
US July budget deficit up 20% year-over-year despite record Trump tariff income
The government's shortfall has climbed 20% this fiscal year compared to the same period in 2024.
Even as Trump talks about America becoming rich because of his import tax hikes, federal spending keeps outpacing the revenues collected by the government. That financial picture might change as companies exhaust their pre-tariff inventories, forcing them to import more goods and generate even more in tax revenues that could whittle away at the deficit without meaningfully reducing it as promised.
If tariffs fail to deliver on Trump's pledge to improve the government's balance sheet, the American public could be faced with fewer job options, more inflationary pressures and higher interest rates on mortgages, auto loans and credit cards. The budget deficit is the annual gap between what the U.S. government raises in taxes and what it spends, over time feeding into the overall national debt.
A Treasury official who spoke on the condition of anonymity to preview the data said overall increased spending is in part due to a mix of expenditures, including growing interest payments on the public debt and cost-of-living increases to Social Security payouts, among other costs. This comes as the federal government's gross national debt creeps up to the $37 trillion mark.
While organizations like the Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget say that tariff income can be a stream of meaningful revenue — estimated to generate about $1.3 trillion over the course of President Trump's four-year term in office; some economists like Kent Smetters of the University of Pennsylvania's Penn Wharton Budget Model say tariffs are likely to result ' in only modest reductions in federal debt.'
In June, the Congressional Budget Office estimated that President Donald Trump's sweeping tariff plan would cut deficits by $2.8 trillion over a 10-year period while shrinking the economy, raising the inflation rate and reducing the purchasing power of households overall. But revenue estimates are also difficult to predict as the president has changed his tariff rates repeatedly and the taxes declared as part of an economic emergency are currently under appeal in a U.S. court.
A Treasury official did not respond to an Associated Press request for comment on when the U.S. could begin to see tariff revenue start to put a dent in the deficit.
Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said last month on Fox Business Network's 'Mornings with Maria' that the administration is 'laser-focused on bringing this deficit down.' The Trump administration expects to make more trade deals with other nations, including China and other major economies.
For instance, on Monday, Trump extended a trade truce with China for another 90 days, which preserves the 30% tariffs he had imposed as a condition for negotiations. The previous deadline was set to expire at 12:01 a.m. Tuesday.
Trump posted on his Truth Social platform that he signed the executive order for the extension, and that 'all other elements of the Agreement will remain the same.' Beijing, at the same time, also announced the extension of the tariff pause, according to the Ministry of Commerce.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


CBC
4 minutes ago
- CBC
BoC officials considered whether interest rate already low enough to weather tariffs
Newly released documents show some members of the Bank of Canada were wondering last month whether the central bank's benchmark interest rate is already low enough to support the Canadian economy through U.S. tariffs. The Bank of Canada on Wednesday released the summary of deliberations from the meetings leading up to its decision on July 30 to hold the policy rate steady at 2.75 per cent. Those minutes show the central bank's governing council was fixed on how U.S. tariffs and the global trade "rewiring" were affecting inflation and the wider Canadian economy. The central bank's decision arrived just a couple days before U.S. President Donald Trump ratcheted base tariffs on Canada up to 35 per cent, while maintaining an exemption for goods compliant with CUSMA. Despite the ongoing uncertainty, monetary policymakers noted there were some signs of economic resilience heading into the rate decision. Rate cuts 'sufficient' to support economy The deliberations show some members wondered if the Bank of Canada had already provided "sufficient support" to guide the economy through its tariff transition. The central bank cut its policy rate seven consecutive times from June 2024 to March of this year in a bid to boost the economy as inflation showed signs of coming back under control. Economists say much of the impact from a monetary policy decision tends to take effect a year or more after the move, so many of those rate cuts are just now starting to stimulate the economy. WATCH | Bank of Canada held rates again in July: Bank of Canada 'ready to respond to new information,' Macklem says after holding rate 14 days ago Bank of Canada governor Tiff Macklem, when asked Wednesday if he sees the need for a rate cut this year, declined to forecast — but stressed that the bank is always watching for new information, especially around the Canada-U.S. trade situation. In that vein, the Bank of Canada governing council wondered whether cutting rates now, only for the economy to recover on its own, would only end up fuelling inflation down the road. "Given the lagged effects of monetary policy, there was a risk that further easing might take effect only as demand was recovering, which could add to price pressures," the summary read. Some forecasters, including RBC, have no further interest rate cuts in their base-case outlooks. Others on the Bank of Canada's governing council felt that signs of slack emerging in the economy could warrant additional rate cuts, particularly if the labour market started showing more weakness. If incoming data showed inflation wasn't straying too far from the central bank's target of two per cent, there could be a need for a lower policy rate, those members argued in the deliberations. No sharp rise in inflation with U.S. tariffs Alongside the rate decision, the Bank of Canada issued three scenarios for how the U.S. tariff situation could evolve: the status quo persists; there's a de-escalation in trade restrictions; and tariffs ramp up. The governing council noted that none of those scenarios showed a "sharp rise in inflation." Monetary policymakers said in deliberations that the impact of tariffs on consumer prices "appeared to be modest so far," but those effects were only just starting to show up in the data. "Members judged the risks to inflation to be elevated given evident pressures on underlying inflation and the uncertainty around the impacts that tariffs and trade disruptions could have on Canada's economy over time," the summary read. The Bank of Canada will get a fresh look at inflation figures for July and August ahead of its Sept. 17 interest rate decision.


CBC
4 minutes ago
- CBC
Air Canada says it will begin cancelling flights ahead of possible weekend strike
Air Canada says it will begin cancelling flights on Thursday ahead of a potential strike that could see more than 10,000 flight attendants walk off the job this weekend. It comes as unionized flight attendants with Air Canada issued 72-hour strike notice.


Canada News.Net
24 minutes ago
- Canada News.Net
US tariffs pressure tactics to get India to sign on dotted line in trade talks, we have not caved in: Vikas Swarup
New Delhi [India], August 13 (ANI): There are three reasons US President Donald Trump has imposed 50 per cent tariffs on Indian goods including his 'being miffed that India has not acknowledged his role' in cessation of hostilities with Pakistan following Operation Sindoor, former diplomat Vikas Swarup has said, noting that if there is positive outcome of Alaska talks, Russia sanctions will be off the table. In an interview with ANI, Vikas Swarup, who has been a former High Commissioner to Canada and is a renowned author, said that India has not caved in to the US pressure in trade talks to provide more access to the country's agriculture and dairy sectors. He said US is exerting pressure tactics to get India to agree to its maximalist demands. President Trump announced 25 per cent tariffs on Indian goods plus an unspecified penalty in July, even as there were hopes of an interim India-US trade deal that would have otherwise helped avoid elevated tariffs. A few days later, he imposed another 25 per cent tariff, taking the total to 50 per cent, over India's imports of Russian oil. 'We have to understand why these tariffs have been imposed. I personally feel that there are three reasons. One, Trump is not happy with India because we are a member of BRICS and somehow, in his head, he has got this notion that BRICS is an anti-America alliance which is hell-bent on creating an alternative currency to the dollar. So, because of that, he feels that India should not be a member of the BRICS. Two, Operation Sindoor and his so-called role in bringing about the ceasefire,' Vikas Swarup said. 'We have been saying right from the beginning that Trump had no role because we do not accept external mediation. This ceasefire was mediated directly between the DGMOs of Pakistan and India at the request of the DGMO of Pakistan. Trump has now said almost 30 times that it was he who got the two countries to stop back from the brink, who stopped a nuclear conflagration in the subcontinent. So, obviously he is miffed that India has not acknowledged his role, whereas Pakistan has not only acknowledged his role but has even nominated him for a Nobel Peace Prize,' he added. India had carried out Operation Sindoor in early May in response to Pahalgam terror attack and carried out precision strikes on terror infrastructure in Pakistan and PoJK. India had replled subsequent Pakistani aggression and pounded its airbases. Referring to Bilateral Trade Agreement (BTA) talks between India and US, Vikas Swarup said Trump is resorting to pressure tactics to get India to sign on his maximalist demands. '...This is part of his pressure tactics to get India to sign on the dotted line on the maximalist demands that the US is making with regard to access to our dairy and agriculture and GM Crops. We have not caved in and it is also in a way a signal to Russia because he is also frustrated that he has not been able to get President Putin to agree to the ceasefire that Zelenskyy has agreed to,' he said. Vikas Swarup referred to the summit meeting between President Trump and President Putin in Alaska on August 15 over the Ukraine conflict. 'Now they are meeting in Alaska on 15th August. If there is a positive outcome of the Alaska talks then I am 100% sure that the Russia sanctions will be off the table because Putin is not going to accept a ceasefire and yet be saddled with economic sanctions,' he said. India and the US initiated talks for a just, balanced, and mutually beneficial Bilateral Trade Agreement (BTA) in March this year, aiming to complete the first stage of the Agreement by October-November April 2, 2025, President Trump signed an executive order for reciprocal tariffs on various trade partners, imposing varied tariffs in the range of 10-50 per cent. He subsequently kept the tariffs in abeyance for 90 days, while imposing a 10 per cent baseline tariff. The deadline was to end on July 9, and the US administration later pushed it to August 1. During the ongoing Monsoon session of Parliament, Commerce and Industry Minister Piyush Goyal made a statement in both Houses, affirming that the government is examining the impact of tariffs and will take all necessary steps to safeguard the national interest. (ANI)