America has lit a fire under the rare earths market. Now ASX juniors want Australia to do the same
Floor price of US$110/kg for NdPr could drag ex-China rare earths prices higher
Developers and explorers want Australia to follow suit and provide floor pricing to build ex-China supply chain
In the weeks ahead of the Federal Election, the Albanese Government launched its "Trump Card", to get miners onside and float a carrot in the face of the US Administration in a bid to allay the threat of tariffs.
A $1.2 billion commitment to build a critical minerals stockpile, leveraging the geological miracle of WA with its bounty of lithium, nickel and rare earths, was proposed as a way to support a set of industries beaten down by Chinese market control and manipulation and give the US access to something it dearly wants.
Like so many political commitments it was wishy-washy. What would go into that stockpile was unclear.
Lynas (ASX:LYC) boss Amanda Lacaze declined last month at a media huddle in Perth to say whether the company had been in negotiations about selling material to Canberra from its Mt Weld mine near Laverton, or what price it may chase.
But a shot in the arm was delivered by the Americans themselves last week, which could set prices for any similar initiative the Aussie Government wants to roll out.
MP Materials, the US$7.4 billion owner of the US' only rare earths operation at Mountain Pass in California, inked US$400m in equity investments from the Department of Defense as part of a multi-billion dollar public-private partnership that will make the Pentagon a 15% shareholder in the New York listed company – a 52% gain on Thursday already putting the taxpayer in the money.
Contained within that deal were loans to expand and construct new and existing magnet production plants and, crucially, a 10-year arrangement to buy or stockpile oxides from Mountain Pass at US$110/kg NdPr oxide.
Even with prices in China surging in response to the news, that clocks in at roughly double the Chinese market price once value-added tax is removed. If ex-China pricing rises to meet that signal, the key circuit-breaker to kick-off stalled rare earths developments – ending low prices resulting from overproduction in the Middle Kingdom – could be triggered.
Argonaut's Jon Scholtz and George Ross said the deal could provide guidance for future offtakes in Australia, such as for the Iluka Resources (ASX:ILU) Eneabba Refinery in WA, which is being supported by close to $2 billion of cheap Canberra debt.
"We view this move as a positive which solidifies the US rare earth magnet supply chain. Of our covered, LYC has upside from the US Plant (separate heavies) which would fill the last remaining gap in the US supply chain," they said in a note on Monday.
"While this provides precedent for ILU's Eneabba facility and potential offtakes with the Australian government for a strategic stockpile."
Developers rejoice
The MP Materials news unsurprisingly sent a whole host of rare earths stocks flying on Friday.
And even more ASX companies are now stepping out with calls for more support for western rare earths supply.
"China's price manipulation of rare earths has halted the development of dozens of otherwise viable projects globally and hurt the bottom line of companies such as Lynas," Victory Metals (ASX:VTM) CEO and executive director Brendan Clark said.
"It's not that the demand isn't there it's that the economics have been artificially crushed to maintain China's dominance.
"That strategy has worked for a long time, but this kind of US Government backed partnership is exactly what is needed to break that control."
VTM owns the North Stanmore project in WA's Gascoyne region. It's already built strong ties with the US Government despite being based in Australia.
The project, which promises to deliver critical metals including heavy and light rare earths, gallium, scandium and hafnium for the defence, semiconductor, auto and energy sectors, has already received a letter of intent for a US$190m funding package from the US Export-Import Bank.
With System for Award Management approval this week it is now able to throw its hat in the ring for further support and engagement with the Pentagon and other US Government departments.
Clark said he was pleased by the level of US involvement to date, and expects to see more news in the pipeline.
"I predict you will see more of these types of announcements especially for the more critical rare earths like dysprosium and terbium," he said.
Others, like Red Metal (ASX:RDM) boss Rob Rutherford, have called for Australia to mirror the policy direction from the DoD.
His company owns the Sybella project near Mt Isa in north Queensland and he thinks the Australian Government should work with nations like South Korea and Japan to set up subsidised intergovernmental supply chains.
'It is now up to other manufacturing nations like South Korea, Japan, Europe and even Australia to invest in expanded magnet capacity with REO supply guaranteed with similar price flooring mechanisms," he said.
'I strongly believe the Australian Government should jointly fund and build magnet plants in these resource-poor manufacturing nations, government to government, on the provision they utilise Australian raw REO materials."
Excitement brews in Brazil
While the DoD has set its focus on the sole domestic operation in the United States – something that lead to big price gains since Friday for ASX stocks in the immediate vicinity like Dateline Resources (ASX:DTR) and Locksley Resources (ASX:LKY) (both continued climbing ~12% on Monday) – other jurisdictions could stand to benefit.
The key exploration jurisdiction open to the West for rare earths outside the US and Australia is Brazil, where explorers are trying to prove up "China-style" clay-hosted rare earth deposits.
Developers have been seeking to align their exploration and resource compilation efforts tailored to commodities the US desperately wants for its defence and tech markets.
Alongside rare earths, that also includes critical minerals like gallium, a key component in semiconductor chips also subject to controls from Beijing.
One of those is Axel REE (ASX:AXL), which is aiming to compile a maiden resource of both gallium and rare earths at its Caladão project.
"As countries seek to diversify away from China's dominance, rare earths jurisdictions like Brazil, with strong resource endowments and a growing appetite for foreign investment, are rising in global importance," AXL's Pat Volpe said.
"Our Caladão Project is particularly well placed in this emerging landscape. With high-grade magnetic rare earths mineralisation, and more importantly exceptional at surface gallium content, Axel's portfolio is aligned with the very materials now being prioritised by US and allied governments.
"Gallium, in particular, is rapidly gaining attention for its role in semiconductors and 5G infrastructure, yet global supply is almost entirely controlled by China. Projects like ours can play a meaningful role in reshaping that balance.
"This US investment will likely trigger a broader reassessment of how and where the world sources its critical minerals."
Demand strength
Others think it says as much about the demand side as it does supply chains.
Demand for rare earth metals could lift from 93,000t in 2023 to 169,000t by 2040, according to the International Energy Agency.
RareX (ASX:REE) managing director James Durrant says the MP investment highlights how important rare earth elements are to the defence sector.
With investment in defence budgets increasing, more REE magnets will be required to fuel growing drone and airforce fleets, along with other military tech and weaponry.
RareX owns the Cummins Range project in WA's north, a large deposit consisting of rare earths and phosphate, with high grade hits also of scandium and gallium.
But it is also leveraged to any supply deals Iluka makes, with the junior collaborating with the mineral sands producer to potentially pick up the Mrima Hill project Kenya, where rare earths enriched material would be mined and then shipped for processing at Eneabba.
Durrant says "diversification is always key for competition and supply security".
"If the Americans are doing this, will the Ausralians follow? There's already Australian Government debt, but will they go into the equity space?" Durrant asked.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Daily Telegraph
24 minutes ago
- Daily Telegraph
US politics live: Trump's wild question: ‘Volodomyr, can you hit Moscow?'
Welcome to our coverage of US politics. Donald Trump's decision to allow more US weaponry to be sent to Ukraine and his imposition of a 50-day deadline on Russia to come to a ceasefire continues to ricochet around Washington. Ardent Trump backer but even more enthusiastic isolationist congresswoman Marjorie Taylor Greene has slammed the support for Ukraine. 'Without a shadow of a doubt, our tax dollars are being used,' she said, despite the US president's insistence other NATO members would pay for weapons systems. It's now been reported that Mr Trump asked Ukraine's President Volodomyr Zelensky earlier this month if he could 'hit Moscow' to make Russians 'feel the pain'. 'Absolutely. We can if you give us the weapons,' was the reply. While Ukraine has hit Russia's capital with drones, hitting it with US made weapons would be an escalation. Disquiet continues within Republicans over the White House's insistence there is nothing more to see from the Jeffrey Epstein files. Influential Republican and Mr Trump's daughter-in-law Lara Trump has said that the White House needs to show 'more transparency' over its handling of the investigation into Epstein. Meanwhile, Mr Trump has gone on a missive against one of his most prominent critics. He said Democratic Senator Adam Schiff was being investigated for 'possible mortgage fraud' and he 'always suspected... he was a scam artist'. Mr Schiff said it was a 'baseless attempt at political retribution'. Read on for more updates. Originally published as US politics live: Trump's wild question: 'Volodomyr, can you hit Moscow?'

News.com.au
33 minutes ago
- News.com.au
Trump UN envoy pick chastised for discussing bombing on Signal
President Donald Trump's former national security advisor Mike Waltz on Tuesday defiantly defended his use of a group chat to discuss military plans as he faced accusations of lying during a hearing to be US ambassador to the United Nations. The editor-in-chief of The Atlantic magazine said in March that Waltz had mistakenly added him to a chat among top US officials on commercial messaging app Signal about the imminent US bombing of Yemen. Senator Cory Booker of the rival Democratic Party accused Waltz of deliberately maligning the journalist by falsely saying that he infiltrated the group. "I've seen you not only fail to stand up, but lie," Booker told Waltz. "I have nothing but deep disappointment in what I consider a failure of leadership on your part," Booker told Waltz. Waltz pointed to guidance under former president Joe Biden that allowed the use of Signal, which is encrypted, and said the White House has not taken disciplinary action. "The use of Signal was not only authorized, it's still authorized and highly recommended," Waltz said, while insisting the chat did not exchange "classified" information. Senator Chris Coons, another Democrat, was incredulous over his explanation and voiced alarm that the White House has not taken any corrective action. "You were sharing details about an upcoming airstrike -- the time of launch and the potential targets. I mean, this was demonstrably sensitive information." Waltz, a former congressman and special forces officer, survived little more than three months as national security advisor before Trump on May 1 replaced him with Secretary of State Marco Rubio, who is juggling both jobs. Waltz did not deny he has kept taking his salary, saying he was not "fired" and still served as "an advisor." Senator Jacky Rosen, raising the salary issue, contrasted Waltz's actions with his vow to "root out waste and unnecessary overhead at the UN." Trump has aggressively cut US assistance overseas and pulled the United States out of several UN-backed bodies. Waltz vowed to press for reforms at the United Nations, accusing it of "anti-Semitism" and "radical politicization" for criticisms of Israel and the United States, even though the United States is the organization's largest funder. The United Nations, he said, has "drifted from its core mission of peacemaking." "The UN's overall revenue has quadrupled in the last 20 years, yet I would argue we have not seen a quadrupling of world peace," Waltz said.

ABC News
2 hours ago
- ABC News
Laura Tingle on tricky diplomacy in China
Sam Hawley: Will Australia join a US war against China if it invades Taiwan? That's the stark question Anthony Albanese faced during his delicate visit to Beijing. He's trying to strengthen trade and business ties. So with the prime minister meeting the Chinese president, can he drum up more business while managing tensions in the relationship? Today, the ABC's newly appointed global affairs editor, Laura Tingle, joins us from Beijing. I'm Sam Hawley on Gadigal land in Sydney. This is ABC News Daily. Sam Hawley: Laura, Anthony Albanese and President Xi, they're two leaders that have a lot to talk about, to say the least, aren't they? Laura Tingle: They do have a lot to talk about, Sam. News report: Prime Minister is sitting down with China's president in Beijing in a high profile meeting being closely watched in Canberra and Washington. Anthony Albanese, Prime Minister: Australia values our relationship with China and will continue to approach it in a calm and consistent manner. It's important we have these direct discussions on issues that matter to us and to the stability and prosperity of our region. Xi Jinping, Chinese President: With joint efforts from both sides, the China-Australia relationship has rose from the setback and turned around. Laura Tingle: There are all the sort of cliches about relationships and all those sorts of things, but it's interesting to me to come back to China on a prime ministerial trip after a bit of a break, because it does feel very much like the trips of the 80s and 90s, where it was all love and kisses and opportunities, which, given that there are points of significant difference between the two sides, is interesting. Sam Hawley: Well, Laura, the prime minister did speak after the meeting. He says he raised the detention of the Australian writer Yang Hengjun with the Chinese president. But overall, he was really positive about the economic relationship that Australia has with China right now. Anthony Albanese, Prime Minister: We had a very constructive meeting with President Xi in which we spoke about the range of issues facing our relationship with China. My government's approach to our relationship with China is patient, is calibrated and is deliberate. Sam Hawley: Not to mention, of course, Donald Trump. He's ever present, isn't he? And his tariffs. Laura Tingle: Absolutely. He's ever present. And just in the last 24 hours, we've had yet another announcement from Donald Trump, of course, about the possibility of really tough tariffs on Russia, over Ukraine, if Vladimir Putin doesn't do as he should, according to Donald Trump. And he's threatening secondary sanctions on China, or he hasn't named China, but on countries that have strong trading relationships with Russia, which would hit China as its biggest trading partner. So it affects everything that's going on here in Beijing at the moment. The world is being rewired before our eyes, I think, Sam. Sam Hawley: Well, we know, of course, that trade and business are crucial items for Anthony Albanese during this trip. Anthony Albanese, Prime Minister: And given that China is overwhelmingly, by far, the largest trading partner that Australia has, it is very much in the interest of Australian jobs and the Australian economy to have a positive and constructive relationship with China. Sam Hawley: But the thing is, Laura, we've seen before that this relationship with China is so delicate that it can fall apart in a nanosecond. We saw that, didn't we, with Scott Morrison when he called for an inquiry into COVID, trade was just cut by Beijing. So why are we trying to build it up when we know that it can fall apart so easily? Laura Tingle: Well, it can fall apart around the edges, but realistically, we still have this massive trade relationship with China. That's the reality of it. They've cut us off on some particular markets in the past few years, but still 25% of our exports go to China. So that relationship is really solid. China, for the time being, certainly, or for the next little while, is reliant on our iron ore. So while you have these disruptions and things, it's still a fundamental relationship. Now, it is extraordinary to just think about how bad things did get a few years ago, where basically no minister could get a phone call from anybody in China. They were throwing Australian journalists out of the country and jailing others. It was, you know, it was pretty ugly. News report: An Australian journalist working in China has been detained by the Chinese government in a highly sensitive case, posing a fresh challenge to those already fraught Australia-China relations. News report: First, it was barley. Now it's beef. Our largest trading partner suspending imports from four abattoirs. News report: Beyond meat, China is now refusing to accept timber from four states. Lobsters are shut out. Wine exporters face up to 200% tariff. Laura Tingle: I think there's been a bit of a change at the Chinese end. I think the whole culture of the so-called wolf warrior diplomacy was something that they ultimately decided wasn't really working in their interests. And I think once again, to mention Donald Trump, you can see, I think, that not just in their relationship with Australia, but in their relationship with countries like Vietnam. China is really pushing this message that, you know, we're the safe and steady, you know, people who make very sensible, rational, calm decisions about our trade relationships. China's playing the sort of adult in the room role, if you like. Sam Hawley: Well, Laura, of course, trade is one thing. But then there is the flip side to this relationship, and that is security, of course, and the elephant, if you like, in the room, which is Taiwan. And that is when things get really complicated, don't they, for Anthony Albanese? Laura Tingle: Well, they do and they don't get complicated in some way, Sam. If you think about sort of the domestic way this issue has to play out at some point and also then how it plays out on the international stage. Now, a story was leaked over the weekend, just as the prime minister was arriving in Shanghai, about how the Under Secretary of Defense, Elbridge Colby, was pushing Australia and Japan to say exactly what their position would be in the case of a war with Taiwan. On one level, that's sort of a bit embarrassing for the prime minister, but he's made it clear that, you know, we make our own decisions about these things. Reporter: Do you think it's important, from the point of view of deterrence, of China, that you say, yes, we're involved or no, we're not involved? Anthony Albanese, Prime Minister: I think it's important that we have a consistent position, which Australia has had for a long period of time. We support the status quo when it comes to Taiwan. We don't support any unilateral action. Laura Tingle: And it was being linked to the AUKUS submarines, the Virginia class submarines that we're supposed to be getting from the Americans. Now, it's quite clear, talking to Australian officials, that they don't regard the AUKUS deal is in any way, gives the Americans any right to tell us what we would do with the US submarines once we got them, because they'd be ours, you know, we would buy them. Now, there seems to be a fair degree of confidence that despite these stories, you know, that will all sort of settle down. And I sort of also think you've got to back engineer this a little bit. I mean, if you took Elbridge Colby's comments seriously and said, he's saying that we can't get the submarines unless we're prepared to go to war with Taiwan. Well, wait a minute. The Americans haven't said that they would go to war with China over Taiwan. It sort of doesn't all quite stack up. Sam Hawley: There was some confusion, wasn't there, when Joe Biden was president over some questioning on this, whether the US would support Taiwan militarily. Laura Tingle: Yes. Sam Hawley: That was never really cleared up, but he came pretty close to saying they would. Laura Tingle: He certainly did come close to saying that they would. Donald Trump certainly hasn't. Sam Hawley: What do you think, though, Laura, is the Trump administration justified in asking this question, asking nations if they would support the US if China did invade Taiwan? You know, China has continually been flexing its muscles, hasn't it? Military exercises around the Pacific, including almost all the way around Australia. So there's reason for concern. There's reason for discussions like this. Laura Tingle: Absolutely. There's a really legitimate reason for discussions. And I think it's really important that Australia has that discussion internally, because I don't think we've been having it until now. And it affects those decisions about whether we have a forward strategic stance in the South China Sea or not. But I think the crucial question is it's fine for the Americans to ask that question if their own position is clarified. And I think this is the dodgy bit of it, to use the technical phrase. I mean, I think the Americans don't want to say what their position is. And it's not clear that they would go to war over Taiwan with China. Reporter: Would it be reasonable for the United States to demand any sort of assurances from Australia on a Taiwan contingency, given the United States itself maintains a policy of strategic ambiguity, at least in theory, on Taiwan? Anthony Albanese, Prime Minister: Well, you've just answered the question yourself, I think, through the comments that you've made. Sam Hawley: Well, Laura, just sum this up for me. How successful do you think the prime minister's approach to China will be? Because it is remarkably different, isn't it, to the way that Scott Morrison, for instance, dealt with Beijing or Donald Trump, for that matter? Laura Tingle: Well, you'd have to say at this stage, it's certainly more successful, Sam, just because we have restored those trade links. He's here. This is another visit. You know, as you say, it's always volatile. But for now, it's quite a good relationship. And it serves both countries well in the context of this global trade war that Donald Trump has started. So I think, you know, it's a it's a good basis to be operating in this very uncertain world. Sam Hawley: But Laura, what about tensions in the relationship? What do you think? Will Anthony Albanese actually tackle those head on? Or is he going to bring some sort of softer approach for fear of backlash from China? Laura Tingle: Look, well, I suppose there are two observations on that. One of them is Penny Wong has in the last week gone out very hard on these issues, both in a speech and also in her meetings with her counterpart when she was at the ASEAN meeting. Penny Wong, Foreign Minister: China continues to assert its strategic influence and project its military power further into our region. And we have seen the worrying pace of China's nuclear and conventional military build up without the transparency that the region expects. We are realistic about China's objectives in changing the regional balance of power. Laura Tingle: So she's laid down Australia's protests on all these issues in a very forthright way. And the prime minister has said that, you know, these issues will not be avoided in his conversations with the president and premier while he's here in Beijing. But, you know, it's always the case that those leader to leader meetings, they're a little bit more diplomatic about what they might say publicly. But Anthony Albanese says that, one, he's on the case and two, that it's been successful in the interests of Australia since he's been prime minister. Sam Hawley: All right. Well, Laura, it's a true balancing act. That's for sure. The PM's trying to work with China, but he also wants to keep the US happy too. So this, I think, is one of the most complicated relationships he has to deal with as the leader of Australia, right? Laura Tingle: Absolutely. Absolutely. But I can't help but feeling that the way that the Trump administration has been behaving, if you like, in that broader description of its sort of erraticness and everything, has created both political space at home and abroad for the prime minister to establish a more assertive position with both major powers and sort of establish that more independent voice of our own. I think it's been quite useful because I think people at home are sort of, they look at what Donald Trump's been doing with a bit of confusion and concern, and it's just given him some space. And of course, also, you know, three years ago, there was this sense that the Labor Party couldn't say anything negative about the United States at all or about the alliance because they'd get absolutely pummelled by the coalition. It's harder to do that now because of the way the US has been going. But also, of course, the coalition is weakened politically and its both its capacity and its taste for, you know, fighting every last fight as a sign of, you know, being disloyal to the Americans has really subsided. So I think there's a lot of tectonic plate shifting, which give government of the day room to manoeuvre with both major powers. Sam Hawley: Laura Tingle is the ABC's Global Affairs Editor. This episode was produced by Sydney Pead and Kara Jensen-Mackinnon. Audio production by Sam Dunn. Our supervising producer is David Coady. I'm Sam Hawley. Thanks for listening.