logo
Now That They've Relaunched, How Will DC and Marvel Avoid the Same Old Downward Spiral?

Now That They've Relaunched, How Will DC and Marvel Avoid the Same Old Downward Spiral?

Yahoo6 days ago
If superhero fatigue is a trend that became all too real, the making of the movies that brought it on might be likened to an addiction. The studios that produced those films got hooked on the idea that comic-book movies would be a limitless cash cow. And so they started to make them without limits, jacking up the budgets, the thorny interconnectedness of the characters, and the sheer volume of films they greenlit, each one promising — in theory — to be the box-office equivalent of Christmas Day. But it didn't work out that way. For audiences, more turned out to be less. After a while, the sheer overkill of comic-book cinema began to look like it might kill the golden goose.
This summer, though, the release of two vital, game-changing superhero movies created a kind of Christmas in July. With 'Superman' and 'The Fantastic Four: First Steps,' DC and Marvel, the reigning studio factories of superhero movies, have brought off more than just a course correction. They have, in effect, started over, relaunching expectations for a bold new era in which comic-book movies become successful again by avoiding the addictive missteps of the past. Both films have connected with audiences the old-fashioned way: by merging spectacle and emotion, infusing their iconic characters with the kind of human relatability that got squashed in the superhero-overkill era.
More from Variety
'Superman' and 'Fantastic Four': How Hollywood Finally Pulled Off Comic Book Camp
James Gunn to Direct Next Movie in the 'Super-Family' at DC Studios After 'Superman' Success
Box Office: 'Freakier Friday' and 'Weapons' Battle for First Place Over 'Fantastic Four'
That said, even two terrific flagship movies do not a revolution make. James Gunn, the co-chairman of DC Studios (and, not so incidentally, the writer-director of 'Superman'), and Kevin Feige, the president of Marvel Studios, have both spoken of the new era they're embarking upon in the abashed, let's-own-our-failures language of recovering addicts. Gunn has vowed that he won't put a superhero movie into production until it has a fully realized, well-carpentered script — the absence of good scripts, in the face of ever-more-bombastic onslaughts of CGI, being the most notorious feature of bad comic-book movies. And Feige has vowed that he'll produce fewer films and TV spinoffs, and exert the kind of quality control that went out the window at Marvel as the studio went on its bender of more, and lesser, comic-book product. You deeply want to believe these two, because they sound like they mean it, and because anyone who cares about the future of movies has a vested interest in seeing Hollywood maintain a thriving and creatively disciplined blockbuster culture.
In both 'Superman' and 'The Fantastic Four,' the filmmakers (Gunn and Matt Shakman, respectively) made the very canny decision to spin right past the usual origin-story narratives (Superman's arrival on earth, how the Fantastic Four got their powers). Both films are, in effect, second chapters. And there's a tradition in comic-book cinema of second chapters being the charm. 'The Dark Knight' is the crowning masterpiece of the whole genre, 'Superman II' is, for many of us, deeper and richer than 'Superman: The Movie,' and 'Spider-Man 2' is universally cherished.
But if second chapters are the sweet spot, they're also the easy part. 'The Fantastic Four,' especially, benefits from the fantastic simplicity of its storytelling design. But the film concludes with a teaser of an end title that I, for one, found worrisome: 'The Fantastic Four will return in 'Avengers: Doomsday'.' In other words: The next time you see these characters, they'll be in a movie that features 14 superheroes. And just like that, we could once again be in the land of overkill.
I believe Gunn and Feige when they say they're newly committed to quality control. The challenge they're going to face is this: As their shiny new universes grow ever more complicated and multi, which is going to start happening in about five minutes, the new DC and Marvel are going to lose, by definition, the elemental, no-strings-attached quality that 'Superman' and 'The Fantastic Four' have. They're going to become glorified puzzle pieces again, fitting into a larger more elaborate whole that…we once again stop giving a damn about? I'd be a cynic if I said that was destined to be true. I'd be a realist if I said there's a very good chance it could be.
Best of Variety
Final Emmy Nom Predictions: 'Severance' and 'The Studio' Expected to Lead Series With 19 Noms Each
Oscars 2026: George Clooney, Jennifer Lopez, Julia Roberts, Wagner Moura and More Among Early Contenders to Watch
Oscar Predictions: Best Picture — Netflix, Neon and Warner Bros Could Dominate Season With 'Frankenstein,' 'Sentimental Value' and 'Sinners'
Solve the daily Crossword
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Why So Many Southerners Go By Their Middle Names
Why So Many Southerners Go By Their Middle Names

Yahoo

time27 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Why So Many Southerners Go By Their Middle Names

We asked our readers to help demystify this unique tradition. We recently shared a story about double-name rules that every Southerner should know (namely, never shorten or abbreviate one without express permission), and the comments went wild. It turns out lots of y'all have double names and were glad to see us advocating for the Mary Jos and Patty Anns of the world. But there was another camp in the comment section requesting some overdue acknowledgement as well: 'Can you do a post about middle-name-ers too?' We aim to please, so here's a little love for the Middle Name Crowd (which includes actress Reese Witherspoon). We tip our hats to all y'all—and your neglected first names too. Why Some Southerners Go By Their Middle Names We turned to our Facebook audience to get to the bottom of the unique tradition, asking, 'Are you a Southerner who goes by their middle name? Tell us the story behind your moniker!' We got nearly 250 comments, which shed a bit more light on the sometimes sticky situation. To Avoid Confusion For many parents naming their children, going by the middle name is a matter of practicality—and avoiding a case of mistaken identity. Wrote one Southern Living reader, 'My dad, grandfather, and great-grandfather all had the same first name. They all went by their middle names.' Imagine the confusion if you called for Earl and three people answered you! To Honor A Loved One A handful of readers noted that they went by their second name because it once belonged to a treasured family member or friend. That's the case for Southern Living's very own Editor in Chief, Sid Evans. 'I'm a Jr., so I have my father's name, but he wanted to call me Sid after a beloved uncle,' he says. To Help the Flow Sometimes, it's a simple matter of what sounds better. 'Myself and my 3 oldest siblings all go by our middle names,' wrote another reader. 'Our names just are easier on the ear in the order our parents placed them. But they got smart on kid #5 and went with calling him by his first name as it sounds better that way too!' To Make the Most of a Moniker You've got to work with what you've got. Joked one reader, who punctuated her comment with a laughing emoji, 'Although I'm not real keen on my middle name, which I go by, I dislike my first name even more! I guess it's the lesser of two evils!!' The Downside of Going By Your Middle Name While there are plenty of practical and heartwarming reasons for a parent to call their child by a middle name, lots of commenters who go by their middle names were very vocal about the pain points that often accompany the practice. 'Named after my mom, so to avoid confusion, I go by my middle name, which causes all kinds of legal issues,' wrote one reader. 'If you're an expecting parent, don't name your child one name and call him/her by their middle. It truly is a huge hassle.' Another wrote, 'All of my financial, business, medical, passport/ID have my first name. Such a pain.' There were so many similar comments about the legal and everyday frustrations associated with the tradition that one reader took it upon himself to sum things up: 'Long story short… it's a curse to go by your middle name.' Even so, other middle name-ers, like Sid, take it in stride: 'For airlines, credit card companies, hotels, etc., I just let them call me John.' Read the original article on Southern Living Solve the daily Crossword

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store