Awful murders in SA can bring out the best and the worst in us
The murder of Olorato Mogale has gripped the country as gender-based violence, one of our biggest blights, has been put on full display yet again.
For me it has brought up a few points of contention, however: the exceptionalisation of beauty, the benefits of proximity to social capital when action is needed, and the celebration of the suspected perpetrator dying during a shootout with the police.
Much has been written about pretty privilege. As an article in Psychology Today by Dr Nafees Alam explains: 'Attractiveness can affect social mobility. Individuals who benefit from pretty privilege might have access to better social networks, which can open doors to opportunities and resources that are less accessible to others.'
Social capital is 'any benefit that is derived from interaction between members of a social grouping or society'. In this instance, one could argue that a wealth of resources could be deployed for the speedy apprehension of Mongale's killer because of her network of friends and former colleagues who had access to both traditional and social media resources.
There are many other cases of women perhaps not as attractive or socially connected who failed to galvanise similarly urgent action. Without wading into the 'damned if we do, damned if we don't' camp of thinking, I think it is certainly worth examining why certain cases grip our imagination, while others fall to the far reaches of our somnambulant, horror-fatigued minds.
The other thing that worried me was the cheering of some when the number-one suspect was shot dead, the assertion being that he got his just deserts. I can definitely understand the anger at the injustice of Mongale's life being taken, but our Constitution warns us against such thinking because of the potential pitfalls it presents.
In his paper reflecting on the death penalty as a deterrent in South Africa, Chris Derby Magobotiti, who holds a PhD in criminology, explains that the death penalty was abolished by the Constitutional Court as a sentence option for capital crimes in South Africa in 1995.
Subsequently, section 277 of the Criminal Procedure Act was repealed because 'the Constitutional Court held that capital punishment infringed the rights to life and dignity, and constituted a cruel, inhuman or degrading punishment'.
'The court emphasised that various factors such as elements of arbitrariness, possibility of error in the enforcement of the death sentence, inequality and destruction of life make capital punishment cruel, inhumane and degrading, which is in conflict with the Constitution,' Magobotiti writes.
In the Mongale case, a potentially fatal error was made when Fezile Ngubane was named as a suspect also linked to the case, but was later found not to have been involved.
Magobotiti concludes that 'there is a lack of vigorous scientific analysis and empirical evidence to determine whether there is, historically, a deterrent effect of the death penalty in South Africa'.
I say this not to invalidate the relief we all felt when Mongale's suspected killer was found, but to caution against extremes that would diminish the gains of humaneness and enlightenment we have made thus far. DM
This story first appeared in our weekly Daily Maverick 168 newspaper, which is available countrywide for R35.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Eyewitness News
4 hours ago
- Eyewitness News
Parliament to get to work on amending Constitution following high court order barring John Hlophe from serving on JSC
CAPE TOWN - Following last week's high court ruling that a judge impeached for gross misconduct can't serve on the Judicial Service Commission, Parliament is set to get to work on amending the Constitution during this administration. Besides a submission made to the Constitutional Review Committee by the Council for the Advancement of the South African Constitution (CASAC), the DA says a bill to this effect is already in the pipeline. ALSO READ: The party's justice spokesperson, Glynnis Breytenbach, said it's important to tighten the law to prevent impeached individuals from making a return in other spheres of government. The National Assembly speaker is yet to announce the next steps in filling the vacancy on the judicial service commission. The seat belongs to the MK party, which plans to appeal a ruling preventing its parliamentary leader, John Hlophe from serving on the body. CASAC wants Parliament's Constitutional Review Committee to consider amending sections 177 and 194 to specify that any person removed from judicial office or a Chapter 9 institution may not hold any other public office. Breytenbach, co-chair of the committee, said a Private Member's Bill has already been prepared and is with Parliament's legal drafters. "I think it's very important that Parliament is populated with MPs who are ethical, honest, reliable and have integrity, so the sooner we can prevent bad eggs like John Hlophe and Busisiwe Mkhwebane coming to Parliament, the better." The Western Cape High Court said in a judgment last week that the National Assembly had not acted rationally nor constitutionally when it rubberstamped the MK Party's nomination for the JSC.
The Star
7 hours ago
- The Star
Edgar Lungu's death sparks outcry, allegations of poisoning and political suppression
Former Zambian President Edgar Chagwa Lungu has died at the age of 68, with his final days clouded by political tension, medical struggles, and serious allegations of state-sponsored persecution. Lungu passed away on Thursday in a South African hospital, where he had been receiving treatment for an undisclosed illness. However, the official silence on the cause of death and mounting accusations from his political allies have sparked a storm of controversy, including claims that the former head of state may have been poisoned to prevent him from contesting the 2026 presidential elections. Lungu, who served as Zambia's sixth president from 2015 to 2021, had announced a political comeback in late 2023 after years of relative quiet following his electoral defeat to current President Hakainde Hichilema (popularly known as HH). But what began as a bid to return to the ballot box quickly turned into a contentious and, some claim, dangerous standoff with the ruling administration. A Contested Comeback Lungu's return to politics was met with immediate resistance from the Hichilema-led government. In December 2024, the Constitutional Court ruled that Lungu was ineligible to contest again, arguing that his first, partial term from 2015 to 2016 counted as a full term under Zambia's constitutional two-term limit. Lungu's legal team and supporters decried the judgment as politically motivated, pointing to his widespread popularity among grassroots voters and within opposition coalitions as a threat to the ruling United Party for National Development (UPND). But critics say the court ruling was just the beginning of a broader campaign to shut Lungu out of national politics. Stripped of Protection and Benefits Soon after his political re-entry, Lungu was stripped of all retirement benefits typically afforded to former heads of state. These included state-provided security, official transportation, medical support, and diplomatic privileges. The government justified the move by citing a legal provision that bars retired presidents from engaging in politics if they wish to retain those benefits. While technically legal, the action had far-reaching consequences for Lungu's safety and well-being. Without state protection, his movements were left exposed. More alarmingly, his access to healthcare, particularly urgent specialist treatment, was severely limited. Sources within the Patriotic Front (PF), Lungu's party, say repeated requests for travel permits to receive medical care abroad were delayed or denied. 'He was denied not only political freedom but medical care too,' said a senior PF official. 'When it became clear that he needed to leave for urgent treatment, the government stalled. That decision may have cost him his life.' Allegations of Poisoning With the cause of Lungu's death yet to be officially confirmed, speculation is growing that he may have been deliberately poisoned. Though no forensic evidence has been made public, the PF is calling for an independent international investigation into the circumstances surrounding his death. His daughter, Tasila Lungu-Mwansa, confirmed in a public statement that her father had been unwell for weeks and had travelled to South Africa under medical supervision. However, she also alluded to the family's belief that his condition may have been the result of "external interference" — a veiled reference to suspected foul play. PF leaders have taken a more direct stance. 'This was not a natural death,' said Brian Mundubile, a close ally of Lungu. 'We believe this was orchestrated to eliminate him politically and permanently.' Restricted Movement and Surveillance Beyond the courtroom and hospital bed, Lungu's daily life was increasingly policed. Police were reportedly stationed outside his home, monitoring his activities and restricting public engagements. Even routine morning jogs and Sunday church services were flagged as political activity and discouraged or blocked by law enforcement. 'It was humiliation, plain and simple,' said one family confidant. 'He was a former president being treated like a common criminal just for exercising and praying.' Human rights activists and opposition figures have condemned the government's treatment of Lungu as not only unconstitutional but dangerous for Zambia's democratic fabric. 'What happened to President Lungu sets a dangerous precedent,' said a representative of the Zambia Human Rights Commission. 'If a former president can be silenced this way, what protection exists for the ordinary citizen?'
Daily Maverick
9 hours ago
- Daily Maverick
Awful murders in SA can bring out the best and the worst in us
The murder of Olorato Mogale has gripped the country as gender-based violence, one of our biggest blights, has been put on full display yet again. For me it has brought up a few points of contention, however: the exceptionalisation of beauty, the benefits of proximity to social capital when action is needed, and the celebration of the suspected perpetrator dying during a shootout with the police. Much has been written about pretty privilege. As an article in Psychology Today by Dr Nafees Alam explains: 'Attractiveness can affect social mobility. Individuals who benefit from pretty privilege might have access to better social networks, which can open doors to opportunities and resources that are less accessible to others.' Social capital is 'any benefit that is derived from interaction between members of a social grouping or society'. In this instance, one could argue that a wealth of resources could be deployed for the speedy apprehension of Mongale's killer because of her network of friends and former colleagues who had access to both traditional and social media resources. There are many other cases of women perhaps not as attractive or socially connected who failed to galvanise similarly urgent action. Without wading into the 'damned if we do, damned if we don't' camp of thinking, I think it is certainly worth examining why certain cases grip our imagination, while others fall to the far reaches of our somnambulant, horror-fatigued minds. The other thing that worried me was the cheering of some when the number-one suspect was shot dead, the assertion being that he got his just deserts. I can definitely understand the anger at the injustice of Mongale's life being taken, but our Constitution warns us against such thinking because of the potential pitfalls it presents. In his paper reflecting on the death penalty as a deterrent in South Africa, Chris Derby Magobotiti, who holds a PhD in criminology, explains that the death penalty was abolished by the Constitutional Court as a sentence option for capital crimes in South Africa in 1995. Subsequently, section 277 of the Criminal Procedure Act was repealed because 'the Constitutional Court held that capital punishment infringed the rights to life and dignity, and constituted a cruel, inhuman or degrading punishment'. 'The court emphasised that various factors such as elements of arbitrariness, possibility of error in the enforcement of the death sentence, inequality and destruction of life make capital punishment cruel, inhumane and degrading, which is in conflict with the Constitution,' Magobotiti writes. In the Mongale case, a potentially fatal error was made when Fezile Ngubane was named as a suspect also linked to the case, but was later found not to have been involved. Magobotiti concludes that 'there is a lack of vigorous scientific analysis and empirical evidence to determine whether there is, historically, a deterrent effect of the death penalty in South Africa'. I say this not to invalidate the relief we all felt when Mongale's suspected killer was found, but to caution against extremes that would diminish the gains of humaneness and enlightenment we have made thus far. DM This story first appeared in our weekly Daily Maverick 168 newspaper, which is available countrywide for R35.
