Man who stole iconic portrait of Winston Churchill from hotel is jailed
Police said the "Roaring Lion" portrait - which appears on the UK's £5 note - was stolen from the Fairmont Chateau Laurier hotel in Ottawa in Canada sometime between Christmas Day 2021 and 6 January 2022.
It was replaced with a fake and the swap was only uncovered in August 2022 when a hotel worker noticed the frame was not hung properly and looked different from the others.
The portrait had been sold through an auction house in London to a private buyer and ended up in Rome, where two Canadian police detectives retrieved it.
Both seller and buyer were unaware that it had been stolen, police said.
Jeffrey Wood, from Ontario, was later arrested and admitted stealing the portrait, committing forgery and trafficking property obtained by crime in March, according to CBC News.
He was sentenced to "two years less a day" in prison at Ottawa Courthouse on Monday.
In Canada, a sentence of less than two years is served in a provincial jail, while sentences of more than two years are served in a federal prison.
The judge reportedly told Wood he was guilty of stealing a "cultural and historical" portrait that was a "point of national pride".
Justice Robert Wadden also told the court Wood said he had committed the crime to find money to help his brother, who was experiencing mental health struggles, CTV News reported.
The investigation by police in Ottawa had reportedly spanned several countries across two continents before Wood's arrest.
'Roaring Lion' back in its rightful place
The famous portrait was captured by renowned Armenian-Canadian photographer Yousuf Karsh in 1941 just after Sir Winston delivered a rousing wartime address to Canadian politicians.
Towards the end of his life, Mr Karsh signed and gifted the portrait to the hotel, where he had lived and worked.
The portrait was returned to the hotel in November after it surfaced in Italy.
Genevieve Dumas, the hotel's general manager, said when it was unveiled: "I can tell you that it is armed, locked, secured.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
27 minutes ago
- The Independent
AriZona has been 99 cents for decades. Trump's tariffs might change that
AriZona Iced Tea has warned that, for the first time in almost 30 years, it may have to raise the price of its signature 'Big Cans' from $0.99 because of Donald Trump 's tariff war. Co-founder Don Vultaggio has said his company may finally have to disappoint customers and hike the retail price of its tallboy beverages, which have held steady since 1997, because Trump decides to place a 50 percent tariff on steel and aluminum imports. 'At some point, the consumer is going to have to pay the price,' Vultaggio told The New York Times of the president's actions. 'I hate even the thought of it. It would be a hell of a shame after 30-plus years.' AriZona imports 20 percent of the aluminum used in its cans from Canada (the remaining 80 percent comes from recycled materials in the United States), meaning that rising costs could force it to change its pricing, however reluctantly. 'Our price has been dramatically bumped up because of this tariff talk,' Vultaggio said, pointing out that the few domestic aluminum manufacturers are all but sure to hike their prices in response to Trump's manoeuvring. 'I hope the administration understands and deals with the fact that if you're going to protect American manufacturers, you can't allow them to gouge the marketplace because of that protection. If I had Donald Trump 's ear, that's what I would tell him directly.' The company sells approximately 2 billion cans of drinks annually, according to the Times, around half of which are tallboys. Had Vultaggio kept pace with inflation, AriZona's Big Cans would currently retail for $1.99. Still, he has preferred not to do that, believing in building up repeat purchases through earned customer loyalty, a philosophy he says he learned working in his father's grocery store in Flatbush, Brooklyn. Asked by NBC's Today Show last summer why he had never moved to raise his prices before, Vultaggio answered: 'We're successful. We're debt-free. We own everything. Why? Why have people who are having a hard time paying their rent have to pay more for our drink? 'We're going to fight as hard as we can for consumers because consumers are my friends.' AriZona has yet to announce a tariff-enforced price hike and, for now, its owner says he is maintaining an phlegmatic outlook, telling the Times: 'What happens, happens. We can find our way through it.' Justifying his decision in June to raise the metals tariffs to twice that initially announced in April, President Trump said: 'I have determined that increasing the previously imposed tariffs will provide greater support to these industries and reduce or eliminate the national security threat posed by imports of steel and aluminum articles and their derivative articles.' Charles Johnson, president and CEO of The Aluminum Association, responded to the president's decision by saying: 'Re-establishing a more level playing field for domestic producers is critical, but a Section 232 tariff of 50 percent threatens to undermine the very industry the administration aims to support. 'The Aluminum Association, which represents the full industry supply chain and 70 percent of domestic production, urges the administration to reconsider today's decision given the negative impact it will have on manufacturers.' Even before the president made his announcement, he received an open letter in February co-signed by the leaders of 20 can-based food and drink producers warning him of the unintended knock-on consequences of meddling with metal imports. 'We understand your efforts to use tariffs and other broad trade tools to level the global economic playing field and make our country's economy great again,' the signatories wrote. 'However, the unintended consequences of these measures – if not properly tailored and implemented – are extremely detrimental to American food producers, farmers, and metal can makers and, hence, our nation's food security.' The prospect of AriZona having to raise its prices has already caught the attention of New York Democratic Rep. Ritchie Torres, who wrote on X on Sunday: 'Since 1997, AriZona Iced Tea has proudly kept its iconic 99-cent price tag. 'For the first time in nearly three decades, Trump's tariffs (effectively a tax on American consumers and businesses) threaten to double that price to $1.99. Trump promised to lower prices. Instead, he's driving them up.'
The Independent
27 minutes ago
- The Independent
Trump sends in National Guard to ‘liberate' Washington DC
President Donald Trump has placed the Washington D.C. police department under federal control and deployed the National Guard to address crime and homelessness. The initiative involves deploying approximately 500 federal law enforcement officers from agencies including the FBI, ATF, DEA, ICE, and the Marshals Service. Trump earlier stated his intention to "liberate" the nation's capital, citing concerns about public safety and the city's homeless population. Washington D.C. Mayor Muriel Bowser expressed concerns about the federal intervention, questioning the effectiveness of using the National Guard for city laws. Bowser said that violent crime in Washington D.C. has decreased, contradicting Trump's portrayal of the city as highly dangerous.
Daily Mail
28 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
RICHARD LITTLEJOHN: In Lawless Britain the ‘rights' of scumbags are put ahead of innocent shopkeepers and abused Jewish women
Days like this, as I have been moved to mention before, it's difficult to know where to start. Should I kick off with the shopkeeper told by police to remove a sign calling shoplifters 'scumbags' and the crazy data protection law which prevents retailers displaying photographs of known thieves? Or the Jewish woman called a Zionist 'scumbag' online who was told by a different police force that she shouldn't post on 'politically sensitive' subjects such as Gaza? For now, let's begin with vintage-clothing store owner Rob Davies who has been plagued by thefts from his shop. He has now been forced to display his stock under lock and key. By way of explanation, Mr Davies put a poster in his window, reading: 'Due to scumbags shoplifting, please ask for assistance to open cabinets.' Shortly afterwards, police arrived to tell him to remove the sign as it was 'provocative and offensive'. They had apparently received a complaint from an unnamed member of the public. Mr Davies, who owns Run Ragged, in Wrexham, North Wales, said: 'The only people it should be causing offence to are the shoplifters.' Rob Davies, who has been plagued by thefts from his shop, has been forced to display his stock under lock and key Mr Davies left a handwritten note on his cabinets to explain why they were now locked For the past 12 months, he has caught five thieves red-handed. But apart from the first incident, the police weren't interested. The only time they did respond, they retrieved a stolen shirt but let the shoplifter go without charge. Recently, he's lost £200 worth of stock to thieves – a trifling amount as far as the police are concerned but a significant loss to a small business already struggling to pay sky-high rent, rates and energy bills. Basket Case Britain is in the grip of a shoplifting epidemic, as opportunist thieves loot shelves with impunity secure in the knowledge that they won't be arrested. The only surprise is that when Mr Davies detained that first scumbag, the cops didn't nick him for 'taking the law into his own hands'. They certainly responded rapidly to admonish him when someone was offended by his 'scumbag' poster, which gives you a stark illustration of their warped priorities. But as he asks plaintively: 'What else am I supposed to do?' Precisely. The police won't arrest shoplifters, the CPS won't prosecute. So where's the deterrent? Every day is Supermarket Sweep, as thieves fill their boots, their rucksacks and shopping trolleys with swag and walk out grinning, without paying, as staff are instructed to stand back and let them get on with it. In desperation, some stores have been exhibiting photos of known thieves, taken from CCTV, in the hope that this might discourage them. Now though, they have been told by the Information Commissioner's Office that naming and shaming is a breach of data protection legislation. The law is more concerned about shielding the identities of criminals than protecting their victims. Mr Davies has lost £200 worth of stock to shoplifters a significant loss to a small business already struggling to pay sky-high rent, rates and energy bills How many times have you heard complaints, from this column in particular, that the Old Bill would rather patrol the internet than tackle real crimes like burglary, shoplifting and phone theft? These days they can't even get that right. Here's a seriously troubling case in point. Heidi Bachram is a Jewish woman from Sussex, some of whose family were murdered and taken hostage by Hamas during the October 7 pogrom. She posts regularly on the forum previously known as Twitter and has been subject to vile anti-Semitic abuse into the bargain. Some of it is too graphic and horrible to repeat here, but it includes calling her an 'ugly Zionist pig' and, yes, a 'scumbag'. Ms Bachram reported it to the police but says they were reluctant to investigate. Instead she was visited by one officer who advised her to stop posting 'politically sensitive' material about 'controversial subjects' such as Gaza. 'He said I was making myself a target. I feel like I've been victimised twice. Once by this cruel troll and secondly by the police.' The clear implication was that it was her own fault. Talk about blaming the victim. This is the online equivalent of telling a young woman who has been dragged off the streets and raped that it served her right because she had gone out wearing a short skirt. Perhaps if the sick, cowardly individual who trolled Ms Bachram had posted a few disobliging comments about illegal migrants, the cops would have come down hard on him instantly and he'd now be banged up in jail for two and a half years like the unfortunate, misguided Lucy Collins. We are increasingly told that reports of Lawless Britain are exaggerated. But what the hell else are we to conclude when the law puts the 'rights' of scumbags ahead of protecting innocent shopkeepers and abused Jewish women? Never mind where to start. Where will it all end?
