logo
Boots opens brand new store in Glasgow Central Station

Boots opens brand new store in Glasgow Central Station

Glasgow Times17 hours ago
Boots has officially opened its brand-new shop within the city centre travel hub, offering an expanded selection of health, wellness, and beauty products. The store also provides NHS Pharmacy First Scotland services.
Designed to deliver an enhanced shopping experience for commuters and travellers, the new branch is open from 7am to 10pm, Monday to Saturday, and 9am to 6pm on Sundays.
(Image: Supplied)
READ MORE: Fashion giant announces first Glasgow store to open in Silverburn
The new shop will also be providing the NHS pharmacy service operates from 9am to 7pm on Saturdays.
Conveniently located next to the station's entrance, the store is easily accessible for those on the move.
(Image: Supplied)
Emma Collins, Store Manager at Boots Glasgow Central Station, said: 'Located in one of the country's busiest stations, we welcome thousands of people to our store each week, and we love being able to help them on their journey – whether they need to see a pharmacist, grab lunch on the go, are popping in to get blister plasters or want to pick up skincare for a pamper when they get home, we've got something for everyone.
"We are delighted to open our brand-new store and can't wait to welcome even more passengers through our doors.'
READ MORE: Brand-new 'free' store opens in busy Glasgow shopping centre
(Image: Supplied)
For those in need of last-minute travel essentials, the store stocks a wide range of products, including toiletries and everyday items from popular beauty brands such as No7, Soap & Glory, and Boots' own label.
Customers can also enjoy a variety of food and drink options, with the classic Boots Meal Deal available for those seeking a quick bite before or after their journey.
Boots has had a presence at Glasgow Central Station for nearly a century. Its first store opened there in 1931, marking it as the first Boots branch in a railway station in Scotland.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Booze makes my face turn red - this GP-approved remedy has saved my insecurities
Booze makes my face turn red - this GP-approved remedy has saved my insecurities

Daily Mirror

time33 minutes ago

  • Daily Mirror

Booze makes my face turn red - this GP-approved remedy has saved my insecurities

I thought I had an allergy to alcohol when I saw my cheeks flush bright red after a drink, but it turns out there's a unique term to describe my ailment and a GP-approved way to avoid it. When I had my first-ever alcoholic drink, I started to turn red. I never understood the reason behind it, and kept drinking until someone asked me: 'Why are you so red?'. Then I learnt the meaning behind the so-called 'Asian flush', and now I wonder if there's a way to stop it. The ' Asian flush ', also known as the 'Asian glow' is a condition in which a person develops flushes on their neck, shoulders, ears, and in some cases, their entire body after consuming alcoholic beverages. It got so bad that at one point, I even thought I was allergic to booze. ‌ This so-called alcoholic flush comes from an inherited deficiency in the enzyme aldehyde dehydrogenase 2 (ALDH2), as explained by Science Direct. The build-up of acetaldehyde leads the blood vessels to dilate, which is where the 'Asian flush' comes from. ‌ As reported by Alcohol Change UK, not only does one's face become red, but it is also accompanied by nausea, headaches, itching, vomiting and a fast heart rate. It was also found that those intolerant to alcohol have a higher risk of affecting their overall health, including cancer and other diseases. My symptoms have triggered my insecurities and limited my drinking habits and I know I'm not alone. Dr Farah Ahmed, a NHS GP told the Mirror: "[Asian flush] affects an estimated 30-50% of East Asians globally, and with people of East and Southeast Asian heritage making up about 1.5% of the population in England and Wales (2021 Census), it's likely that tens of thousands in the UK are affected." Is there a cure for 'Asian flush'? To keep it plain and simple, no, there isn't a cure for 'Asian flush'. The only solution to avoid the flush from ruining your night is to stop drinking at all, experts have warned. However, there are remedies, which involve taking medication, such as Zantac, Pepcid and Tagamet, although they can impose some health risks. Dr Farah Ahmed added: "Some young people use over-the-counter medications like Pepcid (famotidine) to reduce facial redness, but this only masks the visible symptoms and does not prevent the harmful internal effects, including an increased risk of alcohol-related cancers such as oesophageal cancer." For more stories like this subscribe to our weekly newsletter, The Weekly Gulp, for a curated roundup of trending stories, poignant interviews, and viral lifestyle picks from The Mirror's Audience U35 team delivered straight to your inbox. ‌ Continuing to consume alcoholic beverages during a flush reaction can lead to the build-up of acetaldehyde, which is a toxic by product of alcohol metabolism. 'The concern with this practice is that it can create a false sense of safety, as acetaldehyde, a known carcinogen, still accumulates in the body," she explained. Whilst there isn't a cure for my Asian flush, the most effective way to manage and avoid the redness is to to limit alcohol intake or quit drinking altogether. Plus, going sober has multiple benefits, including better sleep, improved mental health and improved skin health. Help us improve our content by completing the survey below. We'd love to hear from you!

Keir Starmer told me he'd met every challenge. But things look bad right now
Keir Starmer told me he'd met every challenge. But things look bad right now

BBC News

timean hour ago

  • BBC News

Keir Starmer told me he'd met every challenge. But things look bad right now

Will Keir Starmer allow himself to celebrate his first anniversary as prime minister this weekend? Or will he be taking a long, hard look in the mirror and asking himself what went wrong?That is what is in my mind as he greets me in the Terracotta Room on the first floor of 10 Downing Street for a long-planned conversation about his first 12 months in office, this looks surprisingly relaxed, given that his chancellor, Rachel Reeves, had been in tears sitting behind him in the Commons just hours earlier. That triggered fevered speculation about how long she would last in the job, moving markets to sell the pound and increase the cost of that is the impression he wants to convey to me as he shares a story about his photo opportunity with Formula One cars parked outside his front door - the most famous door in the is determined that the problems of recent weeks - and boy there's been a long list of those - will not overshadow the achievements he believes deserve just as much attention."We have done some fantastic things," he tells me, "really driven down the waiting lists in the NHS, really done loads of improvements in schools and stuff that we can do for children - whether that's rolling out school uniform projects, whether it's school meals, breakfast clubs, you name it - and also [brought in] a huge amount of investment into the country. And of course we've been busy getting three trade deals."It's clear that, given the chance, his list would go on. And yet, I point out, there is another long list - of things he's recently admitted to getting the last year, he's said hiring Sue Gray - Starmer's former chief of staff who left Downing Street in October - was wrong. He's also held his hands up about plans to end winter fuel payments, about rejecting a national grooming gang inquiry, and cutting benefits for disabled people. That's not even the full list, yet it's quite a number of things that he's admitting to being a prime minister thinks I've rather crudely summarised his personal reflections on what he might have done better. He challenges the idea, which is prevalent in Westminster, that changing your mind represents weakness, or a "humiliating U-turn".Listen: The inside story of Starmer's stormy first yearInDepth: Why Sir Keir's political honeymoon was so short-livedThis is the fourth time we've sat down for an extended and personal conversation for my Political Thinking podcast."You know this from getting to know me," he says. "I'm not one of these ideological thinkers, where ideology dictates what I do. I'm a pragmatist. You can badge these things as U-turns - it's common sense to me."If someone says to me, 'here's some more information and I really think it's the right thing to do', I'm the kind of person that says, 'well in which case, let's do it'."There is, though, no doubt that scrapping so much of his welfare reforms was a U-turn - a costly and humiliating one. Starmer and his chancellor have not only lost authority and face, they've lost £5bn in planned savings, something that will have to be paid for somehow, through extra borrowing, lower spending or, most likely, higher taxes."I take responsibility," he says, "we didn't get the process right". But somehow he implies that it might have been someone other than the leader of the Labour Party's responsibility to persuade Labour MPs to back his plans. He doesn't spell out what he means by getting the process right and, perhaps more importantly, he dodges my attempts to get him to spell out clearly what story he's trying to tell the country about Labour be on the side of disabled people and people like his own mother, who had a crippling disease that meant she eventually had to have a leg amputated? Or should they adopt her unwillingness to be written off, which he described to me the last time we spoke? When told by her doctors that she wouldn't walk again she refused to listen. Wounded by the events of the past week, Starmer refuses to even address that choice. But surely, I suggest to him, the nation doesn't just want a problem-solver, or a chief executive of UK plc? Voters surely want a leader who has a story to tell?Starmer clearly knew this question - or a variation of it - was coming. I've pushed him on it every time we've spoken at length. "It's about a passion, if that's the right word," he says. "But certainly a determination to change the lives of millions of working people and, in particular, to tackle this question of fairness.""It's almost like a social contract," he adds, "that people are getting back what they're putting in, that there is a fairer environment for them that supports them and respects them."That's a bit long to sew on to an election banner, to chant in the streets, or write in a post on X, but it is a theme. He is a self-proclaimed pragmatist who doesn't want there to be something that can be labelled as "Starmerism", but at least we can now say that his guiding principle is fairness. In truth, what matters more than anything else to him is not losing, something he tells me he hates, whether in politics or on the five-a-side pitch playing football regularly with his mates - as he still does and has done for decades.I tell him people think he is losing now - some say he is the most unpopular prime minister since records began. He reacts with the defiance of a man whose football-playing friend recently described him as a "hard bastard". A man who served in Jeremy Corbyn's shadow cabinet and then had him thrown out of the party; who stood to be leader on promises to keep much of Corbyn's agenda before tearing up those promises to win power; and someone who hired then fired Sue Gray as his first Downing Street chief of staff. "Every challenge that's been put in front of me I've risen to, met it, and we're going to continue in the same vein," he says.I end our conversation by reminding him what they say about failing football managers who have "lost the dressing room". Has he lost the Labour Party dressing room? His reply is emphatic."Absolutely not," he says. "The Labour dressing room, the PLP, is proud as hell of what we've done, and their frustration - my frustration - is that sometimes the other stuff, welfare would be an example, can obscure us being able to get that out there."Almost as an afterthought he adds: "I'm a hard-enough bastard to find out who it was who said that, so that I can have a discussion with him." Knowing Starmer I suspect he's much more likely to deliver a crunching tackle on the pitch than a quiet word off the prime minister's message is clear to me: Don't count me out, however bad it looks now. To pretty much everyone other than him it currently does look bad. Very bad.

Sussex cuts number of NHS-funded IVF cycles from three to one
Sussex cuts number of NHS-funded IVF cycles from three to one

BBC News

timean hour ago

  • BBC News

Sussex cuts number of NHS-funded IVF cycles from three to one

The number of NHS-funded IVF cycles people can receive in Sussex has been cut from three to Sussex's Integrated Care Board (ICB) announced the reduction took effect on 1 July as the region was brought in line with the majority of ICBs across had been one of only four regions in the country to offer three cycles of IVF treatment on the NHS, the Sussex-based Agora Clinic James Ramsay, chief medical officer at NHS Sussex, said: "We remain committed to offering fertility treatment for our population and through our new policy will continue to support hundreds of people in Sussex every year." Katie Rollings, from Billingshurst, started IVF in 2010 and finished in 2017 when she concieved Rollings, who went on to create charity Fertility Action, said the decrease in NHS-funded cycles was "really concerning"."I think you get to a stage where you have to stop trying, which is heartbreaking, and we see it regularly in our charity's support groups and unfortunately people get to a point where they can't do it anymore," she said."Sometimes it's emotionally, but often it's financially, they get to a place where they just have to stop and I think it's heartbreaking." Sussex-based singer Tom Ball, who was a finalist on Britain's Got Talent in 2022, became a parent via said: "Every family deserves a chance, and cutting treatment takes that away from so many people who are already going through so much." Dr Ramsay said as an ICB it had a duty to ensure services were provided fairly for the entire population across Sussex within the resources available."This has meant that we have had to consider difficult decisions about how the budget we receive for healthcare in Sussex is allocated, and the decision was not made lightly," he added.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store