Iran-Israel Conflict: What Gamble Has U.S President Donald Trump Taken By Striking Tehran's Nuclear Facilities?
New Delhi: In January, US President Donald Trump returned to office projecting himself as a man of peace. But less than six months into his term, that image is facing its biggest test yet. By ordering direct U.S. military strikes on Iranian nuclear sites, he has entered a volatile conflict between Israel and Iran and dragged Washington into its most dangerous Middle Eastern escalation in years.
Just two hours after American warplanes struck targets in Iran, Trump addressed the nation from the White House. With Vice President J.D. Vance, Secretary of State Marco Rubio and Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth by his side, he called the strike a 'resounding success'. He claimed it would stop Iran's nuclear ambitions and pave the way for a more stable future.
Iran, however, downplayed the attack, stating only minor damage occurred at its Fordow nuclear facility. Whether Trump's assessment holds true remains to be seen.
The U.S. president did not stop at celebration. He issued a warning to Tehran – abandon your nuclear program or the next attacks will be 'more devastating and much easier'. He added that many of Iran's military sites remain on the radar and could be hit with 'speed, precision and skill'.
But the boldness of the move raises real fears. UN Secretary-General António Guterres has cautioned that such a strike could spark a dangerous cycle of escalation. The Middle East, already on edge, now risks slipping into a new phase of instability.
Iran's Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei had earlier warned that any U.S. strike would not go unanswered. Now the world waits to see whether Iran retaliates and how far this conflict might spiral.
From 'Two Weeks' to Two Days
Just days ago, Trump had said Iran would have 'two weeks' to comply. That ultimatum dissolved in less than 48 hours. On June 22, the president announced the operation had already taken place.
Was the two-week deadline just a ruse? A diplomatic bluff to lull Tehran into a false sense of safety? Or had the back-channel efforts led by Trump's peace envoy, Steve Witkoff, already collapsed?
So far, few details have emerged. Trump's public remarks framed the strike as an effort to open the door for negotiations. But that may be overly optimistic.
Israel's recent military moves against Iran were meant to weaken Tehran's capabilities. Yet Iran still has missiles and allies ready to respond. With the Fordow facility hit, Iran now has even greater incentive to strike back.
Trump hopes Iran will now come to the table and offer concessions. But it is unclear why a nation that refused diplomacy after Israeli airstrikes would suddenly bow after American bombs.
And if these latest attacks failed to cause significant damage to Iran's deeply buried nuclear sites, pressure will grow for Trump to launch more strikes. That could force him into a bigger gamble with unpredictable consequences.
Political Fallout in the U.S.
Back home, Trump's decision has ignited both Democratic outrage and skepticism from within his own 'America First' base. Critics say the president has abandoned his core promise to keep the United States out of foreign wars.
Trump's decision to appear with his top aides may have been designed to show party unity. Vice President Vance, who has long championed a restrained foreign policy, recently said Trump remains a non-interventionist.
If the strike remains a one-off, Trump might patch over internal rifts. But if America gets pulled deeper into conflict, the same president who once slammed endless wars may face growing rebellion within his ranks.
The action of June 22 marked a dramatic shift for a leader who took pride in avoiding war during his first term. It also stood in sharp contrast to his 2024 campaign speeches, where he repeatedly criticised past presidents for entangling America in overseas military ventures.
Trump has now chosen his path. What happens next may no longer be entirely in his hands.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
&w=3840&q=100)
First Post
30 minutes ago
- First Post
US issues 'worldwide caution' for its citizens after joining Israeli campaign on Iran
The US has issued a global security alert, warning its citizens to be extra cautious amid rising tensions in the Middle East. The alert follows recent US airstrikes on Iran and growing threats of retaliation. read more This handout picture released by the Iranian Red Crescent on June 14, 2025, show Iranian Red Crescent volunteers working in a Tehran neighbourhood hit by a reported Israeli strike. AFP The US State Department issued a 'worldwide caution' alert on Sunday, warning Americans that the conflict in the Middle East could increase security risks for those living or travelling abroad. 'The conflict between Israel and Iran has disrupted travel and led to airspace closures across the region. There is also a risk of protests targeting US citizens and interests overseas,' the alert said. It advised all Americans to be extra cautious worldwide. The alert did not mention the US airstrikes on Iran's nuclear sites the night before, which Iran warned would have 'irreparable consequences.' STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD In response to the strikes, Iran threatened US bases in the region. An advisor to Iran's Supreme Leader, Ali Akbar Velayati, said any country hosting American forces involved in attacks on Iran would be considered a legitimate target. Meanwhile, the US began evacuation flights from Israel for American citizens and permanent residents. It also ordered staff to leave US embassies in Iraq and Lebanon.
Time of India
31 minutes ago
- Time of India
Kentucky MAGA: Trump advisers launch 'super PAC' to defeat Thomas Massie; Congressman denounced US strikes on Iran nuclear sites
Kentucky Republican Thomas Massie Two key advisers to Donald Trump have launched a "super PAC" (political action committee) to unseat Rep. Thomas Massie, a Kentucky Republican who criticized the US President over the strikes on nuclear facilities in Iran, and previously, opposed the MAGA leader's "big, beautiful bill." The organization, named "Kentucky MAGA," will be run by Trump's senior political advisers, Chris LaCivita and Tony Fabrizio. "The PAC would spend 'whatever it takes' to defeat Massie (in the May 2026 primary)," LaCivita told Axios, which was the first to report that the super PAC is being formed. Another Trump aide told the website that plans for taking on Massie were in the works before the Congressman decided to call the attack on Iran "unconstitutional." Trump lashes out at Massie for remarks on ' Operation Midnight Hammer ' Earlier, Trump called his fellow Republican Massie a "loser" and demanded that MAGA "drop" the Kentucky representative after the latter denounced Operation Midnight Hammer - the US air strikes in Iran - as "unconstitutional." "MAGA should drop this pathetic LOSER, Tom Massie, like the plague! The good news is that we will have a wonderful American Patriot running against him in the Republican Primary, and I'll be out in Kentucky campaigning really hard. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Free P2,000 GCash eGift UnionBank Credit Card Apply Now Undo MAGA is not about lazy, grandstanding, nonproductive politicians, of which Thomas Massie is definitely one," the US President wrote on his Truth Social platform. 'Actually, MAGA doesn't want him, doesn't know him, and doesn't respect him. He is a negative force who almost always Votes 'NO,' no matter how good something may be. He's a simple minded 'grandstander' who thinks it's good politics for Iran to have the highest level Nuclear weapon, while at the same time yelling 'DEATH TO AMERICA' at every chance they get," he added.
Time of India
31 minutes ago
- Time of India
Trump is open to regime change in Iran, after his admin said that wasn't goal
The Trump administration on Sunday sent a series of conflicting messages to Iran - with US officials initially indicating a willingness to resume negotiations after a surprise attack on three of the country's nuclear sites and President Donald Trump talking up the possibility of regime change. "It's not politically correct to use the term, 'Regime Change', but if the current Iranian Regime is unable to MAKE IRAN GREAT AGAIN, why wouldn't there be a Regime change???" Trump posted on social media. "MIGA!!!" The posting on Truth Social marked something of a reversal from Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth's Sunday morning news conference that detailed the aerial bombing. "This mission was not and has not been about regime change," Hegseth said. The Trump administration has made a series of intimidating statements even as it has simultaneously called to restart negotiations, making it hard to get a complete read on whether the US president is simply taunting an adversary or using inflammatory words that could further widen the war between Israel and Iran. Live Events Up until the US president's post on Sunday afternoon, the coordinated messaging by Trump's vice president, Pentagon chief, top military adviser and secretary of state suggested a confidence that any fallout would be manageable and that Iran's lack of military capabilities would ultimately force it back to the bargaining table. Hegseth had said that America "does not seek war" with Iran, while Vice President JD Vance said the strikes have given Tehran the possibility of returning to negotiate with Washington. But the unfolding situation is not entirely under Washington's control, as Tehran has a series of levers to respond to the aerial bombings that could intensify the conflict in the Middle East with possible global repercussions. Iran can block oil being shipped through the Strait of Hormuz, attack US bases in the region, engage in cyber attacks or double down on a nuclear programme that might seem like more of a necessity after the US strike. All of that raises the question of whether the strikes will open up a far more brutal phase of fighting or revive negotiations out of an abundance of caution. Inside the US, the attack quickly spilled over into domestic politics with Trump choosing to spend part of his Sunday going after his critics in Congress. Trump, who had addressed the nation from the White House on Saturday night, returned to social media on Sunday to lambaste Rep Thomas Massie, who had objected to the president taking military action without specific congressional approval. "We had a spectacular military success yesterday, taking the bomb right out of their hands (and they would use it if they could!)" Trump said as part of the post on Truth Social. At their joint Pentagon briefing, Hegseth and Air Force Gen Dan Caine, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, said that "Operation Midnight Hammer" involved decoys and deception, and met with no Iranian resistance. Caine indicated that the goal of the operation - destroying nuclear sites in Fordo, Natanz and Isfahan - had been achieved. "Final battle damage will take some time, but initial battle damage assessments indicate that all three sites sustained extremely severe damage and destruction," Caine said. Vance said in a television interview that while he would not discuss "sensitive intelligence about what we've seen on the ground," he felt "very confident that we've substantially delayed their development of a nuclear weapon." Pressed further, he told NBC's "Meet the Press" that "I think that we have really pushed their program back by a very long time. I think that it's going to be many many years before the Iranians are able to develop a nuclear weapon." The vice president said the US had "negotiated aggressively' with Iran to try to find a peaceful settlement and that Trump made his decision after assessing the Iranians were not acting "in good faith." "I actually think it provides an opportunity to reset this relationship, reset these negotiations and get us in a place where Iran can decide not to be a threat to its neighbours, not to be a threat to the United States, and if they're willing to do that, the United States is all ears," Vance said. Secretary of State Marco Rubio said on CBS's "Face the Nation" that "there are no planned military operations right now against Iran, unless, unless they mess around and they attack" US interests. Trump has previously threatened other countries, but often backed down or failed to follow through, given his promises to his coalition of voters not to entangle the United States in an extended war. It was not immediately clear whether Iran saw the avoidance of a wider conflict as in its best interests. Much of the world is absorbing the consequences of the strikes and the risk that they could lead to more fighting across the Middle East after the US inserted itself into the war between Israel and Iran. Israeli airstrikes that began on June 13 local time targeted Iran's nuclear facilities and generals, prompting retaliation from Iran and creating a series of events that contributed to the US attack. While US officials urged caution and stressed that only nuclear sites were targeted by Washington, Iran criticised the actions as a violation of its sovereignty and international law. Iran's foreign minister, Abbas Araghchi, said Washington was "fully responsible" for whatever actions Tehran may take in response. "They crossed a very big red line by attacking nuclear facilities," he said at a news conference in Turkey. "I don't know how much room is left for diplomacy." China and Russia, where Araghchi was heading for talks with President Vladimir Putin, condemned the US military action. The attacks were "a gross violation of international law," said Russia's Foreign Ministry, which also advocated "returning the situation to a political and diplomatic course." A Turkish Foreign Ministry statement warned about the risk of the conflict spreading to "a global level". British Prime Minister Keir Starmer said the United Kingdom was moving military equipment into the area to protect its interests, people and allies. His office said he talked on Sunday with Trump about the need for Tehran to resume negotiations, but Trump would have posted his remarks about regime change after their conversation. The leaders of Italy, Canada, Germany and France agreed on the need for "a rapid resumption of negotiations." France's Emmanuel Macron held talks with the Saudi crown prince and sultan of Oman. Iran could try to stop oil exports through the Strait of Hormuz, which could create the same kind of inflationary shocks that the world felt after Russia invaded Ukraine in 2022. Oil prices increased in the financial markets as the war between Israel and Iran had intensified, climbing by 21% over the past month. The Pentagon briefing did not provide any new details about Iran's nuclear capabilities. Hegseth said the timeline for the strikes was the result of a schedule set by Trump for talks with Iran about its nuclear ambitions. "Iran found out" that when Trump "says 60 days that he seeks peace and negotiation, he means 60 days of peace and negotiation," Hegseth said. "Otherwise, that nuclear programme, that new nuclear capability will not exist. He meant it." That statement was complicated as the White House had suggested last Thursday that Trump could take as much as two weeks to determine whether to strike Iran or continue to pursue negotiations. But the US benefited from Iran's weakened air defences and was able to conduct the attacks without resistance from Iran. "Iran's fighters did not fly, and it appears that Iran's surface to air missile systems did not see us throughout the mission," Caine said. Hegseth said that a choice to move a number of B-2 bombers from their base in Missouri earlier Saturday was meant to be a decoy to throw off Iranians. Caine added that the US used other methods of deception as well, deploying fighters to protect the B-2 bombers that dropped a total of 14 bunker-buster bombs on Iran's sites at Fordo and Natanz. The strikes occurred Saturday between 6:40 pm and 7:05 pm in Washington, or roughly 2:10 am on Sunday in Iran.
