
1 arrested in Moradabad for hurling petrol bombs at express trains; accused says he saw his deceased brother in dream
The accused has been identified as e-rickshaw driver Deepu Saini, a resident of the Civil Lines area in Moradabad.
According to Anil Kumar Verma, Circle Officer (CO), GRP, the accused was caught on August 1 following increased surveillance after two recent incidents of suspected arson targeting express trains in the region.
'On July 31, we received information about a fire-like situation in a train compartment caused by a bottle containing some flammable substance. When our teams reached (the spot), we could not find anything concrete,' said Verma.
'But the very next day, another similar bottle was hurled at a train. That's when we realised someone was challenging us deliberately and was throwing these bottles repeatedly to damage trains,' he added.
Thereafter, a joint RPF-GRP team was deployed in plain clothes in the surrounding areas. On August 1, the railway police spotted a man in an e-rickshaw descending a bridge, clutching a bottle wrapped in cloth. They then chased him down and arrested him.
'He (the accused) was carrying a petrol-filled glass bottle sealed with cloth and then topped with a cap, Rs 560 in cash, a few coins, a pouch of M-seal, and a matchbox,' said Verma.
The police said Saini told them during the interrogation that he was acting based on a dream.
'He told us that in his dream, his brother, who had died by suicide earlier this year, appeared and said he had been harassed by people. Saini believed this dream was a message, and… he had to take revenge by harming train passengers,' Verma said.
The police said they were verifying the accused's mental health condition and also probing the circumstances that led to his brother's death.
'We're speaking to the family and the local police in Civil Lines to understand what happened with his brother. Only after that can we piece together the full picture,' Verma added.
So far, the police have linked Saini to at least two instances of petrol bomb attacks – one targeting the Champaran Satyagraha Express and another unconfirmed incident on July 31.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Indian Express
13 minutes ago
- Indian Express
‘Imperative for police to investigate': Supreme Court pulls up UP Police for not probing complaint of witness in Lakhimpur Kheri violence case
The Supreme Court Thursday pulled up the Uttar Pradesh Police for not reaching out to a witness who was allegedly threatened not to depose in the 2021 Lakhimpur Kheri violence case, in which former BJP Union minister Ajay Mishra's son Ashish Mishra is one of the accused. In January, the witness approached the Supreme Court, claiming that someone had threatened him not to depose in the trial. The apex court on March 24 allowed the witness to give a complaint to the police and said that it should be investigated dispassionately. On Thursday, senior advocate Prashant Bhushan, appearing for the complainant in the case, told a bench of Justices Surya Kant, Ujjal Bhuyan and N Kotiswar Singh that though the complaint was given, no FIR was registered. 'He was given liberty to make (a) complaint with authorities… We made a complaint in writing on June 20, pointing out that he was called by a person and given (an) inducement of Rs 1 lakh…threatened that if he deposed, he will face dire consequences… Despite this, no FIR till date, Bhushan submitted. He added that this was in violation of the judgement in the Lalita Kumari case, according to which an FIR has to be registered within a week of the complaint. Appearing for the state of Uttar Pradesh, Senior Additional Advocate General Garima Prashad submitted that the superintendent of police (SP) had called the complainant, but he did not appear. Justice Kant, however, said, 'Where a complaint is received, which prima facie discloses a cognisable offence, and if you find that for reasons unknown to you, the complainant is not coming forward…what's wrong if your police officer goes there and finds out?' The state counsel agreed to do so and said, 'We will do that.' 'In case the complainant has been reluctant in coming forward in support of his complaint, some senior police officer can be deputed to visit the complainant to verify if (a) complaint has been made by him. If such contents are acknowledged, it is imperative for (the) police to investigate. Necessary consequences must follow,' the bench said. The court also asked the Lucknow SP to file an affidavit after verification of the complaint. Bhushan said if the police found any truth in the complaint, the court must cancel the bail of Ashish Mishra, who is accused of mowing down farmers protesting against the now-scrapped farm laws at Lakhimpur on October 3, 2021. Senior advocate Siddharth Dave, who appeared for Ashish Mishra, opposed this, saying the allegations were being made without any proof. He pointed out that out of the 208 witnesses, the prosecution dropped 20 witnesses, and of those remaining, 20 key witnesses have been examined so far. Dave added that though the trial court is hearing the case thrice a month, 'nobody turns up'. On the day of the violence, a convoy of vehicles, including one belonging to Ajay Mishra, allegedly ran over four protesting farmers in Lakhimpur Kheri. In the ensuing clash, two BJP workers, the driver of one of the vehicles, and a journalist were also killed. Ashish Mishra was arrested within six days. The Allahabad High Court initially granted him bail in the case, but the Supreme Court set aside the high court order after the kin of some of the deceased approached it. The matter was remanded back to the high court, which, after rehearing, dismissed the bail plea. Subsequently, the Supreme Court granted him interim bail in the case on January 25, 2023. This was extended from time to time and made absolute on July 22, 2024.


Time of India
41 minutes ago
- Time of India
SC releases Karti Chidambaram's Rs 1 cr deposited as pre-condition for foreign travel
The Supreme Court has directed the release of ₹1 crore previously deposited by Lok Sabha MP Karti P Chidambaram. This deposit was a pre-condition set in 2022 for his foreign travel. The court's decision came after noting that Karti Chidambaram had complied with the previous conditions by returning to India and submitting his passport to the investigating officer. Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads The Supreme Court on Thursday ordered the release of Rs 1 crore deposited by Lok Sabha MP Karti P Chidambaram with the apex court in 2022 as a pre-condition for foreign travel A bench of Justices Surya Kant, Ujjal Bhuyan and N Kotiswar Singh allowed his 2023 application and noted after travelling abroad he returned to India and deposited his passport with the investigating officer."Amount of Rs 1 crore deposited by the petitioner alongwith interest accrued thereupon is directed to be released in 1 week," the court son of former finance minister P Chidambaram, is accused in several cases including in Aircel-Maxis and INX Media was granted bail in both top court in 2022 asked him to deposit Rs 1 crore with the apex court registry as a pre-condition to travel abroad.


Hans India
an hour ago
- Hans India
MACT awards Rs 21.54 lakh compensation to kin of man killed in 2019 road accident
Thane: The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (MACT) in Thane has awarded compensation of Rs 21.54 lakh to the kin of a 59-year-old man who died in a road accident in 2019. Arun Mahajan, a supervisor with a pharmaceutical firm, died on August 9 that year after a speeding tempo rammed into several vehicles, including his motorcycle near Pataripul in Kalyan. In the order of August 1, MACT member RV Mohite accepted the claimants' contention that the accident was solely due to the rash and negligent driving of the tempo driver. It also said the tempo was uninsured at the time of the accident and the driver lacked a valid licence for heavy goods vehicle. The MACT said the insurance firm will pay the compensation and then recover it from the vehicle owner. It awarded Rs 21.54 lakh to Mahajan wife and three children. The amount included Rs 17.89 lakh for loss of future income.