Stakes rise in Russia-Ukraine war as Trump's deadline for Kremlin approaches
Previous Trump promises, threats and cajoling have failed to yield results, and the stubborn diplomatic stalemate will be hard to clear away.
Meanwhile, Ukraine is losing more territory on the front line, although there is no sign of a looming collapse of its defences.
Emergency workers inspect damage from a Russian missile (Efrem Lukatsky/AP)
Mr Witkoff was expected to land in the Russian capital on Wednesday or Thursday, according to Mr Trump, following his trip to Israel and Gaza.
'They would like to see (Witkoff),' Mr Trump said on Sunday of the Russians. 'They've asked that he meet so we'll see what happens.'
Mr Trump, exasperated that Russian president Vladimir Putin has not heeded his calls to stop bombing Ukrainian cities, a week ago moved up his ultimatum to impose additional sanctions on Russia as well as introduce secondary tariffs targeting countries that buy Russian oil, including China and India.
Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov said on Monday that officials are happy to meet with Mr Trump's envoy.
'We are always glad to see Mr Witkoff in Moscow,' he said. 'We consider (talks with Witkoff) important, substantive and very useful.'
Mr Trump said on Sunday that Russia has proved to be 'pretty good at avoiding sanctions'.
'They're wily characters,' he said of the Russians.
The Kremlin has insisted that international sanctions imposed since its February 2022 invasion of its neighbour have had a limited impact.
Ukraine insists the sanctions are taking their toll on Moscow's war machine and wants Western allies to ramp them up.
Ukrainian president Volodymyr Zelensky on Monday urged the United States, Europe and other nations to impose stronger secondary sanctions on Moscow's energy, trade and banking sectors.
Mr Trump's comments appeared to signal he does not have much hope that sanctions will force Mr Putin's hand.
The secondary sanctions also complicate Washington's relations with China and India, who stand accused of helping finance Russia's war effort by buying its oil.
Since taking office in January, Mr Trump has found that stopping the war is harder than he perhaps imagined.
Senior American officials have warned that the US could walk away from the conflict if peace efforts make no progress.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
an hour ago
- The Independent
Trump wants to roll back $7 billion in grants for solar projects in low-income communities
The Trump administration is reportedly considering terminating a $7 billion grant program aimed at helping low- and moderate-income families install home solar panels, part of the White House's larger campaign to claw back billions in Biden-era climate spending. The Environmental Protection Agency is in the process of drafting termination letters to the 60 state agencies, nonprofit groups, and Native American tribes awarded the funding through the Solar for All initiative, part of the Biden administration's landmark 2022 climate law. The agency said Tuesday it has not made a final decision about the grants. Environmental groups say if Trump does go through with the cancellation, the effort will face legal challenges. Wiping away the grants would halt many projects before they were complete. The first Solar for All projects, efforts to install residential solar and battery storage systems for tribal communities in Montana and South Dakota, went online in October 2024. 'One in five households on reservations lack access to electricity, and this program was an opportunity to close that gap,' Cody Two Bears, the chief executive of Indigenized Energy, told The New York Times, which first reported on the cancellation effort. 'But those were just two kickoff projects to show what was coming for the next five years.' Critics of the Trump administration and climate experts said cancelling the grants, which were projected to serve about 900,000 people, would be bad public policy that hurts low-income families and the climate. 'Solar for All is laser focused on helping nearly a million low-income families afford electricity at a time when their bills keep going up,' Zealan Hoover, the EPA's former director of implementation, told The Washington Post. 'If the Trump administration is serious about energy abundance and affordability, then they should be working hard to accelerate — not terminate — these grants.' 'Solar for All means lower utility bills, many thousands of good-paying jobs and real action to address the existential threat of climate change,' Senator Bernie Sanders of Vermont, who championed the program, said in a statement on Tuesday. 'At a time when working families are getting crushed by skyrocketing energy costs and the planet is literally burning, sabotaging this program isn't just wrong — it's absolutely insane.' In March, the EPA said it was terminating a separate pot of $20 billion in climate funding, prompting a legal challenge. In April, a federal judge issued an injunction siding with grant recipients. The administration's One, Big Beautiful Bill spending package, signed in July, repealed the Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fund, the single largest portion of climate money under the Biden law, and ordered any unassigned funds back to the U.S. Treasury. There is an ongoing legal battle between grantees and the federal government over the fate of much of the IRA's climate funding. Grantees say much of the funds were legally obligated before Trump took office and immune from presidential action, while the administration claims it claw the funds back.
The Guardian
2 hours ago
- The Guardian
US judge blocks Trump officials from diverting disaster prevention grants
A federal judge blocked the Trump administration on Tuesday from diverting funds from a multibillion-dollar grant program designed to protect communities against natural disasters. US district judge Richard Stearns in Boston issued a preliminary injunction preventing the government from spending money allocated to the Building Resilient Infrastructure and Communities (Bric) program for other purposes. Twenty mostly Democratic-led states sued the administration last month, saying the Federal Emergency Management Agency (Fema) lacked power to cancel the Bric program without congressional approval. Fema is part of the Department of Homeland Security (DHS). Neither agency immediately responded to requests for comment. Created in 2018 during Donald Trump's first term, the Bric program helps state and local governments protect major infrastructure such as roads and bridges before the occurrence of floods, hurricanes and other disasters. According to the lawsuit, Fema approved about $4.5bn in grants for nearly 2,000 projects, primarily in coastal states, over the last four years. But the agency announced in April it would end the program, calling it wasteful, ineffective and politicized. Stearns said that while Fema does not appear to have since canceled grants, states should not have to wait to sue until after they lose funding, while the cancellation of new grants suggested Fema considered an eventual shutdown a fait accompli. He also said the states have shown a realistic chance of irreparable harm if the Bric program ended. 'There is an inherent public interest in ensuring that the government follows the law, and the potential hardship accruing to the states from the funds being repurposed is great,' the judge wrote. 'The Bric program is designed to protect against natural disasters and save lives,' Stearns added. 'The potential hardship to the government, in contrast, is minimal.' Led by Massachusetts and Washington, the 20 states that sued also include Arizona, California, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, Illinois, Maine, Maryland, Michigan, Minnesota, New Jersey, New York, North Carolina, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, Vermont and Wisconsin. The offices of Massachusetts' and Washington's attorneys general had no immediate comment.
Times
3 hours ago
- Times
Big rise in UK bosses warning of extreme weather effects
The number of British companies warning of extreme weather has risen twentyfold since 2015. References to 'extreme weather' occurred just 35 times in filings made by companies on the FTSE 350 in 2015, according to an analysis of company records on Factset. In 2024 this figure had risen to 741 mentions, with 560 references to the phrase in filings by the 350 largest listed companies in the UK so far this year. Companies across a variety of industries have pointed to extreme or unusual weather events as a reason for faltering or unexpected sales. Last month Greggs warned that operating profits at the bakery chain could be 'modestly below' 2024 due to the heatwave in June, which boosted demand for cold drinks but reduced overall shopper numbers, causing a slowdown in sales growth in the first half of the year. Rio Tinto said in April that extreme weather events had affected operations at its Pilbara iron ore mine in Western Australia, though it added last month that production had recovered well since. However, the majority of the increase in references to extreme weather in company filings over the past decade came in the form of companies warning of the risks that such events might pose to their businesses in the future. Currys and Watches of Switzerland recently warned of the potential impact of extreme weather events in their full-year results. The luxury watch seller said that their increasing frequency could lead to significant disruption of retail showrooms, offices and distribution centres through flooding and strong winds, while the electricals retailer said extreme weather events could increase footfall for consumers seeking air-conditioning in some regions during heatwaves, but could also lead consumers to shop online more than in stores. The increasing prevalence of warnings about extreme weather is not specific to the UK either. Research by Sara Mahaffy, a managing director at RBC Capital Markets who runs the bank's sustainability strategy research, found that discussions of physical climate risks on earnings calls has hit new highs in 2025 in the US and Asia. She added that the increasing prevalence of references to extreme weather underscored a wider trend occurring across the private sector, in which a premium was increasingly being placed on adapting to climate change and its impacts, rather than just mitigating them. 'What we noticed when we looked at ESG [environmental, social, and governance] debt issuance and green bond issuance, the private sector is increasingly integrating adaptation as part of the eligible criteria,' Mahaffy said. 'For so long, so much of the focus was on mitigation and renewable energy, energy efficiency, but we're starting to see adaptation creep in more. As the private sector is feeling these impacts directly, they are taking the steps themselves to build resilience.'
