
Republican voters on Trump's sweeping tax-and-spend legislation: ‘This bill is a no-brainer!'
The measure, which the House of Representatives could pass on Wednesday, is centered on making permanent tax cuts created during his first term, creating new exemptions for tips, overtime and car loan interest, and funding mass deportations of undocumented immigrants. To lower its price tag, Republicans have proposed the largest cuts ever to Medicaid, which provides healthcare to poor and disabled Americans, and to the food assistance program known as Snap. They have also included provisions to phase out tax incentives meant to encourage the expansion of clean energy technologies that were created under Joe Biden.
Does that sound beautiful to the president's supporters? The Guardian asked, and here's what they told us.
Kyle Hanson, a 41-year-old IT professional in Wisconsin, said the measure would bring 'absolutely beautiful, critical, important, and responsible fiscal changes that our overly bloated bureaucracy of a government is way overdue for, and in desperate need of'.
'The disgusting career politicians have been extremely fiscally irresponsible for many decades, and all the US citizens will pay the price for it. This needed to be addressed a long time ago, and finally there is a politician willing to be ridiculed for doing what is needed. It may not be what everyone thinks will be nice, fuzzy, and warm feeling, but it is the responsible thing to do,' he continued.
According to the non-partisan Congressional Budget Office, the bill would increase the deficit by $3.3tn through 2034.
In New York, 60-year-old grandmother Dee said: 'I believe this will greatly help heavily taxed middle class and lower class and lift us out of the debt we have been inundated with by the Biden administration!'
'This bill is a no-brainer! Americans first!' she added.
A Montana Republican, William King, described the bill as 'great', particularly the tens of billions of dollars it dedicates to stepping up deportations.
Others who backed Trump last November said the bill was not what they voted for.
'It's very bad,' said Teddy Johnson, 40, of Phoenix. He objected to the cuts to Medicaid and 'hard workers', saying: 'they need to tax the wealthy.'
A 39-year-old in Pennsylvania who asked to remain anonymous said: 'I think [it] is a scam to the American people. We cut all the programs for poverty-stricken kids and raise the national debt anyway. Where is all the money going?'
Their recipe for making the bill better. 'Remove cuts to Snap and Medicaid, cut the defense budget, and cut all these handouts to the rich.'
There was more skepticism to be found among voters who usually back the GOP, but did not support Trump's re-election.
An Oklahoman who voted for the Libertarian party's candidate called the bill 'a nightmare for now and future generations', and said it should be rewritten to raise taxes on the rich and corporations, and lower them for poor and middle-class tax payers, without increasing the national debt.
Texas resident Steven K said: 'I think the bill is a slap in the face to all of us that have been paying into these systems all our lives.
'Trump's lies that he campaigned on to lower the deficit and [make America great again] was all a smokescreen to get the country's vote so he wouldn't go to prison,' he continued.
M, a 65-year-old Detroit Republican who declined to share their full name and voted for the Democratic candidate Kamala Harris, said the bill was 'a fiscally irresponsible, mean, mess. It increases our deficit, undermines the health and safety of this nation, reduces states' rights, and harms those who most need help so they can continue to contribute to this great nation. This is a filthy giveaway to ultra-rich people who are not paying their fare share.'
North Carolina resident James Walker, 63, said the measure should be renamed 'the big bankruptcy bill'. 'The world's biggest Ponzi scheme, otherwise known as the economy of the United States of America, comes closer to the point of no return. No politician is going to make the necessary cuts required to pay down the debt.'
The bill would be better, he said, if it focused on paying down the country's debt, improving the Department of Veterans Affairs and allocating money meant for research and development of military technology towards improving housing for soldiers and their families.
'How many times over DO we need to destroy the world?' Walker asked.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Independent
23 minutes ago
- The Independent
Trump suggests hosting UFC matches at the White House
Donald Trump has suggested hosting Ultimate Fighting Championship (UFC) matches at the White House on Thursday (3 July), Speaking at an event in Iowa ahead of the 250th anniversary of America's independence on Friday (4 July), the US president said he's considering inviting upwards of 20,000 spectators to view the fights as part of celebrations to commemorate the historic milestone. 'So every one of our national parks, battlefields and historic sites are going to have special events in honor of America 250. And I even think we're going to have a UFC fight,' Mr Trump said. ″Think of this on the grounds of the White House. We have a lot of land there,' he said, Press secretary Karoline Leavitt later said that Mr Trump was being 'dead serious' about his plans.


BBC News
32 minutes ago
- BBC News
White House to host UFC fight, US President Donald Trump says
The White House will host a UFC bout next year as part of events to mark 250 years of American independence, US President Donald Trump has event will be a "championship fight" with an audience of 20,000-25,000, Trump told a crowd in Iowa on Thursday. The president, who is a friend of UFC president Dana White, said: "We are going to have some incredible events, some professional events, some amateur events."Trump has attended several UFC events, including UFC 316 in Newark, New Jersey, last month, where he was pictured watching a fight with White. Addressing the crowd during an appearance at the Iowa State Fairgrounds in Des Moines, Trump said: "Does anybody watch UFC? The great Dana White? We're going to have a UFC fight. We're going to have a UFC fight - think of this - on the grounds of the White House. We have a lot of land there."UFC boss to promote Trump's 'fighter' image at RNC finaleListen: Donald Trump, UFC and WWE: The love affairFollowing Trump's announcement, White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt confirmed the plans on X, writing: "It's going to be EPIC!"Trump's links to UFC date back more than 20 years. In 2001, he hosted a UFC fight at Trump Taj Mahal casino in Atlantic City when White was struggling to find a venue. White has backed the president's political career from the beginning, endorsing his presidential bid in 2016, calling Trump a "fighter". Following a failed assassination attempt on Trump last year, White described Trump as a "tough guy" and "the legitimate, ultimate, American badass of all time".Trump suggested the UFC event would be one of many to mark the 250th anniversary of American independence on 4 July next year. He said: "Every one of our national parks, battlefields and historic sites are going to have special events in honour of America250."


Telegraph
32 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Three charts that show you're paying too much for gold
Investors are piling into gold as market volatility drives the price higher. They may, however, be overpaying. New analysis shows the precious metal has never been so expensive. Unlike other investments, gold produces no income, and its industrial uses are limited, which makes it difficult to assess its 'fair value'. But Russ Mould, of stockbroker AJ Bell, said one crude way of doing so is to measure how much metal a pay packet can buy. He explains: 'If bullion moves beyond the reach of the worker, that could at least crimp jewellery demand and one source of incremental buying.' By this measure, gold is at its most expensive level on record. Today, a blue collar worker in the US would have to work for 105 hours to buy one ounce of gold, according to AJ Bell's analysis of US Federal Reserve data. This compares to just 12 hours in the early 1970s, before president Richard Nixon broke up the Bretton Woods agreement that pegged the US dollar to the precious metal. Even when the price of gold spiked in the 1980s, one ounce peaked at just under 99 hours of earnings. Mr Mould said: 'The current score of 105 hours could be seen as ominous for gold affordability, since the best cure for high prices is high prices – they stoke supply, depress demand, prompt searches for substitutes, or all three.' Gold is also far more expensive compared to other commodities than it has been in the past. Since 1970, one ounce of gold has bought an average of 17 to 18 barrels of oil, but today it would buy 49 barrels, while one ounce of gold would buy 91 ounces of silver today, up from an average of 60. Since 1976, gold and platinum prices have been equally matched. But today, one ounce of gold buys 2.4 ounces of platinum, despite a recent surge in the price of platinum. Gold is a go-to asset during times of economic turmoil thanks to its reputation as a store of value. The price hit a record high of over £2,500 per Troy ounce in April, as investors sought safe havens from market volatility. Investors are usually advised against buying when prices are at the top, but in the case of gold, it seems newcomers have been unable to resist. In the second quarter of the year, UK buyers of the precious metal outnumbered sellers by the widest margin in four years, according to precious metals marketplace, BullionVault. Adrian Ash, of BullionVault, said: 'After taking profit on this year's earlier surge in prices, UK investors are now buying into gold's bull market. 'They're joining central banks and Asian wealth managers in building their holdings as the geopolitical shock of Trump's return to the White House persists and the UK's economic gloom worsens under Labour.' Some experts believe gold can only rise further because of geopolitical instability and inflationary pressures, but others are more apprehensive. Jock Henderson, investment analyst at Capital Gearing Asset Management, said the firm was 'cautious' about being overly exposed at current prices. The investment trust Capital Gearing has only 1pc in gold, despite its defensive positioning. Mr Henderson said: 'While gold investors have been rewarded for holding gold, there are complicated underlying dynamics which make its fundamental value hard to determine.' Advisers generally recommend that investors should not hold more than 10pc in gold. Over time, the allocations in your portfolio typically drift in favour of the highest-performing asset, so some investors may need to trim their gold exposure in order to reduce volatility across their investments.