logo
Boosting firepower: India shifts towards private defence manufacturing

Boosting firepower: India shifts towards private defence manufacturing

Russia Today19-03-2025

Atmanirbharta (self-reliance) in defense is the flavor of the season in India. The country's defense manufacturing sector is rapidly emerging as a cornerstone of New Delhi's strategic and economic ambitions, and government policies are focusing on making sure that modern weaponry is both designed and manufactured in India, or, at the very least, is 'Made-in-India.'
The Indian military has identified over 5,000 items that must be manufactured in the country rather than imported. Called the positive indigenization list (PIL), the initiative began in 2020 and aims to offer defense items to be indigenized by Indian manufacturers, including small and medium enterprises and startups. It has already yielded results, according to the Defense Ministry.
Defense production and exports are being monitored at the highest levels of the executive. Ambitious targets are being set: 75% of the defense capital budget has to be spent procuring India-made products. The private sector is being encouraged to enter defense production, which was hitherto public-dominated. Some big industrial groups have entered defense, but there are also large numbers of Micro, Small & Medium Enterprises (MSMEs) and start-ups that are producing international quality components and subsystems to global manufacturers.
It was different for the newly independent India. In the early 1950s, the country's economy was greatly influenced by the Soviet 'socialist' approach, and evolved its five-year plans. Perhaps that was the best for those times.
Throughout the 1950s, there was Soviet assistance and technology transfer in multiple industrial sectors such as steel, defense, railways, construction equipment, metal, mining, petrochemicals, and much more to India. A very important part was the building of military aircraft, aero-engines and avionics factories. At one point the Indian armed forces had nearly 85% of military equipment of Soviet or Russian origin.
Back then, India's private sector was relatively small and primarily focused on meeting the daily needs of the masses. The government utilized public funding to establish essential infrastructure, nationalizing key industries such as banking, car manufacturing, and aircraft production. This approach may have been suitable for that time.
Over the long term, both public and private sectors exhibited distinct strengths and weaknesses. The public sector benefits from government funding but operates under the bureaucratic control of government departments. Decision-making can be complex, and progress monitoring is similarly cumbersome. With taxpayers' money at stake, accountability tends to be lower. Salaries are fixed according to government scales, and once hired, employees find it difficult to be dismissed for poor performance, resulting in generally lower productivity compared to the private sector.
After the collapse of Soviet Union, Russia realized the need to compete with the rest of the world through market forces. India too realized that it had to diversify its defense sourcing.
After the economic reforms of 1991 that deregulated markets, reduced import tariffs, and lowered taxes, India's economy began to grow. This growth enabled significant investment in the defense sector and marked the emergence of a robust private sector. Manufacturing capabilities expanded, resulting in the mass production of cars and motorcycles. Additionally, the previously protected defense sector began to open up to private players.
The private sector attracts top talent with competitive salaries and can quickly dismiss non-performers. Its efficiency allows tasks to be completed with fewer workers, and it can easily raise funds from banks and international institutions. Unlike the public sector, which faces complex governmental approvals for joint ventures and foreign collaborations, the private sector can pursue these opportunities swiftly. Foreign corporations prefer working directly with Indian companies to avoid bureaucratic hurdles. Additionally, the private sector can acquire essential technologies and raw materials based on commercial needs, improving operational agility.
Interestingly, 41 of the top global defense companies are from the US. All are private. These companies had $317 billion in arms revenues, which was half of the total revenue of the top 100 companies. The top five arms companies were all US-based. Nine Chinese, three Indian, and two Russian companies are in the top 100. All these were public sector companies.
New Delhi has launched a host of programs and policies in the past few years to attract private companies to participate in defense manufacturing.
This includes Innovation for Defense Excellence (iDEX), which aims to spark innovation in defense and aerospace by creating prototypes that enhance national security; and the Defense India Startup Challenge, which supports startups and small and medium companies in building prototypes and commercializing solutions for national defense. Additionally, the 2020 Defense Acquisition Procedure reserves certain orders (worth of up to 1 billion rupees or $11.5 million) for small and medium sector companies.
The Defense Ministry has also encouraged industry bodies to create dedicated defense chapters and help connect the industry with the government and address concerns. Lastly, the government is pushing public sector banks to develop loan schemes tailored for the defense industry, with the Small Industries Development Bank of India (SIDBI) already offering specific options.
The government has also insisted that state-run companies and agencies in defense, including the largest one, the Defense Research and Development Organization (DRDO), which was created in the late 1950s to support defense equipment research, should offer support to the private sector by providing their facilities.
Setting up an independent nodal umbrella body for testing, trial, and certification requirements of defense systems should improve access to existing facilities while reducing the need for investments to recreate the capital-intensive infrastructure.
Currently, India has 16 Defense Public Sector Units (DPSUs), over 430 licensed companies, and approximately 16,000 MSMEs. Notably, 21% of this production comes from the private sector, bolstering India's journey toward defense self-reliance.
There has long been a feeling that state-owned defense companies are keeping their technology R&D cards very close to their chest and are reluctant to share with private sector. They also continue to treat them as competitors rather than partners. Meanwhile, the government has offered increased governance and control rights to foreign companies.
While major foreign defense manufacturers have chosen to partner with major Indian conglomerates like Tata, Reliance, Adani, L&T, and others to invest in defense in India, similar projects with the public sector have been few.
The Indian government's defense procurement policies have lured several global players, such as Airbus, BAE, Boeing, Collins Aerospace, Dassault Aviation, Israel Aerospace Industries (IAI), Pilatus, Lockheed Martin, Raytheon, Rafael, Safran, and Thales, to set up operations and form joint ventures in India.
For instance, Lockheed Martin and Boeing joined with Tata group manufacturing aero-structures and sub-systems for global supplies, while Adani group is making UAVs and drones with Israeli's Elbit group.
The Airbus C295 is built by Tata group in India. This first-of-its-kind 'Make in India' aerospace program in the private sector is expected to involve more than two dozen small and medium-sized suppliers, producing over 60% of the 30,000 detail parts, sub-assemblies, and component assemblies locally.
The Defense Ministry issued an expression of interest (EoI) to the private sector to participate in the Advanced Medium Combat Aircraft (AMCA) program through a special-purpose vehicle. The project will include ADA, HAL and a selected private company under the PPP model. The name is expected to be announced by mid-2025.
There are many private companies making defense electronics, large aero-structures components, advanced technology components, and sub-systems. Dynamatic Technologies makes assemblies of vertical fins for Sukhoi 30 MKI fighters. They are also supplying aero-structures to Airbus for its A320 family of aircraft and the wide-body 330 aircraft. Hyderabad's VEM Technologies manufactures centet fuselage for LCA Tejas.
The BrahMos is JV is a joint venture between the DRDO and Russian NPO Mashinostroyeniya, which together have formed BrahMos Aerospace and have had significant success in missile production and exports. The AK-203 assault rifle is being produced in India through a joint venture between Russia and India. Russia has recently offered to make the fifth-generation Sukhoi Su-57 in India through a JV with Indian partners. Interestingly, the Russian Army wears boots crafted in India's Hajipur district in Bihar.
Overall, India's aerospace and defense sector has witnessed remarkable growth in recent years, with the private sector contributing a staggering 20% to its turnover. Developing a strong research base in India and a robust supply chain for components and sub-systems, most currently sourced from abroad, will help create the market for civilian and defense systems in the aerospace sector.
Domestic defense production in India has already reached $14.5 billion in the 2023-24 financial year. The target to procure 75% of all defense capital acquisitions domestically will give a huge boost to the 'Make-in-India' initiative. The target is $19 billion in the current fiscal year with aspirations to achieve $34 billion in defense production by 2029.
Meanwhile, India's defense exports reached $2.4 billion last year, and the government set a defense export target of $5.7 billion by 2028-29. Currently, India exports to over 100 nations, with the top three destinations for defense exports in 2023-24 being the USA, France, and Armenia.
To move beyond traditional defense manufacturing, India needs to boost public funding for investments in key future technologies like artificial intelligence (AI), robotics, autonomous vehicles, hypersonic technology, directed energy weapons, augmented and virtual reality, and blockchain. These investments will lay the groundwork for future innovations in both commercial and military applications. Developing intellectual property is vital for India to secure a prominent place in global defense manufacturing.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Narendra Modi visits plane crash site and meets sole survivor
Narendra Modi visits plane crash site and meets sole survivor

Russia Today

time19 hours ago

  • Russia Today

Narendra Modi visits plane crash site and meets sole survivor

Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi arrived in Ahmedabad on Friday morning to visit the site of the Air India Boeing 787-8 Dreamliner crash that killed at least 290 people a day earlier. Just one passenger survived the crash on the London-bound flight, which had 242 people on board, including 12 crew members. The total death toll stands at 290, as the plane hit a hostel for doctors when it crashed, claiming additional lives. 'The scene of devastation is saddening,' Modi said in a post on X. 'Met officials and teams working tirelessly in the aftermath.' According to Air India, there were 169 Indian, 53 British, seven Portuguese, and one Canadian national on board. After visiting the crash site, Modi went to the Ahmedabad Civil Hospital, where he met the lone survivor of the crash, Ramesh Vishwashkumar, a 38-year-old British citizen. Ahmedabad police said Vishwashkumar, who was sitting near the emergency exit, managed to jump off the plane. He is being treated for his injuries. 'When I got up, there were bodies all around me. I was scared. I stood up and ran. There were pieces of the plane all around me,' Viswashkumar told the Hindustan Times. 'Someone grabbed hold of me and put me in an ambulance and brought me to the hospital.' ❗️PM Modi Visits Crash Site Of Air India Tragedy In Ahmedabad#AhmedabadPlaneCrashhttps:// Footage from the wreckage area on Thursday showed rescue efforts, with bodies being retrieved and injured individuals, many suffering from burns, being rushed to the nearby city civil hospital for treatment. Visited the crash site in Ahmedabad today. The scene of devastation is saddening. Met officials and teams working tirelessly in the aftermath. Our thoughts remain with those who lost their loved ones in this unimaginable tragedy. The cause of the crash is unclear but the pilot had issued a 'Mayday' distress call, denoting a full emergency, soon after takeoff, Air Traffic Control at Ahmedabad said. Boeing, one of the world's largest aircraft manufacturers, has faced mounting scrutiny in recent years due to a series of safety and quality control issues. Most notably, the Boeing 737 MAX was grounded globally between 2019 and 2020 following two fatal crashes in Indonesia and Ethiopia that killed 346 people.

India accuses West of double standards on Ukraine and Pakistan
India accuses West of double standards on Ukraine and Pakistan

Russia Today

time3 days ago

  • Russia Today

India accuses West of double standards on Ukraine and Pakistan

Indian Foreign Minister S. Jaishankar has said Western countries are hypocritical to expect India to take a strong stance against Russia, while shying away from condemning what New Delhi sees as Pakistan's sponsorship of terrorism in Kashmir. In an interview with Euractiv on Tuesday, Jaishankar reiterated that India refuses to take sides in the Russia-Ukraine conflict. 'We don't believe that differences can be resolved through war – we don't believe a solution will come from the battlefield,' he said. 'It's not for us to prescribe what that solution should be. My point is, we're not being prescriptive or judgmental – but we are also not uninvolved.' Jaishankar added that India is justified in questioning the West's moral authority regarding international matters, given their past actions. 'India has the longest-standing grievance – our borders were violated just months after independence, when Pakistan sent in invaders to Kashmir. And the countries that were most supportive of that? Western countries,' he said. 'If those same countries – who were evasive or reticent then – now say 'let's have a great conversation about international principles,' I think I'm justified in asking them to reflect on their own past.' Jaishankar went on to say that India has a strong relationship with both Russia and Ukraine, adding that every country has its own history and interests. The foreign minister is on a one-week visit to Europe. This comes as India is involved in negotiations with the EU on a free trade agreement with the South Asian nation, according to media reports. The trip comes close on the heels of a visit to India by a delegation led by European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen to hammer out a trade deal. The EU has been critical of New Delhi's lack of support for Western sanctions against Moscow. India remains one of the largest buyers of Russian oil, despite the sweeping sanctions imposed by Western governments on Russia's energy and financial sectors.

India shocked at Pakistan's new UN counter-terrorism role
India shocked at Pakistan's new UN counter-terrorism role

Russia Today

time3 days ago

  • Russia Today

India shocked at Pakistan's new UN counter-terrorism role

Indian Defense Minister Rajnath Singh has expressed shock and disappointment over the United Nations Security Council's (UNSC) decision to appoint Pakistan as the vice-chair of its counter-terrorism committee. In a public address on Tuesday, Singh questioned the intentions and policies of international organizations in light of the move. Last week, the UNSC appointed Pakistan as vice-chair of the Counter-Terrorism Committee consisting of 15 nations. 'Its land has been used as a refuge by global terrorist organizations. There, terrorists like Hafiz Saeed and Masood Azhar roam around openly, and senior officers of Pakistan Army attend the funerals of terrorists,' Singh said. 'Now, the same country is expected to lead the global community against terrorism. This raises serious questions on the intentions and policies of the international system.' India and Pakistan have fought four wars since the countries gained independence from British rule in 1947. Their most recent military standoff began on May 7, when India launched strikes against suspected terror targets in Pakistan-controlled territory. New Delhi said the strikes were conducted in response to a terrorist attack in Pahalgam in India's union territory of Jammu and Kashmir in late April that killed 26 people, mostly tourists. The Resistance Front, believed to be linked to the Pakistani-based Lashkar-e-Taiba, initially claimed responsibility for the attack, but later denied it. Islamabad also denied having any involvement in the Kashmir attack. Pakistan retaliated to India's May 7 strikes, and after intense fighting over the next few days, the two nuclear-armed nations announced a ceasefire on May 10. On Tuesday, India's defense minister also called on the international community to cease funding Pakistan, claiming that the money ultimately supported the infrastructure of terrorism. He advocated for the international community to exert strategic, diplomatic, and economic pressure on Pakistan to compel it to address terrorism. Singh suggested that if Pakistan was unable to take action against terrorism within its own territory, it should consider seeking assistance from India. He said the Indian armed forces possessed the capability to conduct counter-terror operations on both sides of the border.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store