Cow legacy worth preserving
Why Protect our Cow Breeds?
There are more than 51 recognised indigenous cow breeds like Gir, Sahiwal, Tharparkar, Ongole, Kankrej, Hallikar, and Red Sindhi, among others. These breeds are uniquely suited to local climatic conditions and possess high immunity to tropical diseases. Unlike exotic breeds, Bharatiya breeds are low-maintenance, drought-resistant, and require less feed, making them ideal for small and marginal farmers.
In 2023–24, Bharat has exported cow dung products worth ₹386 crore, including fresh dung (₹125 crore), fertilizers (₹173.67 crore), and compost manure (₹88.02 crore), driven by rising global demand for organic farming. Key importers include the U.S., Maldives, Singapore, China, and Gulf nations. Cow dung enhances soil fertility and supports sustainable agriculture. Additionally, indigenous cattle breeds are in demand abroad for their resilience. Embryos of the Kankrej breed earned ₹2 crore in exports to Brazil, while an Ongole breed bull was sold for a record ₹40 crore, highlighting the global value of Bharat's indigenous cattle genetics.
There is an enormous contribution of cows to all beings on the planet, for instance, the Amrit Mahal is a distinguished draught cattle breed from Karnataka, renowned for its exceptional strength, endurance, and historical significance. In the 16th century under the Mysore rulers, it was initially used for supply of milk. Later adapted for military logistics which was utilised as bullocks for rapid artillery movement. The breed's resilience made it invaluable for transporting heavy loads across challenging terrains.
To preserve this vital genetic resource, the Mysore administration established dedicated grazing lands known as 'Amrit Mahal Kavals.' These pastures were managed by a specialised department focused on maintaining and improving the breed's quality.
Native contribution extends beyond agriculture to include livelihood generation, natural resource management, and climate resilience. These hardy breeds thrive in high temperatures and water-scarce, rugged terrains, making them ideal for climate-adaptive rural development. The A2 milk contains beta-casein protein, which is easier to digest and offers greater health benefits than the A1 milk from exotic breeds. Their dung and urine serve as natural fertilizers, integral to organic farming, Panchagavya, and traditional Ayurvedic medicine. Economically, they support dairy, draught power, manure-based enterprises, and byproducts like biogas. Culturally, cows symbolise ahimsa (non-violence) and seva (service), and remain central to festivals, rituals, and folklore. Protecting native breeds preserves biodiversity and also enhances rural livelihoods and ensures sustainable cow-based economies.
Human-Cow bonding in Bharatiyatha
Cow was never perceived as a milk production being, it was of the family, offering emotional and spiritual support. From birth rituals to festivals like Govardhan Puja and Pongal, the cow is honoured as Gau Mata, a sacred mother figure. For centuries, cows have been integral to sustainable agriculture, transportation, and village economy.
Grazing practices, cowherd traditions, and songs in local languages reflect the symbiotic relationship between humans and cows. This connection has shaped community values of compassion, sustainability, and coexistence with nature.
Need for DNA Preservation of Native Breeds
With increasing threats from indiscriminate crossbreeding and declining population of pure native breeds, it is critical to preserve the genetics of indigenous cows through DNA mapping and cryogenic storage of semen and embryos.
DNA preservation is crucial for:
l Retaining genetic purity and diversity.
l Ensuring availability for future breeding.
l Research on medicinal and nutritional benefits of native cows.
l Creating a bio-resource bank for endangered breeds.
Establishing breed-specific DNA libraries and genome sequencing projects will help conserve the country's unique bovine wealth.
Crisis of Crossbreeding
The Green Revolution and the push for higher milk yields led to the widespread crossbreeding of Bharatiya cows with exotic breeds like Jersey and Holstein Friesian. While these crossbreeds initially provided more milk, they came with several issues:
l Low disease resistance in climate.
l High maintenance and feed costs.
l Loss of fertility and shorter productive lifespan.
l Decline in native breed population due to genetic dilution.
l Dependency on foreign genetics and semen imports.
This has led to a serious crisis where many indigenous breeds are now under threat of extinction. The overemphasis on quantity has overshadowed quality, sustainability, and biodiversity.
Protecting Bharatiya cow heritage is about preserving a way of life, a sustainable ecosystem, and a unique genetic legacy. Promoting native breeds, supporting organic cattle farming, establishing breed sanctuaries, and spreading awareness about the virtues of desi cows are vital for ensuring that the next generations inherit this invaluable heritage.
In essence, preserving cow heritage is preserving Bharat's soul, where tradition and nature coalesce in harmony.
(The writer is an Expert, Creative Economy)
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hans India
06-08-2025
- Hans India
24 legislators from State to attend global legislative summit in USA
Bengaluru: In a significant step towards strengthening global democratic engagement, 24 legislators will participate in the National Conference of State Legislatures (NCSL) Summit in Boston, USA ending on Wednesday. The initiative for Bharatiya delegation of legislators is being facilitated by National Legislators' Conference Bharat (NLC Bharat), a pioneering platform dedicated to empowering Indian legislators and fostering national and international legislative collaboration, cooperation and dialogue for sharing knowledge and best practices. The delegation—comprising Members of Legislative Assemblies (MLAs) and Members of Legislative Councils (MLCs) from over 24 Indian states and representing a diverse spectrum of 21 political parties—embodies the rich and inclusive tapestry of Bharat's democratic leadership. This historic journey began in 2024, when a pioneering group of 50 legislators participated in the Legislative Summit held in Louisville, USA—an initiative unprecedented in independent Bharat and undertaken neither by the government nor any other institution. Now, in a landmark moment, the delegation has grown to an unprecedented 130 legislators—marking the largest-ever Indian legislative presence at any global conference. This first-of-its-kind endeavour aims to foster cross-border learning, enhance legislative capacity, and provide exposure to international best practices in governance and lawmaking. Rooted in the success of the inaugural NLC Bharat 2023 in Mumbai, this international visit is part of a long-term vision to create non-partisan, knowledge-driven platforms for legislators. At the NCSL Summit, legislators from Bharat will participate alongside over 2,000 U.S. legislators and more than 7,000 legislators from different parts of the world in sessions addressing AI in governance, digital democracy, cybersecurity, voter confidence, and policy innovation. Dr. Rahul Karad, Founder, NLC Bharat, said, 'This is not just a delegation. It is a living expression of Bharat's democratic strength and unity in diversity — never before has such a large and representative group of MLAs and MLCs come together to engage the world on such a scale. What makes this moment even more special is the spirit behind it — the desire to learn, to grow, and to lead with wisdom and vision. When our legislators step into this international arena, they carry not only their personal aspirations, but the hopes of a billion citizens and the essence of an ancient civilization. Our goal is simple yet profound — to build meaningful bridges across democracies, to learn from each other, and to kindle conversations that transcend borders and strengthen governance.' The itinerary includes academic orientation programs on U.S. legislative systems, visits to local institutions and state assemblies, and meetings with Indian-origin leaders across politics, academia, and industry. These engagements aim to foster meaningful dialogue between the world's two largest democracies and deepen ties with the Indian diaspora. The Boston delegation is part of a larger vision to create a series of international exposure programs for Indian legislators, with future visits being planned to countries across Asia, Europe, and the Americas. Through this structured engagement model, NLC Bharat aspires to build a stronger, more informed, and globally connected legislative ecosystem—one that enhances India's democratic credentials and positions Bharat as a leader in democratic innovation on the global stage. Who are attending? Manjunath Bhandari, MLC, Dakshina Kannada, M. K. Pranesh, Dy Chairman of the Karnataka Legislative Council from Chikkamagaluru Local Authorities constituency, U T Khader, Speaker, Ashok M. Pattan, MLA from Ramdurg, Badarli Hampanagouda, Sindhanur, C. B. Suresh Babu, Chikkanayakanahalli, Arvind Bellad, Hubli-Dharwad, Yashvantarayagouda Vittalagouda Patil Indi, T A Sharavana, MLC elected by MLAs, Balkhees Banu, Hemalatha Nayak, Bharathi Shetty, Veerendra Puppy, Bhoj Raj, Mane Srinivas, N Ravikumar, Dineesh Gooligowda, Basavaraj Horatti, Suja Kushalappa, Ivan Dsouza, Ashok Kumar Rai, Gururaj Shetty Gantihole, Gurme Suresh Shetty; Bhimanna T. Naik, all Members of the Legislative Council
Indian Express
01-08-2025
- Indian Express
Can corporations be victims? The debate is on after Supreme Court verdict
Even as companies are increasingly found culpable for corporate crimes, their recognition as victims of crime has also been jurisprudentially established. On July 14, the Supreme Court in Asian Paints vs Ram Babu (2025) ruled that companies aggrieved by any injury owing to criminal conduct can challenge an acquittal or seek enhancement of the sentence, in line with the established jurisprudence on victim justice. The judgment is a landmark one in as much as it grants due recognition to corporates as victims under the criminal justice system. The implications of such recognition are far-reaching, as it enables and grants corporations access to a host of rights available to victims under our criminal procedure. Under section 2(wa), CrPC (now section 2(y) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Samhita, 2023 (BNSS)), a 'victim' refers to any person who has suffered injury or loss as a result of the accused's act or omission. Section 2(26) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Samhita, 2023 (BNS) and section 3(42) of the General Clauses Act, 1897, define a person to include any 'company or association or body of persons.' BNS and criminal law, therefore, generally apply not only to natural persons, but also to legal persons. Given this, a crucial question is whether a corporate entity can suffer an 'injury', as conceived in criminal law, at par with natural persons. Section 2(14) of the BNS defines an injury to mean any harm, illegally caused, to the 'body, mind, reputation and property' of any 'person'. Criminal acts that cause loss or injury to any company, including economic loss, reputational harm, or violation of intellectual property (IP) rights, therefore, amount to victimisation. The reasoning of the Court in the Asian Paints case is based on this interpretation of 'injury'. The company, Asian Paints, suffered both revenue loss as well as weakened market competitiveness due to a loss of reputation, due to a clear IP infringement. The case pertains to a complaint by Asian Paints through a third party authorised on its behalf (complainant) relating to the sale of counterfeit products under its brand name. The accused was acquitted by the trial court, and Asian Paint's appeal to the Rajasthan High Court was rejected with the reasoning that only the original complainant could contest the acquittal, not the affected company. In this context, the Supreme Court ruled that the term 'victim' applies to any entity, individual or juristic that suffers harm from a criminal act and that a company need not be the initial complainant to be recognised as a victim. It further reiterated that the victim's right to appeal under the proviso to Section 372 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (CrPC) stands independently and does not rely on Section 378. Since the Court clarified that the term 'victim' under this provision includes any person or legal entity that has suffered harm or loss as a result of a criminal act, not merely those who initially filed the complaint, consequently, entities like Asian Paints are entitled to appeal not only in cases of acquittal but also where the conviction is for a lesser offence or the compensation awarded is insufficient. This decision marks a shift from passive tolerance to active enforcement. The ruling emphasised that victimhood is determined by the harm endured, rather than procedural status. Citing Mahabir vs State of Haryana, the Court affirmed that the legislature aimed to empower victims, recognising them as central to the justice process. Companies can be victims of crime, corruption, and human rights abuses in various countries, but legal, jurisdictional, and reputational challenges often limit their ability to seek justice. The recognition of companies as victims and the effectiveness of remedies vary significantly, with substantial barriers remaining, particularly in cross-border cases and in countries with weak governance. Corporations rarely invoke the imagery of a crime victim in the public imagination. The same may be attributed to the fact that the stereotypical notion of the ideal victims in Nils Christie's conceptualisation requires the victim to be someone who is weak, carrying out a respectable project, cannot be blamed for the offence, and is victimised by a powerful but unknown offender. While companies may satisfy some of the traits, such as that of involvement in a respectable project and blameless conduct, they often fall short on other traits, such as being weak or victimised by a bad and powerful offender. A recognition of corporations as victims, however, must be accompanied by a caveat. Hopkins' (2016) research titled Business, Victimisation, and Victimology conceptualises that the idea of 'crimes against businesses' has been strategically employed by both governments and corporate entities to construct a narrative of business victimhood. Critics argue that such recognition diverts attention from the illegal activities committed by the businesses by portraying themselves as victims rather than victimisers, and that it may enable powerful corporations with deep pockets to dominate the public discourse on victim justice. Traditionally, India's criminal justice system placed the responsibility for prosecution primarily on the state, leaving victims, especially corporate entities, with a minimal role. While this approach suited conventional crimes involving physical harm, it fails to address the complexities of contemporary corporate offences such as financial damage, brand erosion, and fraud in the supply chain. The Supreme Court's ruling opens up avenues for companies to actively pursue criminal proceedings. It also removes the longstanding reliance on the public prosecutor's discretion, which often impeded companies from seeking justice when the state opted not to appeal. Additionally, this judgment holds particular significance for industries frequently affected by counterfeit and unauthorised market activities. The jurisprudential shift, with the Supreme Court explicitly bringing a corporate entity under the ambit of a victim, expands the scope for judicial interpretation, extending several other victim rights under our criminal justice system to corporate entities. Bajpai is Vice Chancellor at National Law University Delhi, where Ankit is Assistant Professor
NDTV
23-07-2025
- NDTV
Fake App, Fake Profit: Pilot Loses Rs 3.16 Crore In Share Market Investment Fraud
Mumbai: A 56-year-old pilot was allegedly cheated of Rs 3.16 crore by cyber fraudsters under the guise of offering attractive returns in share trading, Mumbai Police said on Wednesday. The scam unfolded after the pilot watched videos on share market investments on a YouTube channel he had subscribed to. "After watching the videos in May, the pilot received a call from a woman on WhatsApp. She introduced herself as an assistant mentor and claimed to be working with SMC Global Securities," a police official said. The pilot was then added to a WhatsApp group and started receiving investment tips. After some days, the woman asked him to download the SMC Global Securities app. He subsequently invested in shares as per the tips. He deposited over Rs 3.16 crore in various bank accounts shared by the woman until July 11, the police official said. The pilot's wife had downloaded the app and found that her investment generated Rs 6.73 crore profit, while the profit in her husband's account showed Rs 15.82 crore. On July 11, the pilot, who works with Air India, contacted the company as he wanted to withdraw the money. The call was attended by an 'official' of the securities company who asked him to deposit an additional 10 per cent. The pilot realised that he was being taken for a ride and lodged a complaint with the National Cyber Crime Reporting Portal and approached West Region Cyber Police Station on July 19, the official said. Police registered a case against unidentified cyber fraudsters under relevant sections of the Bharatiya Nyay Sanhita and the Information Technology Act, he said, adding that further investigation is underway.
