run and enhance our city.' The amendment only received two votes as SNP councillors supported the initial recommendations to note the update and Labour members chose to abstain. Get all the latest news from around the country Follow STV News Scan the QR code on your mobile device for all the latest news from around the country
The Herald Scotland
an hour ago
- The Herald Scotland
Fife councillor defects to Nigel Farage's Reform UK
'After thoughtful consultation I am delighted to join Reform UK to become part of a team who want to deliver real change for our communities,' she told The Courier. 'I want more grown up, authentic politics and an opportunity to work together to offer better. 'I look forward to this exciting new chapter and I remain fully committed to serving the people of Fife.' Fife councillor Julie MacDougall. (Image: Fife Council) Cllr MacDougall quit the Labour Party after she was not selected to stand in the Kirkcaldy and Cowdenbeath constituency ahead of the 2024 general election. The party instead selected Medical Aid for Palestinians CEO Melanie Ward, who was elected in July 2024. Cllr MacDougall, whose father John served as MP for Glenrothes between 2001 and 2008, said the decision was "disrespectful and insulting". In a post on X, Reform Scotland UK welcomed the Fife councillor to the party, tweeting: "Delighted to welcome Cllr MacDougall to Reform UK. "Julie MacDougall is a hardworking Fife councillor having previously been elected for Labour, she is the daughter of former Fife Labour MP John MacDougall. Julie is a fantastic local champion and a great addition to Team Reform." Reform UK has secured more than a dozen councillor defections across Scotland in recent months. Renfrewshire councillor Jamie McGuire, formerly of Labour, defected to Reform in June, amidst the heated Hamilton, Larkhall, and Stonehouse by-election. The 25-year-old, who previously served as chair of Glasgow University's Labour club, said at the time: "I joined Reform because I see it as a genuine opportunity to tackle the deep structural issues holding Britain back. 'We are in a state of managed decline – with overstretched public services, an uncompetitive tax system and too many people being left behind." Read more: 'A slap in the face': Reform's Scottish defectors will face the public's wrath Best get used to it: Reform and indy will be at the heart of our debate for years 'Absolute nonsense': Reform denies SNP defection claim after council website glitch According to polling guru Sir John Curtice, Reform could become the second largest party at Holyrood after the next election. Speaking at The Herald's Unspun Live event, he said: 'I think at the moment it is a race between Reform and Labour over who comes second, and unless the popularity of the Labour government improves, Labour may find themselves in much the same position as they are at the moment. "The lesson of the last Westminster parliament is not to presume that the outcome of the last election is going to determine what happens at the next one.'
The Independent
an hour ago
- The Independent
Warning Labour's rewilding plans could trigger surge in UK wildfires
Gamekeepers have warned that the government 's rewilding proposals could trigger an increase in wildfires across the UK. Labour has plans to ban winter burning from over half of England's peatland. The changes are claimed to help 're-wet' the country's peat bogs, as well as reduce the chances of wildfires and decrease carbon emissions. Environmentalists argue that peat bogs must be preserved as they soak up huge amounts of carbon, while landowners and gamekeepers say burning restrictions will, in fact, enable wildfires to break out that will be 'too large to fight'. Winter burning is a controlled traditional upland management technique whereby firebreaks in upland areas are established by creating strips of less flammable foliage. It is used to decrease the amount of fuel for possible wildfires and slow the speed at which blazes can spread. However, in conservation areas of 'deep peat', of a depth of 40cm or deeper, the burns were banned in 2021, covering 222,000 hectares of land. The Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (Defra) is now looking into lowering the threshold for 'deep peat' to 30cm, which would extend the restrictions to 368,000 hectares. It says wetter peat will decrease the likelihood of wildfires, while gamekeepers argue the plans would leave Britain's moors and heaths more vulnerable. Andrew Gilruth, chief executive of the Moorland Association, told The Telegraph: 'This is our worst-ever year for wildfires. Britain is burning because of the religion of rewilding. 'It is obvious to everyone bar Natural England that, with climate change making vegetation tinder-dry, increasing this fuel load through rewilding is a really stupid idea. It makes for bigger, more intense blazes which can move at frightening speed.' 'I think the whole thing is very concerning – not just from a loss-of-habitat point of view, but also putting firefighters and land managers in real danger from the inevitable wildfires. 'The whole thing is becoming a massive tinderbox and a bomb that is going off. At the moment, re-wetting is increasing the fuel level on the moors and that is a real concern. Prescribed burning will not stop wildfires, but it reduces the length of flames and allows fires to be contained quicker.' More proposals include removing an exemption to current restrictions, which would allow burns to continue on 'inaccessible' land. Adrian Blackmore, the director of shooting at the Countryside Alliance, described Defra's plans as 'staggering'. He told The Telegraph: 'They are showing a staggering lack of understanding or knowledge. Burns reduce the fire load, encourage young growth for the birds to eat and encourage the growth of sphagnum moss, which is the peat-forming moss. 'So if you don't remove the canopy, you can't encourage sphagnum moss, because it's not going to grow underneath it. And sphagnum moss is the be-all and end-all, making moors wetter.' A Defra spokesperson told The Independent: 'Our peatlands are home to Britain's most precious wildlife, while also storing carbon and reducing flooding risk. With 13 per cent of the world's blanket bog in the UK, we've consulted on ways to ensure these rare habitats are better protected. We will set out our response in due course.' Heatwaves and consistent dry weather have seen the London Fire Brigade tackle more wildfires this summer than in the whole of 2024. A senior firefighter said that crews were experiencing a 'busy summer' and that they were working under 'very challenging conditions' to bring the blazes under control. Wildfires have even been raging in Scotland this summer, a place that rarely sees blazes break out. The Scottish Gamekeepers Association warned the fires were limiting the ability of 'stretched' firefighters to respond to other emergencies, so they were 'becoming a danger to human life'. Land managers can apply for licences to burn for the purpose of wildfire management, which are regulated and issued by Defra. The Defra spokesperson said repeated burning risks permanently altering the species composition and hydrology of peatland habitats. They added that peat that is wet is less likely to burn during a wildfire, builds new peat and loses less carbon through oxidation, protecting the stored carbon of old peat and ensuring that the habitat persists.
