NFL smelling salts ban: NFLPA provides key updates on policy
However, the league did not actually ban the products from being used, as the NFLPA clarified Wednesday.
"We were not notified of this club policy change before the memo was sent out," the NFLPA wrote in a message to its players, per ESPN. "To clarify, this policy does not prohibit player use of these substances, but rather it restricts clubs from providing or supplying them in any form. The NFL has confirmed this to us."
The confusion stemmed from the NFL's initial memo to players, which explained why NFL clubs would no longer be permitted to distribute smelling salts to its players.
"In 2024, the FDA issued a warning to companies that produce commercially available ammonia inhalants (AIs), as well as to consumers about the purchase and use of AIs, regarding the lack of evidence supporting the safety or efficacy of AIs marketed for improving mental alertness or boosting energy. The FDA noted potential negative effects from AI use. AIs also have the potential to mask certain neurologic signs and symptoms, including some potential signs of concussion. As a result, the NFL Head, Neck, and Spine Committee recommended prohibiting the use of AIs for any purpose during play in the NFL.
"In light of this information, effective for the 2025 NFL season, clubs are prohibited from providing or supplying ammonia in any form at NFL games. For clarity, 'ammonia' refers to ammonia capsules, inhalers, ammonia in a cup, and any form of 'smelling salts.' This prohibition applies to all club personnel (including but not limited to team physicians, athletic trainers, strength and conditioning coaches and coaches or other personnel). The prohibition applies through the entirety of all NFL games, including during all pregame activities, and halftime, and applies on the sideline and in stadium locker rooms."
Several NFL players took the memo to mean the use of smelling salts had been banned outright. That upset many, including San Francisco 49ers tight end George Kittle, who said he was "distraught all day" after reading the memo.
"I'm an every drive guy," Kittle said of his use of smelling salts in an appearance on NFL Network. "I considered retirement. We got to figure out a middle ground here guys. Somebody help me out, somebody come up with a good idea… I miss those already."
After the NFLPA's clarification, Kittle no longer has to worry about negotiating a middle ground.
He will, however, have to provide his own stash of smelling salts if he wants to continue using them in 2025.
This article originally appeared on USA TODAY: NFL players not banned from using smelling salts, NFLPA says
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
6 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Lions put CB Ennis Rakestraw on IR with season-ending shoulder injury and sign TE Steven Stilianos.
ALLEN PARK, Mich. (AP) — The Detroit Lions have placed cornerback Ennis Rakestraw on injured reserve with a season-ending shoulder injury and signed tight end Steven Stilianos. Detroit made the moves Thursday after coach Dan Campbell lamented that Rakestraw was hurt a year after injuries limited him to eight games as a rookie. 'You hate it for the kid,' Campbell said earlier this week. 'It's not his fault, just one of those tough deals. All you can do is try to get it better and rehab, come back stronger and move on.' Detroit drafted the former Missouri star in the second round last year and his season ended in mid-November after various ailments kept him off the field. Stilianos provides depth at tight end for exhibition games, limiting snaps for starter Sam LaPorta and veteran backups Brock Wright and Shane Zylstra. Rakestraw played when the Lions opened the preseason with a 34-7 loss to the Los Angeles Chargers. Detroit plays the Atlanta Falcons on Friday night in its second of four exhibition games. ___ AP NFL:
Yahoo
6 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Micah Parsons remains in camp despite not attending practice
Micah Parsons didn't show up to watch the Cowboys practice for the first time in training camp. That caused a stir, and the fact that owner Jerry Jones also wasn't at Thursday's practice caused a bigger stir. Alas, there is nothing to see here. Cowboys executive vice president Stephen Jones told reporters after practice that Parsons remains in training camp, and two sources told Jane Slater of NFL Media that "nothing is happening" with negotiations behind the scenes. Parsons showed up to training camp on time, but he has not participated in any of the practices as he awaits a contract extension. The sides are in a stalemate, with the Cowboys' season opener four weeks from today. Now that he's in camp, Parsons essentially is stuck. According to the NFL's Constitution and Bylaws, if a player leaves the team during training camp or the regular season, he has five days to return. If he doesn't, the team can place the player on its reserve list as a retired player. And if that happens under those specific circumstances, the player cannot play again that year for any team. His contract would toll. Both sides will have a big decision to make if Parsons isn't under contract before the start of the season. The Cowboys, though, have a recent history of completing contract extensions at the 11th hour, so to speak. Jones said earlier this week that he is "absolutely not" confident Parsons will play in the season opener.
Yahoo
6 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Woman with Severe Motion Sickness Refuses to Give Up Her Seat to Pregnant Sister-in-Law
The woman wants to know if she was wrong for not giving up the front seat to her pregnant sister-in-law during a long driveNEED TO KNOW A woman refused to give up the front seat to her pregnant sister-in-law during a six-hour family car ride She explained that she suffers from severe motion sickness and had already taken precautions Now, her sister-in-law is upset and claims she was forced to "suffer" through the rideA woman seeks advice from the Reddit community following a tense family road trip that left her feeling conflicted and accused of being inconsiderate. The 28-year-old woman shares in her post that she refused to give up her front seat to her pregnant sister-in-law and now finds herself at the center of family drama. 'I get motion sickness pretty badly unless I'm in the front passenger seat,' she writes, adding that her family is well aware of this long-standing issue. Even with medication, she says, 'it doesn't always help,' which is why she chose to sit up front for the six-hour drive. The entire family, including her husband, his brother, and the brother's pregnant wife — who is six months along — had all packed into one car for the weekend trip. She explains that she 'got in the front seat as usual and everyone else got settled in the back,' without any objections at first. But just 30 minutes into the drive, her sister-in-law asked if they could switch seats so she could stretch out and be more comfortable. 'I politely said I really didn't think I could because I'd likely get sick,' the woman explains, 'and reminded her I have had this issue for years.' At that point, the conversation ended, but the issue wasn't over. 'She got quiet but didn't push it,' the woman recalls, though the tension began to build. Later on, during a stop, the sister-in-law brought it up again — this time more directly. 'She said I was being selfish, and that she's carrying a human being and I'm just being 'a little nauseous,' ' the woman writes. Fortunately, her husband stepped in to support her decision, reminding everyone that the seating arrangements had already been planned in advance. 'My husband backed me up, saying we had already discussed the seating beforehand,' she explains. Still, the atmosphere in the car shifted, and not everyone seemed comfortable with how things were playing out. 'My in-laws seemed kind of awkward and didn't say much,' she notes, hinting at the growing unease. Never miss a story — sign up for to stay up-to-date on the best of what PEOPLE has to offer, from celebrity news to compelling human interest stories. Since returning home, the situation has escalated behind the scenes. The woman reveals, 'I heard through another relative that she's still upset and told others I 'made her suffer' the whole ride.' Now, she's left wondering if she handled things the right way or if she should've given up her spot to avoid the ongoing conflict. 'I honestly didn't mean to be rude or inconsiderate,' she says, 'but I also didn't want to throw up all over everyone.' Supportive commenters offered alternative solutions that might have avoided the entire issue. 'You or SIL drive and the other sits in the passenger seat,' one suggests. 'I get car sick, so I do all the driving in my house.' Another user points out that the couple could have made other plans entirely if the setup didn't work for them. 'She and her partner could have gotten another car with more space for her,' they write. Despite the drama, the woman feels torn between compassion for her pregnant relative and her own very real physical needs. 'I feel bad, but I also feel like I shouldn't have to make myself sick for hours just to avoid conflict,' she admits. Read the original article on People Solve the daily Crossword
