logo
Kristi Noem under fire over deadly Texas floods, faces resignation calls for delaying FEMA response for 72 hours

Kristi Noem under fire over deadly Texas floods, faces resignation calls for delaying FEMA response for 72 hours

Time of India10-07-2025
Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem is facing calls to resign for enacting disaster relief reforms which officials say hobbled FEMA at the crucial moment after the
Texas floods
. Sources inside FEMA told multiple US media outlets that new policies, including one that requires Noem personally sign off on any spending request over $100,000, slowed responses and removed autonomy from agency employees.
Search and rescue teams specially trained to respond to catastrophic floods couldn't be deployed in case of the devastating Texas flood until Kristi Noem personally gave her stamp of approval, which didn't come until "more than 72 hours after the flooding began,' CNN reported.
Amid the growing criticism of her handling of deadly Texas flood, calls for her to resign are growing as the death toll continues to mount. As many as 160 people still remain missing after the Guadalupe River burst its banks, washing entire communities away. The Trump administration has reportedly shifted the blame to Biden for the chaos.
ALSO READ:
July 9 is the shortest day ever in history? Scientists call it 'unprecedented, big deal'
Why is Kristi Noem facing calls to resign?
Noem, who oversees FEMA, recently introduced sweeping rules attempting to cut costs, decreeing that every contract over $100,000 now requires her personal sign-off. But in emergency situations like the Texas floods this has hampered the rescue efforts. A request from Texas first responders for aerial imagery from FEMA to help in the state's search and rescue operations, which also needed Noem's personal approval.
Live Events
As the floods hit the Central Texas, FEMA officials told CNN they couldn't deploy the Urban Search and Rescue crews in response to urgent requests from authorities at the epicenter of the disaster. Noem didn't authorize FEMA's deployment of the teams until Monday, more than 72 hours after the flooding began, sources told the paper.
Calls for her resignation have emerged in response to the story. The popular X profile Republicans Against Trump wrote, "This is inexcusable. She should resign."
ALSO READ:
Amanda Anisimova's net worth: How much money does the US tennis star make?
The DHS has hit back against the claims. Tricia McLaughlin, a spokesperson for the deparment, said that Noem didn't need FEMA's teams because other DHS search and rescue assets were deployed.
'FEMA is shifting from bloated, DC-centric dead weight to a lean, deployable disaster force that empowers state actors to provide relief for their citizens,' McLaughlin told CNN in a statement. 'The old processes are being replaced because they failed Americans in real emergencies for decades.'
Kristi Noem delayed Texas aid
Kristi Noem waited four days to sign off crucial aid for the Texas floods. She faced massive criticism for posting on social media about her official portrait. Noem asked her Instagram followers on Sunday which image they preferred for her official portrait as the former governor of South Dakota.'Which one do you like for the official Governor's portrait to hang in the South Dakota State Capitol? Thank you David Uhl!' she posted.
ALSO READ:
Amanda Anisimova, Wimbledon semi-finalist, opens up on her mental health struggles, says 'just taking some time to breathe....'
Homeland Security spokesperson Tricia McLaughlin told CNN, 'FEMA is shifting from bloated, DC-centric dead weight to a lean, deployable disaster force that empowers state actors to provide relief for their citizens.'
'The old processes are being replaced because they failed Americans in real emergencies for decades,' she said.
Economic Times WhatsApp channel
)
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Sydney Sweeney's controversial ad campaign draws Trump's attention, he says 'advertising a very funny thing'
Sydney Sweeney's controversial ad campaign draws Trump's attention, he says 'advertising a very funny thing'

Economic Times

time32 minutes ago

  • Economic Times

Sydney Sweeney's controversial ad campaign draws Trump's attention, he says 'advertising a very funny thing'

AP US President Donald Trump was asked about the Sydney Sweeney's American Eagle's ad by Newsmax anchor Rob Finnerty The ongoing controversy surrounding Sydney Sweeney's American Eagle ad has garnered a lot of attention online. Sweeney, 27, and American Eagle faced backlash earlier this week after the blonde-haired, blue-eyed 'White Lotus' starlet appeared in a new denim ad for the popular clothing and accessories retailer. It sparked a debate over race and Western beauty President Donald Trump was asked about the Sydney Sweeney's American Eagle's ad by Newsmax anchor Rob Finnerty. Trump was asked about the highly contested advertisement in a bizarre question that ended with the president going on a rant about transgender actress Dylan Mulvaney and his own experience with advertising, reports The Irish Star. ALSO READ: Social Security eyes massive reform in US: New policy could hit 3.4 million Americans this month "Your administration has been very open about the fact that American women are not having enough babies," the Newsmax anchor began his perplexing line of questioning. "There was an ad this week. Sydney Sweeney, an actress, was in an ad for Blue Jeans. The ad is doing very well. It's very popular. The jeans are sold out," he went on before asking, "Does America need to see more ads like that? And maybe fewer ads with people like Dylan Mulvaney on the cover?" ALSO READ: Solar Eclipse on August 2 in US? What NASA has said on world going dark for 6 minutes Trump took the bait and went on a rant about the Bud Light campaign. He said, "The Dylan Mulvaney ad was perhaps the most unsuccessful ad in history. It knocked 35 million dollars off the value of a certain company. You know what I'm talking about. That was one of the great disasters of all time. I would say it was probably the most unsuccessful ad, worst ad ever." He continued, "You know, advertising is a very funny thing. I've done ads where I thought they were lousy and they turned out to be iconic, and then I've done some that I thought were beauties that were gonna be fantastic, and they weren't so good, so to each his own. But the Dylan Mulvaney ad was a total disaster." The Newsmax anchor paired the question with an onscreen banner that read, "Trump ends the era of woke."ALSO READ: 'Rage Against The Regime' protests: Over 300 US cities hosting anti-Trump demonstrations today on JD Vance's birthday. Full list American Eagle is standing by its controversial ad campaign featuring Sydney Sweeney, which includes various commercials with the tagline: 'Sydney Sweeney Has Great Jeans.' The campaign has been criticized for promoting eugenics with its tagline, "Sydney Sweeney has good jeans," which many interpreted as a white supremacist dog whistle. ''Sydney Sweeney Has Great Jeans' is and always was about the jeans,' the company said Friday in a statement obtained by The Post. 'Her jeans. Her story.' 'We'll continue to celebrate how everyone wears their AE jeans with confidence, their way,' the statement continued. 'Great jeans look good on everyone.''I have great jeans… now you can too,' the 'Euphoria' actress wrote on Instagram on July 23, alongside a video for the controversial campaign. But some social media users compared the marketing move to "Nazi propaganda". ALSO READ: Stimulus payments August 2025: These US states will receive financial benefit. Do you qualify? 'I thought it was gonna be, like, kinda bad, but wow,' one critic wrote on TikTok. 'That's gonna be in history books!' 'I will be the friend that's too woke, but those Sydney Sweeney American Eagle ads are weird,' another added. 'Like, fascist weird. Like Nazi propaganda weird.' Singers Lizzo, 37, and Doja Cat, 29, also took to social media to ridicule Sweeney and American Eagle over the controversy. 'My jeans are black…' the 'Truth Hurts' singer wrote alongside a digitally altered picture showing herself in the denim shirt and jeans that Sweeney wore for the American Eagle photo shoot. Doja Cat shared a TikTok video of herself repeating Sweeney's American Eagle campaign monologue with an exaggerated accent. American Eagle appeared to distance itself from the 'Nazi propaganda' backlash by sharing other ads from the campaign that did not feature Sweeney.'Denim on denim on denim… on denim,' the company wrote alongside the new ad on July 27. 'AE has great jeans.' Plus, American Eagle's stock rose more than 10% immediately after the new campaign kicked off on July 23.

'She must leave country': France to deport woman over anti-semitic posts; suspends evacuations from Gaza
'She must leave country': France to deport woman over anti-semitic posts; suspends evacuations from Gaza

Time of India

time36 minutes ago

  • Time of India

'She must leave country': France to deport woman over anti-semitic posts; suspends evacuations from Gaza

A Gaza student will be deported from France following outrage over alleged anti-semitic content she reposted on social media, French Foreign minister Jean-Noel Barrot said on Friday. The government has also announced a suspension of all evacuations from Gaza pending an investigation into the matter. 'She must leave the country. She does not have a place in France,' Barrot told France Info radio, without confirming whether the student would be sent directly to Gaza. The woman, whose identity has not been made public, was also expelled from Sciences Po Lille, a university in northern France, after her online activity was deemed incompatible with the institution's values. Her case has fuelled a national political row, with the interior minister accusing her of promoting 'Hamas propaganda.' Barrot said the student had passed both French and Israeli security vetting before entering France, and that her "anti-semitic and unacceptable" social media activity had not been flagged during those checks. He confirmed that all French-led evacuations from Gaza would now be paused while authorities carry out an inquiry, CNN reported. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like TV providers are furious: this gadget gives you access to all channels Techno Mag Learn More Undo Since the Hamas-led attacks on Israel on October 7 2023, France has helped evacuate hundreds of individuals from the Gaza Strip. Just days earlier, Barrot had stated that France was 'dedicating lots of energy' to rescue starving journalists from AFP, the French news agency, trapped in the enclave. It remains unclear whether those efforts will resume. While condemning the student's actions, Barrot also stressed the dire humanitarian conditions in Gaza, calling the situation 'inhumane' and 'a scandal that must stop immediately.' Sciences Po Lille did not specify which posts triggered the backlash but said the student's remarks ran 'in direct contradiction' to the institution's principles. '(Sciences Po Lille) fights against all forms of racism, anti-semitism, and discrimination, as well as against any type of call to hatred, against any population whatsoever,' the university posted on social media platform X on Wednesday. It said the decision to revoke the student's enrolment was taken in consultation with the ministry of higher education and research, as per CNN. Education minister Philippe Baptiste described the student's alleged comments as 'extreme' and supported calls for her removal from France. 'France does not have to welcome international students who advocate for terrorism, crimes against humanity, and anti-semitism. Whether they come from Gaza or elsewhere, international students holding or relaying such statements have no place in our country,' he posted on X. Other senior ministers have also condemned the student's social media activity, which has now been referred to the judiciary.

US had threatened illegal immigrants to deport them to third countries, then it sent them home
US had threatened illegal immigrants to deport them to third countries, then it sent them home

Mint

timean hour ago

  • Mint

US had threatened illegal immigrants to deport them to third countries, then it sent them home

Washington: The Trump administration says that some serious criminals need to be deported to third countries because even their home countries won't accept them. But a review of recent cases shows that at least five men threatened with such a fate were sent to their native countries within weeks. President Donald Trump aims to deport millions of immigrants in the U.S. illegally and his administration has sought to ramp up removals to third countries, including sending convicted criminals to South Sudan and Eswatini, formerly known as Swaziland, two sub-Saharan African nations. Immigrants convicted of crimes typically first serve their U.S. sentences before being deported. This appeared to be the case with the eight men deported to South Sudan and five to Eswatini, although some had been released years earlier. The U.S. Department of Homeland Security said in June that third-country deportations allow them to deport people 'so uniquely barbaric that their own countries won't take them back.' Critics have countered that it's not clear the U.S. tried to return the men deported to South Sudan and Eswatini to their home countries and that the deportations were unnecessarily cruel. Reuters found that at least five men threatened with deportation to Libya in May were sent to their home countries weeks later, according to interviews with two of the men, a family member and attorneys. After a U.S. judge blocked the Trump administration from sending them to Libya, two men from Vietnam, two men from Laos and a man from Mexico were all deported to their home nations. The deportations have not previously been reported. DHS did not comment on the removals. Reuters could not determine if their home countries initially refused to take them or why the U.S. tried to send them to Libya. DHS spokesperson Tricia McLaughlin contested that the home countries of criminals deported to third countries were willing to take them back, but did not provide details on any attempts to return the five men home before they were threatened with deportation to Libya. 'If you come to our country illegally and break our laws, you could end up in CECOT, , Guantanamo Bay, or South Sudan or another third country,' McLaughlin said in a statement, referencing and a detention center in the subtropical Florida Everglades. DHS did not respond to a request for the number of third-country deportations since Trump took office on January 20, although there have been thousands to Mexico and hundreds to other countries. The eight men sent to South Sudan were from Cuba, Laos, Mexico, Myanmar, South Sudan and Vietnam, according to DHS. The man DHS said was from South Sudan had a deportation order to Sudan, according to a court filing. The five men sent to Eswatini were from Cuba, Jamaica, Laos, Vietnam and Yemen, according to DHS. White House spokeswoman Abigail Jackson said the men deported to South Sudan and Eswatini were 'the worst of the worst' and included people convicted in the United States of child sex abuse and murder. 'American communities are safer with these heinous illegal criminals gone,' Jackson said in a statement. The Laos government did not respond to requests for comment regarding the men threatened with deportation to Libya and those deported to South Sudan and Eswatini. Vietnam's foreign ministry spokesperson said on July 17 that the government was verifying information regarding the South Sudan deportation but did not provide additional comment to Reuters. The government of Mexico did not comment. The Trump administration acknowledged in a May 22 court filing that the man from Myanmar had valid travel documents to return to his home country but he was deported to South Sudan anyway. DHS said the man had been convicted of sexual assault involving a victim mentally and physically incapable of resisting. Eswatini's government said on Tuesday that it was still holding the five migrants sent there in isolated prison units under the deal with the Trump administration. The Supreme Court in June allowed the Trump administration to deport migrants to third countries without giving them a chance to show they could be harmed. But the legality of the removals is still being contested in a federal lawsuit in Boston, a case that could potentially wind its way back to the conservative-leaning high court. Critics say the removals aim to stoke fear among migrants and encourage them to 'self deport' to their home countries rather than be sent to distant countries they have no connection with. 'This is a message that you may end up with a very random outcome that you're going to like a lot less than if you elect to leave under your own steam,' said Michelle Mittelstadt, communications director for the non-partisan Migration Policy Institute. Internal U.S. immigration enforcement guidance issued in July said migrants could be deported to countries that had not provided diplomatic assurances of their safety in as little as six hours. While the administration has highlighted the deportations of convicted criminals to African countries, it has also sent asylum-seeking Afghans, Russians and others to Panama and Costa Rica. The Trump administration deported more than 200 Venezuelans accused of being gang members to El Salvador in March, where they were held in the country's CECOT prison without access to attorneys until they were released in a prisoner swap last month. More than 5,700 non-Mexican migrants have been deported to Mexico since Trump took office, according to Mexican government data, continuing a policy that began under former President Joe Biden. The fact that one Mexican man was deported to South Sudan and another threatened with deportation to Libya suggests that the Trump administration did not try to send them to their home countries, according to Trina Realmuto, executive director at the pro-immigrant National Immigration Litigation Alliance. 'Mexico historically accepts back its own citizens,' said Realmuto, one of the attorneys representing migrants in the lawsuit contesting third-country deportations. The eight men deported to South Sudan included Mexican national Jesus Munoz Gutierrez, who had served a sentence in the U.S. for second-degree murder and was directly taken into federal immigration custody afterward, according to Realmuto. Court records show Munoz stabbed and killed a roommate during a fight in 2004. When the Trump administration first initiated the deportation in late May, Mexico's President Claudia Sheinbaum said her government had not been informed. 'If he does want to be repatriated, then the United States would have to bring him to Mexico,' Sheinbaum said at the time. His sister, Guadalupe Gutierrez, said in an interview that she didn't understand why he was sent to South Sudan, where he is currently in custody. She said Mexico is trying to get her brother home. 'Mexico never rejected my brother,' Gutierrez said. Immigration hardliners see the third-country removals as a way to deal with immigration offenders who can't easily be deported and could pose a threat to the U.S. public. "The Trump administration is prioritizing the safety of American communities over the comfort of these deportees,' said Jessica Vaughan, policy director at the Center for Immigration Studies, which supports lower levels of immigration. The Trump administration in July to take migrants and the Pacific Islands nation of Palau, among others. Under U.S. law, federal immigration officials can deport someone to a country other than their place of citizenship when all other efforts are 'impracticable, inadvisable or impossible.' Immigration officials must first try to send an immigrant back to their home country, and if they fail, then to a country with which they have a connection, such as where they lived or were born. For a Lao man who was almost deported to Libya in early May, hearing about the renewed third-country deportations took him back to his own close call. In an interview from Laos granted on condition of anonymity because of fears for his safety, he asked why the U.S. was 'using us as a pawn?' His attorney said the man had served a prison sentence for a felony. Reuters could not establish what he was convicted of. He recalled officials telling him to sign his deportation order to Libya, which he refused, telling them he wanted to be sent to Laos instead. They told him he would be deported to Libya regardless of whether he signed or not, he said. DHS did not comment on the allegations. The man, who came to the United States in the early 1980s as a refugee when he was four years old, said he was now trying to learn the Lao language and adapt to his new life, 'taking it day by day.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store