logo
Growth in the wrong places for education

Growth in the wrong places for education

Minister of Finance Nicola Willis called it the "Growth Budget". But it is not a Budget that we think will foster children's growth and learning.
Yes, there is a welcome funding boost for early intervention and learning support, but it is accompanied by several new budget lines that will grow the testing culture and narrow the curriculum in schools and early childhood education (ECE).
In the first year of school, children are already subject to two phonics tests; now maths tests await them in the following years. But even before children have made it to school, a new oral language development tool is proposed for ECE.
The thing about testing is, once you have produced information about what children do and do not know and can and cannot do, you're obliged to act on it.
But growth in this direction seems woefully inadequate. A promised 143 full-time maths intervention teachers, 32 more structured literacy teachers, and a "digital tutoring solution" nationwide just doesn't add up.
Teachers are already capable of assessing children's language, literacy and numeracy capabilities without the unnecessary costs of new testing regimes. Qualified teacher numbers, better teacher to student ratios, and smaller class/group sizes are more warranted for growth than these.
Yesterday's announcements are revealing of government priorities in other growth areas too. There will be increased policing of children's and young people's school attendance. But we wonder if anyone in government has considered how other decisions, like testing, affect children's and young people's satisfaction and attendance at school?
So it's all about the C word - choices.
In last year's Budget, this government chose to give tax breaks to landlords and tobacco companies, and this year to overseas investors. But what matters to us is the education choices we make for children's and young people's futures.
Ms Willis seems obsessed with fiscal debt, but not future debt. We face future debt whenever there is under-investment in children and young people.
Many of the investments made today are headed in the wrong direction. We advocate for growth in quality learning and teaching so the young have good reasons to go to school.
■ Karen Nairn and Alex Gunn are professors at the College of Education, University of Otago.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

New Poll: Labour Becomes Largest Party, Economy Top Concern
New Poll: Labour Becomes Largest Party, Economy Top Concern

Scoop

time2 hours ago

  • Scoop

New Poll: Labour Becomes Largest Party, Economy Top Concern

Bad news for National in the latest Taxpayers' Union-Curia Poll as Labour would now be the largest party in Parliament, gaining three seats to 44. The Coalition would still just about cling on to power on these numbers. The poll, conducted between 07 and 09 June shows National drop 1.1 points on last month to 33.5 percent, while Labour are up 1.6 points to 34.8 percent. ACT is down 0.4 points to 9.1 percent, whilst the Greens are down 0.9 points to 8.2 percent. New Zealand First also drops 1.3 points to 6.1 percent, while Te Pāti Māori is down 0.6 points to 3.3 percent. Headline results and more information about the methodology can be found on the Taxpayers' Union's website at For the minor parties, TOP is on 1.8 percent (+1.3 point), Outdoors and Freedom is on 1.1 percent (+0.7 points), New Conservatives are on 0.7 percent (+0.7 points) and Vision NZ on 0.6 percent (+0.2 points). This month's results are compared to the last Taxpayers' Union-Curia Poll conducted in May 2025, available here at The combined projected seats for the Centre-Right of 62 is down 1 seat from last month. The combined seats for the Centre-Left is up 2 seats to 60. On these numbers, the Centre-Right bloc could still form a Government. National remains on 42 seats again this month, whilst Labour is up 3 seats to 44. ACT is unchanged on 12 seats, whilst the Greens are down 1 seat to 10. New Zealand First drops 1 seat to 8 seats, while Te Pāti Māori remains on 6. For the first time since October 2024, Cost of Living has been replaced as voters' top issue. The Economy more generally is the most important issue to voters at 20.2 percent (+3.7 points), followed by the Cost of Living at 18.1 percent (-8.3 points), Health at 11.9 percent (-5.0 points) and Employment at 5.8 percent. Commenting on the results, Taxpayers' Union Spokesman James Ross said: "Labour taking the lead and growing concern over the economy should be a worrying sign for the Government in the first Taxpayers' Union-Curia poll since the Budget. Voters are losing faith in the managed decline on offer." "With inflation finally under heel, cost of living has slipped off the top spot for the first time in over three years. But lower interest rates don't make a sound economy on their own." "The so-called Growth Budget's only pro-growth policy offered a 1 percent boost to GDP over 20 years, spiralling debt and no credible pathway back to surplus." "Growth wins votes, stagnation doesn't."

Reserve Bank criticised by Willis over handling of Adrian Orr exit
Reserve Bank criticised by Willis over handling of Adrian Orr exit

1News

time4 hours ago

  • 1News

Reserve Bank criticised by Willis over handling of Adrian Orr exit

Finance Minister Nicola Willis has criticised the Reserve Bank for its sharing of information surrounding former governor Adrian Orr's sudden resignation in March, saying the central bank could "have pulled their socks up." The rebuke comes after the bank yesterday released documents revealing Orr quit in March due to a funding dispute with the bank's board and the Government. It was a fact previously not disclosed publicly, with the media and financial observers having received few answers from the central bank's leadership. "I've expressed that I think they could have shared the information they shared yesterday earlier," Willis told reporters at Fieldays today. "I have spoken to their chairperson, Neil Quigley, and expressed my view that they did not manage that Official Information Act request well, and that I expect them to do better. He has acknowledged that they could have and should have done better." ADVERTISEMENT The morning's headlines in 90 seconds including passengers stuck on ferry overnight, new flights to Sydney coming, and the weirdest things we leave in Ubers. (Source: 1News) Multiple journalists and financial observers have had Official Information Act request deadlines about the former governor's departure extended over the past few months. The Finance Minister emphasised expectations around transparency from agencies. "It's my expectation that all government agencies comply with their statutory obligations, and wherever possible, are open and transparent with New Zealanders," she said. "Of course, they need to balance that against their legal obligations when it comes to employment discussions and agreements. "But on this one, I think they could have pulled their socks up." In response to the minister's criticism, Quigley acknowledged shortcomings in handling information requests and added he was limited in what he could've said about Orr's resignation when it was first announced in March. ADVERTISEMENT In what it described as a response to numerous Official Information Act (OIA) requests over the resignation, the Reserve Bank revealed yesterday that Orr resigned after disagreeing with the board and Willis over operational funding. Nicola Willis speaks to media at Parliament on May 6. (Source: 1News) Documents show Orr believed the bank needed $1.031 billion over a five-year period, but the board was willing to accept "considerably less." According to the Reserve Bank, this caused "distress" to Orr and led to his personal decision that he "had achieved all he could as governor" and could not continue with less funding than he thought viable for the bank to fulfil its obligations. The bank eventually secured $750 million in operating expenses and $25.6 million in capital expenditure. Bank chairperson 'regrets' information release delays Quigley said he "regrets" not releasing information on Orr's departure sooner. ADVERTISEMENT "The Reserve Bank was late in producing a response to some of the OIAs we received on Adrian Orr's resignation. I regret that this delay occurred," he said in a statement. "The circumstances and the volume of information associated with the OIAs on Adrian Orr's resignation were complex, and we needed to be sure that our consideration of relevant information was comprehensive. Reserve Bank Board Chair Neil Quigley. (Source: 1News) "As well as our obligations under the OIA, we needed to take into careful consideration the former Governor's exit agreement and privacy law. "For this reason, we extended consultation on the information and our response, including review by senior external counsel." He added that he was "limited" in disclosing why the former governor resigned in March. Reason behind resignation finally revealed officially ADVERTISEMENT Orr had served in the role of governor for seven years at the time of his resignation. He left his job three years before his second five-year term was due to end. Willis and bank officials were tight-lipped for months over the departure of one of the Government's most senior public sector bosses. When the former governor's departure was announced on March 5, little reason was provided beyond that it was his "personal decision". Speaking to reporters on the day, the Reserve Bank's board chairperson Neil Quigley was asked directly why Orr had resigned and whether funding issues were behind it. Quigley was also asked whether there were any "policy, conduct or performance issues which are at the centre of this resignation". He responded: "We have issues that we've been working through, but there are no issues of that type that are behind this resignation." But speaking today, the bank's chairperson said he was "limited" over what he could say at the time of the media conference. "On March 5, I was limited in what I could say about the former governor's resignation both by the terms of his exit agreement and the fact that we were still working through finalisation of the detail of the next five-year funding agreement. "We were conscious of the need to explain to staff of the Reserve Bank the potential implications for staffing levels of a lower level of funding and needed time to consider the details of that."

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store