Court of Appeal judge Wan Ahmad Farid named Malaysia's 17th Chief Justice, swearing in set for July 28
This followed an announcement by the Office of the Chief Registrar of the Federal Court in a statement released late yesterday.
Hailing from Kuala Terengganu, the 62-year-old jurist was appointed to the Court of Appeal on Nov 12 last year.
He holds a Bachelor of Laws (LL.B Hons) from the University of West London, earned in 1985, and obtained a Certificate in Legal Practice (Hons) from Universiti Malaya in 1986. He began his legal career as an advocate and solicitor with Messrs Adnan & Wee in Kuala Terengganu, serving from 1987 to 2003.
Beyond his legal career, Wan Ahmad Farid has been active in public administration and politics. He served as political secretary to former Prime Minister Tun Abdullah Ahmad Badawi from 2003 to 2008, before being appointed Deputy Home Minister from 2008 to 2009.
He returned to legal practice between 2011 and 2015 as a partner at Messrs Wan Farid & Surin in Kuala Lumpur.
Wan Ahmad Farid began his judicial career in 2015 as a Judicial Commissioner, serving in the High Courts of Shah Alam, Kuala Lumpur, and Kota Bharu until 2019.
He was then elevated to High Court Judge from 2019 to 2024, with postings in Kota Bharu, Shah Alam (Special Powers Division), and Kuala Lumpur (Special Powers Division 3).
In 2024, he played a key role in a landmark ruling involving a constitutional suit filed by lawyer Dr Syed Iskandar Syed Jaafar Al Mahdzar, which challenged the powers of the Yang di-Pertuan Agong in declaring a state of emergency.
In his judgment, Wan Ahmad Farid held that the Yang di-Pertuan Agong's authority to declare an emergency under Article 150 of the Federal Constitution is a prerogative power that is non-justiciable and beyond the court's review.
Wan Ahmad Farid was also among the members of the panel of judges who heard a case involving a dispute over 263.272 acres of land dubbed 'Duta Enclave' involving Semantan Estate Sdn Bhd in the Federal Court. — Bernama
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Star
39 minutes ago
- The Star
MPs urge new CJ to continue defending judiciary's independence
PETALING JAYA: Datuk Wan Ahmad Farid Wan Salleh's appointment as the new Chief Justice has somewhat eased public concerns over the independence of the judiciary, but it still received mixed reactions, say several PKR MPs. This was because of Wan Ahmad Farid's background as a former Umno leader, and he is also seen as more junior than some other judges, they said in a joint statement on Friday (July 18). It was issued by Datuk Seri Rafizi Ramli (Pandan), Nik Nazmi Nik Ahmad (Setiawangsa), Wong Chen (Subang), Rodziah Ismail (Ampang), Zahir Hassan (Wangsa Maju), Datuk Muhammad Bakhtiar Wan Chik (Balik Pulau), Syed Ibrahim Syed Noh (Ledang), S. Kesavan (Sungai Siput) and Onn Abu Bakar (Batu Pahat). ALSO READ: King appoints Wan Ahmad Farid as new Chief Justice The MPs said that Wan Ahmad Farid's appointment, together with those of Datuk Abu Bakar Jais as Court of Appeal president and Datuk Azizah Nawawi as Chief Judge of Sabah and Sarawak, completes the top leadership of the judiciary for the time being. They hoped that Wan Ahmad Farid would accept the different views of his appointment with an open mind. 'It should serve as a guide and encouragement to prove that his leadership will defend the independence of the judiciary, surpassing the excellent record of Tun Tengku Maimun Tuan Mat. 'We hope Wan Ahmad Farid will continue efforts to strengthen the independence of the judiciary and resolve several issues, including finalising the appointment of 31 vacancies for judges as soon as possible, to avoid disruption to the flow of judicial administration. 'The appointment of judges should be based on merit and seniority, so that it is fair to judges who have served for a long time and are responsible for maintaining the quality and good reputation of the judiciary,' they said. ALSO READ: Seniority not a requirement for Chief Justice appointment, say experts They added that the appointment of judges must follow due process under the Federal Constitution and the Judicial Appointments Commission Act 2009 without any interference to manipulate, control, or influence the process that is contrary to the principles of the independence of the judiciary. They urged that issues that have been raised in previous JAC meetings, including follow-up action to investigate allegations of attempting to influence judicial decisions made against a Federal Court judge, be resolved. Additionally, they highlighted that the recent crisis in the appointment of judiciary leadership signals the need for reforms to further strengthen the process of appointing judges, so that this matter does not recur. They pointed out that the administration under Prime Minister Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim should not view the matter as completely resolved without improvements to the judicial appointment process. To this end, they proposed that the prime minister's power to reject the list of nominations from the JAC be improved and limited, with an official reason (either to the JAC or Parliament) required as to why a candidate screened by the JAC has been rejected. Other proposals include candidates from the legal bodies of the peninsula, Sabah and Sarawak automatically appointed to the JAC, reducing the prime minister's power to appoint the majority of JAC members. 'We also propose that Parliament be involved in confirming the nominations from the JAC before they are brought to the prime minister, either in the form of a confirmation hearing as is the case in other countries, or the form of a parliamentary vote (according to a voting mechanism that can be determined later). 'We will continue to pay attention to these matters so that there is a voice from the backbenchers to ensure that this reform process can continue,' they said.
Malay Mail
39 minutes ago
- Malay Mail
Malaysian Bar hails Wan Ahmad Farid's appointment as Chief Justice, cites understanding of judicial independence in Laidlaw recusal
KUALA LUMPUR, July 18 — The Malaysian Bar has today lauded the appointment of Datuk Wan Ahmad Farid Wan Salleh as Chief Justice, citing his 2022 decision to recuse himself from a high-profile case involving UK King's Counsel Jonathan Laidlaw. In a statement, it said this shows that Wan Ahmad Farid had shown a profound understanding of judicial independence — especial in his remark then, which highlighted the importance of public confidence in the Judiciary and its role in upholding the rule of law. 'These statements demonstrate a profound understanding of the Judiciary's sacred role in upholding the rule of law,' its president Mohamad Ezri Abdul Wahab said. 'We hope that under the stewardship of these new judicial office bearers, the Judiciary will continue to uphold the highest standards of independence, integrity, and service to the nation, reaching greater heights.' In August 2023, the Federal Court refused to admit British lawyer Laidlaw as an advocate and solicitor to represent former prime minister Datuk Seri Najib Razak in the SRC International Sdn Bhd criminal case. Wan Ahmad Farid had in June 2022 recused himself to avoid any unnecessary criticism against the judiciary, due to his past role as a politician and because a family member is a division leader in Najib's Umno party. The Malaysian Bar today also welcomed the appointments of Datuk Abu Bakar Jais as President of the Court of Appeal, and Justice Datuk Azizah Nawawi as Chief Judge of Sabah and Sarawak. 'We extend our congratulations and wish him every success in leading the Judiciary with distinction, courage, and unwavering commitment to justice,' it said, referring to Wan Ahmad Farid. The Bar said the new appointments were much welcomed following months of uncertainty and speculation, and expressed confidence that the Judiciary, under its new leadership, could reach greater heights. However, the Bar also raised concern over continuing vacancies at the Federal Court, Court of Appeal and High Court levels. 'While these appointments are much welcomed after months of uncertainty, anticipation, and avoidable speculation, many critical vacancies — current and anticipated — remain unfilled across the Federal Court, the Court of Appeal, and the High Court. 'We remain hopeful that these remaining vacancies will be filled promptly and transparently, in a manner that reinforces public confidence in the Judiciary and strengthens the administration of justice,' it said.
The Star
2 hours ago
- The Star
Over 2,000 cops to be deployed during rally on July 26
KUALA LUMPUR: More than 2,000 police officers and personnel will be deployed to facilitate the "anti-PM" rally on July 26. Acting KL police chief Deputy Comm Datuk Mohamed Usuf Jan Mohamad said police personnel will be stationed at all locations where the rally participants are expected to gather. "The rally goers are expected to gather at Sogo shopping mall, Masjid Jamek, Masjid Negara and Pasar Seni at 11am before marching to Dataran Merdeka at 2pm. 'We will be there to facilitate and ensure the safety of all involved," he told reporters after the handing over ceremony for the KL police chief post on Friday (July 18). DCP Mohamed Usuf has taken over the post in an acting capacity from outgoing police chief Comm Datuk Rusdi Mohd Isa. He said the organiser has already notified the police of the rally. "We respect the rights of the people to gather. "However, we urge the rally goers to gather peacefully and refrain from any acts of provocation," he added. DCP Mohamed Usuf also reminded rally participants to not burn anything during the rally. "There will be speeches given at Dataran Merdeka thus we urge the participants to not touch on any sensitive issues. "We will take stern action if there is any offence committed," he said. Home Minister Datuk Seri Saifuddin Nasution Ismail previously said that the police will facilitate the upcoming rally on July 26 as well. He said the police would ensure the safety of participants despite organisers no longer being legally required to notify authorities, following a landmark Federal Court ruling on July 1 that struck down Section 9(5) of the Peaceful Assembly Act 2012 as unconstitutional. 'Even though notification is no longer mandatory, we remain committed to facilitating the gathering,' he said. However, Saifuddin admitted the ruling has somewhat complicated police preparations. 'In the past, when organisers were required to inform the police, the police could better estimate crowd sizes and mobilise resources accordingly, not to restrict the gathering, but to facilitate it. 'Now, without prior notice, the police have to deploy all available assets to prepare a suitable security strategy,' he said. He assured that the police will handle the rally in a professional manner but reminded organisers and participants to adhere strictly to provisions under the Peaceful Assembly Act 2012.
