
Responding to Crosetti Brand case, lawmakers pass bill emphasizing domestic violence training for Prisoner Review Board
The Democratic-led House passed the legislation Tuesday by a near party-line vote of 74-37 and it now heads to Gov. JB Pritzker, who a spokesperson said Wednesday intends to sign the bill into law. The bill passed in the Senate last month, with three moderate Democrats joining Republicans in voting against it: Patrick Joyce of Reddick, Meg Loughran Cappel of Shorewood and Suzy Glowiak Hilton of Western Springs.
The bill's passage came 14 months after authorities say Crosetti Brand broke into his ex-girlfriend's apartment on Chicago's North Side and attacked her before fatally stabbing her son, 11-year-old Jayden Perkins, when the boy tried to come to her rescue. The 39-year-old Brand is on trial for the attack and Jayden's family has filed a lawsuit against the review board alleging negligence in the case.
The case became a political challenge for Pritzker as the review board had been criticized a couple of years before the attack by state legislative Republicans for authorizing the early release of people convicted of killing police officers, children and committing mass murder.
In light of Jayden's case, two review board members, including the chairman, resigned. The crime also led to the appointment of an executive director for the board. Pritzker was also critical of how Brand's case was handled.
'It is clear that evidence in this case was not given the careful consideration that victims of domestic violence deserve and I am committed to ensuring additional safeguards and training are in place to prevent tragedies like this from happening again,' the governor said last year.
Since then, there have been at least two efforts to reform the review board but those have failed to get through the General Assembly.
State Rep. Kelly Cassidy, a Chicago Democrat and a leader of the reform efforts, said a version of the bill that failed to pass during the lame-duck session in early January didn't do enough to address domestic violence issues, which is why she especially welcomed the passage of the revamped bill.
'This is everything that I worked on with the advocates,' Cassidy, who worked on the bill with Chicago Democratic Rep. Will Guzzardi, said Tuesday. 'In the lame-duck version, absolutely none of the domestic violence advocates' materials were included. It just was simply omitted.'
Under the bill sent to Pritzker, the review board is required to run a Law Enforcement Agencies Data System, or LEADS, report, which typically has information about a person's criminal history including orders of protection filed against them, before making a decision on whether to revoke someone's parole or mandatory supervised release.
The board within 60 days must also publish on its website its decision and the name and identification number of individuals accused of violating their terms of release.
Board members currently must have five years of experience in corrections, law enforcement, law, education, sociology, social work, medicine, psychology or other behavioral sciences. The bill would expand those requirements to include 'advocacy for victims of crime and their families, advocacy for survivors of domestic violence, sexual violence, or intimate partner violence.'
In addition, the bill would require seven of the board's maximum 15 members to have at least five years of experience as a law enforcement officer, parole officer, prosecutor, criminal defense lawyer or judge. Board members are appointed by the governor with consent of the Senate.
The legislation would require board members to participate annually in 20 hours of training on topics including domestic violence, restorative justice, racial bias, mental health and trauma. They would also be required to be trained on lethality of domestic violence and gender-based violence.
Republican lawmakers supported an earlier version of the bill that included a requirement that recordings of much of the board's hearings be made public. The GOP also raised concerns about why the terms of the board members were extended from six years to eight years, arguing that could limit the Senate's consent role in appointments.
'My concern is that you've got these members who are now going to be in office for eight years and they are going to have less accountability than they had before and that's not a good thing,' said Sen. Steve McClure, a Republican from Springfield and an ardent critic of the Pritzker administration's handling of the review board. 'That's a public safety issue. And this is all in light of the fact that we lost a brave hero in our state, Jayden Perkins, who was trying to defend his mother last year.'
Democrats, including Senate President Don Harmon of Oak Park, who sponsored the bill in the Senate, contended the eight-year terms would help board members be more effective.
'I think with an eight-year term, members will be less concerned about being reappointed and will serve their term and do the best work that they can do,' Harmon said.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
5 minutes ago
- Yahoo
California voters support EV tax incentives, but are wary of sales mandates says poll
California drivers don't want to lose their electric vehicle tax incentives, but even voters in one of the bluest states are wary about reviving plans to phase out gas cars. Voters are split down the middle on whether California should stick to its guns on its Trump-blocked plans to phase out sales of gas cars by 2035, according to an exclusive POLITICO-Citrin Center-Possibility Lab poll. Only 46 percent of the more than 1,400 registered voters surveyed said they support the policy, while 47 percent said no. Yes, there was an obvious partisan split: 60 percent of Democrats said they backed the phase-out, compared with 40 percent of independents and 31 percent of Republicans. But the results offer a note of caution for Gov. Gavin Newsom, who directed the California Air Resources Board to start writing new vehicle emissions rules after Republicans revoked the state's sales mandates for cars and heavy-duty trucks in June. 'None of us really like the idea of government intervening to take something away from us,' said Dan Sperling, a former California Air Resources Board member and director of the University of California, Davis' Institute for Transportation Studies. 'That's even the most liberal of us.' Poll respondents are more bought into Newsom's plan to backfill the soon-to-be-defunct $7,500 federal EV tax credit. Nearly two-thirds — 64 percent — said they would support state-funded tax incentives once the federal subsidy ends Sept. 30, as part of the Trump administration's ongoing attacks on clean energy policy. That question again showed a partisan divide, with 80 percent of Democrats saying they back the approach, compared with 60 percent of independent voters and just 43 percent of Republicans. But the overall result bolsters Newsom's push to backfill incentives that the Biden administration used to coax drivers off fossil fuels, as he suggested using cap-and-trade revenues last year and directed state agencies to consider in a June executive order. But Jack Citrin, a veteran political science professor at UC Berkeley and partner on the poll, said a closer look at the poll results shows that Democrats need to keep affordability in mind. He pointed to the fact that 28 percent of respondents said they'd support new EV incentives only if gas prices aren't impacted and another 20 percent said they should be reserved for low-income buyers, reflecting the fact that cost of living was the top concern of voters polled. And 64 percent of respondents said gasoline prices are putting a significant, extreme or moderate burden on their household budgets. 'That reflects a concern with the cost of all of this,' Citrin said. 'Yes, we're for environmental protection. Yes, we're for all of this, just as long as it doesn't cost a lot.' The poll comes as state agencies released a joint report Tuesday with recommendations for countering Trump's assault, calling on lawmakers to bolster tax incentives, improve charging infrastructure and regulate facilities that attract polluting trucks, but offering few specific timelines or dollar figures. CARB Chair Liane Randolph framed the report — which Newsom asked for in his June order — as a first step in the state's defense against a hostile federal government. 'Clean air efforts are under siege, putting the health of every American at risk,' she said during a press briefing. 'California is continuing to fight back and will not give up on cleaner air and better public health.' Sperling called the report a surprisingly 'modest document,' and said it lacks the specificity he hoped to see. 'The word I would use is disconcerting,' Sperling said when asked about where California stands in its fight against Trump. The POLITICO-Citrin Center-Possibility Lab poll was fielded by TrueDot, the artificial intelligence-accelerated research platform, in collaboration with the Citrin Center and Possibility Lab at UC Berkeley and POLITICO. The public opinion study, made possible in part with support from the California Constitution Center, was conducted in the field between July 28 and Aug. 12. The sample of 1,445 registered voters was selected at random by Verasight, with interviews conducted in English and Spanish, and includes an oversample of Hispanic voters. The modeled error estimate for the full sample is plus or minus 2.6 percent. The policy influencer study was conducted from July 30 to Aug. 11, among 512 subscribers to POLITICO Pro, and the modeled error estimate is plus or minus 3.7 percent. Like this content? Consider signing up for POLITICO's California Climate newsletter.
Yahoo
5 minutes ago
- Yahoo
The 2025 Political Beat Primary Candidate Guide
Charlotte residents will head to the polls to decide who should advance to the November general election for Charlotte City Council. In-person early voting starts August 21. The primary is on September 9th. Channel 9 sent key questions to all candidates. Their responses are posted unedited. ALSO READ: Where you can vote early in Charlotte for the primary election Whoever wins the primaries in Districts 1, 4, and 5 will serve on the next Charlotte City Council. There is no opposition for these seats in November. Democrats and unaffiliated voters can vote in all districts. Republicans can only vote in the District 6 primary. This is the only contested Republican race in September. Unaffiliated voters can choose the Republican ballot in District 6. See the candidates' responses in each race below: The Political Beat Candidate Guide: City of Charlotte Mayor The Political Beat Candidate Guide: Charlotte City Council At-Large The Political Beat Candidate Guide: Charlotte City Council- District 1 The Political Beat Candidate Guide: Charlotte City Council—District 3 The Political Beat Candidate Guide: Charlotte City Council—District 4 The Political Beat Candidate Guide: Charlotte City Council—District 5 The Political Beat Candidate Guide: Charlotte City Council—District 6 Use the map below to easily find your city council district and a link to our guide for the district. (WATCH BELOW: Charlotte City Council approves conversion of motel to studio apartments)


The Hill
6 minutes ago
- The Hill
Democrats press DHS for ‘Alligator Alcatraz' information
Democratic lawmakers are pressing the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) for more information about how the Trump administration teamed up with the state of Florida to create a controversial detention facility for migrants in the middle of the Everglades. 'Brushing aside concerns from human rights watchdogs, environmentalist groups, and Tribal nations, [DHS] has greenlit the construction of this expansive detention facility that may violate detained individuals' human rights, jeopardize public and environmental health and violate federal law,' House and Senate Democrats wrote in a letter to DHS Secretary Kristi Noem dated Wednesday. The detention facility, dubbed 'Alligator Alcatraz,' opened in early July to house arrested migrants awaiting deportation. It was created through a state and federal partnership, with Florida officials leading oversight and construction, with DHS footing the bill. President Trump toured the facility when it opened, along with Noem. A federal judge last week temporarily halted expansion of the site after tribal and environmental groups filed a lawsuit over potential damage to wetlands. Located just south of Miami, Alligator Alcatraz quickly raised alarms about conditions for detainees in the hot, humid climate. Some whistleblowers have described worm-infested food, plumbing problems and other issues since its opening. 'The Everglades site was selected precisely because of its remote location and harsh surroundings, which Florida officials reportedly view as 'an ideal location to house and transport migrants,'' the Democrats wrote in their letter Wednesday. 'We ask that DHS promptly provide critical information for the American public to better understand this detention plan.' The letter was signed by more than five dozen members of Congress, led by Sen. Jeff Merkley (D-Ore.) and Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz (D-Fla.). It requested that DHS respond to several questions by September 3.