25,000-Strong Petition For Supermarkets To Price It Right Adds Weight To Minister Willis' Warning
Consumer NZ chief executive, Jon Duffy, says handing over this petition is a significant milestone in the advocacy organisation's fight for accurate supermarket pricing.
'Supermarkets have had plenty of opportunity to sort this out themselves. It's time for the government to step in and make supermarkets price it right, and tens of thousands of New Zealanders agree. People want clear pricing rules, automatic compensation and stronger penalties when supermarkets get it wrong,' said Duffy.
In 2024, the Commerce Commission estimated pricing errors were likely to be costing shoppers tens of millions of dollars every year. Recent research by Consumer (April 2025) found 62% of New Zealanders noticed a pricing inaccuracy at the supermarket.
'If supermarkets can't get their pricing right, they – rather than shoppers – should face the consequences,' said Duffy.
The petition will be presented on the steps of Parliament at 9am, Tuesday 19 August.
About the Price It Right petition
Consumer's petition asks the government to introduce a mandatory supermarket pricing accuracy code with:
clear pricing rules
requirements for supermarkets to automatically compensate consumers when pricing errors occur (for example, by requiring products to be provided free of charge if the shelf price is cheaper than the scanned price, there is a special that doesn't offer a genuine saving or there is incorrect unit pricing)
the requirement for shoppers' rights to be clearly disclosed both in store and online
infringement notice powers and much higher penalties (similar to those in Australia) for misleading pricing and promotions.
'We know that all the problems in the supermarket sector won't be fixed overnight, but new rules like those in our proposed code will help put money back in the pockets of New Zealanders.
'This petition, which has the support of more than 25,000 New Zealanders, sends a strong signal to law makers that New Zealand consumers support stronger regulation. Supermarket pricing issues haven't stopped, despite enforcement action, and we feel they won't, until the government steps in.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Otago Daily Times
2 hours ago
- Otago Daily Times
NZR confirm new broadcast deal
New Zealand Rugby (NZR) has confirmed a new broadcast deal with Sky from 2026-2030 with TVNZ to screen provincial games free-to-air. Sky will continue to broadcast all All Blacks, Black Ferns, Super Rugby Pacific, Super Rugby Aupiki and NPC and Farah Palmer Cup matches. Up to five offshore All Blacks and Black Ferns test matches respectively during the period are not included in the domestic broadcast agreement. NZR hopes these matches will give it the ability to generate additional income if confirmed. Rights to broadcast these matches will be negotiated on a match-by-match basis at the time. No financial details have been revealed, though NZR chairperson David Kirk said the governing body was pleased with the deal. "We're delighted to confirm this new agreement with our long-term partner Sky, which will see Sky remain the home of rugby in New Zealand. The next five years are exciting for fans, with the best domestic competitions in the world and an amazing international calendar for our All Blacks and Black Ferns, including a men's and historic first women's British & Irish Lions tour," Kirk said. TVNZ will become NZR's free-to-air provincial rugby partner. "We are pleased to partner with TVNZ to provide expanded free-to-air coverage of provincial rugby," Kirk said. "New Zealanders will have more ways to watch rugby than ever before over the next five years." NZR has reserved the right to play up to five offshore All Blacks and Black Ferns matches respectively over the five-year term from outside the scheduled competitions, to support its efforts to increase its revenue base. New Zealand rights to broadcast such matches will be negotiated on a match-by-match basis at the time. Kirk said NZR was focused on improving access to rugby for fans through this broadcast agreement and NZR's wider content strategy, supported by exciting domestic and cross-border competitions and a block-buster international calendar. "The Black Ferns will take part in a new international women's calendar from next year that will see them play more test matches against the best teams in the world. We also have some exciting announcements to make in the coming months to confirm the All Blacks calendar, including new competitions and tours." The agreement with TVNZ will see 93 provincial matches available free-to-view on TVNZ+, with three games a week in appointment viewing slots on TVNZ 1. These matches will also be shown co-exclusively live on Sky. "We see this as a win-win-win outcome - a secure revenue stream to support NZR in investing in rugby; Sky remaining our partner and the home of rugby; and a win for our fans as they will have more options and channels for viewing rugby," Kirk said. Kirk said there was much to be positive about in terms of the financial outcome, the expansion of rugby coverage and fan access. "We have seen positive broadcast numbers on Sky for the All Blacks and Black Ferns this year and the Super Rugby Pacific Final enjoyed its best viewership since 2016." Kirk said NZR will now focus on finalising its international broadcast agreements.
The Spinoff
2 hours ago
- The Spinoff
The cost of being: A solo parent navigating redundancy
As part of our series exploring how New Zealanders live and our relationship with money, a solo parent who was recently made redundant worries they may soon have to sell their house. This instalment of The Cost of Being is brought to you by Westpac. Want to be part of The Cost of Being? Fill out the questionnaire here. Gender: Female. Age: 46. Ethnicity: NZ-born European / Chinese. Role: Just made redundant. Salary/income/assets: Was $180,000 pa, now zero. Have a mortgage on a central Auckland home. My living location is: Urban. Rent/mortgage per week: $1,165 per week – I'm a solo parent with one child and a dog, so I pay for it all. Student loan or other debt payments per week: Credit card and hire purchase – $100. Typical weekly food costs Groceries: Approximately $300 per week, but always seem to be topping up for school lunches etc. Eating out: Once a week, something low key and cheap for a change. Takeaways: It's usually fakeaways – something like home made burgers and hand cut chips. Workday lunches: When working it was $10-$12 on something from an average cafe, now I'm unemployed it's a cheese and lettuce sandwich and coffee at home. Cafe coffees/snacks: Minimal, but once or twice a week will stop at a bakery for convenience. Other food costs: Wine! $20 per week. Savings: Zero – I just can't afford to save anything with the cost of living. I worry about money: Always. Three words to describe my financial situation: Highly anxious… if I don't find a job soon, I'll have to sell the house and move in with my parents – not a great option given I'm 46 and have a child. My biggest edible indulgence would be: I love to dine out, but do need to be measured about how often – Auckland restaurant month menus allowed for a delicious dinner at Origine for $45. In a typical week my alcohol expenditure would be: $20-$30. In a typical week my transport expenditure would be: Petrol, $80 on average weekly. I estimate in the past year the ballpark amount I spent on my personal clothing (including sleepwear and underwear) was: $2000 – I'd love to shop more but can't afford to. My most expensive clothing in the past year was: After I got burgled, I splurged on a ring for $1,100 (thanks to insurance). My last pair of shoes cost: $120, Adidas Originals SL72. My grooming/beauty expenditure in a year is about: $1,200 – I'm low maintenance because I can't afford to be anything more. My exercise expenditure in a year is about: $50 – it's easy to see why I'm so unfit 🤦🏻♀️ My last Friday night cost: $40 – the cost of Ubers and dinner at a friend's house. Most regrettable purchase in the last 12 months was: My power bill and council rates – essential, but excruciating to pay for. Most indulgent purchase (that I don't regret) in the last 12 months was: A ski trip to Queenstown last winter. One area where I'm a bit of a tightwad is: Myself – home ownership and solo parenting is a challenging combo. Five words to describe my financial personality would be: Struggling to prepare for the future. I grew up in a house where money was: Super tight, and not talked about. But we knew there wasn't enough. No planning for retirement. The last time my Eftpos card was declined was: Last week. In five years, in financial terms, I see myself: Selling the house to afford to live / affording today to afford retirement. Downsizing. I would love to have more money for: Holidays and treats! Describe your financial low: Right now – unemployed, and the job market is the worst I've ever seen it. I'm anticipating my next job to pay 50% of the last one, just so I can have one. I give money away to: Charities on occasion, but I can't afford to really.
The Spinoff
4 hours ago
- The Spinoff
Right to repair bill stalls as NZ retreats on waste reform
Labour and Green MPs are accusing their government colleagues of negotiating in bad faith, while campaigners warn New Zealand is falling behind on recycling, writes Catherine McGregor in today's extract from The Bulletin. Right to repair bill on brink of failure Green Party co-leader Marama Davidson's Right to Repair Bill is unlikely to survive its second reading in Parliament, despite overwhelming public support. The bill, which sought to close a loophole in the Consumer Guarantees Act allowing manufacturers to opt out of repairs, would have compelled companies to provide spare parts, tools and repair information. Of the 1,250 submissions received, 95% backed the proposal. However, on Monday it emerged that Winston Peters had withdrawn NZ First's support, describing the law as 'unworkable and costly'. Speaking to Stuff's Esther Taunton in February, Paul Smith of the Right to Repair Coalition Aotearoa strongly disputed that claim, noting there is no evidence from overseas that repair laws push up prices for businesses. 'If you provide the parts, you don't have to provide the entire product [as a replacement].' Still, even after Davidson offered amendments to narrow the bill's scope – it currently covers all consumer goods, which many agree is too broad – Smith conceded to Consumer NZ that 'realistically there's little to no hope' of its passage. Concerns over select committee process Labour and Green MPs say the bill has not just been defeated, but deliberately undermined during the select committee stage. As The Post's Rob Stock reports (paywalled), the Economic Development, Science and Innovation Committee recommended that the bill not proceed, despite extensive cross-party workshopping of amendments designed to meet government members' concerns. In a report released on Monday, the minority Labour and Green MPs recorded 'serious concerns' with how the process was handled, noting that opposition members had engaged 'in the reasonable expectation that such engagement was aimed at building genuine cross-party agreement'. Instead, they wrote, 'the perception [is] that the process was used to keep the committee occupied rather than to improve the bill, at a cost to the public purse'. Why repair matters The impetus for Davidson's bill is a global economy increasingly dependent on disposable goods. 'Millions of appliances and electronic products are being dumped needlessly because they can't be repaired,' says Consumer NZ's Jon Duffy. 'It's costing us all, and it's costing the planet.' Electronic waste is one of the fastest-growing waste streams worldwide, and without a right to repair, New Zealand risks becoming a dumping ground for poorly designed, short-lived products, Duffy says. In Europe and the UK, right to repair laws already require manufacturers to provide spare parts for appliances for up to 10 years and ensure that repairs can be carried out with commonly available tools. Davidson's bill would have followed a similar path, giving New Zealanders the right to demand repair instead of replacement. Supporters argue this would not only reduce waste and emissions but also help grow a repair economy that keeps money and skills local. Another setback for recycling efforts The bill's likely demise marks the government's latest retreat from waste-reduction initiatives. As RNZ's Anneke Smith observes, since the coalition was elected, 'the container-return scheme has been scrapped, plastic bans pared back, and product stewardship rules delayed.' In December, the government also quietly cancelled plans for mandatory kerbside composting and recycling in all urban areas, a move that Wellington City Councillor Iona Pannett said had pulled 'the rug out from under' local waste strategies. The collapse of right to repair now leaves consumers with fewer options for extending the life of their products and adds to New Zealand's already poor record on waste diversion. Davidson insists she will not give up. 'If the government is serious about protecting the rights of consumers, this bill can still be passed,' she says. But unless one of the coalition parties shifts its position, the chances of New Zealand joining the growing global repair movement remain remote. More from The Spinoff
