Kentucky's McConnell not seeking reelection to U.S. Senate in 2026
Kentucky's longtime Republican U.S. Sen. Mitch McConnell will announce Thursday that he does not plan to seek reelection in 2026, according to media reports.
McConnell, who turns 83 on Thursday, is expected to make the announcement in a noontime floor speech, Politico reports.
McConnell was the longest serving Senate leader in U.S. history after stepping down from his leadership role last November, leading the GOP caucus for nearly two decades. According to the Associated Press, which initially reported the senator's decision, McConnell said in prepared remarks that he has been 'humbled by the trust' of Kentuckians in electing him to the Senate for seven terms.
His announcement further fuels speculation about who will run for Kentucky's now open Senate seat in 2025.
'Representing our commonwealth has been the honor of a lifetime,' McConnell said. 'I will not seek this honor an eighth time. My current term in the Senate will be my last.'
In recent years, his legacy has become shaping the federal judiciary by allowing Senate floor votes for three key Supreme Court appointments from President Donald Trump while blocking nominations from Democratic presidents. Overall, McConnell led the Senate confirmation of 234 lifetime appointments to the federal bench.
Concerns for the senator's health have risen within the last year after falls and freezing mid-speech. Earlier this month, McConnell fell in the U.S. Senate but was reported to be 'fine.'
Throughout his political career, McConnell has had a strong influence on both American and Kentucky politics. He was first elected to the Senate in 1984 at a time when Kentucky Republicans were a small minority in contrast to the long-dominant state Democratic Party. When Kentucky's five Republican constitutional officers were sworn in at the state Capitol in January 2024, McConnell told the crowd he was 'thrilled to have an opportunity to be here today in this most improbable thing, which is a crowd in Frankfort that is not at least 100% Democratic.'
McConnell's rise to the Senate came after he was Jefferson County judge-executive in Louisville. Since then, he's repeatedly supported Republican candidates in Kentucky, leading to their rise across decades. In the 2024 election cycle, McConnell's PAC gave 95 Republican candidates $2,100 each, the maximum allowed under state law.
Last September when the Republican Party of Kentucky dedicated an expansion of their state headquarters in Frankfort, top GOP leaders in the state heralded 'the house that Mitch built.' The building is also named after McConnell.
'We've come a long way, and the people here today had a lot to do with it,' McConnell said at the time. 'Thanks for all the praise for me, but it's a team sport, and many of you have contributed a lot of years and a lot of dollars over the years to bring us where we are today.'
Robert Benvenuti, the chairman of the state party, said in a statement that Kentucky Republicans offered the 'deepest gratitude to Sen. Mitch McConnell for his extraordinary and steadfast service to our state and nation.'
'Without his vision and tireless efforts, we would not be the majority party in Kentucky, with strong voter registration, supermajorities in our legislature, and seven of Kentucky's eight seats in Washington,' Benvenuti said. 'His principled, conservative leadership has shaped policies that have strengthened both our state and our country.'
McConnell's term ends in 2027. With his announcement to not seek reelection, the stage is set for a swath of Republican and Democratic candidates to announce their bids for Kentucky's Senate seat. Candidates cannot officially file for the election until Nov. 5.
Former Kentucky Attorney General Daniel Cameron, a Republican, quickly announced his plans to run for the seat after McConnell concluded his remarks. During his unsuccessful 2023 gubernatorial bid, Cameron was often heralded as a McConnell protegé.
'Kentucky, it's time for a new generation of leadership in the U.S. Senate,' Cameron said on X. 'Let's do this.'
Kentucky Congressman Andy Barr, of Lexington, recently told Fox News he was mulling a run for the seat regardless of McConnell's decision.
After the news Thursday, Barr said on X he was still considering running 'because Kentucky deserves a Senator who will fight for President Trump and the America First Agenda.'
'I've done that every day in the House and would do so in the Senate,' Barr said. 'I'm encouraged by the outpouring of support and my family and I will be making a decision about our future soon.'
Barr's initial comments on running for the seat came after Lexington-based businessman and GOP political donor Nate Morris took to X to criticize McConnell for not confirming some of Republican President Donald Trump's recent nominations in the Senate. Morris said in the video he was considering running for the Senate seat or governor.
The state's top Democrat, Gov. Andy Beshear, 'will not be running for Senate in 2026,' said his political strategist, Eric Hyers, in an email to the Kentucky Lantern.
House Democratic Floor Leader Rep. Pamela Stevenson, of Louisville, recently filed her paperwork to raise money for a Senate campaign. In 2023, she was the Democratic nominee for attorney general but lost to Republican Russell Coleman.
This story was originally published by the Kentucky Lantern which is part of States Newsroom, a nonprofit news network, including the Daily Montanan, supported by grants and a coalition of donors as a 501c(3) public charity.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Fox News
27 minutes ago
- Fox News
‘Tired of Democracy dying': Gavin Newsom redistricting push facing possible lawsuit
California Republican Assemblywoman Alexandra Macedo is threatening to sue over Governor Gavin Newsom's redistricting push, which she says is 'disenfranchising Californians.' (Office of Assemblywoman Alexandra Macedo)
Yahoo
30 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Legislative committees advance CA redistricting legislation
(The Center Square) — Legislators, taxpayers and others debated passionately Tuesday for several hours as Democratic-led election committees in the California Assembly and Senate advanced congressional redistricting legislation. The bills making up the Election Rigging Response Act received support from the Democratic majorities in the Senate Elections and Constitutional Amendments Committee and the Assembly Elections Committee. Ultimately they're expected to land on the floors of the Assembly and Senate on Thursday. They're backed by the Democratic supermajorities in both houses, as well as by Democratic Gov. Gavin Newsom. With their passage certain, the legislation will mean voters on a Nov. 4 special election will decide whether to revise boundaries for congressional districts in response to redistricting in Republican-led states such as Texas. But the Republican minority in the Legislature scored what they called an early victory Monday night by delaying Thursday's floor votes. "The bill was stalled until after 7 p.m., meaning the earliest it can be legally voted on is Thursday evening. That leaves only hours before the special election deadline for passage and Newsom's signature," Senate Minority Leader Brian Jones, R-San Diego, posted on X. Democrats and Republicans agree democracy is at stake and that California has a gold standard with its independent, nonpartisan Citizens Redistricting Commission. Republican lawmakers argued the will of voters, who approved a constitutional amendment creating the commission, was being disregarded. But Democratic legislators stressed voters can see the proposed map, which is posted at They also noted that unlike people in Texas, Californian voters will have the final say on whether congressional districts are changed and that the independent commission can resume its work after the 2030 census. "We are not asking California to rubber stamp maps behind closed doors," Assembly Elections Committee Chair Gail Pellerin, a Democrat, told the committee. "As a former election official, I would never stand for that. This is about defending democracy itself, making sure checks and balances our kids learned in government class are alive and well after the 2026 election." Other Democrats on the committee voiced their support. 'Who should have the control of the vast power of the federal government?' asked Assemblymember Steve Bennett, D-Ventura. 'Our founding fathers agreed hundreds of years ago on a special form of democracy, designed to protect our democracy from power grabs.' If people in power try to change the rules to seize power undemocratically, then democracy advocates must also change their rules in response, Bennett argued. But Assemblymember David J. Tangipa, R-Clovis, who sits on the committee with Bennett, told the committee that Republicans weren't given enough time to review the legislation in advance of Tuesday's hearing. He also noted the proposed congressional map changed at 8 p.m. Monday. Pellerin countered that she understood the map was posted at 8 a.m. Monday. Pellerin and Tangipa clashed during the hearing as the latter asked extensive questions of Assemblymember Marc Berman, D-Palo Alto, who spoke on behalf of one of the three bills making up the Election Rigging Response Act. Pellerin said she was trying to keep the meeting moving, and Tangipa stressed the importance of his questions on topics such as funding. A large number of residents throughout California, union representatives and representatives of organizations such as Planned Parenthood and the California Teachers Association, spoke in favor of redistricting at the Assembly committee meeting. But what appeared to be an even bigger number of taxpayers from throughout the state, as well as representatives of Republican organizations, spoke against the legislation. Comments on the two sides echoed those made by the Democratic and Republican legislators. The Assembly committee rejected a motion by its ranking Republican, Vice Chair Alexandra Macedo of Tulare, that the committee recess until its members could read all 16,000 comments that voters have made in a portal on the Assembly website. "Democratic power bosses want to take the power away from the people," Macedo said. She called the Election Rigging Response Act a coordinated effort to tear down the independent commission and gerrymander districts for political gain at a time California faces severe budget shortfalls. The Assembly Republican Caucus has said the Nov. 4 election will cost voters more than $235 million. Democrats have countered the Trump administration has cost the state much more than that by cutting or withholding funding.
Yahoo
30 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Texas lawmaker who slept in House Chamber after rejecting DPS monitor files lawsuit
AUSTIN (KXAN) — A Texas lawmaker who slept in the House Chamber of the Texas Capitol Monday night filed a lawsuit shortly into her protest, according to online records. That lawsuit claims Rep. Nicole Collier is being illegally confined. 'Representative Collier is under restraint by virtue of the Speaker of the House's order placing her into the custody of law enforcement prior to the Wednesday, August 20, 2025, Session,' the lawsuit says. Collier is refusing to leave the chamber because she would need to be monitored by a Department of Public Safety escort should she do so. Before the House adjourned Monday, House Speaker Dustin Burrows, R-Lubbock, ordered the doors to the chamber to be locked. He said that members needed written permission to leave the chamber. But he added an extra step for Democrats who broke quorum and had arrest warrants issued. The speaker said those members would be granted written permission to leave only after agreeing to be released into the custody of a designated Department of Public Safety officer who will ensure they return to the House on Wednesday at 10 a.m. Protest planned Tuesday evening in support of lawmaker who rejected DPS monitoring State Rep. Nicole Collier, D-Fort Worth, refused and was therefore not allowed to leave. 'We have a lawyer working on getting a court to enter an injunction to allow all of us to be free from DPS escorts or DPS trails,' Collier told NBC's Ryan Chandler. 'And so hopefully that's successful, and we won't be here too long. But I am willing, and my heart has not changed. I still believe that this is wrong, and I have no intention to stop.' In a planned public display Tuesday afternoon, some House Democratic members tore up the permission slips required to leave the chamber, and announced they'll join Collier in sleeping inside the chamber Tuesday night, a news release said. 'She's a prisoner of nothing more than her own imagination,' Rep. Brian Harrison (R-Midlothian) said of the lawsuit. 'This is like bad Kabuki theater, I'm talking like elementary, junior high-level grade dramatic actions that we're seeing here. That's all there is to say, this is pure theater.' 'We conclude that it does': Supreme Court ruling from 2021 Several years ago, members of the Texas House of Representatives fled the state to deny the House quorum to prevent voting legislation they disagreed with in a special session. 'They fled the state to escape the jurisdiction of the House, whose internal rules provide that absent members may be 'arrested' and their attendance 'secured and retained,'' a 2021 Supreme Court opinion explained. Nearly a month after leaving the state, those lawmakers sued 'seeking an injunction prohibiting their arrest.' The Supreme Court ultimately ruled against those members. 'The legal question before this Court concerns only whether the Texas Constitution gives the House of Representatives the authority to physically compel the attendance of absent members. We conclude that it does,' that ruling said. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. Solve the daily Crossword
