Fleeing Trooper, Chrysler 300 Wrecks Into Innocent Bystanders
It's always unfortunate when a suspect flees police, then hits innocent bystanders, like what this guy in a Chrysler 300 did in Atlanta. Pulled over by a trooper for having window tint that wasn't in compliance, he turned what would've been a small violation into a dangerous crash for him and several other drivers.We know in these situations some people automatically blame cops. Apparently, in their minds the suspects who run have zero culpability for causing a crash. We're not sure how these people then rationalize what happens in places with no-chase policies and suspects still speed away, causing a crash even though no police are chasing them.
This guy drives the Chrysler 300 like he stole it, even though there's no indication it wasn't his. He drives on the shoulder, weaves through the dense traffic, and does everything he can to ditch the trooper after pulling over and pretending to comply.
But the fleeing suspect makes a miscalculation, slamming into some cars and a commercial truck while attempting to squeeze in between them. The violent collision flips one of the victim's vehicles while also leaving the Chrysler mangled and disabled.
Troopers have to secure the suspect first. After all, they don't know if he's armed and will try to shoot them or carjack another innocent bystander. It's not until later the reason for the guy fleeing comes out: he's a wanted man.
The guy has a warrants for his arrest for failing to appear in court and for violating parole. In other words, his reckless actions had nothing to do with the window tint and everything to do with violations he committed long before.
Sadly, other people paid the price of this guy's irresponsibility. But do you think the trooper is at fault at all in this crash? Did he make the suspect drive recklessly?
Image via State Boyzzz/YouTube
Join our Newsletter, subscribe to our YouTube page, and follow us on Facebook.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
What Happened to Stacey Tourout and Matthew Yeomans? What We Know About the Influencers Who Died
The online community has continued to mourn influencers Stacey Tourout and Matthew Yeomans after their deaths in August. Kaslo Search and Rescue (SAR) confirmed the deaths of the couple, who ran the YouTube channel Toyota World Runners, claiming that rescuers were called to the scene of an off-road motor vehicle accident on August 7 around 7:30 local time. "So it was on a forestry road, somewhere in the mountains, and quite a long ways north in the valley up towards ... the village of Trout Lake,' Mark Jennings-Bates, a manager of the Kaslo SAR, told Canadian Broadcasting Corporation (CBC), noting that rescuers had an accurate location for the incident. He continued, "Our teams were able to get to them efficiently. It's a long journey, but they got there efficiently. So that was very, very helpful. And of course that means that the helicopter pilot could also fly straight to the destination with confidence that he was going to find them." Scroll down for everything we know so far about Tourout and Yeomans' deaths: Where Were Stacey Tourout and Matthew Yeomans Found? Tourout and Yeomans were found in British Columbia after falling downhill about 200 meters, which is roughly 656 feet, according to Jennings-Bates. He claimed that the pair rolled 'many, many times' during the incident. One of the victims allegedly had no vital signs in the vehicle while the other was taken to a hospital and later died. Jennings-Bates claimed that the rescue to locate Tourout and Yeomans was 'challenging' because of the uphill terrain, but noted that his team was able to do it "efficiently." The team has also allegedly responded to several calls around the location where the incident occurred. What Is Stacey Tourout and Matthew Yeomans' Cause of Death? No cause of death has been shared at this time. What Caused Stacey Tourout and Matthew Yeomans' Off-Roading Accident? While Jennings-Bates claimed that the exact cause of the accident was unclear, he suspected that Tourout and Yeoman lost control on the terrain. What Have Stacey Tourout and Matthew Yeomans' Family Said About Their Deaths? The couple's family announced their deaths on August 11 alongside an image of Tourout and Yeoman smiling while standing in front of a mountain. 'With unimaginable heartache, the families of Matthew Peter Yeomans and Stacey Tourout would like to advise that we lost them both tragically succumbing to injuries in an offroad accident on Aug 7, 2025 in the beautiful mountains of British Columbia that they loved so much,' the statement shared via Facebook read. The message continued, 'Please keep us and them in your thoughts and prayers as we navigate this devastating end to an amazing Love Story. They are together forever as we knew they would always be.' Did Stacey Tourout or Matthew Yeomans Initially Survive the Off-Roading Accident? Jennings-Bates told People that Tourout was still conscious when the team arrived at the scene of the incident, but suffered a 'severe head injury.' Tourout, who allegedly 'didn't realize quite how injured she was,' was lifted from the area by helicopter. She was then transferred to an ambulance that took her to a local hospital, where she died later that night. Jennings-Bates claimed that Yeomans had been ejected from the vehicle in the crash and had 'no vital signs' when the rescue team located his body. He noted that the couple crashed in an area with 'pretty rough terrain,' alleging that the vehicle fell roughly 200 meters (around 656 feet) down a 'steep boulder field.' Tourout reportedly remained in the vehicle until it came to a stop. 'From what I understand, it's one of the few patches of the road that doesn't have a forest on the side,' Jennings-Bates told the outlet. 'So anywhere else, they would've been caught by the trees — they would've maybe gotten a bit hurt. But this is the one area where they were gonna go for a big ride if they did go off the side road.' Solve the daily Crossword
Yahoo
4 hours ago
- Yahoo
COLUMN - Can Zuckerberg duck deposition in Meta privacy class action?
By Jenna Greene August 18 (Reuters) -Mark Zuckerberg has better things to do than sit for a deposition. Or so lawyers for Meta Platforms suggest in a pending petition to the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, objecting to the billionaire CEO being forced to give testimony in a proposed privacy class action. The company invokes a controversial principle known as the apex doctrine to claim Zuckerberg should be spared the hot seat, arguing that he has no "unique" knowledge of the case, and plaintiffs' lawyers could get the same information from lower-level Meta employees. Plaintiffs want to question the CEO about allegations that Meta obtained private health information from millions of Facebook users without their knowledge or consent via its Pixel tracking tool. The claims echo those in a class action by users of fertility tracking app Flo Health, where a San Francisco jury on August 1 found Meta violated the California Invasion of Privacy Act. Damages are yet to be determined, but as I previously noted, the total could be huge. In June, U.S. District Judge William Orrick in San Francisco agreed with U.S. Magistrate Judge Virginia DeMarchi and gave the plaintiffs a green light to depose Zuckerberg. However, the judge limited the session to a maximum of three hours and narrowed the scope of allowable questions to center on a consent decree Meta entered into with the Federal Trade Commission involving the Flo app and Zuckerberg's role as a final decisionmaker on privacy-related matters. A Meta spokesperson did not respond to a request for comment. The company in court papers has denied wrongdoing in both cases. Plaintiffs' lawyers from Gibbs Mura declined to comment for this column. Defense counsel from Latham & Watkins and Gibson Dunn & Crutcher in July asked the 9th Circuit for a writ of mandamus to nix the deposition, calling it 'a critically important issue of first impression' for the San Francisco-based court. Mandamus is a 'drastic and extraordinary' request, plaintiffs' lawyers say, arguing that the trial court judge in allowing the deposition committed no clear error to justify such relief. But defense counsel say there's a larger issue at stake than a one-off deposition. Multi-billion-dollar companies like Meta face scores of lawsuits, and their leaders have "uniquely crucial and demanding job duties, as well as limited time," they wrote. That makes being called to testify especially burdensome. District courts within the sprawling 9th Circuit are 'deeply divided' on exactly when and how to properly apply the apex doctrine, Meta lawyers said in asking for appellate guidance. Indeed, spats over deposing CEOs have arisen regularly in court within the 9th Circuit and beyond in cases involving companies including Microsoft, Tesla, Uber, and Alphabet. In some instances, execs were let off the hook, while others were compelled to sit for depositions. Such demands can be more about harassment than a legitimate need for information, the Meta lawyers claim, arguing that deposition testimony is only justified if the executive has unique, first-hand knowledge that cannot be obtained elsewhere. Here, they assert, the bid to depose Zuckerberg is 'a ploy to increase the burdens of this litigation and obtain perceived leverage." Plaintiffs' lawyers counter that state and federal procedural rules already allow subpoenaed witnesses to contest demands for their testimony. There should be 'no special dispensation from civil discovery for corporate executives simply because of their status as titans of industry,' wrote lawyers from Gibbs Mura; Simmons Hanly Conroy; Cohen Milstein Sellers & Toll; Kiesel Law; and Terrell Marshall Law Group. The underlying litigation began in 2022, when plaintiffs alleged Meta violated a federal wiretap law and a California privacy law, as well as its own contractual promises governing user privacy on Facebook, my Reuters colleague Jonathan Stempel reported. According to the complaint, Meta Pixel -- an internet analytics tool that Meta makes available to website developers -- provided sensitive information about users' health to Meta when they logged into patient portals where it had been installed, enabling Meta to make money from targeted advertising. Meta in court papers has responded that it should not be held liable if certain healthcare providers allegedly misused Pixel, 'a publicly available tool that Meta did not implement or configure on the providers' websites.' Plaintiffs' lawyers, in justifying their request to question Zuckerberg, argue that from the start he's been implicated in the case. 'He had personal knowledge of Meta's intent to receive this information,' they allege, 'and he knew about and played a key role in Meta's collection of sensitive health data.' The appeals court has not indicated when it will rule on the petition, but Meta lawyers notified the district court that Zuckerberg's deposition may proceed this month in Palo Alto if the 9th Circuit denies its mandamus petition by August 21.
Yahoo
5 hours ago
- Yahoo
Farmfoods worker 'threatened and assaulted' as goods stolen
A worker was threatened and assaulted as thieves targeted a Wednesbury supermarket. Items - of unknown value - were stolen from Farmfoods in Camp Street on July 30. The incident, which happened at around 3.20pm, has prompted West Midlands Police to launch an appeal. READ MORE: Ladbrokes tragedy as 'lovely' veteran who 'enjoyed a bet' dies after collapse The force has issued two CCTV images of a man and woman officers wish to speak to. An accompanying appeal read: "Do you recognise this man and woman? "We want to speak to them after items were stolen from Farmfoods supermarket on Camp Street, Wednesbury. "It happened at around 3.20pm on 30 July. "A shop worker was also threatened and assaulted. "If you recognise them please call 101 quoting 20/329132/25." READ MORE: 'Blight on community' jailed for breaching ban on begging, urinating and taking drugs in public People can also get in touch using the live chat facility at Stay up-to-date by following our Twitter feed @birmingham_live or liking our Facebook page. To get the latest news emailed to you, sign up here, it's free.
