Map Shows States Paying Most—and Least—for SNAP Under Trump Bill
The majority of U.S. states will be required to pay a portion of Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) benefits in the coming years.
Under current federal rules, SNAP benefits, which help some 42 million Americans across the country, are paid by the federal government but administered at the state level. All states pay half of the cost of this administration.
But the One Big Beautiful Bill Act is set to change things. Beginning in 2028, the bill will require states to cover a portion of SNAP benefits if error payments are above 6 percent, and all must pay for an additional share of program administration costs.
Why It Matters
This will be the first time that states have had to shoulder the responsibility of paying SNAP benefits, and numerous lawmakers, poverty experts and advocacy groups have warned against the policy.
How Does The Cost Share Work?
Erroneous payments are when too much or too little is paid to a SNAP recipient. States will have to pay a certain percentage based on thresholds set by the bill:
Error rate below 6 percent: No cost-sharing required
6 to 8 percent error rate: 5 percent cost-sharing
8 to 10 percent error rate: 10 percent cost-sharing
Over 10 percent error rate: 15 percent cost-sharing
Which States Will Pay The Most?
Based on fiscal year 2024 data, 43 states will be expected to pay up for a portion of SNAP benefits when the new rules begin in 2028, according to data compiled by the Food Action Research Center (FRAC).
California is poised to pay the most of all 50 states if its error rate doesn't come down. With a 15 percent requirement based on an error rate of 11 percent, the Golden State will be expected to pay an estimated $1.9 billion in benefit costs and $661 million in administrative costs, bringing its total to just shy of $2.6 billion if its error rate does not drop.
Other top payers will be New York ($1.9 billion), Florida ($1.3 billion), Texas ($1 billion) and Pennsylvania ($982 million), according to FRAC's analysis.
Which States Will Pay The Least?
Based on 2024 error rates, only Idaho, Nebraska, Nevada, South Dakota, Utah, Vermont, Wisconsin, and Wyoming will not have to cough up for a share of the benefits, though they will still be required to bear more of the administrative costs.
Some Exceptions
Senate Republicans added a carve-out to address concerns from Alaska Senator Lisa Murkowski, letting her state delay cost-sharing due to its high SNAP error rates. To follow reconciliation rules, the delay option was extended to any state with a SNAP error rate — when multiplied by 1.5 — that hits 20 percent or more. If a state meets that threshold in FY 2025, it can delay cost-sharing until FY 2029; if it qualifies in FY 2026, it can delay until FY 2030. But states can only use this delay once, based on either year, not both.
Based on FY 2024 data, likely beneficiaries include Alaska, Florida, Georgia, Maryland, Massachusetts, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, Oregon, and Washington, D.C, according to FRAC.
What People Are Saying
FRAC in its analysis: "Taken together, these provisions represent an unprecedented cost-shift from the federal government to the states, one that forces local leaders to make painful tradeoffs between essential services and rising administrative demands. As states grapple with tighter budgets, reduced federal support, and growing caseload complexity, the core promise of SNAP — as a reliable safeguard against hunger and hardship — is at risk. The Trump- and Republican-passed budget reconciliation bill, OBBBA, not only weakens a cornerstone anti-poverty program; it reshapes the relationship between federal and state governments in ways that could prove devastating for millions of families, workers, and communities across the country."
Jennifer Greenfield, associate professor at the University of Denver who specializes in the intersection of health and wealth disparities, told Newsweek: "The proposed federal 'savings' are not savings at all—it's a shift of the costs to our already cash-strapped states and families. The net result will be to increase hunger and financial instability among households with children, older adults, people with disabilities, and veterans—while also sending tens of thousands of people into unemployment."
House Speaker Mike Johnson told CBS News Face the Nation with Margaret Brennan in May: "The states are not properly administering this because they don't have enough skin in the game. So what we've done in the bill is add some- just a modest state sharing component, so that they'll pay attention to that, so that we can reduce fraud. Why? Again, so that it is preserved for the people that need it the most."
What Happens Next
Cost-sharing requirements will begin in 2028. How much each state will have to pay will depend on its future error rates.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Boston Globe
15 minutes ago
- Boston Globe
With sanctions looming, Trump's envoy to Russia meets with Putin
But a few hours after the meeting's end, Trump announced that he would increase his tariffs on India to 50 percent, describing the move as a penalty for purchasing Russian oil. Trump also ordered his administration to determine whether other countries are importing Russian oil and recommend whether they should face similar tariffs. Advertisement Trump said Tuesday that, depending on the results of Witkoff's meeting, the United States could impose new sanctions on Russia and countries that buy its fossil fuels. A White House official, who was not authorized to speak publicly about the meeting, said Trump's timetable was unchanged and that the secondary sanctions he has threatened were still expected to be implemented Friday. Ushakov said Witkoff had passed along 'signals' from Trump and that Putin had conveyed 'some signals' back. He added that he would offer more details once Witkoff had briefed Trump. Trump wrote in his post on social media that he had shared an update of Witkoff's meeting with several European allies, and said that 'everyone agrees this War must come to a close, and we will work towards that in the days and weeks to come.' Advertisement Previous meetings between Witkoff and Putin drew praise from the Kremlin without leading to any breakthroughs in stopping the Ukraine war, which Trump describes as his primary goal in diplomacy with Russia. But Witkoff's visit Wednesday held particular weight because it came just days before a deadline imposed by Trump for Putin to make peace. Brief video footage released by the Kremlin from the meeting's start showed a smiling Putin greeting Witkoff with a warm handshake as Ushakov looked on from behind an oval conference table. Earlier Wednesday, Witkoff was met at Moscow's Vnukovo airport by Kirill Dmitriev, an economic aide to Putin who has been his main counterpart at the Kremlin. Russian state television then showed Dmitriev and Witkoff taking a walk in the morning sun in Zaryadye, a landscaped park just outside the Kremlin walls, before Witkoff headed into the Kremlin for his meeting with the Russian president. During his recent visits to Russia, Witkoff, a longtime personal friend of Trump who now holds the title of special envoy for peace missions, has held hourslong talks with Putin himself. That has given him extraordinary access to a Russian leader who has met with few Western officials since he invaded Ukraine, and who rarely grants audiences to foreigners who are not heads of state. Those meetings helped facilitate prisoner exchanges that freed two Americans jailed in Russia, and helped pave the way for phone calls between Putin and Trump. But none brought clear signs of progress in ending the war in Ukraine. While Trump initially appeared to give Putin the benefit of the doubt and blamed President Volodymyr Zelensky of Ukraine for dragging out the three-year war, he has increasingly soured on Putin in his public comments lately. Putin, on the other hand, has sought to placate and engage with Trump without showing any willingness to compromise on his far-reaching goals in his war against Ukraine. Advertisement Trump said on July 28 that he would give Moscow 10 to 12 days to end the conflict or face a new round of financial penalties — a deadline that expires soon. Asked Tuesday whether he was still considering sanctioning countries like China that buy Russian energy, Trump said the United States would 'be doing quite a bit of that,' but suggested that Witkoff's visit would determine the next steps. Putin's forces have been advancing on the ground and have pummeled Ukraine with some of their fiercest airstrikes of the war in recent months, even as Trump has tried to negotiate peace. The United Nations said that June saw the most civilian casualties in a single month over the past three years, with 232 people killed and 1,343 injured, and that preliminary data showed that 'this alarming pattern' continued in July. Overnight, Russia again hit Ukraine with drone strikes. A summer holiday resort in the Zaporizhzhia region of southeastern Ukraine was targeted, killing two people and injuring 12, including children, Ukrainian officials said. Zelensky said he discussed the details of Wednesday's call with Trump and European leaders in a separate conversation. He didn't release any of those details, but said, 'Our joint position with our partners is absolutely clear — the war must end.' Energy exports are the main source of revenue for the Russian government, though those earnings have declined as the price of Russian oil has fallen. The Russian government collected about $9.8 billion in oil and gas taxes in July, Russia's Finance Ministry said Tuesday, a 27 percent drop from a year earlier when measured in Russian currency. Advertisement This article originally appeared in
CBS News
16 minutes ago
- CBS News
$10,000 6-month CD vs. $10,000 money market account: Here's which can earn you more right now
In a steady economic climate, giving up access to a large, five-figure portion of your money may not be the most advantageous approach. You'll need access, after all, for deposits, withdrawals and timely investment opportunities. But this isn't a normal economic climate, either. Recovering from the decades-high inflation of recent years, many Americans may feel unsure about where to keep their hard-earned money right now. And with inflation increasing again in recent months, albeit at a much lower level, and high interest rates on hold at least through mid-September, the question surrounding a home for your money becomes increasingly important to get right. One major deciding factor, then, becomes the interest-earning potential. And with a certificate of deposit (CD) account or a money market account, savers can still earn substantial rates on their money right now. A CD will even provide a fixed interest rate for the full length of the term, assuming the saver keeps their money untouched during that period. So, in these instances, a 6-month CD could be an attractive alternative as it will allow savers to weather economic changes and rate fluctuations comfortably past the end of the year. But will the returns justify the loss of access, especially when money market accounts won't require that same sacrifice? Specifically, between a $10,000 6-month CD and a $10,000 money market account, which could earn more right now? Below, we'll crunch the numbers. Start earning more interest on your money with a high-rate CD here now. CD and money market account interest rates are around the same right now, meaning that the interest-earning potential to start is virtually identical. But that can and likely will change in the weeks and months to come, as money market accounts have variable rates responsive to market conditions, while the CD rate you opened your account with will be the same one it matures with. Assuming rates on the money market account remain constant, then, and assuming that no early withdrawal penalties are issued against the CD, here's what a $10,000 deposit into each can earn now, tied to recently available rates: While the difference in earnings between the accounts is negligible, the CD account here becomes the clear preferential option. Not only are earnings higher, but they're guaranteed thanks to that locked rate. And with rate cuts on the horizon for as soon as this September and with money market account rates likely to decline when those cuts are ultimately issued, this interest-earnings differential could become stark by the time that six-month period has concluded. Lock in a big return on your money with a high-rate CD here today. High-yield savings accounts come with similar rates to money market accounts currently (in the 4.25% to 4.35% range). But they also came with the same unfortunate caveat as those accounts do, namely, a variable interest rate likely to decline soon as rate cuts are issued. If you're comfortable with that dynamic, knowing that it'll be a sacrifice for maintaining access to your money in the way a CD account won't allow, then these accounts could also be worth exploring and opening now. However, if the end goal remains earning as much interest as possible, a CD is arguably still your better recourse. A $10,000 deposit into either a CD or money market account will earn savers a few hundred dollars right now, but that return will be guaranteed and predictable with a CD, neither of which a money market or high-yield savings account can offer now. Weigh the structure of each account type, then, versus the interest-earning potential to better determine which can truly be the secure and prosperous home for your $10,000 through the end of 2025.
Forbes
16 minutes ago
- Forbes
Credit Card Debt Is Surging: Smart Ways To Pay It Off Faster In 2025
Editorial Note: We earn a commission from partner links on Forbes Advisor. Commissions do not affect our editors' opinions or evaluations. Americans now hold a record-high $1.21 trillion in credit card debt, according to new data from the Federal Reserve Bank of New York. In the second quarter of 2025 alone, balances surged by $27 billion, signaling growing financial strain for millions of households. While post-pandemic spending habits may explain some of the increase, high interest rates, inflation and stagnant wages are making it harder for many to keep up with revolving debt. With average APRs exceeding 24%, credit card interest has become more than just a budgeting nuisance—it's a long-term liability. Balance transfer credit cards and a strict plan to pay down your debt can be the solution. With inflation and the cost of everyday living stretching household budgets, rising credit card debt has become a consequence for many Americans. If life's financial pressures push you to rely on credit cards, it's crucial to understand the cost of carrying a balance. Even modest balances can snowball under today's high interest rates. For example, a $5,000 balance at a 24% annual percentage rate (APR) can cost around $1,200 a year in interest alone if you don't pay it down. If you're only making minimum payments each month, it could take years—or even a decade—to pay your debt off, depending on your card's terms. Read more: Credit Card Minimum Payment Calculator If your credit card debt has high interest, utilizing a card with a 0% introductory APR offer can help. These cards typically offer 12 to 21 months without interest, so your payments go toward shrinking what you owe instead of just covering interest and fees. It's like pressing pause on the interest piling up. But it's not magic—You still need to stick to a payoff plan and avoid making new charges while you're paying your debt off. Also, be mindful that most balance transfer credit cards charge an upfront balance transfer fee, usually 3% to 5% of the balance you are transferring. A 0% APR introductory card can give you some breathing room while you figure out your next move. One option is the Discover it® Cash Back , which offers a 0% introductory APR for 15 months on purchases and eligible balance transfers. Then, a standard rate of 18.24% to 27.24% variable applies. A balance transfer fee of up to 5% of the amount transferred applies. If you can pay off your debt within the intro period, a card like this can be a tool to avoid interest from piling up. INTRO OFFER: Unlimited Cashback Match for all new cardmembers–only from Discover. Discover will automatically match all the cash back you've earned at the end of your first year! There's no minimum spending or maximum rewards. You could turn $150 cash back into $300. Credit Score ranges are based on FICO® credit scoring. This is just one scoring method and a credit card issuer may use another method when considering your application. These are provided as guidelines only and approval is not guaranteed. If you're considering a balance transfer credit card , here's how to approach using it strategically: Know your debt. Add up your credit card balances and determine which cards have the highest interest rates—the debt costing you the most. Check your credit. Most cards with 0% introductory APR offers require good to excellent credit to qualify. If your score isn't there yet, you might want to hold off or look into other ways to consolidate your debt . Read the fine print. Credit cards often charge a fee, usually between 3% to 5%, of the balance you are transferring to the card. Still, if you can pay off your balance during the intro period, the savings typically outweigh this upfront cost. Commit to a payoff plan. Divide your total transferred amount by the number of months in your 0% APR period. That's the monthly payment you need to make to eliminate your balance during the promotional period. Set up autopay and reminders. A late payment may cancel your promotional APR and trigger penalty interest rates. Setting up autopayments and payment alerts can help you stay on track. The jump in credit card debt isn't just a statistic—it's a warning sign for many families. Higher balances, climbing interest rates and economic uncertainty are creating serious financial pressure. You can take charge of your debt with a plan, potentially using a balance transfer card or exploring other ways to manage your debt. It is important to act now, as time is on your side when it comes to interest accumulating.
