logo
Challenges for LGBTQ+ community 10 years after referendum

Challenges for LGBTQ+ community 10 years after referendum

RTÉ News​22-05-2025

This day 10 years ago, voters were asked whether they were in favour or against legalising same sex marriage in a referendum to change the constitution.
62% of voters approved the amendment to the Constitution of Ireland that would allow same-sex marriage, 38% voted against.
It was the first time a state legalised same-sex marriage through a popular vote. Thousands celebrated, including those who had travelled from overseas to vote.
Our Social Affairs Correspondent Ailbhe Conneely looks back at the campaign and examines challenges the LGBTQ+ community face.
The Upper Square of Dublin Castle has been the backdrop to many historic moments.
However, few have been charged with the emotion of that landmark result 10 years ago when the public voted for the legalisation of same sex marriage.
There were scenes of joy when the final result was announced.
62% of voters approved the amendment to the Constitution of Ireland that would allow same-sex marriage, 38% voted against it.
The anniversary of the referendum has offered campaigners on both sides a chance to reflect.
The co-director of the 'Yes Equality' campaign Brian Sheehan said he realised they might just do it when those who had travelled home to vote by boat arrived in Dublin Bay.
"The boat to vote people were crossing, sailing into Dublin Bay and somebody got up on the deck and sang 'She moved through the Fair', which has that beautiful line, 'it will not be long love till our wedding day', and I thought, OK, maybe we just can do it.
"But the scale of the result was astonishing. Irish people were fair and generous and inclusive and kind."
62% of voters said yes to marriage equality and 38% voted against. The turnout was 61%.
Magnanimous in defeat 10 years ago, Independent Senator Rónán Mullen who campaigned for the No side admits that the outcome was clear at the time.
In hindsight, he believes there was a sense of understanding and civility from both sides.
"I think broadly speaking the yes side were mostly quite understanding of no voters' concerns, particularly at the leadership level.
"Now, there were incidents where there was a certain amount of unfair accusations of homophobia towards people and that maybe a certain amount of cultural pressure as well online," he said.
Me Mullen added: "I think that was unhelpful, but for the most part, I think the debate took place very civilly between the different sides."
Bolstered by their unions through marriage, many gay couples decided to expand their families, but having children hasn't been straight forward for some.
While Ranae Von Meding and her wife are legally recognised as the parents of their eldest girls, their 16-month-old son has just one legal parent because of a change in the law in 2020.
She has lobbied hard for years to point out that the existing legislation is not fit for purpose and is excluding many children.
"I always bring it back to children because as a parent, yes, it's an inconvenience for me and we have to find work arounds and only one parent can sign certain things. But when you come down to it, it's the children who are affected.
"My son is being denied such a basic right that other children are given, which is a legal connection to the people who are raising him, and if anything, were to happen to me, he would be orphaned and that is not what people voted for 10 years ago."
Efforts to lobby successive governments and health ministers to change legislation has been gruelling.
"We are doing this for our children, but we have to remember that for the Government and the people in those positions that were put there, this is their job to engage and to fix this so that the children of Ireland can finally say that they're equal," Ms Von Meding said.
In 2015, few could have imagined that hate crimes and discrimination would seep into Irish society over the following decade, but this is a reality for many members of the community, particularly in the last four to five years.
LGBT Ireland CEO Paula Fagan believes it's a rollback on what was achieved.
"People are back feeling unsafe and not wanting to be out because of fear for their safety.
"So that's a real rollback and I think it's that's why it's so important that the government and politicians and society keep pushing for progress," Ms Fagan said.
Campaigners have the next 10 years is about reigniting the positivity and hope of 2015.
Brian Sheehan believes Ireland's EU Presidency next year could offer an opportunity.
"It's an opportunity to demonstrate strong leadership and stand firm for EU LGBT people to show that they're valued and respected and will be treated equally.
"The Irish people gave a mandate to the Irish Government to do that," Mr Sheehan said.
He added: "We need the courage to stand up for those who are not being treated well in our lives around us at the moment and I think that matters, whether you're LGBT, there's a rollback on women's rights, there's a rollback on rights from minorities for people of colour, and I think that's the kind of space we have to mind.
"We have to mind the good bits of Ireland, and therein lies the victory in the referendum. That isn't done yet."

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Irish citizens among activists detained in Egypt after arriving for march to Gaza border
Irish citizens among activists detained in Egypt after arriving for march to Gaza border

The Journal

time22 minutes ago

  • The Journal

Irish citizens among activists detained in Egypt after arriving for march to Gaza border

EGYPTIAN AUTHORITIES HAVE detained more than 200 people who arrived in the country ahead of a planned peaceful march to the Rafah crossing on the border with Palestine, according to the march's spokesperson. Asked if there were Irish citizens among those detained, the Department of Foreign Affairs told The Journal it 'has been contacted by a small number of Irish citizens and is providing consular assistance'. Demonstrators from around the world have been arriving in Cairo this week, with dozens of Irish people among them. 'Over 200 participants were detained at Cairo airport or questioned at hotels across Cairo,' the march's spokesperson Saif Abukeshek told the AFP news agency, adding that those detained included nationals from the United States, Australia, the Netherlands, France, Spain, Morocco and Algeria. People Before Profit TD also plans to join the march and told RTÉ Radio this morning that the demonstrators have no intention of trying to enter Gaza. He described the demonstrators as people 'trying to do everything we can to highlight the absolute horror faced by the people of Gaza'. 'The aid must be allowed to enter and Israel must stop using starvation as a weapon of war. The blockade must be lifted and the genocide halted,' Murphy said in a statement yesterday. Meanwhile, a convoy that left Tunisia on Monday is making its way to Egypt to join the march, crossing through the divided and war-torn Libya. Following Israeli war minister's orders, Egyptian authorities directed its security services to block the International March to Break Gaza Siege from entering the country! Thousands taking part in the March, which has been launched from Tunisia, are planning to walk through… — Global March To Gaza (@globalmarchgaza) June 12, 2025 According to the Global March to Gaza website , participants plan to gather in Cairo tomorrow before travelling by bus the following day to Al Arish, where they will begin their 48km march to the besieged Palestinian territory to the north of Egypt's Sinai region. Advertisement 'Over the course of 2–3 days, we'll walk in solidarity toward Rafah,' the website says. The demonstrators have said they do not plan to try and enter Gaza and will camp at the border for three days before returning to Cairo on 19 June. Israel had asked Egyptian authorities to prevent people from making the march. 'I expect the Egyptian authorities to prevent the arrival of jihadist protesters at the Egypt-Israel border and not to allow them to carry out provocations or attempt to enter Gaza,' Defence Minister Israel Katz said in a statement. Katz added that such actions 'would endanger the safety of (Israeli) soldiers and will not be allowed'. Egypt said on Wednesday that it supports efforts to put 'pressure on Israel' to lift its blockade of Gaza, but added that any foreign delegations seeking to visit the border area must receive prior approval through official channels. Speaking this morning, Paul Murphy said the march aims to pressure Israel into lifting its blockade on Gaza, but also put 'pressure on our own governments'. 'I mean, these are peaceful Palestine solidarity protests. We have clear guidelines on what we're doing. 'We're not trying to forcibly break through into Gaza or anything like that. It is a peaceful demonstration. 'Unfortunately, this morning, we're hearing reports of people being detained at the airport, and I think at least two Irish citizens have been detained by Egyptian authorities.' With reporting from AFP Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone... A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article. Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation. Learn More Support The Journal

Government fined €550,000 by privacy regulator and warned over facial scans for Public Services Card
Government fined €550,000 by privacy regulator and warned over facial scans for Public Services Card

Irish Independent

timean hour ago

  • Irish Independent

Government fined €550,000 by privacy regulator and warned over facial scans for Public Services Card

The Government department has also been ordered to stop the practice and cease using its biometric database by April of next year, unless it finds a correct legal basis under which to do it. The Department, the regulator said, holds biometric data on at least 70pc of the population here. It has been engaged in the 'ongoing collection, storage and processing of highly sensitive personal data, including biometric data consisting of facial templates, on a large scale', according to the DPC. The Public Services Card has been a privacy battleground between the Government and the regulator for years. While ministers and civil servants insist that it's necessary to bring more efficiency into public services, with facial scans being required to protect against fraud, critics have consistently labelled it an attempt to introduce a national identity card through the back door. In 2017, the then Social Protection Minister, Regina Doherty, infamously described it as being 'not compulsory but mandatory'. In 2021, the Irish privacy regulator began an investigation into what the Department was doing with regard to biometric facial templates and its usage of associated facial matching technologies as part of the registration process for the Public Services Card. The registration process, known as 'SAFE 2 registration', typically involves the submission of a digital photo of someone to make sure they're not already registered or claiming benefits under another identity. Under European GDPR law, biometric data is categorised as 'special category data' to which higher protections and safeguards must be applied. 'SAFE 2 registration is mandatory for anyone who wishes to apply for a Public Services Card,' said the DPC. ADVERTISEMENT 'Persons who do not submit to such processing cannot access DSP services, including welfare payments.' However the Department said it believes there is a legal basis to operate the process, but that the legal provision is 'not in it view, clear and precise enough to satisfy the requirements of the GDPR'. it said that it 'will carefully consider the DPC decision report, in conjunction with colleagues in the Attoreny General's Office with a view to determining an appropriate response within the nine-month timeframe'. It said that depending on the outcome, it may appeal any enforcement notice or work to rectify the issues as perceived by the DPC. The Department said that the DPC 'did not find any evidence of inadequate technical and organisational security measures. "There are no examples of any person suffering damage or loss as a result of SAFE registration.' It insisted that the process has led to a reduction in identity fraud and offered 'security and customer service benefits'. There are no immediate implications for users of the card or MyGov ID, according to the Department, and during the nine-month period the process will continue. The regulator had looked at whether the Department of Social Protection had a 'lawful basis' for collecting and retaining biometric data 'for the purposes of conducting facial matching' as part of this SAFE 2 registration. It also examined the Department had complied with transparency obligations and had carried out an adequate Data Protection Impact Assessment (DPIA) as part of SAFE 2 registration. It found the Department liable on all counts, by 'failing to identify a valid lawful basis for the collection of biometric data in connection with SAFE 2 registration' and, thus, incorrectly 'retaining biometric data collected' as part of the process. The watchdog said that it also 'failed to put in place suitably transparent information' to citizens and failed to include certain details in the DPIA it carried out. 'In light of the infringements identified above, the DPC has reprimanded the DSP, issued administrative fines totalling €550,000 and issued an order to the DSP requiring it to cease processing of biometric data in connection with SAFE 2 registration within nine months of this decision if the DSP cannot identify a valid lawful basis,' said the privacy regulator. However, the regulator did not suggest there was any security risk to the sensitive facial scans stored. 'The DPC did not find any evidence of inadequate technical and organisational security measures deployed by the DSP in connection with SAFE 2 registration in the context of this inquiry,' said Graham Doyle, deputy commissioner of the DPC. 'It is important to note that none of the findings of infringement identified, nor the corrective powers exercised by the DPC, pertain to the rollout of SAFE 2 registration by the DSP as a matter of principle. "This inquiry was concerned with assessing whether the legislative framework presently in place for SAFE 2 registration complies with the requirements of data protection law and whether the DSP operates SAFE 2 registration in a data protection-compliant manner, and the findings announced today identify a number of deficiencies in this regard.'

Reformed Triple Lock would not impact neutrality
Reformed Triple Lock would not impact neutrality

RTÉ News​

timean hour ago

  • RTÉ News​

Reformed Triple Lock would not impact neutrality

Tánaiste and Minister for Defence Simon Harris has said he does not believe a reformed Triple Lock would impact Ireland's policy of military neutrality. The General Scheme of the Defence (Amendment) Bill 2025 would remove the need for UN Security Council approval when deploying more than 12 members of the Defence Forces overseas when they are serving as part of an international force. Draft legislation is currently in a scrutiny process which is expected to last eight weeks, after which a Bill will be drafted to go to Government for approval before going through the various stages of the Oireachtas. The proposal has faced criticism from some Opposition TDs, who believe it could impact Ireland's long-standing policy of military neutrality. However, Mr Harris said it should be up to the people of Ireland to decide where Irish peacekeepers are deployed, and that many neutral countries have no triple lock policy. "I strongly believe that such consideration on international engagement should be within our sovereign control," he told the Dáil this morning. "The people of Ireland decide where our peacekeepers go, their democratically elected officials decide, not people who've never received one vote in any constituency in this country. "That's how our democracy works, how many neutral countries work. The Triple Lock is not the norm in other neutral countries." He added: "There are militarily neutral countries, quite a number of them, that have no triple lock. There are many, many, many ways you can be a military neutral country and not have a triple lock. "People in Ireland including me have a love for our military neutrality, we want to be militarily unaligned, the people of Ireland have an overwhelming desire for that." Independent TD Catherine Connolly told the Dáil that Taoiseach Micheál Martin once called the Triple Lock a "fundamental part and the core of our neutrality". "Perhaps you should talk to him about that, when did that change?" she said. Social Democrats TD Sinead Gibney said she was struck by the draft legislation's "apparent lack of human rights monitoring mechanisms" which could be included as safeguards for the deployment of troops to peacekeeping missions. Mr Harris responded saying the UN charter would be "at the heart" of the safeguards of the reformed legislation. He said the mandate of any request for troops to participate in a peacekeeping mission would also be in compliance with Irish law and foreign policy as well as carrying the consent of the host nation and a trust in partners. Labour TD Duncan Smith said he did not believe peacekeeping outside the UN was something that Government can "take a punt on". He told the Dáil: "I don't think we should rush into removing the triple lock as part of this legislation at all. There is a process of reform ongoing in the UN, I think we should be leading on that. "I fundamentally believe in the UN and any future of peacekeeping outside the UN is not something we can take a punt on at this point." Mr Harris said the geopolitical situation has evolved "extraordinarily rapidly" in the last number of years. He asked what Ireland would do if the UN did not renew the mandate under which Ireland's "brave men and women serving in Lebanon" operate. What if one of the permanent members, "Donald Trump or Vladimir Putin", or an Elon Musk-driven cost savings measure, led to a veto on the mission, he asked. Mr Harris said he believes should that happen, those peacekeepers should remain in place.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store