logo
Prince Harry to owe more than $1.3 million to British taxpayers over failed legal battle

Prince Harry to owe more than $1.3 million to British taxpayers over failed legal battle

Daily Telegraph05-06-2025
Skynews.com.au Digital Reporter Reilly Sullivan claims British taxpayers are set to be owed over $1.3 million in costs related to Prince Harry's failed legal battle with the British Home Office.
'When Harry and Meghan left royal duties, they were no longer entitled to taxpayer-funded Met police officers,' Mr Sullivan told Sky News Digital Presenter Gabriella Power.
'This has really been an ongoing court battle for over four years.
'He's lost multiple times on appeals.
'He will be expected to likely reimburse the home office and therefore the taxpayer this money.
'If he does repay the $1.3 million on top of his own legal fees, it's estimated that he spent in the ballpark of about $5 million just on this legal battle.
'It's not a good look.
'It's the legal system … that really have better things to do with their time than hear Harry's grievance in his $20 million mansion, I think they're sick of it.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Guardian struggles to fill political editor role eight months after Middleton exit
Guardian struggles to fill political editor role eight months after Middleton exit

The Age

time7 hours ago

  • The Age

Guardian struggles to fill political editor role eight months after Middleton exit

Guardian Australia is back on the hunt for a political editor, eight months since its top Canberra role became vacant and several months after pausing interviews to fill the flagship position. Senior editors conducted a fresh round of interviews this week after earlier efforts to land a suitable candidate were halted. The West Australian' s Canberra bureau chief Katina Curtis is tipped as a possible front runner, with The Saturday Paper 's special correspondent Jason Koutsoukis also in the race, after the position was readvertised recently. Both declined to comment. A Guardian spokesperson confirmed it has recommenced its search. The Guardian interviewed candidates between April and July, but then opted to pause the process, as it continued the hunt for a high-profile journalist who can break news stories and write a weekly column, two sources with knowledge of the process told this masthead. The UK-owned digital news publisher is trying to replace veteran press gallery journalist Karen Middleton, who officially left The Guardian in March after a year in the role. She had been on extended leave since December and her time in the role coincided with a period of significant change in the outlet's parliament bureau. Middleton replaced Katharine Murphy, who joined Prime Minister Anthony Albanese's office as press secretary in early 2024. Murphy left the PM's office after 18 months, following this year's election. Middleton's departure from The Guardian followed an HR process where she and then-chief political correspondent Paul Karp made counterclaims of workplace misconduct against each other in late 2024. Karp later told colleagues in farewell speech that he was cleared of any wrongdoing.

Victorian department's secrecy bid over how it manages 12yo girl involved in Melbourne killing
Victorian department's secrecy bid over how it manages 12yo girl involved in Melbourne killing

ABC News

time15 hours ago

  • ABC News

Victorian department's secrecy bid over how it manages 12yo girl involved in Melbourne killing

Victoria's child protection department is waging a legal battle to suppress details of its care of a vulnerable teenage girl who stabbed a woman to death in Melbourne, in a case the state's children's commissioner previously described as a systemic failure. The former Victorian children's commissioner last year made a scathing assessment of the girl's care before the killing, saying she had been "failed" by the system designed to keep her safe. The girl, known by the pseudonym WD, had run away from state care hundreds of times and was "sexually exploited" in the lead-up to the fatal stabbing of the 37-year-old woman in 2023. WD's murder charge was eventually dropped, because prosecutors could not prove the 12-year-old had the mental capacity to be criminally responsible for her actions. The girl is being held in a "secure residence" where she is supposed to receive education and ongoing medical treatment with a view to her eventual release. On Tuesday, lawyers for the Department of Families, Fairness and Housing fronted Victoria's Supreme Court, asking for all court documents related to WD's care to be kept "confidential" and for the public and media to be shut out of the courtroom. The secretary's barrister, Joanna Davidson, said the department was also seeking a new court-ordered pseudonym, because "it's known that WD is the girl who was charged with a murder". Ms Davidson said the girl had "significant mental health issues" and a closed court was "necessary to protect her interests". However, Justice James Elliott decided to keep the court open for Tuesday's hearing, but is yet to rule on whether future hearings will be conducted in closed court. "It will take some convincing to say, well, how this child should be dealt with by the state should just become a secret," he said. Barrister Albert Dinelli, representing the Commission for Children and Young People, called on the judge to keep the court open, in line with the legal principle of open justice. In 2023, Justice Elliott rejected a closed court and suppression application by the department, who wanted to prevent media reporting of key aspects of WD's criminal case. On Tuesday, the judge said he was concerned a teacher had not been appointed for the girl. "How that happened I don't know, why that happened I don't know," he said. According to court documents released in June, the girl's stay at the secure residence has been marred with problems. Current children's commissioner Meena Singh wrote that two of WD's male foster carers were stood down for allegedly bullying the girl and calling her stupid, in incidents she managed to secretly record. "To hear two men arguing with and belittling WD is very distressing and there is no excuse for their behaviours," Ms Singh wrote. "Overall, I hold significant concern for WD's treatment. I say this because I think that there has been insufficient focus on fostering and supporting WD's journey to recovery." A lawyer representing the teenage girl said a conversation he had with her last week reflected "a loss of faith and trust in the system". Last year, former commissioner Liana Buchanan tabled a report to state parliament, saying an investigation into WD's care "exposed some of the most profound service system failures I have seen". "WD's case is a tragic example of how Victoria's most vulnerable children can be failed by the systems designed to protect and support them," she wrote. Justice Elliott adjourned the case until next Thursday after requesting more information from the parties.

Irish novelist Sally Rooney risks being ‘arrested' in UK over support for Palestine Action
Irish novelist Sally Rooney risks being ‘arrested' in UK over support for Palestine Action

News.com.au

time15 hours ago

  • News.com.au

Irish novelist Sally Rooney risks being ‘arrested' in UK over support for Palestine Action

Beloved Irish author Sally Rooney risks being 'arrested without a warrant as a 'terrorist'' by the UK if she donates proceeds from her work to Palestine Action, a legal expert has warned. In an Irish Times op-ed over the weekend, Rooney vowed to give royalties generated by two BBC adaptations of her books, Normal People and Conversations with Friends, to the UK-based direct-action network. Founded in 2020, Palestine Action takes part in 'nonviolent but disruptive' protests. Last month, the group was proscribed a terrorist organisation and banned in the UK under its 2000 Terrorism Act. A government spokesperson warned anyone flouting the law risked prosecution – a fact Rooney acknowledged in her Times piece, writing that she had chosen the Dublin-based newspaper to publicise her intention rather than a UK one as doing so 'would now be illegal'. 'My books, at least for now, are still published in Britain, and are widely available in bookshops and even supermarkets,' the novelist wrote. 'The UK's state broadcaster (the BBC) has also televised two fine adaptations of my novels, and therefore regularly pays me residual fees. 'I want to be clear that I intend to use these proceeds of my work, as well as my public platform generally, to go on supporting Palestine Action and direct action against genocide in whatever way I can.' More than 700 people have been arrested, mostly at demonstrations, since the group was outlawed. 'I feel obliged to state once more that like the hundreds of protesters arrested last weekend, I too support Palestine Action,' Rooney continued. 'If this makes me a 'supporter of terror' under UK law, so be it.' Lawyer and writer Sadakat Kadri told The Guardian that 'receiving money with the intention of using it to support terrorism is an offence under section 15 of the 2000 act'. 'That means Rooney could be arrested without a warrant as a 'terrorist',' he said. UK Home Secretary Yvette Cooper's decision to designate Palestine Action a terrorist organisation, Mr Kadri explained, meant the BBC could also be criminally liable if it continued to pay Rooney royalties in light of her stated intentions. Asked if the author could face legal repercussions if she were to speak at a literary festival in the UK, Mr Kadri said that if she used such an opportunity to express 'her views in terms of condemning the war crimes being committed in Gaza, an arguable case for prosecution could be made out'. Head of the public inquiry team at the legal firm Hodge Jones & Allen, Mike Schwarz, said 'anyone providing money which might, in the state's eyes fund 'terrorism' and, separately, anyone supporting an organisation proscribed under terrorism legislation runs a very real risk of serious police interest and prosecution for grave offences in the UK'. According to the Press Association, a spokesperson for Prime Minister Keir Starmer did not address Rooney's pledge directly, but said that there was 'a difference between showing support for a proscribed organisation, which is an offence under the Terrorism Act, and legitimate protest in support of a cause'. Asked what message No 10 would give to people considering giving money to the group, the spokesperson said: 'Support for a proscribed organisation is an offence under the Terrorism Act and obviously the police will, as they have set out, they will obviously implement the law within the law as you'd expect.' The decision regarding Palestine Action was 'based on security advice following serious attacks the group has committed, following an assessment made by the Joint Terrorism Analysis Centre', they said. The ban came into force on July 5, days after the organisation took responsibility for a break-in at an air force base in southern England that caused an estimated £7 million ($14.5m) of damage to two aircraft. Palestine Action said its activists were responding to Britain's indirect military support for Israel during its war in Gaza. Being a member of Palestine Action or supporting the group is now a criminal offence in Britain, punishable by up to 14 years in prison. Jilan Wahba Abdalmajid, the ambassador of the state of Palestine in Ireland, praised Rooney for 'using her voice to call out international law and human rights violations in Palestine'. 'I hope these calls result in practical actions that will stop the horrors we're witnessing carried out by Israel in Palestine; to stop the genocide and forced displacement and end the Israeli occupation,' she said.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store