‘Never forget': Anthony Albanese breaks silence on devastating ongoing impact of car crash in 2021
Anthony Albanese has opened up about the life-changing impact of a car accident that occured five years ago revealing he suffers ongoing spinal issues.
Mr Albanese's car was a write-off after a black Range Rover being driven by a 17-year-old P-plater in the wrong lane struck his Toyota Camry in early 2021.
The Labor leader was taken to the Royal Prince Alfred Hospital in Camperdown where it later emerged his condition was more 'complex' than originally thought.
In an exclusive interview with news.com.au, Mr Albanese has revealed it had ongoing impacts that may surprise voters.
'It took me some time to recover physically and I still have damage to my spine,'' the Prime Minister told news.com.au.
'So I have difficulty sitting in a car for long distances.'
The impact has been present during the election campaign, with Mr Albanese's office trying to avoid long car journeys where possible.
When he's on the campaign plane, he has more freedom to move around and walk which helps his back issues.
Listen to Samantha Maiden's exclusive interview with the PM on news.com.au's From The Newsroom podcast tomorrow. In today's episode, Samantha goes one-on-one with Peter Dutton.
Mr Albanese said the moment he saw the car heading for him, he genuinely thought he was going to die.
'(It) wasn't scary, it was just almost a matter of fact, this is how my life ends,'' he said.
'I will never forget the bang, the sound that was just so loud as it hit the front right hand side of.
'It was a bad accident. so an experience like that does have an impact.
'For me, it was how important life is. Each and every day and valuing it and making a difference to it as well.
Mr Albanese was travelling on Hill Street in Marrickville when a Range Rover travelling in the wrong lane ploughed into his vehicle.
'All of a sudden, he was right in front of me and headed straight for me. I had a little millisecond to react,'' he later said.
'It was all a little bit of a blur for me afterwards, but people are saying they heard the sound of the whack two blocks away. Certainly from looking at my car, that's the case.
'I was just very lucky I had a guardian angel up there looking after me.'
In the interview with news.com.au, he also reflected on the moment he teared up when he called the election when talking about his late mother Maryanne, a disability pensioner who struggled with arthritis.
After the car accident, he ended up in the same hospital room his mum was taken to before she died in 2002.
'The only times I've been in it was with my mom when she went in, in 2002 after an aneurysm, and she never came out of Prince Alfred Hospital,'' he told news.com.au.
'She struggled on and fought for a couple of weeks, before she passed away. She was only 65 years old.'
At the time of the accident, Mr Albanese said it 'just really hit home to me that I was leader of the Labor Party, the alternative prime minister at the time and I got the same care as my mum'.
'I do think that (Medicare) is part of the Australian story,'' he said.
'The two issues that really politicised me as a young man were housing. My mum lived in the one council house for all of her 65 years and they were gonna flog it off,'' he said.
'So we ran an anti-privatisation campaign.
'But also health because my mum was an invalid pensioner, who was crippled up with rheumatoid arthritis and then had other issues.
'She struggled to get the right care. She was a woman by herself. She was very generous, so would agree to go on trials of drugs and, uh, all, all of that.
'But she had a really tough life.'
Mr Albanese said he surprised himself by tearing up in the press conference when he called the election.
'I walked out to that first press conference, not expecting to really talk about that in such a personal way.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
West Australian
32 minutes ago
- West Australian
Work from home a legal right in Australian-first reform
Employees will be legally allowed to demand to work from home two days a week if an Australian-first proposed law is passed. The Victorian government has promised to introduce legislation to make working from home a right in 2026, in contrast to other states that want public servants to spend more time in the office. The proposed law would apply to all public and private sector employees in Victoria who can reasonably do their job from home. Yet to be determined are the legislation's definition of remote work, who can do it and the types of businesses the law would apply to, but the government promised to consult before its introduction to parliament in 2026. It sets up a major contest with business groups in an election year, with Labor seeking a fourth consecutive term that polls indicate it's on track to win. The November 2026 election will be the first as premier for Jacinta Allan, who lags opposition leader Brad Battin as preferred state leader. Ms Allan said legislating the right to work from home was good for families and the economy. "Not everyone can work from home, but everyone can benefit," she said. "If you can do your job from home, we'll make it your right." The coalition's push to end to working-from-home for public servants was partly blamed for its unsuccessful result at the May federal election, despite abandoning the policy before polling day. NSW Premier Chris Minns has described remote-work provisions as a thing of the past but stopped short of seeking an end to working from home, instead ordering public servants to work principally in offices. More than one third of Australian employees usually work from home but that number swells to 60 per cent of managers and people in professional services, according to the Australian Bureau of Statistics. The bureau says 43 per cent who work from home do overtime, compared to one quarter of those who do not.
Perth Now
32 minutes ago
- Perth Now
Work from home a legal right in Australian-first reform
Employees will be legally allowed to demand to work from home two days a week if an Australian-first proposed law is passed. The Victorian government has promised to introduce legislation to make working from home a right in 2026, in contrast to other states that want public servants to spend more time in the office. The proposed law would apply to all public and private sector employees in Victoria who can reasonably do their job from home. Yet to be determined are the legislation's definition of remote work, who can do it and the types of businesses the law would apply to, but the government promised to consult before its introduction to parliament in 2026. It sets up a major contest with business groups in an election year, with Labor seeking a fourth consecutive term that polls indicate it's on track to win. The November 2026 election will be the first as premier for Jacinta Allan, who lags opposition leader Brad Battin as preferred state leader. Ms Allan said legislating the right to work from home was good for families and the economy. "Not everyone can work from home, but everyone can benefit," she said. "If you can do your job from home, we'll make it your right." The coalition's push to end to working-from-home for public servants was partly blamed for its unsuccessful result at the May federal election, despite abandoning the policy before polling day. NSW Premier Chris Minns has described remote-work provisions as a thing of the past but stopped short of seeking an end to working from home, instead ordering public servants to work principally in offices. More than one third of Australian employees usually work from home but that number swells to 60 per cent of managers and people in professional services, according to the Australian Bureau of Statistics. The bureau says 43 per cent who work from home do overtime, compared to one quarter of those who do not.
Sky News AU
an hour ago
- Sky News AU
The week the West was lost: Anthony Albanese joins the countries 'duped' on Israel by terrorists in trucks
This past week has demonstrated how the Western world, which often speaks about defending freedom, liberty and democracy, can be so easily duped by terrorists in pick-up trucks. We saw a statement by 28 countries, including Australia, that was so detached from reality that it blamed Israel for the terrible consequences of the current war in Gaza, rather than Hamas who started the war in the first place, and is refusing all attempts to end it. And of course, it called for an immediate permanent ceasefire without calling on Hamas to disarm or give up power. This is akin to calling for the end of World War II while leaving Nazi Germany and Imperial Japan intact. Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese went a step further saying in a statement that Israel was 'killing civilians, including children, seeking access to water and food' and that its actions 'cannot be defended or ignored'. Despite these harsh and demonstrably untrue words, he didn't go as far as French President Emanuel Macron who declared France's intentions to recognise a Palestinian state in September. Britain and Canada have now signalled similar intentions. In doing so these countries are effectively rewarding Hamas for its atrocities of October 7, 2023, while whitewashing almost 100 years of Arab and Palestinian terrorism and intransigence. They appear to have forgotten how Palestinian leaders have constantly rejected statehood from as long ago as the 1937 Peel Commission plan to the more recent 2008 Olmert plan and up until the 2020 Trump Plan, in which the Palestinians refused to even engage. These declarations were predictably praised and lauded by both Hamas and the Palestinian Authority. One would think that when a death cult praises you, along with a corrupt entity that financially rewards terrorism, this would cause you to question whether your understandings and actions are morally sound. Well, think again! The West has lost its moral compass and now flounders in the dark, unable to have the courage and conviction of its own stated values, preferring instead to attack the victims of evil, rather than evil itself. No one denies there is suffering in Gaza and the images are horrible, but what so much of the West still refuses to accept is that this is a direct result of the deliberate intentions of a death cult terror group whose leaders openly state that their goal remains the destruction of the Jewish state and the genocide of the Jewish people. Moreover, these same leaders have also been open that they believe the suffering of Gaza civilians are 'necessary sacrifices" and serve their evil cause. Israel has already facilitated over 1.8 million tonnes of aid into Gaza – and has just announced several major measures to improve aid access, including daily local ceasefires, designated aid corridors, aid airdrops, and facilitating aid donations from Egypt and Jordan. But it was telling that it was only after Israel exposed that there were still over 950 truckloads of aid on the Gazan side of border awaiting collection last week that the United Nations agencies, which work closely with Hamas, finally began to move some of that aid. So why didn't these agencies do this before? Meanwhile, the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF) has delivered the equivalent of more than 91 million meals to needy civilians, bypassing Hamas' looting and interference – a fact that no country making these virtue-signalling declarations has even acknowledged. Even when the GHF offered to help deliver the stranded aid trucks, the UN still refused to take up that offer. The GHF may not be perfect, but it is delivering aid directly to people in need. The fact that the UN won't even engage with the GHF demonstrates that it has abandoned any pretence of supposedly prioritising helping ordinary Palestinian civilians over other goals. The obsession the world has in blaming Israel for the current crisis is not only misplaced – it's dangerous. Anti-Semitic incidents have been cropping up all around the world, including Australia. In Spain, 50 Jewish school kids were kicked off a flight for singing Hebrew songs. Jewish cruise passengers were also prevented from disembarking by anti-Israel protestors at a Greek port. Jews were also collectively slandered by a leading British broadcaster, James O'Brien, on the LBC channel in London. And here in Australia, 10- and 11-year-old students from the Jewish day school Mt Scopus College, were verbally assaulted during an excursion at the Melbourne Museum, by students from another school who harassed them with chants of 'free Palestine' and called them 'dirty Jews". Rather than confronting Hamas' terrorism, the West is choosing the easy path of blaming Israel instead, taken in by false narratives, distorted reporting and blatant falsehoods. When this war ends, Israel may be battered, but it will survive - it always does. But I fear for the West. In its rush to appease populist outrage, leaders have abandoned their integrity and betrayed the very values they claim to uphold. This moral collapse doesn't just endanger Israel - it threatens the very soul of the West. Justin Amler is a policy analyst at the Australia/Israel & Jewish Affairs Council (AIJAC)
