Nihon Hidankyo Member: Path Toward Denuclearization Unclear; 2026 Nonproliferation Conference to Face Challenges
Jiro Hamasumi of Nihon Hidankyo speaks to reporters at the United Nations headquarters in New York on Monday.
NEW YORK — A member of Nihon Hidankyo said that he cannot see moves toward denuclearization, following a meeting on nuclear nonproliferation at the United Nations headquarters in New York on Monday.
The third and final Preparatory Committee session for the 2026 Review Conference of the Parties to the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons (NPT) started on Monday. The Russian aggression against Ukraine and ever increasing uncertainty in the Middle East are expected to pose challenges in the latest session.
Participants at the session include Jiro Hamasumi, 79, of the Japan Confederation of A- and H-Bomb Sufferers Organizations, which was awarded the Nobel Peace Prize last year.
'Looking at the picture right now, I can't see that it's going in the direction [of denuclearization] at all,' Hamasumi told reporters after the meeting on the first day. 'We hibakusha [atomic bomb survivors] have maintained that damage caused by nuclear weapons should never be inflicted. I hope they'll discuss that more.'
The NPT is an international framework aimed at global nuclear disarmament, and 191 countries and regions have joined the treaty, including the nuclear powers of the United States, Russia, the United Kingdom, France and China. The 2015 and 2022 review conferences fell apart due to such reasons as opposition by Russia.
The current Preparatory Committee session, which will continue through May 9, will serve as an important stepping stone for consensus building at next year's conference.
Foreign Minister Takeshi Iwaya has called for the maintenance and reinforcement of the NPT framework, saying that whether nuclear power brings peace and prosperity or destruction and downfall depends on those present at the session.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yomiuri Shimbun
4 hours ago
- Yomiuri Shimbun
Zelenskyy Appoints a New Prime Minister for a War-Weary Nation
KYIV, Ukraine (AP) — Fresh off securing a plan to receive more U.S. weaponry, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy has appointed a new prime minister – the key negotiator of his country's deal with the U.S. to partner on the development of minerals. By naming Yulia Svyrydenko, the former economy minister, to become the country's first new head of government since Russia's full-scale invasion in 2022, Zelenskyy on Thursday elevated a loyal politician who has experience in diplomacy with the U.S. and other Western nations. In addition to negotiating the mineral agreement — seen as an important way of tying U.S. interests to Ukraine's security — the 39-year-old Svyrydenko has represented her country in a wide range of high-level talks with Western partners, including on issues of defense and economic recovery and reconstruction. In 2022, she negotiated with other countries to impose sanctions on Russia. The outgoing prime minister, Denys Shmyhal, will become defense minister at a time when Ukraine is looking to ramp up domestic weapons production, and as President Donald Trump seeks to bring an end to the war. 'War leaves no room for delay,' Svyrydenko said on X after the parliament voted to approve her promotion. 'We must act swiftly and decisively. Our priorities for the first six months are clear: reliable supply for the army, expansion of domestic weapons production, and boosting the technological strength of our defense forces.' Svyrydenko and Shmyhal are among a wider group of officials taking on new leadership roles as Zelenskyy aims to reenergize a war-weary nation. But to Ukrainians, the reshuffling of the Cabinet is not seen as a major shift in direction for Zelenskyy, who will still be mostly relying on the same experienced officials, as opposed to introducing new faces to his leadership team. Earlier this week, Trump endorsed a plan to have European allies buy billions of dollars of U.S. military equipment – including air-defense systems — that can be transferred to Ukraine, which has come under intense Russian attacks. 'We all want peace as soon as possible,' Zelenskyy said Thursday in a speech to Ukraine's parliament. 'At the same time, we all see how difficult it is to maintain sufficient global support, and how many other wars and crises are flaring up around the world, truly scattering global efforts. Therefore, Ukraine needs more of its own strength.' In announcing the weapons plan on Monday, Trump also made an ultimatum to Russian President Vladimir Putin, promising to impose stiff tariffs on countries that purchase its oil if he doesn't agree to a ceasefire within 50 days. Shmyhal, who announced his resignation as prime minister on Tuesday, was the longest-serving head of government in Ukraine's history, serving since March 2020. Shmyhal will replace Rustem Umerov as defense minster. Although Umerov sought to push reforms, critics said the ministry under his command was plagued by mismanagement. Also on Thursday, Zelenskyy nominated Olga Stefanishyna to become Ukraine's next ambassador to the United States. In the meantime, he appointed Stefanishyna, previously the minister for European integration, as the special representative for the development of cooperation with the United States. Ties between Ukraine and the U.S. have been uneasy since Trump returned to the White House in January, and Zelenskyy had previously said he intended to replace Oksana Markarova as Ukrainian ambassador in the U.S.
The Diplomat
8 hours ago
- The Diplomat
Balancing Prosperity and Protection: India's Place in a Complex Global Economy
Over the 33 years since I first walked into the American Embassy on Shanti Path in New Delhi, there is one change that looms over all the others — the rise of global Indian companies innovating and adding value around the world. Groups like Tata, Mahindra, and Reliance have become global players and widely known marquee brands — something that was hard to imagine in the days of 'license Raj' and an Indian economy defined by scarcity. I have been thrilled to be an observer and sometimes a participant in the rise of global India – a development that has seen the Indian GDP grow by a total of 1100 percent since the early 1990s. This rising India phenomenon has given Indian companies a significant stake in the system of international economic norms and increasing openness that the United States had championed since 1945. This successful globalization also gives Indian companies a stake when countries like Russia or China use economic power as a tool of coercion – as in China's exploitation of its monopoly in rare earth materials and permanent magnets, or Russia's manipulation of gas markets. Around the globe, countries are grappling with how to balance the prioritization of economic growth and cooperation with the imperative of protecting their country's security. This is a legitimate trade-off, particularly as countries seek to protect specific industries considered vital to their economic and national security. As countries increase their use of economic tools for national security-related ends in recent years, however, the dividing line between valid national security considerations and economic coercion for vindictive or political ends is blurring. There have been many cases in recent years when the use of economic tools has been more akin to arbitrary economic coercion. Examples include the Russian government's takeover of the Domodedovo Airport, claiming the strategic asset was at risk of foreign influence, notwithstanding the fact that its assets were owned by Russian businessman Dmitry Kamenshchik and his companies . Similarly, Russia's cutoff of gas supplies to the European Union, beginning with Bulgaria – one of the most vulnerable European states – was an effort to break European solidarity following Russia's full-scale invasion of Ukraine in 2022. Other notable examples include the Maldives' cancelation of a contract with India's GMR Infrastructure Ltd for modernization and operation of the country's main airport (for which it was later ordered to pay $270 million in compensation by an international tribunal), and China's new rare earth export regime, which has effectively blocked most exports to United States and European companies. The common thread is clear. These actions damage investment environments by creating the perception (or reality) of risk. The result in many cases is a significant decrease in foreign investment (Russia and the Maldives), and in some cases, a wholesale global effort to diversify supply chains away from the offending country (China). India stands to gain as it rejects such examples and reinforces its reputation as a reliable destination for investment. This is not the India I first got to know as a junior political officer in 1992. Since those days, India's economic transformation has been powered in large part by the trust it has gained in its business-enabling environment, allowing it to attract vast amounts of investment and spur the unprecedented growth of jobs and its economy. Now India is in a unique moment; it is already a global leader in services, and thanks to a move to reduce supply chain reliance on China, it is poised to emerge as a manufacturing powerhouse, with the workforce and skills to match its ambitions. At the same time, India faces a familiar dilemma: how to protect its national security without appearing to take arbitrary action against individual companies or engage in economic coercion. This challenge is perfectly illustrated by the case of Celebi, which recently had its security clearance and operating rights revoked by the Government of India. While the government must act in the country's security interest, and I know better than most that Indian courts will always fiercely defend their constitutional independence, it is important that this case is pursued in a manner that is seen to uphold due process. We all understand that the matter is now before the courts, which must be allowed to proceed without interference. But the government's next steps, if not carefully approached, risk being viewed as economic coercion when viewed from the outside. In particular, there is a risk that this action could be seen as an act of retribution against a Turkish company (Celebi) with a diversified set of foreign investors, in response to actions taken by the Turkish government. Notably, Indian companies and investors hold substantial assets in Turkiye, and both Indian investors abroad and foreign investors in India expect economic tools to be used with care and fairness. Hastily considered actions against companies like Celebi risk undermining the remarkable progress that India has made as a destination for foreign investment, marking a step backward, which echoes the examples we know from Russia, China, and India's own experience with the Maldives. Fair processes and the rule of law in the commercial environment within India are crucial for the country's success and will likely yield benefits in two major ways. First, foreign companies and investors will have the confidence to invest in India if they do not fear arbitrary or capricious action. Second, Indian companies working around the world will reap the benefits of goodwill and stable investment environments elsewhere – free from the tit for tat economic coercion that arbitrary and unfair processes experienced by international companies within India might spur. Additionally, if India treats foreign companies and investors in India fairly, the Indian government will have a strong foundation to stand on if it needs to go to bat for its own companies in other jurisdictions. This is extremely important: India today is globally exposed and has overwhelmingly benefited from a rules-based system. All countries are making decisions based on national security, but need to do so in a way that appropriately weighs economic factors, ensures due process, and sustains investor confidence. This is the path to ensure India's economic miracle sustains itself for the long-term and to cement India's position as the major player it desires to be on the world stage and in the global economy.
Japan Today
8 hours ago
- Japan Today
Slovakia to allow approval of new EU sanctions on Russia on Friday, PM Fico says
Slovakia will stop blocking the approval of the 18th package of European Union sanctions against Russia on Friday, Prime Minister Robert Fico said. Fico said on Thursday Slovakia had achieved as much as it could at this point, after blocking the EU's approval of the sanctions multiple times to demand guarantees against damages it fears from a separate EU plan to end all gas imports from Russia from 2028. "At this point, it would be counterproductive to continue blocking the 18th sanctions package tomorrow," Fico said in a video message posted on Facebook. EU countries' ambassadors will meet on Friday morning to approve the new sanctions, EU diplomats told Reuters. The European Commission last month proposed the 18th package of sanctions against Russia for its 2022 invasion of Ukraine, aimed at Moscow's energy revenue, banks, and military industry. The proposed package included a floating price cap on Russian oil of 15% below the average market price of crude in the previous three months, EU diplomats have said. The proposal would also ban transactions with Russia's Nord Stream gas pipelines, as well as banks that engage in sanctions circumvention. Slovakia has vetoed the package several times to try to win concessions on the separate plan to phase out Russian oil and gas, which, unlike sanctions, does not need unanimous support from EU countries. Slovakia continues to import Russian energy, including gas under a contract running until 2034, and often takes pro-Russian views on Ukraine. Fico said on Tuesday that Slovakia had received guarantees from the Commission on assistance in case of potential gas shortages or jumps in prices and transit fees, and assistance in disputes over potential damage claims from Russian supplier Gazprom. The Commission said in a letter to Slovakia on Tuesday it would intervene in potential litigation, and also clarify how an "emergency break" can be triggered if gas prices spike because of scarce supply during the Russian gas phase-out. Brussels will also develop a solution that aims to reduce the costs of cross-border tariffs on gas and oil for Slovakia, said the letter. Malta had also previously expressed reservations about the proposed Russian oil price cap, but the government said on Thursday evening it would also support the new sanctions on Friday, EU diplomats told Reuters. © Thomson Reuters 2025.
