Quantumscape stock soars 17% as investors bet big on battery future - here's why it's a gamechanger
This is a crucial development that shifts QuantumScape's story from speculative science to a credible pathway toward mass production. Shares jumped over 42% in pre-market trading on June 26, marking a renewed bullish sentiment around the company's future.
What triggered QuantumScape's 17% rally?
The stock's rally was driven by the company's announcement that it has started baseline production using its next-generation
Cobra separator process
. According to QuantumScape, Cobra is a 25× faster, more compact, and lower-cost method of producing its unique solid-state battery separator — a key part of enabling EV-scale production.
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
40세 넘고 PC만 있으면? 이 게임 완전 내 거임!
Hero Wars
플레이하기
Undo
This matters because solid-state batteries have long promised to deliver:
Longer range than lithium-ion
Faster charging
No risk of battery fires or dendrites
But commercializing them at scale has always been the missing piece. Cobra may change that.
Live Events
Also Read:
US stock market today: Dow jumps 200 points, S&P nears record, Nasdaq climbs as Trump eyes Fed shake-up and Nvidia leads top movers
What is the Cobra process, and why does it matter so much for QuantumScape?
The Cobra process is a new separator manufacturing technique that represents a 25x speed improvement over QuantumScape's previous system, known as Raptor. Unlike Raptor, which had limitations in scaling, Cobra is designed for gigawatt-scale battery production, a game-changer for solid-state battery technology.
This new process also occupies just a fraction of the floor space of its predecessor. That's critical for economic feasibility at mass production levels. CEO Dr. Siva Sivaram noted during the Q1 FY2025 earnings call that Cobra was expected to reach this stage later this year—but they've now delivered ahead of plan, significantly boosting investor confidence.
Also Read:
Jensen Huang's comment sends Cyngn stock soaring 500% - what is this little-known company that has everyone talking
How is Volkswagen tied into QuantumScape's future?
Volkswagen (VWAGY) owns about 14% of QuantumScape and has been a longtime backer. Through its PowerCo joint venture, VW has already pre-paid royalties to license QuantumScape's technology for battery production up to 40 GWh per year—enough to power around 1 million electric vehicles annually.
With such strong OEM backing and clear pathways to commercialization, Cobra gives QuantumScape the potential to leapfrog rivals and become a centerpiece of the EV battery supply chain by 2026.
Can Cobra really unlock mass battery production for electric vehicles?
QuantumScape's batteries use a solid-state, anode-free design, which is considered a holy grail in battery tech for electric vehicles (EVs). But manufacturing these advanced batteries at scale has always been the biggest hurdle.
Cobra's dramatically faster heat-treatment process and reduced physical footprint now make that hurdle easier to clear. According to QuantumScape, the new process lays the foundation for their QSC-5B1 prototype cells, which are expected to begin field testing in 2026.
This could accelerate commercial adoption, especially as the company partners with auto giants like Volkswagen AG and Murata Manufacturing. Their capital-light, fabless model means they'll license technology rather than build massive factories themselves—limiting risk while capturing value.
What do analysts think about QuantumScape stock now?
Despite the surge, QS stock still trades below many analysts' average price targets (roughly $4.80–$5.50) and carries a high-risk, high-reward label. Here's where it currently stands:
Price (as of June 25)
: $6.68 (+17.7%)
52-week range
: $4.11 – $11.49
Market cap
: ~$3.25 billion
Volume
: Over 101 million shares traded
Short interest
: ~21% (as of mid-June)
Buy ratings
: Only
~14% of analysts
currently rate it a Buy
While Cobra tech improves visibility,
execution risk remains high
, especially around scaling production, meeting quality standards, and securing long-term EV contracts.
Could QuantumScape become the Tesla of batteries?
If QuantumScape delivers on its promise — especially with QSE-5, its first commercial-grade cell — it could revolutionize how EVs are powered. Its batteries could:
Charge to 80% in 15 minutes
Offer 30–50% more range
Operate safely without liquid electrolytes
The EV battery market is expected to surpass $500 billion by 2035, and solid-state batteries could command a significant share. QuantumScape, if it sticks the landing, may be first to market with a commercially viable solid-state cell, giving it a first-mover advantage.
Is QS stock a buy after the breakout?
QuantumScape's 17% stock jump is more than just hype — it's backed by a tangible technical breakthrough. The Cobra separator is a major step forward in proving the scalability of solid-state battery tech. But while the upside is huge, investors should still treat QS as a long-term, high-risk tech bet.
Bottom line
: If you're bullish on the EV future and believe solid-state batteries will be the next big leap, QuantumScape deserves a spot on your radar. Just be ready for volatility — because breakthroughs in battery tech don't come without bumps.
FAQs:
What is the QuantumScape Cobra separator breakthrough?
It's a new solid-state battery tech that makes production 25x faster and cheaper.
Why did QuantumScape stock jump 17%?
Because investors loved the Cobra separator news—it shows real progress toward EV battery mass production.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Mint
a few seconds ago
- Mint
US Targets Chinese Steel And Lithium for Forced-Labor Scrutiny
(Bloomberg) -- The Trump administration said it will step up scrutiny of imports of steel, copper, lithium and other materials from China to enforce a US ban on goods allegedly made with forced labor in the country's Xinjiang region. The announcement of new 'high-priority sectors' targeted under the four-year-old Uyghur Forced Labor Prevention Act was included Tuesday in an annual update to the US government's enforcement efforts. It also dovetails with President Donald Trump's broader trade goals, as he seeks to lower the US trade deficit with China and pressures Beijing to curb shipments of fentanyl and precursor chemicals. 'America has a moral, economic, and national security duty to eradicate threats that endanger our nation's prosperity, including unfair trade practices that disadvantage the American people and stifle our economic growth,' Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem said in a statement. Still, the administration went ahead with the announcement at a time when Trump has sought to improve relations with his counterpart, Xi Jinping. The US president last week extended a pause on higher tariffs on goods from China for 90 days as he seeks an in-person meeting with the Chinese leader. Under the 2021 law, the US government assumes that anything made even partially in the Chinese manufacturing hub of Xinjiang is produced with forced labor and cannot be imported into the US. Companies may win exemptions if they can provide 'clear and convincing evidence' forced labor was not used. The measure is meant to help combat alleged repression of Uyghurs and other minorities in the province of Xinjiang. Beijing has repeatedly denied accusations that minorities are compelled to work against their will. Although the law applies to all goods, it originally singled out apparel, cotton and cotton products, tomatoes and silica-based products — including polysilicon — as high-priority sectors for enforcement. Under former President Joe Biden, the government expanded the products subject to extra scrutiny to include aluminum, polyvinyl chloride and seafood. The Trump administration's Tuesday announcement expands the list again to encompass red dates, caustic soda and lithium, as well as steel and copper. The US doesn't import significant tonnage of copper from China, according to data from Morgan Stanley. In 2024, the US imported about 470,000 tons of steel from China, equal to 0.5% of domestic consumption, according to the Commerce Department. --With assistance from Joe Deaux. More stories like this are available on
Mint
a few seconds ago
- Mint
Trump Targets Corporate America to Achieve Economic and Foreign Policy Goals
(Bloomberg) -- He didn't campaign on it. It wasn't even broached during his first administration. He criticized his predecessor for it. But this month President Donald Trump made clear that he's willing to use the full force of the US government to directly intervene in corporate matters to achieve his economic and foreign policy goals. Trump, backed by his team of Wall Street financiers, took the unprecedented step of seeking to collect a portion of money generated from sales of AI chips to China by Nvidia Corp. and Advanced Micro Devices Inc. And in a move that could see the US government become Intel Corp.'s largest shareholder, the administration is said to be in talks for taking a 10% stake in the beleaguered chipmaker. Last month, the Pentagon also decided to take a $400 million preferred equity stake in a little-known rare earth mining company. It's a series of moves that has surprised Wall Street and Washington policy veterans, who privately and publicly acknowledged they've never seen anything like it in their decades-long careers. The actions, if successful, could leave private investors and average 401(k) savings holders enriched while catapulting US national security further ahead of China. But they're also risky bets that could end with taxpayer losses and distort markets in ways investors can't predict. 'I'm very concerned that we're going to have these rolling sectors where the president starts saying 'you have to pay us just to sell internationally,'' Lee Munson, the chief investment officer at Portfolio Wealth Advisors, with $390 million in assets under management, said. 'Where does this end? I don't even know how to buy companies right now that have exposure to China that have high-tech IP.' The Trump administration's direct involvement in corporate matters is becoming a marker of the president's second term. Trump, a self-described dealmaker, has a mixed track record of success yet has vowed to bring more of a business approach to governing in Washington. In addition to the Nvidia and AMD revenue promise and potential Intel investment stake, his administration secured the 'Golden Share' from Nippon Steel Corp., a Japanese steelmaker that gives Trump personal power to make decisions on United States Steel Corp. corporate decisions. In these cases, the administration is picking winners and losers, and risks undermining the free flow of capital. 'The Trump administration's focus on industries like steel, semiconductors, and critical minerals is not arbitrary – these sectors are critical to our national and economic security,' White House spokesman Kush Desai said in an emailed statement. 'Cooled inflation, trillions in new investments, historic trade deals, and hundreds of billions in tariff revenue prove how President Trump's hands-on leadership is paving the way towards a new Golden Age for America.' Trump surprised markets earlier this month when he announced Nvidia and AMD agreed to pay the US government 15% of their revenue from AI chip sales to China. The move rankled investors, trade experts, lawmakers and others who feared a much broader slippery slope in which the federal government could begin forcing pay-for-play scenarios in everything from trade negotiations to defense contracts. Word that the White House is contemplating using Chips Act money to take a direct stake in chip-maker Intel added to the uncertainty around changing norms between private sector companies and the US government. The move could provide a much-needed boost to Intel's ambitious plan for a sparkling new chips facility in Ohio, which is vital to rebuilding domestic chip production in the US but which has been delayed amid shrinking sales and mounting losses at the company. SoftBank Group Corp. agreed this week to buy $2 billion of Intel stock in a surprise deal. In America's free market economy, the government typically doesn't buy stakes in companies. There are exceptions, of course, such as during the financial crisis of 2008-2009, when it stepped in to support major names like Citigroup Inc., American International Group Inc. and General Motors Co. While Intel has performance issues to grapple with, it isn't facing the imminent threat of collapse. That's in part why investors, lawmakers, national security experts and others interviewed repeatedly referred to 'uncertainty' and 'uncharted territory' when asked to contemplate the risks associated with Trump's new policies. 'It's state direction that we haven't had in the US, it's very much the Chinese model making its way into US government,' Gary Hufbauer, a senior fellow at the Peterson Institute for International Economics, said. The Trump administration's approach to public companies in the first year of his second term is in some ways an evolution of the economic statecraft tools he deployed in his first four years as president. Back then he deployed trade levers that hadn't been used in years or decades, from Section 301 tariffs on entire countries, like China, to Section 232 tariffs on sectors like steel and automobiles. The policies weren't popular and they rattled markets, but supporters argued that the tariffs tamped down Chinese and other foreign products that flooded the US market and drove some American companies out of business. Trump has continued to push the boundaries of using novel tools in his second administration. 'What we see here is when it comes to big economic questions like tariffs and fees for exports and also the MP Materials deal, he is willing to push legal boundaries on big economic issues in a way that he wasn't in the first term,' said Peter Harrell, a nonresident scholar for the American Statecraft Program at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. Caitlin Legacki, a former Commerce Department official in the Biden administration, said an argument in favor of 'national champions' is understandable, however a 'lack of transparency' around the deals in concerning. 'Instead of making this a cause for national security or technological independence that people from both parties can rally around, it feels more like a shakedown,' she said. --With assistance from Josh Wingrove and Ryan Gould. More stories like this are available on
Time of India
15 minutes ago
- Time of India
Over 200,000 women in the US have left the workforce since January: Has the land of opportunity become 'gender selective'?
The United States has long upheld and cherished the sobriquet 'land of opportunity' as a badge of honour. Yet what if the opportunity server first checks the gender of the plate before serving it? Opportunity bends and breaks along lines of privilege, and the latest labour figures reveal a stark truth: Women are once again paying the price of policy choices. According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS), 212,000 women aged 20 and over have left the workforce since January 2025, while 44,000 men entered it. Numbers rarely lie, and here they raise a blunt question: Has America's promise of opportunity become gender selective? The fragile gains of flexibility The pandemic years have marked a turning point. Remote work and flexible schedules facilitated women, particularly mothers, to remain in jobs while navigating the unpaid burden of caregiving. By January 2025, labor-force participation among women aged 25 to 44 with a child under five had reached 69.7%, according to US data sources. But by June, the rate had plunged nearly three percentage points to 66.9%, a sharp reversal after years of progress. The culprit is the systemic rollback of flexibility. Mandates from corporate giants like Amazon, JP Morgan, and AT&T, coupled with President Donald Trump's January 2025 directive requiring federal employees to return to the office five days a week, dismantled arrangements that had allowed women to thrive. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like American Investor Warren Buffett Recommends: 5 Books For Turning Your Life Around Blinkist: Warren Buffett's Reading List Undo Data from the Flex Index, which tracks corporate remote work policies, shows full-time office mandates in Fortune 500 companies rose from 13% at the end of 2024 to 24% in the second quarter of 2025. Care work is forcing women out of work At the heart of this crisis lies caregiving, still largely a female responsibility. 'Women still take on the lion's share of caregiving responsibilities,' notes Julie Vogtman, senior director at the National Women's Law Center, as reported by Time. Without workplace flexibility, women are the first to scale back or step out. The problem is mounted by the crumbling of the childcare infrastructure. Federal childcare subsidies ended in September 2024, forcing many centers to shut down or hike tuition. Immigrant workers who make up roughly 20% of childcare providers have been hit by mass deportations and heightened immigration fears, further reducing availability. As costs climb, many families cannot sustain dual-income households, forcing women out of paid employment. Productivity or patriarchy? Evidence does not support the narrative that in-office mandates enhance performance. A 2024 study examining resumes from Microsoft, SpaceX, and Apple found that return-to-office requirements triggered an exodus of senior employees, weakening long-term competitiveness. Similarly, a survey by Walr on behalf of Upwork and Workplace Intelligence revealed nearly two-thirds of C-suite executives admitted return-to-office mandates led to a 'disproportionate' number of women resigning. Policy contradictions and economic fallout The paradox is brimming. While the Trump administration signals concern over declining birth rates and promotes marriage and family incentives, its employment policies create the very conditions that discourage women from combining work and motherhood. Federal jobs once perceived as family-friendly, are shedding flexibility and security, leaving women to choose between paychecks and parenthood. The economic implications are profound. Fewer dual-income households mean diminished consumer spending, precarious healthcare coverage, and a drag on national growth. BLS data already indicates slowed economic momentum in the first half of 2025. In the long term, excluding women from the workforce corrodes both competitiveness and living standards. A selective promise Some women have redressed their exit as liberation- freelancing, starting businesses, or reclaiming time with children. Yet for most, departure is not empowerment; it is compulsion. The pandemic had briefly suggested a different future—one where workplaces acknowledged that workers are also caregivers, and where productivity could coexist with empathy. That fragile revolution has now been rolled back. If opportunity in America now requires outsourcing childcare, sacrificing flexibility, and conforming to rigid schedules dictated from above, then it is no longer universal; it is selective. And when 212,000 women leave the workforce in six months, the question is no longer whether the 'land of opportunity' is failing women, but whether it was ever truly built for them. Ready to navigate global policies? Secure your overseas future. Get expert guidance now!
