BLA slams US decision to brand Majeed Brigade as FTO, calls it 'colonial narrative'
"We view this decision without surprise and without any sense of added pressure. Baloch Liberation Army is a resistance force, active solely against the military domination of the occupying state, and is committed to the liberation of its occupied motherland," BLA spokesperson Jeeyand Baloch said in a statement which was posted on X by several Baloch leaders and journalists, including Bahot Baloch.
Jeeyand asserted that Pakistan occupied Balochistan in 1948 by force of arms and the BLA is a continuation of the resistance movement that began that very day. He added that the BLA is the 'armed embodiment of Baloch national pride', which does not require 'external validation' or any international certification.
'The allegations put forward by the US echoes the same narrative that Pakistan has used as propaganda for decades. Targetting civilians is not part of our manifesto. At the same time, we make it clear that we are under no obligation to justify the nature of our struggle to anyone, nor will we conform to any narrative that serves state interests," the BLA statement added.
Emphasising that all its operations are directed against the Pakistani Army, Frontier Corps, intelligence networks, death squads and their collaborator gangs within Balochistan, the BLA spoesperson stressed that the struggle is for their motherland — the land of their ancestors — seized from them by Pakistan using force. He further said that the militant group is not opposed to the people of Pakistan, nor to any world power, but their arms are raised solely against the 'occupier, whoever that may be and will remain so until the occupation ends'.
The BLA spokesperson stressed that the group operates under the rules of war as defined in international humanitarian law, specifically Common Article III of the Geneva Conventions. The BLA, he stated, is an organised military force conducting all operations in strict compliance with these standards, which define the rights of combatants and the protection of civilians. He mentioned that the militant group has consistently adhered to these principles, adding that non-state resistance movements worldwide have received moral, legal, and political recognition under the same framework.
Jeeyand claimed that the US decision comes at a time when Balochistan's vast mineral wealth has become the focus of global capitalist interests. He alleged that Pakistan is offering these resources to foreign corporations and plans are being advanced to turn Balochistan into a silent economic colony.
'When national resistance stands in the way of these projects, it is no surprise to see such resistance declared unlawful on a global stage,' the BLA spokesperson stated.
Jeeyand invited the global community to visit Balochistan and witness the ground realities, see the mass graves where Baloch youth lie buried, and look into the eyes of those mothers whose sons have been missing for decades.
He also urged them to witness cities where speech is forbidden and villages subjected to Pakistani military operations carried out under the cover of darkness, and then decide whether organised resistance rises against such oppression, is 'terrorism or defense of human dignity'.
Highlighting that BLA is a 'disciplined resistance movement' rooted in national vision and respectful engagement with the world, he said in contrast, Pakistan has violated every principle upon which civilised nations are built. The BLA spokesperson pointed out that historical records showed how Pakistan has repeatedly broken agreements, promises, and trust for self-interest, making it an 'unreliable state'.
The statement concluded with a pledge that the BLA will never retreat from its 'ideological, military or revolutionary' responsibilities.
'We will not allow state propaganda, international labels, or global decisions to block our path. Our struggle will continue until Baloch national liberation and sovereignty are achieved,' it noted.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
&w=3840&q=100)
First Post
7 hours ago
- First Post
US-Pakistan ‘counter-terrorism' dialogue: A cover to suppress Baloch movement
The US, apparently the world's most powerful democracy, entirely ignores the fact that it is the Pakistani practices that are fuelling the Baloch insurgency. (Image: X@BalochYakjehtiC) If you want to collapse in shock, read the latest gem from the US-Pakistan dialogue. This one is on counterterrorism and lauds Pakistan's actions in such laudatory terms as to make any intelligence officer of any country feel sick. Regardless of reality, it seems Trump's United States is on a headlong path against India and, worse, against logic. It might be an attempt to wean the country away from China and drag it firmly into the US camp, or it could be just petty point scoring. Whatever the motives, the news is not good. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD The US-Pakistan Counterterrorism Dialogue Consider the Joint Statement, which says, 'Both delegations underscored the critical importance of developing effective approaches to terrorist threats, including those posed by the Balochistan Liberation Army (BLA), ISIS-Khorasan, and Tehreek-e-Taliban Pakistan (TTP), and applauded Pakistan's continued successes in containing terrorist entities that pose a threat to the peace and security of the region and the world'. There's worse. The US 'expressed condolences for the loss of civilians and members of law enforcement agencies in terrorist incidents in Pakistan, including the barbaric Jaffar Express terrorist attack and the bombing of a school bus in Khuzdar'. There is nothing to indicate that the Jaffar bus attack killed innocent civilians, but the BLA did kill security forces and their colleagues in intelligence. True also, that the school bus attack in May 2025 was particularly horrifying. But the BLA is the last group ever to do such an attack on their own. It would set the Baloch against them, and they know it. Pakistan's agencies are not below killing their own or even the Chinese. Remember the attack on the latter at Dasu in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa last year that killed five Chinese travelling to a power project site? That was blamed on the Pakistanis themselves, to get Beijing to put pressure on Afghanistan on the TTP. And it worked. That's exactly what China did, pressuring Kabul to mend relations with Islamabad on May 21st post Sindoor, in an 'informal' trilateral interaction. Targeting Baloch Now it's the turn of the US. Its intelligence agencies are well aware of the fact that the Baloch have never ever targeted the US, not even when its logistics lines were going through their land to fight the mujahideen or later the Taliban. In fact, the odd reality is that the Majeed Brigade, now officially designated as a terrorist group, have only attacked the Chinese relentlessly for poaching on their land at the behest of the 'Punjabis'. Logic demands that the US should quietly give them a hand against their sworn competitor. But it seems not to be. The farcical nature of the whole joint statement is apparent from the fact that the Pakistani signatory was Nabeel Munir, Special Secretary to the United Nations. Not a single Pakistani counter-terrorism official or anyone from the Interior Ministry. Last year's dialogue also had similar representation but was far less laudatory and more matter-of-fact. It also noted US training of Pakistani personnel on counterterrorism. Most importantly, the 2024 statement made no mention of the BLA, though it was designated as a terrorist group in 2019. This time the focus is almost entirely on it, with the TTP just an add-on. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Accommodation of Pakistan's Balochistan Narrative by the US That is a worrying slide in policy, accommodating Pakistan's frequent complaints of Indian backing of the Baloch resistance. The one and only 'evidence' that Rawalpindi claims is the arrest of former navy officer Kulbushan Jadhav, who was kidnapped from Iran and brought into Pakistan and made to 'confess' to various sins. Compare this to the available data on Pakistanis not in prison for terrorist activities, drug running and the like, but the hundreds of protests and agitations organised every year on 'Kashmir Solidarity Day' or on any pretext whatsoever on Kashmir. There has yet to be a single protest in India on Balochistan. The Indian public is largely ignorant of the serious Baloch crisis which has been brewing since Pakistan's independence, with rebellion after rebellion leading to the kidnapping, torture and deaths of thousands. That includes entirely peaceful protestors like the charismatic Mehrang Baloch, nominated for the Nobel Peace Prize and now languishing in prison — with no access allowed to her family — and others like Mama Qadeer, leader of the 'Voice of Baloch', nominated for the Nelson Mandela peace award. Others, including their family members, lie incarcerated too. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Yet, the US, apparently the world's most powerful democracy, entirely ignores the fact that it is such Pakistani practices that are fuelling the Baloch insurgency. Even if a foreign power is training fighters, it cannot, by any stretch of the imagination or even with the largest purse, create the groundswell of support for the fighters among ordinary people. Also Baloch insurgency has turned a page. It is no longer a platform for the somewhat elite tribal leaders. BLA fighters are heavily part of student organisations and carry those ideals with them that lie with the youth. Shari Baloch, the first female suicide bomber, was an academic with an degree. An additional point the US agencies would obviously know. There is not a shred of obscurantism or extremism about the BLA. US Motivation and Further The question that then arises is US motivation for this unalloyed public support, with the State Department spokesperson reiterating the important role played by the US in ending the conflict while then referring to the US–Pakistan counterterrorism dialogue. But the curious part is that there isn't very much else. No great US financial largesse has come in. The F-16 package of $397 million is a technical package that also prevents these aircraft from being used against India. Neither have there been any weapons commitments — yet. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Pakistan gets almost its entire weaponry from China, but it is parity with India that Pakistan craves, now that the Terrorist Resistance Front, a proxy of Lashkar-e-Taiba, was designated by the US recently. There is another important aspect. It might also mean that US Central Command is legally free to act against BLA—at least with intelligence—much as it used its drones to kill TTP leaders, on Pakistan's urging. This is dangerous stuff. Meanwhile, the designation benefits China in multiple ways. As a commentator says, it will secure Chinese projects and deal a blow to India. The hope among Pakistanis and Chinese is that Trump will mention—at the very least—that India is a state sponsor of terrorism. It could happen. So far it seems this is a personal grudge held by Trump against India because Delhi refuses to recognise a US role in ending the recent conflict or accept mediation. The latter is non-negotiable, and the State Department bureaucracy probably understands that. The former is a different thing altogether. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Delhi could acknowledge that Islamabad—as expected—went running to the US the moment it faced serious damage to its installations. That has been true for almost every single conflict between the two. India should also have anticipated the Trump offer of mediation, given that he offered this to an exuberant Imran Khan in 2019. Pakistan took advantage of that. India got the 'bad guy' image again, as Rawalpindi knew it would. Time to change corners, as it's going to be the Baloch who will suffer. Acknowledge the historical truth of the Pakistan army using the US for its own mischievous ends. On no account must Islamabad be rewarded with 'mediation', simply because there is nothing to mediate. Especially since it has yet to detain or even mildly shake its finger at the many terrorists within its soil. Meanwhile, it's time to name and shame. Get each terrorist into the limelight through media and diplomacy. Ramp up the terrorist dialogue. As the late strategic affairs analyst K Subramanyam used to say, even if one person listens, that's good enough. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD The author is Director (R&A) at the Centre for Land Warfare Studies. She tweets @kartha_tara. Views expressed in the above piece are personal and solely those of the author. They do not necessarily reflect Firstpost's views.
India Today
19 hours ago
- India Today
Nukes & Dump Trucks: Unpacking Pak Army Chief Asim Munir's Wild US Speech In Our Defence S3
Pakistan's army chief Asim Munir recently made wild headlines in the US, casually threatening nuclear apocalypse at a private dinner. He claimed that if India ever attacked, Pakistan would "take half the world down" with it. Yes, really. In this episode, defence journalist Sandeep Unnithan joins host Dev Goswami to unpack what's behind this latest nuclear sabre-rattling. Why would Pakistan's top general say something so reckless -- and why now, and in Florida of all places? We also dive into: -The factors behind the US's new-found but old love for the Pakistan military -The "Mercedes vs dump truck" analogy -The US designation of Baloch Liberation Army as a terror group, timed right after Munir's visit -How Pakistan developed nukes so fast after India's 1998 Pokhran -The legend of US control over Pakistan's nuclear button -How worried should India be about Asim Munir's Produced by Garvit Srivastava Sound mixed by Rohan Bharti
Hans India
a day ago
- Hans India
BLA slams US decision to brand Majeed Brigade as FTO, calls it 'colonial narrative'
Quetta: The Baloch Liberation Army (BLA) on Friday denounced the recent decision by the United States to designate its special unit Majeed Brigade a Foreign Terrorist Organisation (FTO), slamming the move as a "deviation from ground realities" and "an implicit endorsement of the colonial narrative" by an international power. "We view this decision without surprise and without any sense of added pressure. Baloch Liberation Army is a resistance force, active solely against the military domination of the occupying state, and is committed to the liberation of its occupied motherland," BLA spokesperson Jeeyand Baloch said in a statement which was posted on X by several Baloch leaders and journalists, including Bahot Baloch. Jeeyand asserted that Pakistan occupied Balochistan in 1948 by force of arms and the BLA is a continuation of the resistance movement that began that very day. He added that the BLA is the 'armed embodiment of Baloch national pride', which does not require 'external validation' or any international certification. 'The allegations put forward by the US echoes the same narrative that Pakistan has used as propaganda for decades. Targetting civilians is not part of our manifesto. At the same time, we make it clear that we are under no obligation to justify the nature of our struggle to anyone, nor will we conform to any narrative that serves state interests," the BLA statement added. Emphasising that all its operations are directed against the Pakistani Army, Frontier Corps, intelligence networks, death squads and their collaborator gangs within Balochistan, the BLA spoesperson stressed that the struggle is for their motherland — the land of their ancestors — seized from them by Pakistan using force. He further said that the militant group is not opposed to the people of Pakistan, nor to any world power, but their arms are raised solely against the 'occupier, whoever that may be and will remain so until the occupation ends'. The BLA spokesperson stressed that the group operates under the rules of war as defined in international humanitarian law, specifically Common Article III of the Geneva Conventions. The BLA, he stated, is an organised military force conducting all operations in strict compliance with these standards, which define the rights of combatants and the protection of civilians. He mentioned that the militant group has consistently adhered to these principles, adding that non-state resistance movements worldwide have received moral, legal, and political recognition under the same framework. Jeeyand claimed that the US decision comes at a time when Balochistan's vast mineral wealth has become the focus of global capitalist interests. He alleged that Pakistan is offering these resources to foreign corporations and plans are being advanced to turn Balochistan into a silent economic colony. 'When national resistance stands in the way of these projects, it is no surprise to see such resistance declared unlawful on a global stage,' the BLA spokesperson stated. Jeeyand invited the global community to visit Balochistan and witness the ground realities, see the mass graves where Baloch youth lie buried, and look into the eyes of those mothers whose sons have been missing for decades. He also urged them to witness cities where speech is forbidden and villages subjected to Pakistani military operations carried out under the cover of darkness, and then decide whether organised resistance rises against such oppression, is 'terrorism or defense of human dignity'. Highlighting that BLA is a 'disciplined resistance movement' rooted in national vision and respectful engagement with the world, he said in contrast, Pakistan has violated every principle upon which civilised nations are built. The BLA spokesperson pointed out that historical records showed how Pakistan has repeatedly broken agreements, promises, and trust for self-interest, making it an 'unreliable state'. The statement concluded with a pledge that the BLA will never retreat from its 'ideological, military or revolutionary' responsibilities. 'We will not allow state propaganda, international labels, or global decisions to block our path. Our struggle will continue until Baloch national liberation and sovereignty are achieved,' it noted.
