logo
Israeli tactics leave dangerous security vacuum in Gaza which Hamas continues to exploit

Israeli tactics leave dangerous security vacuum in Gaza which Hamas continues to exploit

The Journal4 days ago
Hana Salah
Palestinian journalist
ISRAEL'S CONTINUING ASSAULTS on Gaza cause daily devastations for the people of Palestine. The starvation of children has become the most visible and derided of those consequences.
But last month's killing of 18 Palestinian humanitarian workers, allegedly by Hamas affiliates, also points to a less discussed impact: the dangers of escalating internal lawlessness due to Israel's systematic dismantling of the usual governance mechanisms in Gaza.
The Independent Commission for Human Rights says Israeli strikes have systematically dismantled these mechanisms – by targeting police stations, courthouses and prisons.
That has left a dangerous security vacuum.
Hamas, and other gangs, continue to exploit the gap.
On 11 June, at least 18 people working for the US-Israel backed Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF) were killed when the bus they were travelling in was ambushed by gunmen.
The incident received little media or public attention in June.
What exactly happened on 11 June?
According to family interviews and statements, the attackers stopped the bus and accused the workers of collaborating with Israel before unleashing a brutal assault that initially left 11 people dead.
About another 17 were injured. Bereaved families now say that at least seven of those 17 were later killed later inside Nasser Hospital, where they had initially been taken for treatment, bringing the death toll to 18.
No group has officially claimed responsibility but families of the victims say the attackers were members of the armed Sahem unit, which is affiliated with Hamas.
The GHF claimed in a public statement that Hamas gunmen were behind the killings and called for an independent investigation.
Hamas, which governs Gaza but has seen its authority fray during the war, has not commented publicly on the incident.
However, survivors of the attack say they were targeted because the Sahem unit believed they were members of the Israel-backed Abu Shabab gang.
Why were they targeting GHF workers?
The GHF, which has controversially, ineffectively and dangerously become the sole provider of food aid in parts of Gaza after Israeli authorities restricted UN agency operations, has faced scrutiny from multiple sides.
Some local groups accuse it of serving US interests and consider its operations as 'death traps' because of a lack of proper security protocols.
The Palestinian workers were erroneously accused by the Hamas unit of being Abu Shabab gang members because of GHF's links to Israel.
'They were beaten, shot, humiliated'
'What happened was not a mistake. It was a crime,' says local journalist Alaa Al-Helou about the bus ambush.
'They were beaten, shot, humiliated — and then denied medical help in the hospital. And all because of a false accusation.'
According to the families' statement, armed men stopped the GHF vehicle before beating the driver and passengers with sticks and rifle butts. They then shot some of them in the legs.
Survivors say they were stripped of their belongings and dragged onto the street, where bystanders, incited by the attackers, joined in the assault.
'They forced us off the bus and made us lie on the ground. Then they began beating and shooting us, one by one,' said Younis Abu Shaloof, 18, and a survivor of the attack.
'When the armed men left, people thought we were part of Abu Shabab gang and collaborating with Israel and started hitting us too. The ambulance took us to hospital in Khan Younis.'
Yousef was lucky as his family moved him from Nasser hospital in Kahn Younis to another field hospital in Deir Al-Balah, so he survived the second attack by the armed men in the hospital which killed at least seven others injured in the same incident.
'They hit me in the knee, and I passed out,'he recalls. 'When I came to, I saw another man next to me, bleeding from a gunshot wound to the head.
'I smeared some of his blood on my own head and rubbed sand over my face, hoping the gunmen would think I was already dead — so they wouldn't shoot me again and finish me off.'
Contracting complications
One source, who spoke to
The Journal
on condition of anonymity, said that the GHF had contracted a bus company for transportation and subcontracted Al-Khuzundar Company to supply the labourers.
On 26 May 2025, the Al-Khozendar family — to which the head of the subcontractor company working with the GHF belongs — issued a public statement disowning Mohammad Mohsen Al-Khozendar for his alleged collaboration with a US firm involved in Israeli military projects.
The statement, rooted in tribal and social norms in Gaza, condemned any logistical or engineering work that supports such initiatives as a betrayal of the Palestinian cause, and stressed that the company bearing the family name does not represent the family or its values.
The transportation company, the source added, claimed it had been communicating with Hamas-affiliated internal security forces to coordinate the workers' movement in the designated humanitarian area. They also had an oral coordination with the Israeli army.
Advertisement
'The Israeli army contacted the Palestinian coordinator (sub-contractor) through phone to allow or stop the movement but that doesn't guarantee the bus, or any coordinated movement is protected from strikes, shots, bombing,' the source added.
Who knew about the bus movement at that hour?
A member of another bereaved family said the bus had been waiting for coordination approval when the attack occurred.
'The bus was waiting for clearance, and the armed men struck nearly an hour after coordination calls began,' the source said.
This could suggest that some security sources were already aware of its coordination request.'
Youssef recalls the armed men asking them if they were with the Abu Shabab gang which is backed by the Israeli army.
'They asked us if we were working with Abu Shabab, but we denied,' Youssef said.
'I'm too afraid to leave my home now,' said the survivor Youssef. 'I will never work for the American organisation again.
Better to die by an Israeli airstrike than be killed as a 'traitor' by our own people.'
In the fragmented landscape of Gaza's ongoing war, the Abu Shabab militia has emerged as a controversial player, reportedly collaborating with Israeli forces while launching attacks on Hamas-linked units such as the Sahem Unit.
The group is believed to be operating out of Rafah's eastern border and was formed during the current conflict.
Its leader, Yasser Abu Shabab, 34, is now at the centre of fierce accusations from the Joint Operations Room of Palestinian Resistance Factions, which has charged him with treason and leading an illegal armed group.
A Revolutionary Court has issued a 10-day deadline for his surrender, warning he will otherwise be tried in absentia.
Security body seize bus
Formally, no group has claimed responsibility. Hamas has not commented. The day after the incident, Abu Shabab denied the images of the killings showed members of its militia, according to
EuroNews
.
But a month on from the attack, the Hamas Interior Ministry issued a statement banning all forms of collaboration or work with the GHF.
The bus involved in the attack was seized by a security body in Gaza, according to sources. Witnesses said no one was allowed to approach the vehicle, and individuals who attempted to do so were reportedly beaten.
There have been other killings of suspected Israel collaborators during the lawless chaos of the conflict. However, other innocent civilians have also been mistakenly targeted.
On 26 September 2024, Islam Hejazi, Gaza Programme Director at the US-based charity Shifa' Palestine, was shot dead by armed men in Khan Younis, southern Gaza.
Gunmen in three vehicles opened fire on the car she was travelling in, firing around 90 bullets.
Her family said government officials later told them it was a case of mistaken identity — her vehicle had been wrongly suspected of resembling one linked to a wanted man accused of collaboration.
Hejazi, a mother of two, was described by Shifa' Palestine as a dedicated humanitarian 'of the highest integrity and professionalism'. The charity said it remained committed to serving Gaza in her memory.
Dismantling of public order
In a strongly worded statement, the Independent Commission for Human Rights condemned the Khan Younis attack as an extrajudicial killing and a serious breach of international law.
It warned of a disturbing rise in armed groups acting outside any official framework, and called for an urgent, independent investigation to restore public trust and uphold the rule of law.
A lawyer associated with a human rights organisation in Gaza talked to
The Journal
on condition of anonymity due to potential risk to his safety, and said his organisation and others are working to document cases of extrajudicial killings and vigilante violence, but stressed the extreme difficulty of collecting accurate data during an ongoing war.
'It is nearly impossible to provide precise numbers at this stage,' he told
The Journal.
'The war has made documentation extremely difficult — especially during the period when Gaza was effectively divided between the north and south.'
He added that many killings have not been officially investigated by the Public Prosecution or the Ministry of Health, leaving their motives unclear.
'It is often unknown whether these were revenge attacks, personal disputes, or related to allegations of collaboration with the occupation,' he said.
'There are certainly killings, but in many cases, the reasons remain undetermined — particularly under the current conditions of war.'
Looting
During the 11 June, the Hamas unit targeted workers which the group erroneously identified as Israel collaborators. Meanwhile, the United Nations last week said that 766 aid-seeking Palestinians have been killed in the vicinity of GHF sites – mostly by the IDF. UN human rights office spokesman Thameen Al-Kheetan told the AFP news agency that these almost 800 victims were killed by Israeli military actions.
That death toll has since increased.
The collapse of civil order in Gaza has also been highlighted by the UN Protection Cluster, which warned that humanitarian efforts are being severely disrupted.
In a recent update, the group said aid delivery is hindered not only by Israeli restrictions and access barriers, but also by growing lawlessness within Gaza, fuelled in part by Israeli strikes on civilian police infrastructure.
It noted that the breakdown in law enforcement has led to increased looting and attacks on humanitarian convoys.
The closure of the Rafah crossing since May 2024 — aside from limited evacuations of medical cases — has further compounded the crisis. Israeli military operations and an ongoing siege, particularly in northern Gaza since October, have deepened insecurity and worsened conditions for civilians and aid workers alike.
Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone...
A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article.
Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation.
Learn More
Support The Journal
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Letters to the Editor: 80 years on, remember victims of Hiroshima
Letters to the Editor: 80 years on, remember victims of Hiroshima

Irish Examiner

time2 hours ago

  • Irish Examiner

Letters to the Editor: 80 years on, remember victims of Hiroshima

This week, we marked the 80th anniversary of the first nuclear bomb being dropped on the city and the people of Hiroshima. We honour and remember the victims of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, drawing focus on the horrific impact of nuclear bombs. Some 214,000 people died… an overwhelming number. Buried in that awful statistic is the child victim figure of 38,000. Survivors envied the dead. Let us awaken to the reality of the true inhumanity of nuclear weapons. There can be no compromise on the issue of nuclear either put an end to nuclear weapons, or they will put an end to us. We make our own pledge to continue to work for peace and disarmament and to do all we can to promote world peace and an end to nuclear armaments. Current tensions around the globe shows us that nuclear escalation is not a relic of the Cold War, but an increasing clear and present danger. Nuclear weapons have a combined destructive capability of 100,000 Hiroshima or Nagasaki sized bombs. Bringing an end to the world as we know it…with the ability to kill millions of people and kill the climate catastrophically. I believe that nuclear weapons cannot, must not, coexist with humanity. We are regressing into a world in which the rule of law is replaced with the rule of power. Let us say loudly on this 80th anniversary: No to War! No to Nuclear Weapons! Yes to Peace! Yes to Disarmament! Adi Roche, Chernobyl Children International Church has power to help Gazans The Catholic Church has an opportunity to make a positive impact on the dire situation in Gaza. Shortly after his election, the late Pope Francis visited the Island of Lampedusa and made a significant impact in highlighting indifference to migrants and asylum seekers. Pope Leo could make an equal impact, by visiting Gaza, on the dire situation of the Palestinian people as they die from bullets and starvation. Even if he got as far as the Raffah crossing, it would send out a powerful message to the people of Gaza that religion has no borders. Brendan Butler, Drumcondra, Dublin Rich and poor gap widens further I found Monday's article by the Irish Examiner's Ann Murphy (Cork Crime: Soaring prices drive a surge in the theft of meat) to be a most compelling read. In her piece, Ms Murphy reports about a rise in shoplifting of expensive cuts of meat where more and more cases are coming before the courts in Cork. She delineates how the theft-to-order of luxury food is just one of the patterns revealed in this paper's two-day series based on data from Garda stations. We learn of situations where certain meats like legs of lamb and steak are being stolen and then sold back on to the black market. One would have to say this that this is really quite indicative of the fact that meat is nearly like a real premium product at this stage. It is also very much a reflection of the way that prices have surged. If you look at meats such as fillet steak, one is talking something to the order of €30, €40 or possibly even €50, depending on the size of the packet and depending on the weight. So it's of significant value in terms of its ability to be sold on, and also the demand that these meats hold. One must remember that there's an inherent appeal for beef, certainly among Irish shoppers. It would be true to say that beef is very much one of those products that's in almost every single shopping basket. I do believe supermarkets are conscious of the impact of meat prices on shoppers. The fact that high beef prices are leading to a spike in shoplifting is an indicator of how great the wealth gap is between the rich and the poor. John O'Brien, Clonmel, Co Tipperary AI governance framework vital John Whelan's article (Every penny of Apple cash needed to back Irish AI, Irish Examiner August 4) reporting on Chinese and American AI initiatives is further proof that digital innovation is accelerating and that all countries are struggling with the societal challenges of AI-driven digital transformation. Significantly, neither of these initiatives referred explicitly to the existential threats to humanity posed by AI. These threats have been airbrushed out of the US AI action plan which is designed to facilitate US Big Tech companies, in their go-it-alone, headlong rush to an unregulated era of AI-powered super profits. However the Chinese proposal, made by premier Li Qiang, at the Artificial Intelligence Conference in Shanghai on 26 July, emphasises co-operation, underlining the need to 'strengthen co-ordination to form a global AI governance framework that has broad consensus as soon as possible' and to help create a 'world AI co-ordination organisation'. Rather than a kneejerk rejection, this proposition should be taken at face value. Thus Naoise Ó Cearúil's proposed national Artificial Intelligence Bill 2026 could include an action to spearhead an initiative by Ireland with the EU, the UK, Ukraine, India, and China to create a Global AI Governance framework, supported by appropriate international institutions, that would resonate with citizens, communities and governments everywhere. Underpinned by a philosophy of digital humanism, it could be the catalyst to garner support worldwide for the global solutions that are necessary for a safer digital future for us all. This global AI governance framework could be launched at the planned AI conference during Ireland's EU presidency next year. Declan Deasy, Castlebellingham, Co Louth Litter plan must not be binned I read with interest in your publication recently that Cork County Council is contemplating the creation of a new litter management plan. As has been the situation so often in the past, when the above subject is discussed, local councillors immediately seek headlines on the issue of illegal dumping. What is overlooked by local authorities throughout the country is the lack of essential infrastructural provision to reduce and eliminate, where possible, the litter and waste that is dropped on our streets. This process should be initiated with the adoption of a proactive concept of having all waste taxed at the point of creation in contrast to the present reactionary method where the taxation of waste is not contemplated until it is about to be disposed. Next the numbers of litter bins and cigarette receptacles should be substantially increased, but unfortunately to date the numbers continue to decline. I live in the Fermoy municipal district where the entire electoral area including the towns of Fermoy, Mitchelstown, and Doneraile and surrounding villages are denied the most basic environmental infrastructure, namely an civic amenity site. In conclusion, any plan that lacks the above supports is not worth the paper it is written on. Tadhg O'Donovan, Fermoy, Co Cork US must find power to end war Israel's recent war waged against Iran was brief, efficient, and effective with outcomes that strengthened its military might and prestige. However, the war in Gaza is becoming endless, indiscriminate and pointless from a military perspective and with Israel portrayed as a pariah state. Following ceasefire talks in Qatar, it is now time for the USA to muster its power to find a negotiated solution to end the war. It is indeed essential to do so in order to avoid mass starvation. Moreover, it is in Israel's national self-interest and would create opportunities to develop a government for Gaza and without whatever is left of Hamas. Given the weakness of Hamas, the proposed 60-day truce period and ceasefire could be used to form a new governing body supported by the Palestinian Authority, which would take control of Gaza in the next phase with Western and Arab backstop. What is clearly manifest is the ineptitude, incompetence, cynicism, and indifference that Hamas has shown to Palestinian lives and Gaza citizens. Without a ceasefire, Gaza will not escape a full-blown famine of apocalyptic dimensions. Patrick L O'Brien, Kerry Pike, Co Cork

If states can be shamed into action, Israel will be forced to change
If states can be shamed into action, Israel will be forced to change

Irish Examiner

time2 hours ago

  • Irish Examiner

If states can be shamed into action, Israel will be forced to change

Earlier this week, the renowned Israeli human rights organisation B'Tselem released Our Genocide, an analysis of Israeli policy towards Palestinians since October 7, 2023. The report finds that, since October 2023, the Israeli regime has been responsible for carrying out genocide against the Palestinian people in the Gaza Strip. The finding of genocide is based on two prior conclusions, supported by evidence gathered by the organisation: Mass crimes by Israel are being 'perpetrated systematically, as part of a coordinated attack aimed at annihilating all facets of life in the Gaza Strip'; The intent of Israel's political and military leadership is to 'irreversibly destroy Palestinian life'. The international community, B'Tselem argues, has not only failed to halt this genocide, but enabled it 'through statements affirming Israel's right to self-defense" or active support — including the shipment of weapons and ammunition' to Israel. The foundations for the genocide, the report states, have been laid through Israel's settler-colonial project, notably three of its fundamental elements: Apartheid, imposing separation, and ethnic cleansing; systematic and institutionalised violence against Palestinians, perpetrated with impunity; and the institutionalised dehumanisation of Palestinians, including through the framing of them as an existential threat. B'Tselem points to the Hamas attacks on October 7, 2023 — which it finds 'included many war crimes and likely also crimes against humanity' — as 'the catalyst for the ruling system to carry out genocide". The B'Tselem report is based on 20 months of research and documentation of human rights violations committed by Israel against Palestinians. It was released on the same day as an equally damning and clear report by a second Israeli organisation, Physicians for Human Rights-Israel, which has concluded the following: 'The destruction of life-sustaining systems, the cumulative patterns of destruction, the bodily and mental trauma inflicted, and the direct killing of civilians, when understood in light of the implemented policy and the public rhetoric, make clear that Israel's campaign in Gaza constitutes genocide under international law.' In publishing their reports, the Israeli organisations join a host of other internationally recognised human rights organisations — first and foremost Palestinian — in describing the slaughter being perpetrated by Israel in Gaza as genocide. On October 13, 2023, in light of the Israeli onslaught and statements by high-ranking Israeli politicians that followed the Hamas attacks of October 7 that year, Al-Haq, Al Mezan Centre for Human Rights, and the Palestinian Centre for Human Rights issued a statement calling on the international community to urgently intervene to protect the Palestinian people from a genocide by Israel. The Palestinian organisations warned that other states not only had an obligation under international law to intervene to prevent the potential genocide, but that they may be held responsible if they failed to take all measures within their power to do so. Since then, all three Palestinian organisations have continued to document the mass crimes being perpetrated by Israel. They have denounced its actions as amounting to genocide, and have called on all states do all within their power to bring it to an end. Their work, and that of other Palestinian human rights defenders, has reverberated around the world It has been reinforced by international human rights organisations and UN mechanisms. However, it has been cruelly, callously ignored and disregarded by many states which continue to defend Israel's actions, provide weapons and other equipment for its army, and allow the crimes to continue. The result: A famine engineered by Israel with international support; more than 60,000 Palestinians killed by Israel with international support, including more than 1,000 Palestinians killed trying to access humanitarian aid; cities completely destroyed, and millions displaced with international support; hospitals, schools, mosques, and churches bombed one by one by Israel with international support; more than 100,000 Palestinians injured by Israel with international support; and companies profiting from these crimes with international support. The atrocities go on. All the while Israeli cabinet ministers proclaim that Gaza will be entirely destroyed and cleared of all Palestinians in what B'Tselem calls 'the exact definition of genocide'. UN special rapporteur Mary Lawlor: 'International belief in a system of universal human rights has been eviscerated by the atrocities permitted to happen since October 7.' And what is the response by States? Crumbs dropped from the sky by former colonial powers and Middle Eastern states; an internal conclusion by the EU that there are 'indications' Israel is in breach of its human rights obligations, but no concrete measures to pressure it to abide by them; and the British government arguing in court that there is no evidence of genocide in Gaza. Where is the action? It is with the people in the streets, communities, associations, and organisations all around the world who are organising and protesting to demand an end to Israel's crimes, apartheid, and occupation — doing so despite being beaten by police, designated as terrorists, and smeared as antisemites. Action is with the Palestinian people among them and in Gaza and the West Bank, supporting one another despite the bombardments, massacres, displacement, and starvation. It is with Palestinian human rights defenders and their allies in Israel, such as B'Tselem and Physicians for Human Rights-Israel, documenting these crimes and demanding justice. Recent days have shown what an increase in international pressure can do as aid trucks were finally permitted into Gaza by Israel, albeit on an extremely limited basis and while the killing continues. This is far too little, far too late for far too many, but it does demonstrate that if states can be shamed into action, Israel's behaviour will be forced to change International belief in a system of universal human rights has been eviscerated by the atrocities permitted to happen since October 7. In order to rescue the remnants of this system and resuscitate that which remains, the atrocities must stop, Israel must be held accountable, and the Palestinians must be guaranteed their full rights — including their right to self-determination. Mary Lawlor is the UN special rapporteur on human rights defenders

Slovenia moves to ban imports from illegal Israeli settlements in Palestine
Slovenia moves to ban imports from illegal Israeli settlements in Palestine

The Journal

time6 hours ago

  • The Journal

Slovenia moves to ban imports from illegal Israeli settlements in Palestine

THE SLOVENIAN GOVERNMENT has moved towards banning the importation of goods from illegal Israeli settlements in Palestine. In a correspondence session, a remote discussion between ministries, the government instructed the ministries for the economy and the foreign affairs to prepare for the measure's formal proposal. 'A measure is proposed in the form of a ban on the import of goods originating from illegal settlements in the occupied Palestinian territory, including a ban on the circumvention of the ban on such imports,' a government statement read. The two ministries have also been tasked with examining a possible ban on the export of goods from Slovenia that are intended for Israeli settlements. 'The Government of the Republic of Slovenia will decide on further measures,' the statement added. In its statement today, the Slovenian government cited the advisory opinion of the International Court of Justice from July of last year, which said that states are obliged not to conduct trade with Israeli settlements (colonies) because the occupation itself is illegal. There are more than 700,000 Israeli settlers living in the occupied West Bank and East Jerusalem. They live in settlements endorsed by the Israeli government and the most common exports are agricultural products. Advertisement A similar ban is currently progressing through the Oireachtas in Ireland that would ban the importation of goods from Israeli settlements, but in the pre-legislative stage, a committee recommended services also be included. Today's announcement follows Slovenia's imposition of a ban on arms sales to Israel. Slovenia is one of the European Union member states that has pushed ahead with unilateral actions against Israel in response to its ongoing war on the Gaza Strip in Palestine. As a bloc, the EU has failed to take concrete action to sanction Israel despite it being found to have violated the human rights clause in its trade agreement with the bloc. In explaining Friday's decision, Slovenia said it was in response to the worsening humanitarian situation in Gaza while denouncing the EU's inaction. Need more information on what is happening in Israel and Palestine? Check out our FactCheck Knowledge Bank for essential reads and guides to navigating the news online. Visit Knowledge Bank Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone... A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article. Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation. Learn More Support The Journal

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store