logo
Movie revieW: ‘Jurassic World Rebirth' has few moments of fun

Movie revieW: ‘Jurassic World Rebirth' has few moments of fun

Miami Heralda day ago
LOS ANGELES, June 30 (UPI) --Jurassic World Rebirth, in theaters Wednesday, has some fun moments but they are never in service of anything significant. The premise is so overcomplicated that even "dinosaurs eating people" becomes mundane.
Set several years after 2022's Jurassic World Dominion, on-screen text informs viewers that since dinosaurs escaped captivity, modern climate and diseases largely killed them again. The survivors migrated to tropical climates near the Equator, and travel to those regions has been prohibited.
This leads to a fun image of an ailing brontosaurus causing traffic in New York, to which New Yorkers are more upset about the traffic than the dinosaur. The angle of the public losing interest in dinosaurs becomes a major thematic problem of the film.
Martin Krebs (Rupert Friend) hires special ops freelancer Zora Bennett (Scarlett Johansson) to lead his secret, illegal expedition to obtain samples of the largest dinosaur hearts. Krebs' pharmaceutical company hopes to use those samples to develop medication for coronary diseases.
They recruit paleontologist Henry Loomis (Jonathan Bailey) to accompany them on the expedition, and hire Duncan Kinkaid (Mahershala Ali) to captain their covert boat.
"Running from dinosaurs" is a pretty innate story driver, so the more these films complicate putting people in that scenario, the more tenuous it gets. Medical research is spurious for two reasons.
Even if one believes Krebs is developing heart medicine for the greater good, a movie is not going to solve heart disease. If they succeed in the film, we still don't have dinosaur hearts to harvest in real life. Deep Blue Sea used Alzheimer's research as its premise, but at least sharks exist today.
Secondly, Jurassic audiences have already bought into extracting DNA from fossilized mosquitos to create dinosaurs. Rebirth is asking them to believe that those dinosaurs can also cure human diseases? Now they're just making stuff up.
The notion that dinosaurs have become a mundane nuisance is also at odds with the conceit of making a blockbuster spectacle about dinosaurs. The in-film public has lost interest in dinosaurs, and yet they still made a seventh movie?
Of course, in real life, the public never lost interest in dinosaurs, so it is a meta commentary on a phenomenon that doesn't exist. In Jurassic World Dominion, they finally made a movie where the dinosaurs got loose in the wild, and fans should be disappointed they're already walking it back.
The team encounters mutant hybrid dinosaurs that In-Gen was breeding to spruce up their theme parks. The idea that people got tired of seeing the existing dinosaurs suggests a fundamental misunderstanding of the popularity of this franchise.
Nobody ever got tired of seeing Tyrannosaurus Rexes and raptors. They just want to see them again, and see them as well done as Steven Spielberg did them.
Stop making up fake dinosaurs. The T-Rex still gets the best sequence in Rebirth.
When Rebirth attempts to serve up a sequence of majesty akin to the reveal in Spielberg's first movie, it's only a response to an artificial apathy towards dinosaurs. The mercenaries marvel at dinosaurs in their natural habitat, when the rest of the film should focus on a more organic dinosaur tale.
Rebirth adds even more characters when Duncan responds to the distress call of Reuben Delgado (Manuel Garcia-Rulfo), whose sailboat was capsized by a Mosasaurus in the ocean. Reuben's daughters Isabella (Audrina Miranda) and Teresa (Luna Blaise) are aboard too, with Teresa's stoner boyfriend Xavier (David Iacono).
The script by David Koepp, who adapted the two Michael Crichton books for the first two Jurassic Park movies, can't even commit to the professionals on a mission. It has to throw in a regular family in peril and have them dragged along on the dinosaur mission.
In Koepp's defense, by movie seven he's neither adapting a book nor crafting an original tale. He's stuck in a no man's land of corporate mandates and stringing together set pieces into some logical sense. It's a living.
The cast appears to be having fun, as if reconciled to the fact that these are the roles available in Hollywood, so they might as well make the most of it. Zora has a way of explaining to men that they are unqualified for a task while letting it be their idea to let her handle the tough jobs.
Cursory backstory is given about Zora losing a friend on a previous mission, and Duncan having a family tragedy that broke up his marriage.
Director Gareth Edwards may be having the most fun using playful tricks to show the dinosaur action, given that the payoffs to those scenes are created in post-production with visual effects.
Dinosaurs approaching behind a character's back can be a misdirect, and a Quetzalcoatlus may fly into frame showing a character's fate in its beak. Edwards even pulls off a dinosaur version of Michael Myers disappearing from view in Halloween.
None of these are as effective as the simplicity of seeing glasses of water tremble with dinosaur steps in the original Jurassic Park. Some are blatantly telegraphed when a dinosaur wanders behind a large foreground object.
But at least visually, Edwards is bringing a new approach to the franchise, even though it takes a convoluted route to get there.
One sequence blatantly forgets its own rules once the story is ready to move on. Zora and Henry go to the trouble of rappelling down an entire cliffside, but once they reach the bottom, stairs of an ancient temple appear so the rest of the group can rejoin them.
This shows the rappelling sequence was conceived with no idea how they'd get back up, or the others down. They just filmed the sequence and then decided all the characters had to be together again.
Jurassic World Rebirth is not the worst Jurassic movie. That would be Dominion.
Still, saving this franchise will require someone with clout and daring enough to remember they're still making these movies because people want to see dinosaurs. Just trust the dinosaurs.
Fred Topel, who attended film school at Ithaca College, is a UPI entertainment writer based in Los Angeles. He has been a professional film critic since 1999, a Rotten Tomatoes critic since 2001, and a member of the Television Critics Association since 2012 and the Critics Choice Association since 2023. Read more of his work in Entertainment.
2025 United Press International, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Dan Stevens to voice Solitus in new 'Lego Star Wars' special
Dan Stevens to voice Solitus in new 'Lego Star Wars' special

UPI

timean hour ago

  • UPI

Dan Stevens to voice Solitus in new 'Lego Star Wars' special

1 of 3 | Dan Stevens will voice Solitus in "Lego Star Wars: Rebuild the Galaxy - Pieces of the Past." File Photo by Derek French/UPI | License Photo July 1 (UPI) -- Downton Abbey and Beauty and the Beast actor Dan Stevens is joining the cast of a new four-part Lego Star Wars special. Stevens will lend his voice to the villain Solitus in Star Wars: Rebuild the Galaxy - Pieces of the Past, a sequel series to Star Wars: Rebuild the Galaxy (2024). The new special is due on Disney+ Sept. 19. The voice cast also includes Gaten Matarazzo, Tony Revolori, Bobby Moynihan, Marsai Martin, Michael Cusack, Ahmed Best, Mark Hamill, Ashley Eckstein and Ben Schwartz. Solitus is ready to shake things up. Dan Stevens joins LEGO Star Wars: Rebuild the Galaxy - Pieces of the Past, a four-piece special event, September 19 only on @DisneyPlus. Star Wars (@starwars) July 1, 2025 "With the new villain, Solitus, entering the scene, things are about to get a lot more complicated for this Force Builder in training," an official synopsis says of Sig Greebling's (Matarazzo) character arc. "There really isn't a tug of war between the good and the light with Solitus. It really is just a pure evil force whose main desire is control and order..." Matarazzo said. May the 4th: Fans channel the Force on Star Wars Day Star Wars fans turned out in full costume to honor the Force in in Yokohama, Kanagawa-Prefecture, Japan, on May 4, 2025. Photo by Keizo Mori/UPI | License Photo

Nation's top climate science assessments removed from federal websites
Nation's top climate science assessments removed from federal websites

UPI

timean hour ago

  • UPI

Nation's top climate science assessments removed from federal websites

The vital climate science information offered guidance to communities on the climate risks they face, as well as how to plan for and safeguard residents from climate-related disasters like floods and wildfires. File Photo by Jim Ruymen/UPI | License Photo WASHINGTON, July 1 (UPI) -- The Trump administration has quietly shut down a major federal website that hosted congressionally mandated national climate assessments, which were the U.S. government's preeminent reports on climate change impacts, risks and responses. The disappearance Monday of the U.S. Global Change Research Program's website marked an unexpected loss in public access to the most crucial source for climate-related science. Also missing was access to previous National Climate Assessments, which are robust scientific evaluations used by lawmakers, scientists and the public to understand and mitigate climate change trends. Climate scientists condemned the missing access to the vital climate science information, which offered guidance to communities on the climate risks they face, as well as how to plan for and safeguard residents from climate-related disasters like floods and wildfires. Rachel Brittin, the former deputy director of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Association's external affairs office, said the removal of the website "silences scientists" and "blinds decision-makers." "Americans deserve facts -- not censorship -- when it comes to preparing for a changing world," Brittin, who served during the current Trump administration, said in a statement to Medill News Service. Patrick Gonzalez, a climate change scientist at UC Berkeley and co-author of the third and fourth National Climate Assessments, criticized the Trump administration for "suppressing the science of human-caused climate change because they are afraid of the facts, which disprove their erroneous opinions." None of the five previous iterations of the assessment was available through the Global Change Research Program website as of Tuesday afternoon. Clicking on the 2023 Fifth National Climate Assessment produced an error message. Archived versions of the assessments were buried deep in the Environmental Protection Agency website, but only via the agency's search engine. They also could also be accessed through the Wayback Machine, a non-profit Internet archive. Some climate scientists downloaded copies of past assessments and uploaded them to their own websites after the site went dark. The White House did not respond to a request for comment concerning whether the assessments would be available again online. In 1990, Congress passed the Global Change Research Act, which mandated the federal government to create the Global Change Research Program and require a report every four years on the current state of global climate change. The National Climate Assessment qualified as a Highly Influential Scientific Assessment, which Congress mandated in 2005 be publicly accessible. President Donald Trump targeted the Global Change Research Program in the past. Trump removed Michael Kuperberg, the former executive director of the program, from the position in November 2020. Former President Joe Biden reinstated Kuperberg as head of the program in July 2021, where he oversaw the fourth and fifth editions of the National Climate Assessment. In April, scientists working on the Sixth National Climate Assessment were relieved from their duties. In the dismissal email, the administration said "the scope of the [National Climate Assessment] is currently being re-evaluated." On June 23, the Trump administration released a memorandum directing federal agencies to incorporate "Gold Standard Science" tenets into their research. In an executive order in May, Trump decreed that science must be "reproducible" and "skeptical of its findings and assumptions," among other descriptors. The administration referenced the memorandum to justify deleting another high-traffic federal website for climate change information. redirected users to the NOAA website as of June 24. In the same executive order, Trump said previous administrations "promoted scientific information in a highly misleading manner." The executive order also said that federal decision-making under this standard would use the "most credible, reliable and impartial scientific evidence available."

Review: ‘Jurassic World Rebirth' is tense but a downer, with dinosaur fatigue part of the story
Review: ‘Jurassic World Rebirth' is tense but a downer, with dinosaur fatigue part of the story

Chicago Tribune

timean hour ago

  • Chicago Tribune

Review: ‘Jurassic World Rebirth' is tense but a downer, with dinosaur fatigue part of the story

No novel in history has tailored every paragraph and plot point more deliberately for the movies than Michael Crichton's 'Jurassic Park.' There's a reason. Crichton mapped it out as a screenplay first, back in the pre-digital 1980s, when screen dinosaurs looked a little goofy still. The 1993 Steven Spielberg film changed that, building on early '90s breakthroughs in digital effects found in 'Terminator 2' and others. Spielberg oversaw several storyline changes as well, in his commercially canny pursuit of roaring terror and solemn wonder in more evenly alternating currents. The franchise has gone back and forth between those currents ever since. We've had interesting, controversial sequels (J.A. Bayona's 'Jurassic World: Fallen Kingdom,' especially when it turned into a gothic haunted house suspense affair) and billion-dollar mediocrities ('Jurassic World: Dominion'). So what's the deal with 'Jurassic World Rebirth,' beyond its blatant misspelling of the word in its title that clearly should be 'Reboot'? Mixed, let's say, and that means mixed often within the same scene. More broadly, it's mixed in the early critical reaction, considered a widely well-regarded success in the British press but mostly bleh here in these United States. 'Jurassic World Rebirth' is a genuinely peculiar seesaw, with 'Godzilla' and 'Rogue One' director Gareth Edwards managing some occasionally striking jolts amid a lot of tonal uncertainty. Rarely an exuberant spirit as a filmmaker, Edwards here directs a rather mournful script by veteran pro David Koepp, the primary adapting writer on the '93 franchise-starter. Coming off 'KIMI' and 'Black Bag' with director Steven Soderbergh, Koepp's return to dinosaurs builds its premise on what might be termed the inevitability of franchise fatigue, coded here as dinosaur fatigue in the popular imagination. The world, as this movie depicts it, has plainly had it with the human/dinosaur integration experiment. Dinosaurs are no longer trending. Fleetingly, one poor specimen glimpsed early in 'Jurassic World Rebirth,' under the Brooklyn Bridge, lives with the indignity of graffiti on his aging hide. 'Nobody cares about these animals anymore,' we hear at one point, evoking what may have been the thought balloon floating above Koepp's head as he wrote this seventh 'Jurassic' go-around. Koepp's script imagines a Big Pharma weasel (Rupert Friend, inspired by Paul Reiser's 'Aliens' antagonist every step of the way) hiring globe-trotting mercenaries (Scarlett Johansson and Mahershala Ali), an idealistic museum paleontologist (Jonathan Bailey) and a bloodthirsty hunk ('Game of Thrones' alum Ed Skrein), among others, to harvest precious DNA samples from three different bioengineered dinosaur species — land, air and water dwellers. The illegal but potentially lucrative gig takes them by boat to the forbidden (fictional) Caribbean island of Ile Saint-Hubert, not far from French Guiana. Thailand provided most of the movie's lush exterior locations. En route, the passengers on the Ali character's boat encounter two problems: the mighty and mighty hungry water dweller known as Mosasaurus, followed by a meteorological phenomenon known as the B Plot. Much of 'Jurassic World Rebirth' follows the travails of a sailing family's oceangoing excursion, interrupted by a Mosasaurus attack. Adrift but alive, dad (Manuel Garcia-Rulfo), daughter (Luna Blaise), daughter's unpromising boyfriend (David Iacono) and daughter's younger sister (Audrina Miranda) are rescued by the mercenaries' expedition. Then they're separated on the island from their rescuers. Worst vacation ever! The DNA is to be used for life-saving heart disease cures, to the benefit of millions, and with trillions in profits. It's a time-tested setup promising reasonably high stakes. Yet the early dialogue sequences are determinedly casual and easygoing to the point of 'yeah whatever.' Johansson and Ali are both formidable wellsprings of charisma but their roles stick to basics. Most everyone on screen has either suffered or is in the process of suffering, or both. Ali and Johansson's characters carry deep-seeded emotional wounds from the loss of loved ones. The anguish endured by the rescued family, especially by Miranda's traumatized preteen character, render large swaths of 'Jurassic Park Rebirth' more grueling than exciting. Compared to 165 million years for the small-brain dinosaurs, humans will be lucky to last a million years on this climate-changed, nuke-crazy planet, the Bailey character warns at one point. The movie feels more than a little down in the mouth, even with its string of cliffhangers, some visually impressive, tied together with some ill-fitting comic relief. The moments of awe, involving the pleasant, plant-eating dinosaurs, provide callbacks to previous movies (cue the John Williams 'Jurassic Park' theme for another reprise). But the conspicuous newcomer, a bio-engineered mutant misfire called Distortus rex, pushes things into a different breed of monster movie. And yet: There are flashes and occasional whole sequences when Edwards' directorial eye snaps into focus, as in the brutal but superquick demise of one shipmate, seconds after making it to safety on shore, only to learn that safety is relative. The strategic conceals and reveals of the latest predators recall the best of the director's 'Godzilla,' unfashionably sparing in the visual exploitation of its antihero. But the first-rate digital creature designs must contend with an air of weariness. Still, I'd rank 'Rebirth' ahead of two or three previous chapters in a franchise whose sole consistency lies in a simple question: How have humans survived this long, even? 'Jurassic World Rebirth' — 2.5 stars (out of 4) MPA rating: PG-13 (for intense sequences of violence/action, bloody images, some suggestive references, language, and a drug reference) Running time: 2:13 How to watch: Premieres in theaters July 2

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store