Serious introspection needed by SANDF leadership after DRC withdrawal: Analysts
The assertion by defence and military veterans minister Angie Motshekga that deployed members of the South African National Defence Force (SANDF) have the necessary support in the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) has been widely disputed, and has prompted calls for a rethink of the SANDF.
Motshekga last month answered a parliamentary question posed by MK Party MP Brian Molefe, who wanted to know to what extent the budget cuts in the department of defence have contributed to the lack of serviceable equipment, particularly the lack of fighter jets and helicopters, in the DRC.
Her reply read: 'Budget cuts for the DoD has an impact/effect on the modernisation and renewal of prime mission equipment. However, the deployed soldiers have the necessary equipment and supplies.'
African Defence Review director Darren Olivier called her response 'another example of the lack of accountability and willingness to deal with reality'. He said the minister 'has a very different understanding of 'necessary' to what the rest of us do'.
Olivier said 10 or 20 years ago, the SANDF could have provided a much stronger level of capability for a mission like the Southern African Development Community Mission in the DRC (SAMIDRC), including significant well-tested air power assets like Rooivalks and Gripens. 'Things have deteriorated so badly that those capabilities are now marginal at best.'
When the Rooivalk was first deployed against M23 rebels in the DRC in 2013, the rebels ceased fighting within a week. Now the SA Air Force has no Rooivalks in the DRC, having brought back its three airframes in December 2024 after they had been grounded for years. This meant the SAAF had no air support during the Battle of Goma in January/February.
Experts, political parties and other organisations have all pointed to a lack of support and resources as being one of the main reasons for the death of 14 SANDF soldiers at the hands of M23 rebels in Goma and Sake in late January. Gen Bantu Holomisa, deputy minister of defence and military veterans, in January when asked about support — particularly air support — for SANDF troops in the DRC, said: 'There's no support. We have been asking the department of finance to give us money so that we can service the air force. So it's not adequate at all.'
Also in January, chairperson of parliament's portfolio committee on defence and military veterans (PCDMV) Dakota Legoete, said, 'We are becoming a joke because we are just about to create a security lapse and it's not on. We are calling on Treasury to stop their austerity measures when it comes to defence and allow us to defend the nation and defend the continent.'
Dr Jakkie Cilliers, head of African futures and innovation at the Institute for Security Studies, told the SABC that 'very clearly the SANDF is among others overstretched ... the SANDF forces don't have a logistic, air and other support. Many of their vehicles and equipment are no longer serviceable.'
'The combination of budget cuts, resource limitations, and the complex nature of the conflict raises questions about the SANDF's ability to effectively achieve its objectives, and ensure the safety of its personnel,' Lindy Heinecken, professor of sociology in the Department of Sociology and Social Anthropology, Stellenbosch University, wrote earlier this year about the deaths of SANDF soldiers in the DRC.
On March 13, the SAMIDRC mandate was ended, and troops and equipment from all three troop contributing nations (South Africa, Tanzania, and Malawi) is being returned home, after being routed by land through Rwanda to a staging ground in Tanzania.
'The thing that worries me most about how the South African government is spinning this outcome as a successful one is that I expect it will mean there will be no urgency to fix the deep structural issues and severe underfunding of the SANDF, and that things will only get worse,' Olivier said, in reference to the SANDF suggesting its withdrawal from the now terminated SAMIDRC mission was a positive outcome as it led to peace talks. Fighting between M23 rebels and DRC government forces continues.
'Trying to spin this positively, rather than acknowledging the failure and learning from it, is a disgrace,' Olivier believes. 'For the stability of the region Sadc needs to be able to provide credible and effective military intervention forces, and SAMIDRC's failure should be triggering deep reflection on how to rebuild that capability. At the core of that must be a real and urgent plan to rebuild the SANDF.'
Defence expert Dean Wingrin said some serious introspection is required by the SANDF, the DoD and senior politicians. 'Will they acknowledge the truth and learn from it? We'll see ...'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Citizen
11 hours ago
- The Citizen
Here's when the next group of SANDF troops may return to SA
On Friday, 249 troops touched down at the Waterkloof Air Force Base outside Pretoria. Another group of SA National Defence Force (SANDF) members previously deployed to the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC) are reportedly expected to arrive in the country on Sunday. The officers were in the DRC as part of the Southern African Development Community Mission. They were on the frontline of a conflict between the Congolese army and M23 rebel fighters, which raged for three years in the East of that country until a ceasefire was called in April. On Friday, 249 troops touched down at the Waterkloof Air Force Base outside Pretoria. They have been transported to Bloemfontein to be debriefed, demobilised, assessed, receive counselling, and be reunited with their families. WATCH: The 249 troops arrive in SA WATCH || The Minister of Defence and Military Veterans is the Air Force base Waterkloof to welcome the first batch of Soldiers from the Democratic Republic of Congo.#SANDF #MODMV #JointoperationsDivision #SAMIDRC #DRC — SA National Defence Force 🇿🇦 (@SANDF_ZA) June 13, 2025 SANDF chief of joint operations Siphiwe Sangweni said flights carrying troops will land in SA over the next few weeks. 'With bigger aircrafts, it will now be nine trips bringing our soldiers back to South Africa. The frequency of those aircraft moving will be almost every second day.' According to the SABC News, the next plane will arrive on Sunday. Around 2 000 troops from SA, Malawi, and Tanzania are reportedly still in the DRC. It is hoped that all SA military officials deployed to the region and their equipment will be back in SA by the end of June. 'We are fully aware that half the work is done in terms of prime mission equipment. Hence, we are working around the clock with our counterparts in the region to ensure that the process runs expeditiously with minimal logistical risks,' the minister said. Mission a success, says SANDF Last month, South African National Defence Force (SANDF) head, General Rudzani Maphwanya and defence minister Angie Motshekga called the mission a success and said it had contributed to peace in the area. The DA slammed this, calling the deployment a 'national tragedy'. 'The death of 14 South African soldiers and a further 174 injured in battle – brave men and women sent into an unstable conflict zone without air support, adequate equipment, or a coherent operational mandate – is not a success story. It is a national tragedy. 'Their blood is on Minister Motshekga's hands. Whilst the returning troops make their way back to South Africa, the minister continues to spin political fairy tales instead of reckoning with the facts.' It claimed that SA troops were paid less than a quarter of the stipend they were allegedly allocated, while Tanzanian and Malawian troops on the same mission 'earned nearly double'. ALSO READ: What is taking so long? Why SANDF troops can't get a lift home Minister a no-show to Parliament – twice No reason for the discrepancy had been given, but it was among the issues likely to come up when the minister appeared before Parliament on 9 May. But the minister did not show up. Instead, she was in Russia, on instruction from the ANC, to attend World War II Victory Day celebrations. While Parliamentarians raged, committee chairperson and ANC member Malusi Gigaba defended the minister. Motshekga failed to pitch to committee meetings again a week later. Additional reporting by Jarryd Westerdale and Chulumanco Mahamba NOW READ: 'A nation that values its military doesn't treat its soldiers as disposable'
IOL News
15 hours ago
- IOL News
BEE is at a Crossroads - But Who Benefits from Its Destruction?
BEE, as it has been implemented in too many cases, has failed to meet the aspirations of the majority, writes the author. Gumede is right to point to the recycling of beneficiaries, the political gatekeeping, and the elite capture of empowerment deals. But he is wrong, dangerously wrong, if his insight is used to argue for scrapping BEE altogether. Let me be clear: BEE, as it has been implemented in too many cases, has failed to meet the aspirations of the majority. It is a critique we cannot afford to ignore. But neither can we afford to allow this critique to be weaponised by those who have always opposed transformation, to delegitimise the very idea of economic justice in post-apartheid South Africa. The recent critique by Professor William Gumede that over R1 trillion has been 'transferred' under Black Economic Empowerment (BEE) to fewer than 100 politically connected individuals is a sobering wake-up call. It is ironic that the same voices calling BEE 'racist' rarely propose solutions to white economic over-representation. Here are the facts: 8 of the top 10 richest South Africans remain white men. Over 70% of agricultural land remains under white ownership. Access to venture capital, export markets, and finance remains racially skewed. The idea that 'BEE is the biggest scam in post-apartheid SA' dangerously distracts from the real structural crisis: the continued racial and gendered concentration of wealth. Certainly not the millions of unemployed black youth in townships and rural villages. Not the historically disadvantaged communities who still lack access to capital, land, and markets. And not the African, Indian and Coloured women who remain structurally excluded from the mainstream economy. We must ask ourselves: who benefits when BEE is destroyed instead of reformed? Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. The only ones who benefit from the collapse of BEE are those who were never in favour of transformation in the first place the economic oligarchs who would be thrilled to return to a status quo of white dominance wrapped in the language of meritocracy. Despite limitations, BEE is not a failure: Over 6 million black South Africans now hold direct or indirect ownership in companies through broad-based share schemes (e.g. MTN Zakhele, SASOL Inzalo, Phuthuma Nathi at MultiChoice). Black ownership on the JSE has grown from less than 1% in 1994 to an estimated 25–30% today (direct + indirect via funds and B-BBEE schemes). Over 50,000 black-owned SMEs have been supported via enterprise and supplier development obligations. BEE has enabled the creation of black industrialists, catalysed youth training schemes, and expanded procurement access. The BEE scorecard includes ownership, skills development, employment equity, socio-economic development, and procurement. It is a multidimensional framework, not simply elite enrichment. However now that we know better , we must do better. Acknowledge the Failures, But Don't Abandon the Mission As a former Member of Parliament and lifelong activist for social and economic justice, I have seen first-hand how some BEE deals were little more than rent-seeking schemes. Politically connected figures often acted as fronts for white capital, offering legitimacy without empowerment. These are not just moral failings they are strategic betrayals of the people. But the answer is not abandonment. It is reform, accountability, and reorientation toward true broad-based empowerment. We must ask: What models have worked? What does inclusive, community-rooted BEE look like? And how do we ensure that BEE no longer becomes a revolving door for the same elite, but instead a ladder for the many? What Broad-Based Empowerment Really Looks Like The idea of broad-based empowerment is not hypothetical. I have checked ,it actually exists though often drowned out by the noise of scandal. Let us spotlight real, replicable models that show us what is possible. 1. Sasol Inzalo Trust (2011) – R26 Billion Empowerment for the Public One of the largest and most ambitious empowerment transactions in South African history. Over 200,000 South Africans from nurses to pensioners acquired shares in Sasol via the Inzalo Trust. This was not an elite project, but a mass participation vehicle offering dividends, ownership, and dignity. Yes, the deal had flaws (especially when Sasol's share price dropped), but the intent and structure were inclusive. We must learn from and build on this. 2. Absa Employee and CSI Trust (2023) – A New Vision for BEE In 2023, Absa created a model that should become the new gold standard. It allocated 7% of its ownership to: 3% for over 35,000 employees; 4% to a Community Trust focused on healthcare, education, and township upliftment. This is real empowerment linking productivity with ownership, and profit with community reinvestment. 3. PepsiCo / SimbPioneer Foods (2020) – Worker Trust PepsiCo's merger with Pioneer Foods resulted in a R1.66 billion worker trust benefiting over 12,000 employees 90% of whom are black. It wasn't politically brokered. It was structurally designed to include workers at scale. 4. Heineken's 'Bokamoso' Trust (2021) When Heineken acquired Distell, it was required by the Competition Tribunal to create a broad-based employee share scheme. 'Bokamoso' gave 6% equity to workers a model where empowerment was made a regulatory condition of doing business in South Africa. These are not isolated cases. They are models for the future evidence that BEE can work, and work for the people. Why can the JSE Top 100 Listed Companies not follow this and give shares to their workers, their customers and communities they serve? B-BBEE That Serves the Nation, Not the Network For BEE to be legitimate, it must: Stop recycling elites: No individual or consortium should benefit from more than one major BEE deal. Impose sunset clauses: Empowerment credentials must expire after a certain period. Create a National BEE Beneficiary Registry: All deals and beneficiaries must be publicly disclosed and tracked. Mandate community participation: At least 30% of all future equity deals must be routed through community trusts, worker funds, and township co-operatives. Align with the District Development Model: BEE must build local economies not extract value from them. We must turn BEE into a mechanism for building black productive capacity, not just redistributing shares. That means more funding for black industrialists, township-based manufacturing, rural cooperatives, and tech-enabled youth entrepreneurship. A Call to Action: Reclaim Empowerment from the Few, for the Many To comrades, policymakers, business leaders, and community activists: we are at a crossroads. Either we allow the failures of the past to paralyse us or we reclaim the transformative promise of BEE and remake it to serve all who were historically disadvantaged: Black Africans, Coloured South Africans, Indian South Africans, women, youth, people with disabilities, and the rural poor. I call on the ANC to: Codify a new generation of community-based empowerment deals Reject individual-based enrichment without public impact Strengthen the oversight powers of the B-BBEE Commission Incentivise cooperatives, worker-ownership, and community reinvestment We must restore the moral authority of economic redress by placing THE PEOPLE not political patrons at the centre of empowerment. Conclusion: Build, Don't Burn Professor Gumede has done us a service by exposing what went wrong. But let us not allow this moment to be hijacked by reactionaries who wish to dismantle BEE altogether. Let us not abandon the house of transformation because the roof leaked. Instead, let us rebuild it, repair it, and expand it, so that it shelters all South Africans who have for too long lived on the margins. We don't need to scrap BEE. We need to liberate it from the few and make it finally work for the many. That is the real empowerment and economic justice we must fight and struggle for. This opinion piece was first published in ANC Today * Faiez Jacobs is a former MP, Public Policy Strategist and Advocate for Economic Justice ** The views expressed do not necessarily reflect the views of IOL, Independent Media or The African.
Eyewitness News
16 hours ago
- Eyewitness News
SANDF says troops returning from DRC to undergo demobilisation process
JOHANNESBURG - The South African National Defence Force (SANDF) said troops returning from the eastern Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) would undergo a four-day demobilisation process to help them reintegrate into society. The first group of 249 personnel landed at Waterkloof Air Force Base outside Pretoria on Friday, following a six-hour delay. ALSO READ: - Officials confident all SANDF troops deployed to DRC will be back home by end of June - First flight carrying 249 SANDF troops from DRC arrives in SA - SA blames SADC for the delayed return of 249 SANDF troops from Tanzania They had been deployed to Goma since December 2023 as part of a regional peacekeeping mission in the conflict-ridden North Kivu province. As the troops disembarked from the Tanzanian aircraft, they broke out in song, a moment of emotion and relief following months of battle with M23 rebels in eastern DRC. Their return follows a ceasefire agreement reached between the M23 and the DRC military during a summit in Tanzania in March. Fourteen South African soldiers lost their lives during the deployment. "The South African National Defence Force troops that have just come back from southeast DRC. They are in a very, very good, high spirit," said SANDF spokesperson Prince Tshabalala. "We have seen them on visual search, having enjoyment and singing songs of enjoyment. It's an atmosphere of jubilation, if I can put it that way, in a nutshell." The remainder of the deployed army personnel are expected to return home by the end of June.
