My life and writing are one and the same: Booker Prize winner Banu Mushtaq
'My life is like an open book... There is nothing to hide. My life and writing are one and the same,' said International Booker Prize winner Banu Mushtaq.
Speaking during an interaction, organised by the Karnataka Media Academy at Press Club, Bengaluru, on Wednesday, she said that there are many prejudices in society about a woman from a Muslim family writing boldly.
'A few years ago, a police officer asked me whether to write 'Miss' or 'Mrs' before my name while sending an invitation. Also, at an event in Bengaluru, a member of the audience asked me to share my experience of being divorced. I confronted him, asking who told him that I was divorced. I have been happily married for 50 years.... All these issues will be incorporated in my autobiography,' she said.
Shedding light about the selection of her book Heart Lamp for the Booker Prize, she said: 'This is the first time that a collection of short stories has been awarded the Booker Prize. Heart Lamp was third among the three works selected for the final round of the award.... The selection committee considered the impact the work had on people,' she explained.
'When I felt that I had no life without writing, I turned to journalism. Later, I became a writer and a lawyer. Writing should not have any linguistic boundaries. I had my education in a Kannada-medium school, and wrote in Kannada. For writers, content is important, not the language,' she said. One's work can always be translated into other languages later, Ms. Mushtaq added.
Deepa Bhasthi, translator of Heart Lamp, said that while translating, she felt no compulsion to impress the Western readers. 'Therefore, many words used in the original have been retained. English became better because of Heart Lamp,' she said.
Chairperson of the Karnataka Media Academy Ayesha Khanum, journalist Dinesh Amin Mattu, and others were present at the event.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New Indian Express
an hour ago
- New Indian Express
KSP moves Karnataka HC seeking intervention in plea filed against relief of 'Thug Life'
The Karnataka Film Chamber of Commerce has resolved to ban the release and distribution of Thug Life in Karnataka as actor Kamal Haasan refused to tender an apology over his controversial statement that Kannada was born out of Tamil. Questioning this decision, Raajkamal Films International, for which Kamal Haasan is one of the directors, moved the HC. In its impleading application filed to this petition, KSP contended that the statement in question amounts to intentional or reckless speech that denigrates the dignity of the Kannada language and added that so far, the actor has not made any bonafide effort to tender an apology over his remarks. The KSP has also opposed the prayer made by the petitioner for police protection to release a movie in Karnataka, saying that police resources are not meant to provide protection to a commercial interest. The KSP is approaching the court in the public interest to seek permission to intervene in the petition and to place on record relevant constitutional, linguistic and cultural issues arising from recent events that have caused public unrest and hurt to the sentiments of the Kannada-speaking community.
Indian Express
2 hours ago
- Indian Express
Trump's latest travel ban isn't about national security — it's about national identity and who's allowed to belong
Written by Jonah Blank For more than two decades, larges swathes of American foreign and domestic policy have been organised around terrorism: This spectre was used as the rationale for two major wars, the reorientation of all intelligence agencies, the creation of a Department of Homeland Security, and the weakening of rights of privacy, free speech, and basic legal representation. The proportionality between these responses and the threats actually posed was always tenuous: More than twice as many Americans were killed in Iraq and Afghanistan, for example, as in the attacks of 9/11. In the second Trump Administration, however, the US has used the pretext of terrorism in a new way: It is now deployed primarily in the context of immigration. Next week, most visitors from 19 nations will be barred from entering the United States. Counterterrorism is the stated goal, but the real purpose has less to do with national security and is more about national identity. Donald Trump's latest travel prohibition hearkened back to the 'Muslim ban' of his first term, which was struck down by the courts but revived in a more limited way. The current order, like the original 'Muslim ban', bars entry to citizens based solely on nationality rather than any specific risk factors. Its rationale is clearly stated — the title of the proclamation is 'Restricting the Entry of Foreign Nationals to Protect the United States from Foreign Terrorists and Other National Security and Public Safety Threats'. This pretext, however, had little to do with the action itself. The nations targeted for complete or partial exclusion are spread across Asia, Africa, the Middle East and South America, and 15 out of the 19 have one thing in common: None of their citizens has ever been involved in any terrorist action in the United States; records are less clear globally, but no citizen of these nations seems to have been involved in terrorist actions against American targets anywhere. The nations that have produced the most dangerous terrorist threats to America are all absent from the list. Saudi Arabia supplied all but four of the 9/11 hijackers, as well as their ringleader, Osama bin Laden; last month, Trump travelled to the Kingdom and gushed over its de facto ruler, saying 'I like him too much.' Neither the other nations whose citizens participated in the hijackings (United Arab Emirates, Egypt, and Lebanon), nor the nation that subsequently sheltered Al Qaeda's leadership for a decade (Pakistan) were included in the ban. Of the 12 nations completely banned and seven others slapped with sweeping travel restrictions, only five (Iran, Afghanistan, Yemen, Sudan, Libya and Somalia) could be considered terrorism concerns, and citizens of these countries already face exclusion or exceptionally close scrutiny. The other 14 nations sanctioned present no such threat: Myanmar, Haiti, Eritrea, Chad, the Republic of Congo, Equatorial Guinea, Cuba, Laos, Venezuela, Burundi, Sierra Leone, Togo and Turkmenistan. Since the terrorism rationale is evidently hollow, why single them out? As is the explanation for so much in the Trump administration: Immigration. The proclamation charges these nations with 'historic failure to accept back their removable nationals' who 'pose significant risks of overstaying their visas.' Such allegations may or may not hold up, but they clearly have nothing to do with terrorism. In his remarks, Trump cited a recent attack in Colorado by a man originally from Egypt (not a nation on the banned list), but he then revealed more than he may have intended about the people targeted: 'We don't want them.' This is the difference between the current counterterrorism rationale and that used by Trump's predecessors. If George W Bush, Barack Obama or Joe Biden had used terrorism as the motivation for banning large classes of people, he would have said (and genuinely meant), They're a threat to our security. Trump essentially admits that the threat isn't truly part of the equation. The reason for the exclusion is just that we don't want them. That encapsulates the MAGA obsession with immigration. It's the top of the movement's agenda, and may well have won Trump his second term, but there is remarkably little discussion in America about why immigrants represent a threat. Because they're taking jobs from citizens? Unemployment is low, and many of the jobs taken by immigrants (especially undocumented ones) are poorly-paid agricultural and industrial work that Americans don't want. Because they overwhelm public services? Sometimes, but immigrants contribute far more to America's economy than they draw from it. Because they fuel crime? Immigrants (including those who've come here illegally) have lower crime rates than native-born. The heart of the matter is exactly what Trump said it was: The roughly half of the nation that supports him feels threatened by the demographic changes represented by immigrants from Africa, Asia and Latin America. Do people from Laos or Togo actually represent a terrorist threat? Of course not. And nobody believes that they do. But they need a rationale to give cover to their discomfort. America is in transition from a nation in which a majority of citizens look like Trump to one in which a majority look like — well, like his 2024 election rival Kamala Harris. And most of Trump's supporters are uneasy about this transformation. Many don't like to admit it. Many prefer to believe that the issue really is crime, or inflation, or ever-more-remote connections to the threat of terrorism. But with his latest travel ban, Trump is barely even pretending to maintain this façade. He offers up terrorism as a comforting veil, makes little effort to keep it from slipping. The President and his supporters just don't want them. The writer is the author of Arrow of the Blue-Skinned God: Retracing the Ramayana Through India and Mullahs on the Mainframe: Islam and Modernity Among the Daudi Bohras
The Hindu
2 hours ago
- The Hindu
‘Thug Life' day 1 box office collection: Kamal Haasan's film collects ₹17 crores on opening day
Ace filmmaker Mani Ratnam's much-anticipated Tamil film Thug Life, starring Kamal Haasan and Silambarasan TR, collected ₹17 crores on its opening day, June 5, at the Indian box office. The film arrived in theatres with sky-high expectations, especially since it marked a reunion between Mani and Kamal after 38 years. However, the opening figure falls short of even Kamal's previous film, the widely panned Indian 2, which opened to ₹25.2 crores, according to Sacnilk. That Thug Life hasn't been released in Karnataka following the controversy surrounding Kamal's remark on Kannada is a major factor for the drop in the collections. For comparison, Indian 2 had raked in ₹3.45 crores on the opening day in Karnataka. According to Sacnilk, the Tamil version of the film saw its highest occupancy in Pondicherry, with 70.25 per cent, followed by Chennai with 69.25 per cent. Thug Life, one of the biggest Tamil films of the year, reunites Kamal and Mani Ratnam after the iconic Nayakan (1987). With music scored by A.R. Rahman, the gangster drama also stars Silambarasan T.R. in a pivotal role alongside Trisha, Nasser, Joju George, Abhirami, Bhagavathi Perumal, Ashok Selvan, Aishwarya Lekshmi, Sanya Malhotra and Ali Fazal among others. The film is produced by Kamal's Raaj Kamal Films International and Mani Ratnam's Madras Talkies. The Hindu's review of the film read, 'A 163-minute chronicle of an elderly gangster's tryst with love, destiny, guilt and death, Thug Life is a gangster crime drama with stretches so generic and cold that you might wonder if it was really the filmmaker at the helm.'
