Edgar Lungu's death sparks outcry, allegations of poisoning and political suppression
Former Zambian President Edgar Chagwa Lungu has died at the age of 68, with his final days clouded by political tension, medical struggles, and serious allegations of state-sponsored persecution.
Lungu passed away on Thursday in a South African hospital, where he had been receiving treatment for an undisclosed illness.
However, the official silence on the cause of death and mounting accusations from his political allies have sparked a storm of controversy, including claims that the former head of state may have been poisoned to prevent him from contesting the 2026 presidential elections.
Lungu, who served as Zambia's sixth president from 2015 to 2021, had announced a political comeback in late 2023 after years of relative quiet following his electoral defeat to current President Hakainde Hichilema (popularly known as HH).
But what began as a bid to return to the ballot box quickly turned into a contentious and, some claim, dangerous standoff with the ruling administration. A Contested Comeback
Lungu's return to politics was met with immediate resistance from the Hichilema-led government.
In December 2024, the Constitutional Court ruled that Lungu was ineligible to contest again, arguing that his first, partial term from 2015 to 2016 counted as a full term under Zambia's constitutional two-term limit.
Lungu's legal team and supporters decried the judgment as politically motivated, pointing to his widespread popularity among grassroots voters and within opposition coalitions as a threat to the ruling United Party for National Development (UPND).
But critics say the court ruling was just the beginning of a broader campaign to shut Lungu out of national politics. Stripped of Protection and Benefits
Soon after his political re-entry, Lungu was stripped of all retirement benefits typically afforded to former heads of state.
These included state-provided security, official transportation, medical support, and diplomatic privileges. The government justified the move by citing a legal provision that bars retired presidents from engaging in politics if they wish to retain those benefits.
While technically legal, the action had far-reaching consequences for Lungu's safety and well-being. Without state protection, his movements were left exposed.
More alarmingly, his access to healthcare, particularly urgent specialist treatment, was severely limited. Sources within the Patriotic Front (PF), Lungu's party, say repeated requests for travel permits to receive medical care abroad were delayed or denied. 'He was denied not only political freedom but medical care too,' said a senior PF official.
'When it became clear that he needed to leave for urgent treatment, the government stalled. That decision may have cost him his life.' Allegations of Poisoning
With the cause of Lungu's death yet to be officially confirmed, speculation is growing that he may have been deliberately poisoned. Though no forensic evidence has been made public, the PF is calling for an independent international investigation into the circumstances surrounding his death.
His daughter, Tasila Lungu-Mwansa, confirmed in a public statement that her father had been unwell for weeks and had travelled to South Africa under medical supervision. However, she also alluded to the family's belief that his condition may have been the result of "external interference" — a veiled reference to suspected foul play.
PF leaders have taken a more direct stance. 'This was not a natural death,' said Brian Mundubile, a close ally of Lungu. 'We believe this was orchestrated to eliminate him politically and permanently.' Restricted Movement and Surveillance
Beyond the courtroom and hospital bed, Lungu's daily life was increasingly policed. Police were reportedly stationed outside his home, monitoring his activities and restricting public engagements.
Even routine morning jogs and Sunday church services were flagged as political activity and discouraged or blocked by law enforcement. 'It was humiliation, plain and simple,' said one family confidant. 'He was a former president being treated like a common criminal just for exercising and praying.'
Human rights activists and opposition figures have condemned the government's treatment of Lungu as not only unconstitutional but dangerous for Zambia's democratic fabric. 'What happened to President Lungu sets a dangerous precedent,' said a representative of the Zambia Human Rights Commission.
'If a former president can be silenced this way, what protection exists for the ordinary citizen?'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
IOL News
4 hours ago
- IOL News
Education or Entrapment? How Student Debt Sustains Systemic Youth Oppression in a Democratic South Africa
Awam Mavimbela is a registered social worker, former Walter Sisulu University Lecturer, PhD candidate with University of the Free State, and a published author Image: Supplied Apartheid-era education policies, rooted in oppression and segregation, have necessitated post-apartheid efforts to redress historical injustices by broadening access to the university system. Education remains a critical instrument for addressing inequality and alleviating poverty. However, despite gains in access, post-apartheid South African youth are now confronted by a new barrier, student debt. Even within this debt crisis, the enduring deliberate inequalities of apartheid are evident. Institutions historically serving white students tend to have significantly lower levels of student debt compared to universities predominantly attended by African, Coloured, and Indian students. For instance, as of 2021, student debt at Tshwane University of Technology amounted to R4.4 billion; Cape Peninsula University of Technology stood at R1.13 billion; Central University of Technology at R1.78 billion; and the University of KwaZulu-Natal and the University of the Witwatersrand at R1.7 billion and R1.062 billion, respectively. In stark contrast, Stellenbosch University's student debt was only R16.3 million; Rhodes University, R15.3 million; and the University of Cape Town (UCT), the lowest, at R14.1 million. The consequences of student debt are severe. They include withholding of academic certificates, exclusion from further studies, and blocked registration for subsequent academic years. These frustrations contributed to the #FeesMustFall protests of 2015/2016, when students, particularly from marginalised communities, reached a breaking point. While student demographics are not always disaggregated by race within institutions, without doubt African, Coloured, and Indian students bear the brunt of student debt an inference supported by national socio-economic disparities released by StatsSA yearly. Thus, student debt emerges as a modern mechanism of continued systemic oppression in South Africa, reinforcing historical patterns of exclusion and undermining constitutional promises. Section 29(1)(b) of the South African Constitution obliges the state to make higher education "progressively available and accessible." This means there should be funding (NSFAS) reform as the current leads to student debts. The existing debt crisis contradicts this mandate, challenging the myth that access to education is purely merit-based. Instead, structural inequalities ensure that student debt perpetuates intergenerational poverty as per apartheid policies. During apartheid, racial exclusion from education was legally enforced through instruments such as the Bantu Education Act of 1953, the Indian Education Act, and the Coloured Persons Education Act. Today, universities—ostensibly democratic institutions—function as more subtle vehicles of exclusion through financial mechanisms, particularly student debt. The discourse around student experiences is increasingly colour-blind, overlooking the racialised nature of economic and educational policy legacies. Within a neoliberal framework, student debt is framed as a personal burden rather than a manifestation of systemic socio-economic oppression. This neo-liberal individualistic perspective erases the structural dimensions of debt, which enforces racial and class stratification. As such, debt is not merely a technical or financial issue, it is youth symbolic violence (continuation of oppression). For Black graduates, many of whom are financially responsible for extended families, student debt is a source of mental illnesses like, trauma, stress, and delayed economic participation. Historic debts contribute to the intergenerational mental health burdens—depression, anxiety, social isolation, and trauma—among previously oppressed populations. Furthermore, the student debt crisis reveals how universities have become corporatised entities, dependent on student fees for financial viability. Students are no longer just recipients of education; they are financiers sustaining the neoliberal university model. This article contends that student debt is a consequence of apartheid-era oppression and calls for solutions beyond the current frameworks, such as debt cancellation, free education, or universal basic income. Without reimagining education funding, existing approaches risk entrenching the status quo of racial inequality, thereby serving elite interests. Student debt also undermines initiatives like the 1997 White Paper for Social Welfare, which identified education as a vehicle for redressing historical imbalances (poverty). The fragmented social welfare systems experienced by Africans, Coloureds, and Indians cannot be remedied without addressing the racialised nature of educational debt.
The Star
4 hours ago
- The Star
Edgar Lungu's death sparks outcry, allegations of poisoning and political suppression
Former Zambian President Edgar Chagwa Lungu has died at the age of 68, with his final days clouded by political tension, medical struggles, and serious allegations of state-sponsored persecution. Lungu passed away on Thursday in a South African hospital, where he had been receiving treatment for an undisclosed illness. However, the official silence on the cause of death and mounting accusations from his political allies have sparked a storm of controversy, including claims that the former head of state may have been poisoned to prevent him from contesting the 2026 presidential elections. Lungu, who served as Zambia's sixth president from 2015 to 2021, had announced a political comeback in late 2023 after years of relative quiet following his electoral defeat to current President Hakainde Hichilema (popularly known as HH). But what began as a bid to return to the ballot box quickly turned into a contentious and, some claim, dangerous standoff with the ruling administration. A Contested Comeback Lungu's return to politics was met with immediate resistance from the Hichilema-led government. In December 2024, the Constitutional Court ruled that Lungu was ineligible to contest again, arguing that his first, partial term from 2015 to 2016 counted as a full term under Zambia's constitutional two-term limit. Lungu's legal team and supporters decried the judgment as politically motivated, pointing to his widespread popularity among grassroots voters and within opposition coalitions as a threat to the ruling United Party for National Development (UPND). But critics say the court ruling was just the beginning of a broader campaign to shut Lungu out of national politics. Stripped of Protection and Benefits Soon after his political re-entry, Lungu was stripped of all retirement benefits typically afforded to former heads of state. These included state-provided security, official transportation, medical support, and diplomatic privileges. The government justified the move by citing a legal provision that bars retired presidents from engaging in politics if they wish to retain those benefits. While technically legal, the action had far-reaching consequences for Lungu's safety and well-being. Without state protection, his movements were left exposed. More alarmingly, his access to healthcare, particularly urgent specialist treatment, was severely limited. Sources within the Patriotic Front (PF), Lungu's party, say repeated requests for travel permits to receive medical care abroad were delayed or denied. 'He was denied not only political freedom but medical care too,' said a senior PF official. 'When it became clear that he needed to leave for urgent treatment, the government stalled. That decision may have cost him his life.' Allegations of Poisoning With the cause of Lungu's death yet to be officially confirmed, speculation is growing that he may have been deliberately poisoned. Though no forensic evidence has been made public, the PF is calling for an independent international investigation into the circumstances surrounding his death. His daughter, Tasila Lungu-Mwansa, confirmed in a public statement that her father had been unwell for weeks and had travelled to South Africa under medical supervision. However, she also alluded to the family's belief that his condition may have been the result of "external interference" — a veiled reference to suspected foul play. PF leaders have taken a more direct stance. 'This was not a natural death,' said Brian Mundubile, a close ally of Lungu. 'We believe this was orchestrated to eliminate him politically and permanently.' Restricted Movement and Surveillance Beyond the courtroom and hospital bed, Lungu's daily life was increasingly policed. Police were reportedly stationed outside his home, monitoring his activities and restricting public engagements. Even routine morning jogs and Sunday church services were flagged as political activity and discouraged or blocked by law enforcement. 'It was humiliation, plain and simple,' said one family confidant. 'He was a former president being treated like a common criminal just for exercising and praying.' Human rights activists and opposition figures have condemned the government's treatment of Lungu as not only unconstitutional but dangerous for Zambia's democratic fabric. 'What happened to President Lungu sets a dangerous precedent,' said a representative of the Zambia Human Rights Commission. 'If a former president can be silenced this way, what protection exists for the ordinary citizen?'
Daily Maverick
6 hours ago
- Daily Maverick
Awful murders in SA can bring out the best and the worst in us
The murder of Olorato Mogale has gripped the country as gender-based violence, one of our biggest blights, has been put on full display yet again. For me it has brought up a few points of contention, however: the exceptionalisation of beauty, the benefits of proximity to social capital when action is needed, and the celebration of the suspected perpetrator dying during a shootout with the police. Much has been written about pretty privilege. As an article in Psychology Today by Dr Nafees Alam explains: 'Attractiveness can affect social mobility. Individuals who benefit from pretty privilege might have access to better social networks, which can open doors to opportunities and resources that are less accessible to others.' Social capital is 'any benefit that is derived from interaction between members of a social grouping or society'. In this instance, one could argue that a wealth of resources could be deployed for the speedy apprehension of Mongale's killer because of her network of friends and former colleagues who had access to both traditional and social media resources. There are many other cases of women perhaps not as attractive or socially connected who failed to galvanise similarly urgent action. Without wading into the 'damned if we do, damned if we don't' camp of thinking, I think it is certainly worth examining why certain cases grip our imagination, while others fall to the far reaches of our somnambulant, horror-fatigued minds. The other thing that worried me was the cheering of some when the number-one suspect was shot dead, the assertion being that he got his just deserts. I can definitely understand the anger at the injustice of Mongale's life being taken, but our Constitution warns us against such thinking because of the potential pitfalls it presents. In his paper reflecting on the death penalty as a deterrent in South Africa, Chris Derby Magobotiti, who holds a PhD in criminology, explains that the death penalty was abolished by the Constitutional Court as a sentence option for capital crimes in South Africa in 1995. Subsequently, section 277 of the Criminal Procedure Act was repealed because 'the Constitutional Court held that capital punishment infringed the rights to life and dignity, and constituted a cruel, inhuman or degrading punishment'. 'The court emphasised that various factors such as elements of arbitrariness, possibility of error in the enforcement of the death sentence, inequality and destruction of life make capital punishment cruel, inhumane and degrading, which is in conflict with the Constitution,' Magobotiti writes. In the Mongale case, a potentially fatal error was made when Fezile Ngubane was named as a suspect also linked to the case, but was later found not to have been involved. Magobotiti concludes that 'there is a lack of vigorous scientific analysis and empirical evidence to determine whether there is, historically, a deterrent effect of the death penalty in South Africa'. I say this not to invalidate the relief we all felt when Mongale's suspected killer was found, but to caution against extremes that would diminish the gains of humaneness and enlightenment we have made thus far. DM This story first appeared in our weekly Daily Maverick 168 newspaper, which is available countrywide for R35.
