2024 Ford Mustang Mach-E Rally
Now for an extra $6,000 in the Mach-E Rally, you'll be grinning ear to ear. With all-wheel-drive, adjustable magnetic ride suspension, 480 horsepower and more. This thing is a blast.
White wheels, a hatch-mounted spoiler and stripes give it visual appeal too.
EPA rates it at 265 miles range, about 20 less than a base Mach-E, but in my opinion, worth it.
I don't care for the seats in a regular Mach-E, but these are better.
The rally package includes Ford's blue cruise self-driving feature. A Tesla-like center screen works well once you get used to it. More room is freed up in the center console because of the rotary gear selector. Also, clever is the audio knob that doubles as a fan speed control.
Two adults will be comfortable in row two, three would be snug. The battery pack sits high in the Mach-E and that cuts into cargo space.
Even on ice and snow handling and braking are balanced and power is excellent. One of the most entertaining electric cars available.
So for the 2024 Ford Mustang Mach-E rally, I say thumbs up to the fun factor. Excellent traction and decent range. Thumbs down to the price.
The as-reviewed sticker is $65,485.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
23 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Does Ford's Newest "Model T Moment" Make it a Millionaire Maker Stock?
Key Points Ford placed a large bet on a "skunkworks" team based in California. The new assembly tree will provide a net 15% assembly speed improvement. The new electric vehicle platform will underpin as many as eight EVs. 10 stocks we like better than Ford Motor Company › Ford Motor Company (NYSE: F) investors have had plenty to digest between a spike in recalls this year that drove an increase in warranty costs, tariffs and trade policy whipsawing back and forth, and a price war in China. Finally, there's some intriguing news to digest in what Ford called its latest "Model T moment." But is this move to make a universal low-cost electric vehicle (EV) platform, and a new assembly tree, enough to make Ford a millionaire-maker stock? Skunkworks Ford is attempting to drive engineering and manufacturing forward with its announcement of the new Ford Universal EV Platform and Ford Universal EV Production System on Monday. Born of a "skunkworks" team based in California, the team created a simple, efficient, and flexible ecosystem to deliver a family of affordable, electric, and software-defined vehicles (SDVs). Switch Auto Insurance and Save Today! Affordable Auto Insurance, Customized for You The Insurance Savings You Expect Great Rates and Award-Winning Service "We took a radical approach to solve a very hard challenge: Create affordable vehicles that are breakthrough in every way that matters -- design, technology, performance, space and cost of ownership -- and do it with American workers," CEO Jim Farley said in a statement, according to Yahoo Finance. More specifically, the new EV platform will underpin as many as eight models starting with an electric pickup truck in 2027 that will be closer in size to a Maverick than a Ranger. The four-door electric pickup truck will have more passenger space than a Toyota RAV4, a 0-60 time as fast as a Mustang EcoBoost, a sticker price around $30,000, and, most importantly of all, Ford says the pickup will be profitable. Universal EV production system Arguably as important as the first product turned out by the new production system is the process itself. Ford zeroed in on manufacturing efficiency and transformed its traditional assembly line into an "assembly tree," which will have three sub-assemblies running their lines simultaneously before joining the parts together. Because of the new process and the new EV platform, assembly of the upcoming midsize electric truck could be up to 40% faster than current vehicles produced at the Louisville Assembly Plant. However, Ford plans to reinvest some of that time into automation to improve quality and cost, ultimately providing a 15% net speed improvement. In addition to the assembly speed savings, numbers continue to tell the story with the EV platform reducing parts by 20%, compared to a typical vehicle, with 25% fewer fasteners and 40% fewer workstations dock-to-dock in the plant. Ford also believes the cost of ownership over five years will be lower than that of a three-year-old used Tesla Model Y. What it all means The fact that Ford could churn out a four-door electric pickup for $30,000 that's profitable by 2027 is a big deal. That's especially true when you consider it's not a one-off product, but rather the first entry in a family of up to eight more vehicles. It's a huge deal to take steps toward profitability because Ford's Model-e business division checked in with a hefty $2.18 billion loss during the first half of 2025. Reversing that loss in the near-term will provide a huge boost to the bottom line, and in theory the stock price. But is this move enough to make Ford a millionaire-maker stock? Is it truly another revolutionary step in the spirit of a "Model T moment"? Investors would likely be wise to temper their expectations in the near term, as Ford faces its fair share of headwinds. It faces a brutal price war in China that has caused foreign automakers to struggle for market share and profits. It faces ever-changing tariffs and trade policies that can cause bottlenecks in its supply chain and difficulty in planning ahead. Ford also faces a rise in recalls that it has struggled with in recent years, and the rising expenses associated with warranty costs. Make no mistake, Ford's new assembly and new EV platform are a big, big deal. But before investors even buy into the new developments, much less become millionaires from owning the stock, Ford has to execute the new technology and actually deliver this pickup profitably for $30,000 – we haven't seen it yet. Then it has to follow that up with a line of other successful EVs. To put it simply, Ford needs to not only execute its new platform launches, but it needs much more than a new EV platform to make investors millionaires. Should you invest $1,000 in Ford Motor Company right now? Before you buy stock in Ford Motor Company, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the for investors to buy now… and Ford Motor Company wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $649,544!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $1,113,059!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 1,062% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 185% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join Stock Advisor. See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of August 13, 2025 Daniel Miller has positions in Ford Motor Company. The Motley Fool has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. Does Ford's Newest "Model T Moment" Make it a Millionaire Maker Stock? was originally published by The Motley Fool Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
I tested Tesla and Waymo's robotaxis in Austin — only one felt ready for the future
Waymo's and Tesla's autonomous taxis have touched down in Austin. Business Insider took multiple rides in both robotaxis to compare the ride experience. Tesla's Robotaxi was mostly smooth, but I encountered three incidents that required human assistance. The robotaxi rodeo has arrived in Austin. I was walking down South Congress Avenue in Downtown Austin on a Wednesday afternoon when a fleet of Waymos pulled up at a stoplight, like a little robotaxi posse. This is a fairly new sight. Alphabet's Waymo, which has more than 100 robotaxis in Austin, began offering paid rides through Uber's platform in March, joining several other US cities. Tesla rolled out a pilot launch of its robotaxi in Austin in June. Tesla CEO Elon Musk said in an April earnings call that the service will start with 10 to 20 Model Ys. So far, the service is limited to invite-only and includes a human safety monitor in every car. Musk said in an X post on Sunday that the service will be "open access" by September. I flew to the Texas capital in July to compare the two services head-to-head, examining factors like app experience, pick-up times, drop-off location accuracy, and passenger experience. In May, my colleague Alistair Barr and I pitted Tesla's Full Self-Driving (Supervised) system against Waymo's fully autonomous driver. Musk dismissed that comparison because FSD assumes a human is always ready to take over. This time, I could do a true 1:1 comparison of the companies' robotaxis. My experience with Tesla's Robotaxi shows how far the company has come with its FSD technology since it debuted in 2020. Still, I ran into issues with Tesla's Robotaxi that made me feel it is not yet ready for the masses. A spokesperson for Tesla did not respond to a request for comment. A Waymo spokesperson declined to comment. Here's what happened. The test Tesla's Robotaxi operates with a limited number of cars in Austin — and, more recently, in San Francisco, where human drivers sit behind the wheel. In Austin, Waymo's fleet is managed by Uber. It's part of Waymo's strategy to explore different fleet operators outside its own company. In this case, users hail the robotaxi through the Uber app. Just like in San Francisco, Austin's Waymo fleet consists of retrofitted Jaguar I-PACE SUVs. It has five lidar sensors, six radars, and 29 cameras. Tesla's Robotaxis have eight external cameras. Business Insider's Grace Kay previously reported that the Model Y Robotaxis have some modifications, including self-cleaning cameras and a telecommunications unit that connects with remote operators. The comparison includes multiple rides that I took on July 16 and 17. I took five rides in Tesla's Robotaxi during the early mornings and afternoons. I went on eight Waymo rides over the course of a full day for the test. My time with Tesla's Robotaxi was limited to the availability of my rider companion, Vu Kong, a local Tesla investor who manages a dental group. He received an early Robotaxi invite and graciously took the time out of his workweek to bring me along for a few rides. First up: Waymo One of the observations I've consistently seen from Waymo is that the autonomous driving technology is safe but assertive, whether that's in San Francisco or Los Angeles. In Austin, I saw an even bolder Waymo. One notable moment was when the Waymo was trying to pull out of a parking lot by making a left turn against oncoming cars coming from my left. It was during rush hour, and traffic was packed. A bus to my right had stopped, so oncoming cars to my left had started to form a line. The Waymo decided to squeeze through the space it had and carefully inched forward — almost as if it was telling the other cars, "I'm going to make my left turn, darn it." The Waymos got my pickup and drop-off location exactly right every ride. There are times in San Francisco when a Waymo might pick me up about a block away from where I am. I took multiple Waymo rides from early morning hours to Austin's 5 p.m. peak traffic time. The average price across eight rides was $10.69. The average pick-up time was about seven minutes. In Austin, users must opt in for the autonomous vehicle option in their Uber app. There is no way to specifically request a robotaxi for each ride. Uber will instead pair you with whatever vehicle is on the most time-efficient route — human or robot, according to a Waymo spokesperson. The spokesperson said Uber will likely send a human driver if the best route requires a highway. Waymo is testing on highways in SF, LA, and Phoenix, but public riders don't have access yet, the spokesperson said. I ended up canceling 47 Uber rides in my attempt to hail a Waymo so that I could recreate a route I took in Tesla's Robotaxi from Austin's South Congress area to the Crestview neighborhood up north, about nine miles away. I did not end up connecting with a Waymo for that specific route. Normally, I don't mind human Uber drivers. My main concern is getting from point A to B as quickly, safely, and cheaply as possible. For folks who want a robotaxi or would prefer a ride to themselves, I can see a scenario in the future where people will go straight to Tesla's Robotaxi app instead of Uber — that is, once it's available to the general public and Tesla removes its safety driver. Tesla time Tesla's Robotaxi fleet is made up of the latest Model Y, which I found to be a smooth, comfortable ride. I've hailed Teslas through Uber and Lyft that were driven by humans. During those rides, I almost always got carsick. When riding in Tesla's Robotaxi, I did not get carsick at all (reaffirming a personal theory: Some human drivers don't know how to drive a Tesla). During my rides, the Tesla's autonomous driving system drove at a reasonable speed, maintained a safe distance from other cars and cyclists, and recognized construction zones. Three incidents, though, required us to connect with a remote Tesla support agent — two of which happened on my first ride. The first intervention happened as the Robotaxi was trying to pull out of a parking lot. We were waiting for about a minute when a message popped up on the rear center screen: "Our team has identified an issue and is working to resolve it." A remote "support agent" at Tesla soon connected with us. "It looks like the vehicle isn't making any progress. Is everything OK?" the agent said. After explaining that we appeared to be stuck, the remote agent said they'd help us out. We were soon on our way. The next intervention came about 20 minutes later, after we changed the route mid-journey. As we were heading down Fruth Street, Tesla's Robotaxi began to approach a road clearly marked with two "Do Not Enter" signs. This is where I realized the importance of having a human safety monitor inside every car — and why the monitors appear to be on a strict do-not-talk-to-the-riders policy. Chatting might make the ride feel less awkward, but they're actually performing an important job, which is paying close attention to what's happening on the roads. As the car moved forward, the safety monitor touched a button on the center console screen to stop the ride. We were heading down an empty one-way road. A remote support agent connected again, and the Robotaxi began a three-point turn before slamming the brakes. There were no other notable incidents on that ride. The third intervention came the next day. Kong and I wanted to take the car to the very edge of Tesla's geofence, which establishes the boundaries of the Robotaxi service. When we changed the destination toward the end of our ride, the Tesla started to take us on a new route that briefly put us outside the geofence. A remote support agent called to let us know that they had to reroute the car so that it wouldn't go outside the digital boundaries. I was at least comforted to see how responsive the remote agents were. Tesla's Robotaxi also avoided the highway during my rides. It's unclear if Tesla is avoiding them for public riders for now, just as with Waymo. During my fourth ride to North Austin, Kong, a five-year resident of Texas, noticed that the Robotaxi was taking a longer route to a destination that should've been an 18-minute trip if the car had taken the 35 highway or MoPac Expressway, according to Google Maps. Traffic was light to moderate during the times I took Tesla's Robotaxi. There were no issues with pick-up or drop-off locations. Pick-up times were mostly around 10 minutes, but there was one case where the pick-up time was nearly half an hour. Tesla hasn't specified how many cars it has added since it expanded the coverage area, but during the company's latest earnings call on July 23, Ashok Elluswamy, Tesla's VP of AI software, said it had a "handful" of vehicles on the roads. I didn't have direct access to the Robotaxi app, but based on what I saw from Kong, it appeared easy to use. The app glitched once and showed that a Robotaxi was on the way, even though we had just been dropped off at our destination. Kong told me that the app can be a bit buggy. The verdict As in our May test between Waymo and Tesla FSD (Supervised), Waymo won. While impressive, Tesla's Robotaxi is still a work in progress. I never felt in danger while riding — but it didn't quite feel like the well-oiled service that Waymo delivers. The intervention I experienced when Tesla's Robotaxi started driving down a one-way road showed why a safety monitor is still necessary. They're not passive passengers, but constantly watching for issues. That's not to suggest Waymo is perfect. Even after one hundred million autonomously driven miles, Waymo still makes mistakes. A previous Business Insider analysis of Waymo's progress in California found that between January and March 2025, when it provided more than 1.8 million rides in the Golden State, Waymo saw 7 collisions per 100,000 rides. Still, the company has published data showing a significant safety advantage over the average human driver. Earlier this year, Waymo said it's providing 250,000 paid trips a week. Waymo's achievement didn't happen overnight. Seven years ago, Alphabet launched an early rider program, giving a limited number of vetted riders access to Waymos with safety drivers inside the car. Musk said Tesla's ramp-up will be faster — a thousand robotaxis in Austin by the end of the year. Still, I'm more interested in another milestone: When will they remove the in-car safety monitor? Read the original article on Business Insider
Business Wire
2 hours ago
- Business Wire
Your Poker Crew Just Got Bigger: Zynga Poker Launches on Steam
SAN MATEO, Calif.--(BUSINESS WIRE)-- Zynga Inc., a wholly-owned publishing label of Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc. (NASDAQ: TTWO) and a global leader in interactive entertainment, today announced that Zynga Poker, one of the largest and longest-running, free-to-play poker games, is now available to play on Steam with full crossplay functionality. Launched in 2007 as Zynga's first-ever game, the legendary title is raising the stakes as the label's first game to launch on Steam. With one account, players can now move freely between mobile (iOS and Android), web browsers at and now PC via Steam. For almost 18 years, Zynga Poker has been the go-to destination for millions of poker fans around the world, no matter the platform – from Facebook to mobile and now to Steam. Zynga Poker lets anyone jump in and play, delivering action-packed gameplay that brings an authentic experience straight to your screen. On Steam, the game showcases the same high-stakes energy and fresh features players know and love, including rotating poker modes and Multi-Table Tournaments. Existing players can pick up right where they left off, with collections, events, and friends carrying over for seamless cross-platform support. Watch Launch Trailer Here. 'Since day one, Zynga's mission has been to connect the world through games, and with Zynga Poker, it's always been about delivering the best Texas Hold'Em experience possible to players, whenever and wherever they're playing,' said Yaron Leyvand, Executive Vice President, Mobile Games, Zynga. 'Bringing Zynga Poker to Steam gives our audience a chance to play, compete, and connect on the largest PC platform. This milestone reflects our awesome community that's kept the virtual tables full for nearly two decades.' First-time players logging in via Steam will be rewarded up to 26,000,000 in-game chips, giving poker fans a solid stack to try their hand on the new platform. Challenge your Steam friends, keep your poker action all in one place, and experience the same trusted gameplay. Join in on the action and download Zynga Poker on Steam now! To find supporting assets, click here. Zynga is a wholly-owned publishing label of Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc. About Zynga, Inc. Zynga is a global leader in interactive entertainment with a mission to connect the world through games and a wholly-owned subsidiary of Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc. (NASDAQ: TTWO). With massive global reach in more than 175 countries and regions, the combined diverse portfolio of popular game franchises has been downloaded more than 10 billion times on mobile, including CSR Racing™, Dragon City, Empires & Puzzles™, FarmVille™, Game of Thrones: Legends, Golf Rival™, Hair Challenge™, Harry Potter: Puzzles & Spells™, High Heels!™, Match Factory, Merge Dragons!™, Merge Magic!™, Monster Legends, Screw Jam, Seat Away, Toon Blast™, Top Eleven, Toy Blast™, Two Dot s, Words With Friends™, and Zynga Poker™. Founded in 2007, Zynga is headquartered in California with locations in North America, Europe, and Asia. For more information, visit or follow Zynga on X, Instagram, Facebook, or the Zynga blog About Take-Two Interactive Software Headquartered in New York City, Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc. is a leading developer, publisher, and marketer of interactive entertainment for consumers around the globe. We develop and publish products principally through Rockstar Games, 2K, and Zynga. Our strategy is to create hit entertainment experiences, delivered on every platform relevant to our audience through a variety of sound business models. Our pillars - creativity, innovation, and efficiency - guide us as we strive to create the highest quality, most captivating experiences for our consumers. The Company's common stock is publicly traded on NASDAQ under the symbol TTWO. For more corporate and product information please visit our website at All trademarks and copyrights contained herein are the property of their respective holders. Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements The statements contained herein, which are not historical facts, including statements relating to Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc.'s ("Take-Two," the "Company," "we," "us," or similar pronouns) outlook, are considered forward-looking statements under federal securities laws and may be identified by words such as "anticipates," "believes," "estimates," "expects," "intends," "plans," "potential," "predicts," "projects," "seeks," "should," "will," or words of similar meaning and include, but are not limited to, statements regarding the outlook for our future business and financial performance. Such forward-looking statements are based on the current beliefs of our management as well as assumptions made by and information currently available to them, which are subject to inherent uncertainties, risks, and changes in circumstances that are difficult to predict. Actual outcomes and results may vary materially from these forward-looking statements based on a variety of risks and uncertainties including risks relating to the timely release and significant market acceptance of our games; the risks of conducting business internationally, including as a result of unforeseen geopolitical events; the impact of changes in interest rates by the Federal Reserve and other central banks, including on our short-term investment portfolio; the impact of inflation; volatility in foreign currency exchange rates; our dependence on key management and product development personnel; our dependence on our NBA 2K and Grand Theft Auto products and our ability to develop other hit titles; our ability to leverage opportunities on PlayStation®5 and Xbox Series X|S; factors affecting our mobile business, such as player acquisition costs; and the ability to maintain acceptable pricing levels on our games. Other important factors and information are contained in the Company's most recent Annual Report on Form 10-K, including the risks summarized in the section entitled "Risk Factors," the Company's most recent Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, and the Company's other periodic filings with the SEC, which can be accessed at All forward-looking statements are qualified by these cautionary statements and apply only as of the date they are made. The Company undertakes no obligation to update any forward-looking statement, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.
