
Manchester's radical Black female activists: ‘We didn't define ourselves as feminists'
The city was the moth-eaten Manchester of the 80s, with the cotton industry that shaped it long in decline. Peaceful resistance to the constricts of Thatcher's Britain – and personal liberation – came in the form of Moss Side's Abasindi Co-operative, founded at the turn of that decade as one of the first Black women-only organisations in the UK, and the most influential in the post-industrial north.
Manchester's industrial growth owed an unacknowledged debt to transatlantic slavery, which still cast a shadow over Black Britons in the late 70s and early 80s in the shape of employment discrimination, police racism and thwarted, wasted potential.
Then, when the smoke and shouts of the uprising engulfed Moss Side, white and Black youths alike having taken to the streets to protest against police brutality, James Anderton, the city's authoritarian police chief, resorted to tactics refined by the Royal Ulster Constabulary in Northern Ireland's Troubles. Anderton, an evangelical Christian, knew Moss Side's young Black people had been denied opportunity amid record unemployment – but was determined to restore order to the streets 'fast and hard'.
'With the uprisings, people's eyes were opened … they began to see the value of organisations such as Abasindi,' said Diane Watt, the co-author of a book on the history of Black women's activism in the UK, recalling how Abasindi's headquarters, Moss Side People's Centre, became a shelter in the storm. Police vans were driven at protesters as the state cracked down and bystanders arrested and assaulted. 'Those who were young people then, men and women now, have not forgotten us because we didn't close the door against them then,' she added.
Abasindi emerged as a distinct group from Manchester's self-help Black Women's Co-operative, which was established in the mid-70s. Among BWC founder members was Olive Morris, the Jamaican-born Black British feminist community leader and squatters' rights activist who was last year posthumously honoured with a blue plaque in Brixton, where she lived as a squatter and hosted study groups for Black women.
'However, [BWC] membership was for men and women – and, to a degree, the voices of the men were more dominant,' Watt said. 'So we felt as though we weren't being heard. And the only way for us to be heard is for us to create a space for ourselves. We weren't defining ourselves as feminist. We were seeing ourselves as Black female activists.'
The name Abasindi – Zulu for 'born to survive' – was influenced by the anti-apartheid struggle in South Africa. Men could be allies but not members. Abasindi was one Black activist group among many that fought for a better society in a radical era, but the scale of members' achievements – as a collective, as individuals and in collaboration with other groups – distinguished them.
In Manchester, the legacy of the Abasindi women is everywhere. Its poets and performers, such as Abina Likoya, SuAndi and Shirley May, have influenced countless others. Whether it is a family centre, a business park, an arts collective, an education trust, specialist NHS centre, a housing association or a commemorative plaque – if it was set up in Manchester in the 80, 90s or 00s for the benefit of the Black community, there will be an Abasindi connection.
The proceeds from arts and crafts, drumming, dancing and natural women's hairdressing allowed Abasindi to be financially self-sufficient. All were determined to reawaken pride in African cultures that had been outlawed, demeaned or diminished by the legacy of slavery.
Founders and members challenged systemic inequalities in the education system by founding supplementary schools, working to get Black students into university via access courses.
They campaigned for good-quality, affordable housing in a city where Black home-ownership rates had been devastated by so-called slum clearance programmes, which knocked down streets of terraces but did not compensate the owners enough to buy again.
Abasindi women also gave their children African names, travelled to the continent and collected oral histories for posterity, affirming a Black identity subjugated by society.
Then there was the practical work of looking after elderly people and campaigning for the NHS to recognise the devastating impact sickle cell anaemia and thalassaemia had on Black and Asian patients. They also successfully fought to prevent the deportation of domestic violence survivors whose migration status depended on abusive husbands, as Southall Black Sisters did in London, leading to a change in the law.
The founding of the Nia centre in Hulme, the first Black arts centre in Europe of its size, also involved Abasindi women. Fittingly, the civil rights activist and musician Nina Simone performed on its opening night.
Watt said: 'We were very good at making alliances – we were all about working with other organisations. When a lot of feminists wouldn't work with men, we would look for ways of working together, rather than things that divided us.'
Abasindi's influences and mentors were from the Windrush generation. Guyana's émigrés were particularly influential in the development of community organising in Manchester – the teacher Betty Luckham, the social worker Elouise Edwards, and the engineer Ron Phillips, now all deceased, were inspirational figures.
So was Louise Da-Cocodia, the first Black senior nursing officer in Manchester, having answered the call in the 1950s to leave Jamaica to work in the recently founded NHS. She was the formidable nurse in command when their headquarters became a shelter during the uprising.
Sign up to The Long Wave
Nesrine Malik and Jason Okundaye deliver your weekly dose of Black life and culture from around the world
after newsletter promotion
The political activist Kath Locke, a pioneering campaigner for Black history to be taught in schools and recognised in the public realm, was another local icon. Born in Blackpool in 1928, the daughter of a white mother from Lancashire and a Nigerian seaman, she was a child of Britain whose Britishness was always being questioned.
Commitment to community and dedication to the betterment of society united these activists, as did the pan-African ideology which – with Manchester having hosted the fifth Pan-African Congress, advancing decolonisation in 1945, as well as having been home to intellectuals such the St Lucian economist and Nobel laureate W Arthur Lewis – was well rooted in Manchester.
'But they couldn't have done what they did without a groundswell, the grassroots, behind them,' said Adele Jones, a co-author with Watt, about the ordinary Black women and men who have not become storied figures among historians.
For the writer and broadcaster Lemn Sissay, a former chancellor of the University of Manchester, coming into contact with the group was an act of personal emancipation, as he emerged from a repressive state-care system that had separated him from his mother and his Ethiopian heritage.
'It was at the Abasindi Co-op where I first read poetry live. I'd never been in a room with so many people of colour before … I was in awe,' he said.
'I had a broad Lancashire accent – with dreadlocks. I wasn't like anybody else who was there. At the same time, I really felt the community was saying: 'Tell us what you've been through.' That was the beginning of the rest of my life as a poet.'
For Watt, coming into contact with Black scholars and activists, through Abasindi, opened new horizons. 'When you were at school, you got told you can't,' she said. 'With that group, you were told: 'You can, and you owe it to yourself.' People like myself came out from thinking: 'I'm going to stay at being a secretary' and started going to classes and then growing and growing.
'We left that stereotype that we had inherited from society about Black people being limited, Black people not being aspiring or not able. All those things we removed from our vocabulary.'
Manchester is a city proud of its radical past. The fifth Pan-African Congress, the fight for women's suffrage, the Peterloo Massacre, the campaign for gay rights – all milestones in the mythology of a city on the right side of history, each touching, in different ways, on the lives of the women in Absasindi's orbit. But it was the persistence of injustice – in spite of that campaigning legacy – that made the group's resistance necessary, adding their names to the pantheon of the city's greatest activists.
By 2008, the group had wound down. But Jones, 45 years on from the New Year's Day meeting where Locke, Duduzile Lethlaku, Yvonne Hypolite, Maria Noble, Popgee Manderson, Madge Gordon, Abena Braithwaite and Shirley Inniss formed Abasindi, is acutely aware that the battles they fought continue.
'The transatlantic slave trade has created the conditions in which modern society still functions – the issues of race and inequality,' Jones said. 'Young people have to be aware that progress towards any form of equality is a long-term thing – you have to be in it for the long haul.'
Unsung Stories of Black Women's Activism in the UK: Spirits of Resistance and Resilience by Adele Jones and Diana Watt, is published by Springer Cham and features in the Black British book festival at Manchester Central Library on 29 March.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Scottish Sun
2 hours ago
- Scottish Sun
Ex-priest who led ‘cult-like' church group GUILTY of sexually abusing women he called ‘Lycra Nuns'
Fiend controlled the victims and isolated them from friends and family TWISTED ABUSE Ex-priest who led 'cult-like' church group GUILTY of sexually abusing women he called 'Lycra Nuns' Click to share on X/Twitter (Opens in new window) Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) A FORMER priest who led a "cult-like" church group has been found guilty of sexually abusing women he branded "Lycra Nuns". Chris Brain, 68, abused his position as head of the Nine O'Clock Service (NOS) to allegedly target a "staggering number of women". Sign up for Scottish Sun newsletter Sign up 2 Chris Brain abused female members of his cult-like church group Credit: PA The organisation targeted 18 to 30 years by using rave music and club culture to persuade them to sign up in the 1980s and 1990s. Brain then created a "homebase" team of "attractive women" that served him, his wife and his daughter at their home in Sheffield. He called them the "the Lycra Lovelies" or "the Lycra Nuns" after they were forced to wear lingerie and other revealing clothing. Brain has now been convicted 17 counts of indecent assault against nine women following a trial at Inner London Crown Court. Jurors are still deliberating on a further four counts of indecent assault and one charge of rape. Brain was cleared of a further 15 charges of indecent assault. Jurors heard the NOS services, which took place at 9pm on Sundays, featured multimedia, scantily dressed women and a live band. They attracted 600 people at their peak and were led by Brain, who wore the same cassock sported by actor Robert De Niro in the movie "The Mission". The court heard Brain's Church of England ordination was "fast tracked" in 1991. Some members donated large sums of money or gave up their inheritances or homes to NOS. But behind the scenes, Brain would groom his victims, force them to give him massages and re-enacted a film scene involving sexual abuse, it was said. He would also control the women by ostracising them from friends and family, make them wear the same clothing and lose weight. Brain, who had led a Christian rock band called Present Tense, used his power to turn the group into a "cult". Prosecutor Tim Clark KC said: "In truth, NOS became a closed and controlled group which the defendant dominated and abused his position first as the leader and then as an ordained priest to sexually assault a staggering number of women from his congregation." Concerns were raised about Brain's activities away from the church - including by one official who spoke about "scantily clad, lycra-wearing pretty young women" going to-and from the fiend's home. The man said they would go on a "regular basis" to perform "domestic duties" but was given a "roasting" for raising the issue. One "founder member" of the "homebase" team, who said she viewed Brain as "a form of prophet", told how up to five Lycra Nuns at a time would keep his home spotlessly clean. Another victim described Brain as a "predator hiding in plain sight", who "would pick off women who he viewed as vulnerable". Brain accepted engaging in sexual activity with some of the women but maintained it was consensual. But Mr Clark said any capacity the victims had to say no was removed by the "cult-like domineering nature" of Brain's control over them. He added: "He was the central figure in a cult, he decided the rules, he designed the punishments. "The defendant knew, as perhaps no one else in NOS knew, that these women feared ostracisation more than anything." In his evidence, Brain denied he was an "egomaniac" who wanted to "demonstrate power and control". He claimed the clothes worn by his homebase team were "completely normal" for that era and compared the outfits to those worn by Brit music group Soul II Soul. Brain also admitted massages from some NOS members but told jurors it was to relieve his tension headaches. The court heard he resigned from holy orders after allegations first emerged in the mid-1990s. The jury will to return to court tomorrow to continue their deliberations.


Telegraph
7 hours ago
- Telegraph
Starmer has now reached Sunak-levels of unpopularity: how long can he last?
Loyalty, it used to be said, was the Conservative Party's secret weapon. It was loyalty to the leader, as well as the party, that got them through a series of crises and scandals that less disciplined parties could not withstand. Even when that loyalty was fractured in an unprecedented and dramatic fashion – in the removal of Mrs Thatcher as leader in 1990 – the party quickly united behind the new leadership and pulled off an unlikely general election triumph in 1992 as a result. But that mantle of loyalty, so fruitlessly squandered and devalued by a generation of Tory MPs in the last three decades, has now been handed to the Labour Party. And as this Government's approval ratings plumb the depths of popularity that sealed Rishi Sunak's fate just before the electorate kicked him out of office, Keir Starmer is going to have to rely on party loyalty more than ever. Consider this: until Jeremy Corbyn's arrival as Labour leader in 2015, no Labour leader had been formally challenged since 1988, when Tony Benn took a tilt at Neil Kinnock, who saw off the Left-wing upstart by securing nearly 90 per cent of the party's support. The 2016 challenge to Corbyn occurred in unique circumstances and was the lesser of the radical solutions Labour MPs had considered in response to the hard Left's unforeseen takeover of the party. For the three decades between those two events, Labour leaders were considered untouchable. And despite Starmer's many difficulties, that remains the case today. There are certainly plenty of MPs who would rather he resigned before the next election, allowing a more convincing successor to try to hold on to the party's governing majority; this would also allow the Prime Minister a chance to seize his place in history as only the second Labour Prime Minister to retire undefeated. But there is zero chance of a formal challenge to his leadership. It's just not the done thing in the Labour Party, especially not to a man who has just won a three-figure majority from a position of near electoral extinction at the previous election. But that doesn't mean that there will be no briefing against him by malcontents, and also by apparently loyal ministers whose grievance is hidden behind a mask of loyalty. The Parliamentary Labour Party is nervous. Well, of course it is. It would be weird if it were not. Languishing nearly ten points behind Reform in almost every poll is not the ideal place for any Government elected barely a year ago, albeit on a wave of apathy rather than enthusiasm. And so journalists eager for salacious gossip will listen attentively as unhappy backbenchers relate dreadful anecdotes about how unpopular the Government is on the doorsteps of their constituencies, and of how the antidote could be for Starmer to be replaced. Much of this briefing will be done anonymously, some of it won't. The Liverpool MP Ian Byrne is not the shrinking violet that many of his colleagues are, and has been outspoken in his criticism of the Government. What is less predictable is the end result of all this unhappiness. In the absence of a formal challenge to Starmer at this year's (or next year's) party conference, his detractors will be hoping that the polls will simply pile up too much bad news to withstand. This is the Labour way, to cross one's fingers and hope for the best, rather than to plot any specific course of action. It's what happened under Gordon Brown, who never once looked in danger of winning the next general election, and who was constantly briefed against by MPs and cabinet colleagues in the forlorn hope he would stand aside and give the Government a fighting chance of re-election. Will this summer's discontent produce a more substantial, not to say more electorally beneficial result? There are certainly plenty of Labour backbenchers who maintain a belief that Starmer can yet turn things around in time for the next election, though what this faith is based on remains unspecified. But the eye-watering levels of disapproval revealed by the latest polling makes Starmer's position all the more vulnerable. Not only is he facing the public perception that he has no concrete principles of his own, and that he is too willing to reverse direction in the face of parliamentary rebellions from his own side. He is also facing unprecedented rival challenges to his party's position as the country's chief recipient of Left-wing support. Aside from the imminent launch (or relaunch) of Jeremy Corbyn's new party, Starmer faces an erosion of his party's support from the Greens and even the Liberal Democrats. All of this is in the context of an insurgent Right-wing party led by Nigel Farage that looks set to displace the Conservatives and present a real populist challenge to the political establishment. Is Starmer up to the challenge? It is the key question that will be asked by Labour backbenchers and activists as the year draws to a close and the next set of local and devolved elections hove into view. Much of their judgment will await those results in May. Unless Starmer has plans to unveil a whole new side to his personality, one that reveals a previously hidden talent for strategic policy and communications, that judgment will be damning.


BBC News
12 hours ago
- BBC News
Newcastle's Christian Institute seeks civil service Pride ban
A campaign group has launched legal action to prevent civil servants wearing lanyards, listing their preferred pronouns and attending Pride events while identified as Christian Institute, which is based in Newcastle, claims these actions suggest the civil service supports gender ideology - the belief that gender can be different from biological sex - when it should remain charity's deputy director, Simon Calvert, said meetings with a "phalanx of civil servants in rainbow lanyards" gave the impression their minds were closed to alternative government said the civil service was "committed to an inclusive environment for all staff". The Christian Institute said the civil service's participation in Pride showed an "overt expression of alignment" with one side of the debate on gender ideology, as many marches support trans a letter before action, a formal document sent before initiating court proceedings, the institute said it wished to uphold the right to express "gender critical" views, which support the contention that biological sex is immutable, as well as "traditional Christian views about marriage and sexual ethics".It has called for staff to be banned from doing anything which "gives or may reasonably be perceived by the public as giving the impression" the civil service supports gender ideology. 'Taxpayers expect neutrality' Mr Calvert said the law was clear that civil servants were obliged to maintain impartiality on "controversial political issues". "Whether one agrees with it or not, no one can deny that the LGBTQ Pride movement and its hard-line gender ideology are profoundly political," he said. Mr Calvert said he had attended meetings with the civil service about the clashes between LGBTQ politics and the Christian faith and found staff members wearing Pride lanyards during the meetings."Sitting in front of a phalanx of civil servants in rainbow lanyards gives the impression that their minds are closed on the issues we are discussing," he said. "It certainly does not communicate the kind of neutrality that taxpayers expect of civil servants." A government spokesperson said: "The civil service is committed to an inclusive environment for all staff, boosting productivity and opening up opportunities across the country."The Public and Commercial Services Union, which represents civil servants, declined to comment on how the legal challenge could affect its members and whether the union felt they should be allowed to represent the service in Pride events. In its letter before action, the institute referenced a recent judicial review which ruled Northumbria Police had acted unlawfully when it allowed officers to represent the force while taking part in a Pride march because this breached officers' duty to be impartial. Follow BBC Newcastle on X, Facebook, Nextdoor and Instagram.