Got ‘Trump Derangement Syndrome?' GOP lawmakers want the NIH to study an ‘epidemic on the left'
The bill sponsored by U.S. Reps. Warren Davidson, of Ohio, and Barry Moore, of Alabama, would direct the National Institutes of Health to "study the psychological and social roots" of "a phenomenon marked by extreme negative reactions to President Donald J. Trump."
The pop affliction has 'divided families, the country, and led to nationwide violence—including two assassination attempts on President Trump. The TDS Research Act would require the NIH to study this toxic state of mind, so we can understand the root cause and identify solutions,' Davidson said in a statement.
And 'instead of funding ludicrous studies such as giving methamphetamine to cats or teaching monkeys to gamble for their drinking water, the NIH should use that funding to research issues that are relevant to the real world,' Davidson added, referring to a malady that does not yet appear in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders.
And 'some individuals who suffer from Trump Derangement Syndrome have participated in nationwide political and social unrest, even trying to assassinate President Trump twice,' Moore chimed in, arguing that Davidson's 'common-sense bill will use already appropriated funds on an NIH study that can make a difference.'
It's probably worth noting here that, in the annals of political affliction, TDS isn't new.
In the early 2000s, columnist George Will asserted that President George W. Bush's fiercest critics suffered from 'Bush Derangement Syndrome.'
And if you guessed that it was followed by 'Obama Derangement Syndrome,' give yourself a gold star.
So is Trump Derangement Syndrome a mental illness or not?
Writing for Psychology Today," Rob Whitley, who's in the psychiatry faculty at McGill University in Canada, said it could be, like its predecessors, what's broadly known as a 'folk category' of mental illness.
'The name itself explicitly suggests a 'syndrome,' which the Oxford English Dictionary defines as 'a characteristic combination of opinions, emotions, or behavior.' Several commentators have run with this, putting forth suggestions about opinions, emotions and behaviors characterizing TDS,' he wrote.
The bottom line? It's probably too soon to tell.
'As such, further research is necessary to investigate the extreme reactions toward President Trump, in the same way that researchers investigate other extreme social phenomena, such as Beatlemania or the like,' Whitley wrote for Psychology Today.
Trump uses 'personal time' to meet with mysterious crypto investors
UPDATE: Harvard foreign students feel like 'poker chips,' consider transfer after Trump attacks
Federal judge blocks Trump admin from revoking Harvard enrollment of foreign students
Trump threatens Apple with 25% tariff if it doesn't make iPhones in the US
Trump Commerce boss gets put on blast with 'no pain' tariff claim
'TDS has divided families, the country, and led to nationwide violence—including two assassination attempts on President Trump. The TDS Research Act would require the NIH to study this toxic state of mind, so we can understand the root cause and identify solutions.' said Rep. Davidson (R-OH).
'Trump Derangement Syndrome has become an epidemic on the Left,' said Rep. Moore (R-AL). 'Some individuals who suffer from Trump Derangement Syndrome have participated in nationwide political and social unrest, even trying to assassinate President Trump twice. Rep. Davidson's common-sense bill will use already appropriated funds on an NIH study that can make a difference.'
Background:
The TDS Research Act addresses a critical issue: the instinctual negative and often violent reaction to any supportive statement or event related to President Trump. By leveraging NIH's existing programs at the National Institute of Mental Health, the bill will:
Investigate TDS's origins and contributing factors, including the media's role in amplifying the spread of TDS.
Analyze its long-term impacts on individuals, communities, and public discourse.
Explore interventions to mitigate extreme behaviors, informing strategies for a healthier public square.
Provide data-driven insights into how media and polarization shape political violence and social unrest.
Require an annual report to Congress.
No Additional Spending: Uses existing NIH resources and avoids new spending.
Read the original article on MassLive.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
USA Today
22 minutes ago
- USA Today
Will JD Vance run for president in 2028? VP pressed on potential White House bid
WASHINGTON - Vice President JD Vance said it's "way too early" to consider the 2028 election as political observers speculate about whether he'll launch a White House bid. The conversations comes after President Donald Trump suggested Vance was 'most likely' the heir to the MAGA movement to reporters on Aug. 5. Though Trump hasn't formally endorsed a GOP successor, he acknowledged that Vance would 'probably be favored at this point.' Trump also said Secretary of State Marco Rubio is 'somebody that maybe would get together with JD in some form.' Vance said on Fox News' 'Sunday Morning Futures' that he saw Rubio a month ago and both of them just 'laughed at the whole thing.' 'Neither one of us are focused on politics. We're focused on actually doing a good job for the American people,' Vance said. 'If we do a good job, number one, that's the reward in and of itself," Vance added. "That all have made a big difference in the lives of our country for the last six months and the next three and a half years. But if we do a good job, the politics will take care of itself.' Vance also said that it's 'way too early to be thinking about the political future.' 'It's frankly way too early to be thinking about 2026,' he said, referencing next year's midterm elections. 'It's certainly way too early to be thinking about 2028.' Rubio, who ran for president in 2016, told Fox News host Lara Trump in a July interview that he thinks Vance would make a strong nominee for Republicans in 2028. 'I think he's doing a great job as vice president. He's a close friend, and I hope he intends to do it,' Rubio said. As for his own future political aspirations, Rubio said, 'I feel honestly – you never know what the future holds; you never rule things out or anything, because you just don't know. Things change very quickly.' Contributing: Zac Anderson, USA TODAY
Chicago Tribune
22 minutes ago
- Chicago Tribune
European leaders rally behind Ukraine ahead of Trump-Putin meeting
KYIV, Ukraine — European nations have rallied behind Ukraine, saying peace in the war-torn nation can't be resolved without Kyiv, ahead of an upcoming meeting between U.S. President Donald Trump and Russia's Vladimir Putin in Alaska. Trump said next Friday's meeting with his Russian counterpart on U.S. soil would focus on ending the war, now in its fourth year. In response, Zelenskyy thanked European allies in a post on X, writing Sunday: 'The end of the war must be fair, and I am grateful to everyone who stands with Ukraine and our people.' Saturday's statement by top European leaders came after the White House confirmed the U.S president was willing to grant Putin the one-on-one meeting Russia has long pushed for, and suggestions from Trump that a peace deal could include 'some swapping of territories.' That raised fears that Kyiv may be pressured into giving up land or accepting other curbs on its sovereignty. A White House official, who spoke on condition of anonymity as they aren't allowed to speak publicly, told The Associated Press that Trump remained open to a trilateral summit with both the Russian and Ukrainian leaders, but for now, he will have a bilateral meeting requested by Putin. Meanwhile, U.S. Vice President JD Vance met Saturday with top European and Ukrainian officials at the British Foreign Secretary's weekend residence to discuss how to end the war. Trump previously said he would meet with Putin regardless of whether the Russian leader agreed to meet with Zelenskyy. The Trump-Putin meeting may prove pivotal in a war that began when Russia invaded its western neighbor and has led to tens of thousands of deaths, although there's no guarantee it will stop the fighting since Moscow and Kyiv remain far apart on their conditions for peace. Saturday's statement, signed by the president of the European Union and leaders of France, Germany, Italy, Poland, Finland and the UK, stressed the need for a 'just and lasting peace' for Kyiv, including 'robust and credible' security guarantees. 'Ukraine has the freedom of choice over its own destiny. Meaningful negotiations can only take place in the context of a ceasefire or reduction of hostilities,' the statement said. 'The path to peace in Ukraine cannot be decided without Ukraine. We remain committed to the principle that international borders must not be changed by force,' the Europeans added. U.S. Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., told NBC's 'Meet the Press' on Sunday that a good deal would mean preventing an emboldened Russia, and aggressors elsewhere, from trying to once again redraw borders by force. A Trump ally and Russia hawk, Graham nevertheless said that 'you can't end a war without talking.' 'I do hope that Zelenskyy can be part of the process. I have every confidence in the world that (President Trump) is going to go to meet Putin from a position of strength, that he's going to look out for Europe and Ukrainian needs to end this war honorably,' he said. He argued that 'Ukraine is not going to evict every Russian' soldier, but said the West should give Kyiv robust security guarantees, keep some of its forces on the ground 'as trip wires,' and keep arming Ukraine 'so that Russia will be deterred by the most lethal army on the continent of Europe.' A monthlong U.S.-led push to achieve a truce in Ukraine has so far proved fruitless, with Kyiv agreeing in principle while the Kremlin has held out for terms more to its liking. Trump also moved up an ultimatum to impose additional sanctions on Russia and introduce secondary tariffs targeting countries that buy Russian oil if the Kremlin did not move toward a settlement. The deadline was Friday. The White House did not answer questions Saturday about possible sanctions. The Kremlin earlier this week reiterated demands that Ukraine give up territory, abandon its bid to join NATO, and accept limits on its military, in exchange for a withdrawal of Russian troops from the rest of the country. Particularly galling for Kyiv is Moscow's insistence that it cede pockets of eastern and southern Ukraine the Kremlin claims to have annexed, despite lacking full military control. Mark Galeotti, a British expert in Russian politics who heads the Mayak Intelligence consultancy, says Moscow's tactic of encircling towns in eastern Ukraine has brought a string of territorial gains for Russia, and Putin 'does not appear to feel under pressure.' For the Kremlin, 'further delaying any more serious U.S. action and the optics of a meeting with the U.S. president will already be wins,' Galeotti argued in an analysis published Sunday by the UK's Sunday Times newspaper. Zelenskyy said Saturday that Ukraine 'will not give Russia any awards for what it has done' and that 'Ukrainians will not give their land to the occupier.' Ukrainian officials previously told the AP privately that Kyiv would be amenable to a peace deal that would de facto recognize Ukraine's inability to regain lost territories militarily. But Zelenskyy on Saturday insisted that formally ceding land was out of the question. Galeotti argued that any deal that involves Ukraine abandoning territory would be 'agonising' and politically dangerous for Zelenskyy. Andriy Yermak, a top aide to Zelenskyy, noted on Sunday that Kyiv will strive to boost its position ahead of the planned Trump-Putin meeting. 'Ahead lies an important week of diplomacy,' he said. German Chancellor Friedrich Merz said Sunday that European leaders are 'intensively preparing' ahead of the Alaska summit, while they 'hope and expect' that Zelenskyy will be invited. Merz told Germany's public broadcaster ARD that he has for weeks been encouraging Washington to toughen sanctions against Russia, adding that 'Putin only acts under pressure.' Mikhail Kasyanov, Putin's first prime minister and later a political opponent, similarly told the BBC Sunday that the Kremlin would be more willing to negotiate seriously and make some concessions when sanctions have further strained Russia's economy. NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte on Sunday praised Washington for taking steps such as allowing more military equipment to flow to Ukraine and imposing secondary sanctions on India for purchasing Russian oil, saying Trump 'clearly is putting pressure on Putin.' 'Next Friday will be important because it will be about testing Putin — how serious he is — on bringing this terrible war to an end,' Rutte said in an interview with ABC's 'This Week.'
CBS News
22 minutes ago
- CBS News
As gerrymandering debate rages, New York Rep. Mike Lawler wants to ban it entirely
As states like Texas, California, New York and Illinois spar over gerrymandering, Republican Rep. Mike Lawler says the practice should be banned altogether. The congressman, whose district in New York City's northern suburbs is one of the most competitive in the nation, said Sunday he plans to introduce a bill banning gerrymandering. He believes it would benefit Democrats, Republicans and independents alike. Appearing on CBS News New York's "The Point with Marcia Kramer," Lawler criticized Texas' push for redistricting that adds five GOP seats and California's pledge to respond with a map to "nullify" any Republican gains, calling it "a disaster for our country." "When you look at 435 House seats, only 35 were decided by five points or less last November," he said. "I won by six and a half points." He criticized Gov. Kathy Hochul for defending the Texas Democrats' effort to block redistricting after she approved a new congressional map last year, giving New York Democrats a slight edge. "New York already did mid-decade redistricting just last year. So for Kathy Hochul now to say she's outraged about mid-decade redistricting, that's exactly what happened in New York," he said. Lawler pointed out he is one of three House Republicans from districts won by former Vice President Kamala Harris in 2024. The district includes all of Rockland and Putnam Counties and portions of Westchester and Dutchess. Using New York as an example, Lawler said his bill would lead to fairer elections across the board, regardless of which party ultimately wins. "The map that we had in 2022, that was drawn by a court-appointed special master, resulted in Republicans winning 11 of 26 seats. Now we control seven. The map allows for, broadly speaking, us to go anywhere from six to 11. That is good for New York, that's good for the country. It allows for competition," he said. It's questionable whether a bill banning gerrymandering could pass in a Republican-controlled Congress, but Lawler said he plans to "build consensus and fight to get it done." He opted out of the upcoming governor's race in order to seek reelection and help the GOP hold the House of Representatives in 2026. "I've been rated the fourth most bipartisan member of Congress," Lawler said. "I passed 11 bills. Six were signed into law by President Biden. It is precisely because I've been able to work across the aisle to get things done. If more members were in districts like mine and had to do that, Washington would function a lot better than it does." Click here to watch the full interview with Lawler.
